certifired_img

Books and Documents

Radical Islamism and Jihad

268 - COMMENTS

  • To the Editor......  If u have guts plz post it. 
    There is no problem in MUSLIMS. 
    BUT THE PROBLEM IS KORAN. 
    IT GIVES MANKIND NOTHING BUT RELIGIOUS WAR
    Check this OUT
    By A. Kafir - 7/3/2017 1:00:23 PM



  • After approximately a quarter-century fending off radicalism, it is tragic we remain obstinately blind to the main factor that in fact drives the recruitment support that terrorist networks need to succeed: radical wahhabi ideology and takfirism.   

    By Ghulam Ghaus Siddiqi - 9/7/2016 8:13:31 AM



  • To Abdulla: I appreciate your personal opinion on food habits.
    But many people earth eat diet by relgious practice, vegetarian in India has lots of varieties and guided by relgion, so your personal opinion can be valid to you and like minded people like you who bring do not relgion in food matter, but lot others will like too than we should appreciate their opinion.
    Vegetarianism and veganisim in west is not base on relgion as you are saying but is more about understanding and suffering of other animals who cannot express their concern in word form.
    Same western world eat all kind of meat, without bringing relgion.
    I gave all view points in regards eating food, it is my personal opinion to consider all equal and valid points as long as it does not hurt human sentiments.
    Here I have disregarded animal sentiments, which personally I do care, but I will put humans sentiments above animals.
    By Aayina - 8/29/2016 1:33:34 AM



  • Aayina: I don't appreciate involvement of religion in the matters of food habits, clothing, likes or dislikes as these things depend upon the availability, Necessity, climate and culture as well. When religion is involved, people start practicing undesirable things or suppress people's individual and natural rights. There are certain impractical practices in Islam in the present time scenario which used to be allowed in early Islam. We should go with the applicability of the matters not just because it is allowed in the religions.  By Abdullah - 8/27/2016 11:33:50 AM



  • To
    Abdulla

    "Muslim Bhaiyo eat as much as you want”, you can disagree its up-to you.

    I said eat as much you want it cab be Zero or everyday diet, did your paigamber said in similar way( that my interpretation and understanding of hadees) he did not said no to eat but give scientific approach of what happens in eating cows meat and he leave the matter to his follower, I said similar fashion.

    Especially is used word muslims because
    hindus unnecessary target the muslims in matter of their diet, I know lots of hindus who eat cow meat in secret so do muslims eating pork in secret.

    our hindu hypocrite brothers will not pick hindus even if I write "Hindus eat as much you want" they will certainly pick only muslims and Muslims eating beef.

    Rest as you said indians by nature was nothing eat too much meat and was taking care of animals very well, which is diminishing in since last 50 years after the urbanization and industrialization and taking to much land for human population accommodation and not leaving for other creatures to live in peace. 
    By Aayina - 8/27/2016 4:37:48 AM



  • Aayina: You said, “Muslim Bhaiyo eat as much as you want”. It was a sarcastic statement, as it is not in your command to permit someone or a community to perform any action or even in my command or anybody else. We live in a democratic country, which has the best constitution to command and guide us, so there is no other authority beyond it.

    If permission to do anything has been granted by our constitution, nobody has any right to put obstacle in the citizens’ choices, likes and dislikes.  What I believe and have seen since long that not only milk-feeding animals, but all living beings are looked after and protected by our countrymen except some selfish people who can not see beyond their interests.

    I agree to the rest of your points. Thanks! By Abdullah - 8/27/2016 2:12:47 AM



  • To Abdulla
    Doodh Mata.....And Meat Mata....
    I do not personally care what people eat, meat or plant base food, I am oppose of use of relgion to hurt sentiments of others community that is it.

    That is reason I said to Muslim Bhaiyo eat as much as you want.

    You have raise issue of selling the cow, that I have known and question to our family members and farmers about this many time when I was kid, I had not develope awareness(Shaour) that I was Hindu, I asked question that why cow should be sell when we have used her for many years, now if she is old, we should not nurture her, now it is our turn, but our Hindu community was selling it to butcher, so it is not new for me your issue of Hindu, behaviour.

    I have written in some previous comment, I will repeat it again, our Indian state(their may be exception) Rajesthan which is having very low water avibality, people of this state take care of cows very well, they nurture them even after they do not give milk, Hindu and Muslims both, this is witness case, but this people are not so called Mordern  educated like me and you who will try to prove which side of community is wrong, they follow their heart and even they find solution through relgion it will be accepted by both community sentiments.

    Likewise Muslims who do not want to hurt his fellow Hindu brothers(not all Hindus who are selling) will quote Piagmber Hadees of cow, where he says try to avoide cow meat.

    Now the Muslim who want to hurt Hindu will follow Shah Walillulla, who said hurt the Hindu sentiments by eating cow meat.

    Similarly Hindu will hurt Muslim sentiments taking away their wright of eating cow by saying that  cow is our Mata and will beat up some Muslims and will remain shun on issue of selling cow Hindu or cow on streets vulnerable Finding plastic bags to eat when get old.

    So it is upto individual how to follow, it only became problem at comminuty level.

    The issue going India at higher level, is make cow meat available easily in India itself, so this multinationals can sell to Indian public to eat easily, it more than about Hindu and Muslim, which majority of Hindus and Muslims will be not even understand.

    India was not having butchery business as factory, people were eating cow or any other animal when they want it was not everyday diet (not for even Arabs)it was introduced when British came open butcher where they were having military base, Hire Muslims to creat wider gap between communities, I have also mentioned census point read it further below in the comment.

    It the fool Indians(old sub continents) who not aware of there own history that Muslims kings never use to take census on name of relgion, it is british who introduce column of relgion to give sense of separation, which legacy is still followed uptil now and also followed on only in subcontinent not in western countries.

    Abdulla it might be sensible anwer as per your expectation, if not we'll that is only capacity of my language, I am not language expert, even God had give me that gift I will use simple words and sentence for layman to understand.

    Remember all our relgion had been always given in common men language but scholars and self declared title like Aalim or Pandit twist it to make not us understand and hijack everthing.

    I finish here follow your heart.
    By Aayina - 8/26/2016 3:02:40 PM



  • Aayina: You have gone crazy and lost your reasoning and apprehension otherwise you must have known that it is the 85% Hindu community living in India who nurture and look after the so-called doodh-mata and finally in old age when milk is dried up, sell to the butchers - all religions - who sell their every part for their monitory benefits. These are the hypocrite so-called Doodh-mata-rakchak who are killing them, supplying to other countries in frozen packets and making an issue for the non-sense non-Muslims' vote bank. By Abdullah - 8/26/2016 6:28:29 AM



  • Gay harmi bachoo ke doodh denevali mata he, muslmani Ki meat Mata he.

    Ham Hindu janvro Ki vajase insano Ko marten he, muslman insano Ko na dekhe have Bhagwan Ki vajase marte he.

    Sayad insan Bhi Januwar he

    Meat Mata Ki Jai, suvar Satan ki hai, Hai, muslman Bhaiyo meat Mata ko jetna Khana ho Khayo.
    By Aayina - 8/26/2016 1:23:29 AM



  • @Venugopal Bhat islam doesnt own any explation or clarifiation to people like you seems to like hindu fanatic
    By Shafeeq Mohammad - 8/25/2016 4:37:07 AM



  • asking people to read quran & judge islam by that only & refuse to take into account the actions of the muslims starting with the pedo prophet, i think is a clear example of "do as i say not as i do"... but then hardcore theist brains are too indoctrinated & simpleton to even understand this... anyway, nice try to shut up people calling them dogs & all... personally i smile at the person who asks ppl to read the quran & judge... the first night i read that book i had nightmares... anyway, to each his own imaginary bronze tribal deity... bye bye... By Shahev Sen - 8/25/2016 4:16:40 AM



  • it's religion of peace. who accept "live in peace" and who deny "rest in peace". that is only fact. By Sharma Shruti - 8/25/2016 4:09:17 AM



  • Hasan Faraz
    I am still waiting for your out right condemnation of the evil preaching of ARMED JIHAD in whatever way against people belonging to other religion.
    By Venugopal Bhat - 8/25/2016 4:01:12 AM



  • @Hasan Faraz
    This is called selective Amnesia...
    The same scientist are saying Islam is a threat to world peace.
    The same scientist say Islam is the inspiration and motivation for global terrorism. Whatever the reasons are.
    As far as conversion is concern every conversion is forced conversion...
    Forced by marriage 
    Forced by the greed for charity
    Forced by a particular circumstance
    Forced by particular situation
    and many more 
    Only stupid person can preach or propagate conversion , unless he has psychological problem of hate towards other religion and Gods.........
    its impossible to preach or propagate conversion without abusing disrespecting or insulting the other religion and Gods.
    There is no need to convert a person to a particular religion to teach how to live life happily and peacefully.... 
    Only a religion and its followers who have a problem of superiority complex will preach conversion. This is a psychological disorder.
    (You will not find a single ancient Hindu ritual or text for conversion)
    Ha Ha Ha LOL 
    As far as rape is concern we believe in helping and protecting the victim and punishing the culprit ..... 
    Only Islamic law stones the victim and protects the culprit by claiming a victim should bring a witness with her when some one is about to rape her .
    And Islamic countries are sill following this law .....
    What can we expect from a preacher who recommend sex with a 9 year old child.
    By Venugopal Bhat - 8/25/2016 3:59:19 AM



  • What a mentality of Islam's followers... Hates others religion but they have barbaric laws of their own By Narayan Sarmah - 8/25/2016 3:56:29 AM



  • Ha haaa Mr Venugopal Bhat u r suffering from islamfobia....the religion which came into existence jst before 1400yrs ago nd now it is the second largest and popular religion in the world and scientist tlling that very soon its going to b a first largest religion in the world...on the other side u claimed dt ur religion is the oldest religion in the world bt wt hppnd now....only it restricted in india.....all the gods and goddess came only in india....is ds nt the stupidity....and pls dont say that almost the whole world that is muslim now was forcibly converted.......
    As long as rapist r concerned..no need to waste ur time jst google it or go to any ashram nd u ll find everythng wt u needed....
    By Hasan Faraz - 8/25/2016 3:50:10 AM



  • @ Hasan Faraz
    I challenge you
    Do you condem the evil Islamic preaching of ARMED JIHAD etc etc...
    These are the evil Islamic preaching which is biggest danger for human kind.

    I challenge you to prove your figures 98% rapist across globe are Hindus..... If we research about rapist across the globe we may surprise ourselves to find that even this credit may go to followers of Islam.
    By Venugopal Bhat - 8/25/2016 3:29:36 AM



  • @V Krish Naturalist u r talking about the stupidities....u r the follower of that religion where animals r called mother and real mothers are snt to varadh ashram....girls r killed because their less superiority over boys....statues are made by our hands and claimed it god....wt u r talking about....jst peep into ur bossom... By Hasan Faraz - 8/25/2016 3:15:10 AM



  • Asking people to read quran & judge islam by that only & refuse to take into account the actions of the muslims starting with the pedo prophet, i think is a clear example of "do as i say not as i do"... but then hardcore theist brains are too indoctrinated & simpleton to even understand this... anyway, nice try to shut up people calling them dogs & all... personally i smile at the person who asks ppl to read the quran & judge... the first night i read that book i had nightmares... anyway, to each his own imaginary bronze tribal deity... bye bye... By Shahev Sen - 8/25/2016 3:12:26 AM



  • @V Krish Naturalist Ur idea about islam is not new.... U brihmin.. because u r born to insult others. By Hassamul Haq - 8/24/2016 2:07:32 PM



  • @Barnard Shah said that lslam is the best but muslims may be worst.Mr. Chodhary u should study sincerely about Islam then i hope your thinkjng will be changed. By Shamsul Arfeen - 8/24/2016 2:05:59 PM



  • @Shafeeq Mohammad lol..u failed..am a humanist..I don't believe in any wwf religion Islam or Hinduism or anything else...better luck next time. By V Krish Naturalist - 8/24/2016 2:00:56 PM



  • @Ashish Choudhury islam has more superior solution then this modren bullisht (some democracies )
    Onky the need is to follow in right way
    By Shafeeq Mohammad - 8/24/2016 1:57:51 PM



  • @Damodar Kansara Jodhpur who ask youvto interfer in our matters 
    When you cannot see the wrong done by others 
    When the world dont havecgutts to ask wrong doers like bush blairs etc etc you cannot blame others 
    We know we all belive in in democracy modern days democracy is notthing but a puppet domocracies and notthing but useless inbthis world those who have might are right
    By Shafeeq Mohammad - 8/24/2016 1:49:19 PM



  • @Debasis Chatterjee what is ill concept unscientific practies can you pkease give us examole we know what modern world mean allowing gay sex 
    when you what peace brother teaches justics with out justic you cannot dream peace
    By Shafeeq Mohammad - 8/24/2016 1:43:06 PM



  • @V Krish Naturalist, we dnt need to learn peace and love from other people we know what kind of love peace atwaches by praveen tigodua Rss bagrandal By Shafeeq Mohammad - 8/24/2016 1:38:48 PM



  • @Kulsoom Aayat
    we humiliate stupidities in any religion that claims superiority...but we don't do torture and killing coz we are peaceful humanists..not religious blind zombies.
    By V Krish Naturalist - 8/24/2016 1:35:12 PM



  • There are a lot of lies published in order to mislead the innocent people. Abraham never established any worship place in Kaaba. You should know that initially even your Prophet Mohammad used to pray turning his face to Jerusalem temple. Abraham spoke Hebrew language and not Arabic.

    There are a lot of different opinions that Prophet Mohammad was not descendant of Ishmael.  No clear evidence or proof is available right now to show the Ishmael settled in Mecca or Medina.

    Since I am a truth seeking Christian I find that there is no uniform interpretation about Qur’anic verses. The total Shia community in the world believes that Usman brought changes in the Quran since he destroyed a number of original manuscripts. Subsequently Usman was killed by the Muslims only due to difference of opinions even prevailed in the beginning of Islam.

    Further Quran completely failed to bring individual and personal spiritual transformation in order to possess the real love, joy, peace and unity among the Muslims. There is no Muslim country in the world which is run on the teachings of Quran.

    The Muslims are better in Christian countries rather in their own born countries. There is no law and order in Muslim countries (RULE OF LAW) and the minorities in Islamic nations do not have complete freedom.

    If India has more Muslims than Hindus then they should have India as a Muslim nation. I do really and practically believe that the vast majority of Hindus are secular minded and I am proud to be an India as I have every unlimited freedom to follow my religion and also propagation with respect to others. Pakistan brought BLASPHEMY LAW in order to curb the freedom of minorities and this law brought confusion and disorder in Pakistan. There is no real DEMOCRACY AT ALL as the Military has the final SAY in every serious issue WHEREAS in India the civilian Govt has the final SAY.

    I am able to live in India with family members with peace, joy and unity. Let us live together respecting the feelings of others that is what the ALMIGHTY GOD wants from every individual.

    By Dr Thomas Mathai, India - 8/24/2016 12:51:39 PM



  • You all may humiliate us, torture us and even kill us but certainly can not deviate us from our Deen. Islam is the only relivion which is misinterpreted a lot not only by non muslims but some of our muslim fellows too. By Kulsoom Aayat - 8/24/2016 7:42:54 AM



  • Instead being ashamed, one bloody, tried to bark like a mad pig! They can take all modern facilities discovered by the "harem", but cannot love or rather take lessons from them how to resolve and reform the age old ill concept and unscientific practices. By Debasis Chatterjee - 8/24/2016 7:21:08 AM



  • what you do is more important than what you write if wrong done against writing stop wrong doers or at least condemn the wrong in todays world islam has become threat to humanity and better its followers find solution at least to their own satisfaction better do your own surgery rather than arguing with others facing threat By Damodar Kansara Jodhpur - 8/24/2016 7:03:00 AM



  • @Ashish Choudhury, Apurva Kumar Dutt,Venugopal Bhat ,Hiten Yadaf if you dnt any thing about islam shut your mouth if want to learn about islam then read quran to with open mind still after reading quran if you find fault with islam then you qualified to debate about islam if your not willing to read quran then please shut up you mouth dnt bark like dog with out any knowledge By Shafeeq Mohammad - 8/24/2016 5:51:01 AM



  • It is the Muslim Countries and Islamic scholars should find a way out.This can not continue in 21st century.What was a normal practice 1400 yrs back may not be suitable in this age. By Ashish Choudhury - 8/24/2016 5:42:46 AM



  • @Ashish Choudhury You are the greatest barbarian. You have never seen the true face of Islam. Judge Islam from the teachings of the Quran and the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad. The sublime religion shall always remain sublime even if some misguided persons act contrary to these teachings. By Mohammed Mahmood - 8/23/2016 8:22:06 AM



  • Islam has been interpreted in such a way that all peaceloving people find fear in this barbarian religion. No sane man coming forward to protest. Islam means only increase the number but not with human being. No humanity.
    By Ashish Choudhury - 8/23/2016 7:55:52 AM



  • @Rakesh lambs,Yah Mulk kabhi bhi Hindu Rashtary Nahi Raha yah Sach hai ,yah bhi Sach hai Ke kuch log Hamaisha Hindu Rashtary Banane ki koshish main Anap shanap Bakte Rahte hain ,yah bhi Suraj Ke kiran ki Tarah Sach hai Ke un logo ko kabhi kamyabi Nahi mili our Na milegi, Dusri bat yah hai Ke . Agar kisi ki yah Soch hai ki Musalman Ham logo Ke Raham karam par hai to uski Bewaqoofi Aisi hai jaise Suraj Ke samne Deep Jalakar yah kahta ho Ke Deepak ki Roshni se Suraj ko Dekh Raha hoon ....Aise Log pagal hain ya be waqoof...
    .......,..........................JAI HIND .
    By Niyaz Suhail - 8/23/2016 6:56:01 AM



  •  in the name of sufis some people where running their shops like hindu babas.. that why de r reducing like hindus...
    who said there is no scope for others in Quraan.. you better read The Last Sermon of Prophet (saw). there he said should't disturb those people who worship other God or gods...
    By Md Shamim Siddiqui - 8/23/2016 6:49:08 AM



  • @Mohd Shamim I am not against Muslims but afraid of the norms layed in kuran,where there is no scope for other religion. By Prashant Kurundodi - 8/23/2016 6:35:24 AM



  • @Prashant aasmaan se utra aur khajoor pe atka. who left sanatan dharam and converted to arya samaji... islam always recommended free your slaves you will be greatly rewarded by Allah.. actualy islam discourages slave practices.... By Md Shamim Siddiqui - 8/23/2016 6:02:16 AM



  • @Md. Shamim Yes aasman SE utra our khajoor PE atka.dalits were misguided my Muslims and they didn't know what is there in kuran. In Islam also so dangerous and cruel atrocities are done against each other that doesn't mean that you convert to other religion. Because of our mistakes done earlier today we are giving them reservation in all govt organiziation and colleges and schools. In Islam also you had slaves who work for you . there was nothing like dalits in ancient Bharat. The caste was not by birth but by deeds. Valmiki who wrote ramayan was a robber by profession but by meditation and pennance he became a sanyasi. By Prashant Kurundodi - 8/23/2016 5:50:37 AM



  • even aryan hindus once invaded india and captured all belongings of aadiwasi and dalits... and most of the Muslims are converts from dalits... actualy Islam in india was like a breeze of relief for dalits as they got very good option. that is how to escape from the atrocities of uppercaste hindus.... By Md Shamim Siddiqui - 8/23/2016 5:41:49 AM



  • muslims allowed to marry 4 women... but how many muslims are marrying more than one.. it would be .0003 or .0005%.. jahan 80% log mahina 5000 sahi se Nahi kamate wahan 2nd wife keliye koi tum jaisa bewakoof hi sonch sakta hai.... By Md Shamim Siddiqui - 8/23/2016 5:37:26 AM



  • Keeping two more wife's are so embarrassing to the first wife. How insulting and inhuman. By Prashant Kurundodi - 8/23/2016 4:52:30 AM



  • 3 wife's are allowed only to Muslims not to Hindus and Christians.some of the Muslims don't agree with the national anthem is that constitutional. Why in kuran the kafirs are not tolerated and so many discrimination with other religion. I am speaking as per the information I received about kuran bad points. By Prashant Kurundodi - 8/23/2016 4:48:33 AM



  •  hindus allowed to stay muslims means what? is india is hindu republic?and what is hindu law and muslim law? indian muslims are following indian constitution, and the constitution allows you to get married with 3 wife By Azaz Ali - 8/23/2016 4:41:12 AM



  • In India some of the Muslims didn't want be with Hindus so they seperated India and shifted there but most of the Muslims preferred to stay in India and the Hindus agreed but in Democratic set up they don't want to follow one law they preferred the goodies of both laws and enjoy three wife's, but when they do crime they don't want to follow Islamic rules. By Prashant Kurundodi - 8/23/2016 4:14:23 AM



  • Sir Saudi Arabia is doing great harm to Islam spending millions for a particular Islamic thought.contry like India this particular thought can't be accepted. About Indian molanas most of them are tight lipped due to petrodollars. By Dinesh Pareek - 8/21/2016 1:38:53 PM



  • ISIS ke upar bahut achhi jankari es lekha se mili hai.  sarvsamannya hindi pathakoke liye aapne ek achha kam kiya es liye aapka Dhannyawad !'

    By Suresh Khairnar‎ - 8/21/2016 1:33:21 PM



  • Amazing article. Hope the Govt provides him security......as will need it for being honest about the double standards of many profound guys! By Chandra Shekhar Kapri - 8/21/2016 1:30:42 PM



  •  There is one Tinted glass called Islam. Once you wear then not only you are blind. But mind closed and you became deaf and dumb. By Rama Iyer - 8/21/2016 1:27:04 PM



  • @Mohd your complaint is with America then why do terrorist spread all over the world mostly Muslims. By Prashant Kurundodi - 8/21/2016 1:24:03 PM



  •  @prashant mister jagdish you are blaming all muslims because of the one false and base-less speech of tasleema ,then what about this that 80,90% hindu temples of gujarat don't allowing S C, S T, peoples to come in a temple and mostly in india and they are not eating food which is made up by SC,ST peoples,so is my arguement is right that hinduism is dividing peoples in different casts,no absolutely not,because of some people whole religion was not blamed so why are you blaming all muslims as terrorists or islam is not right By Azaz Ali - 8/21/2016 1:18:54 PM



  • Yes Islam preaches peace with other Muslim but that is also not bring followed By Prashant Kurundodi - 8/21/2016 1:15:14 PM



  • Islam is a vast religion..U some peoples and terrorists are polluting only....u peoples n terrorists have some commons simiilarities..They are affected by lack of knwldge on Islam ,un-employments etc.on the otherhand u peoples also dnt have any idea abt religions...even u dnt knew ur respectv religion also then hw cud knew abt islam....islam is a very vast religions...those who undrstnd it they nvr do any bad things....their was no place of terrorism inside islam...dont try to define islam according 2 ur own perspectives n by showing some terrors face......if u want to talk on islam then dibate by profect mohammad and by other urs.. By Mohammad Ahmed Ali - 8/21/2016 1:09:34 PM



  • To
    Zaiullah M

    Gneocide by Moplah Muslim of Hindu in south very well known history, which Hindus have forget, please Hindu brothers make yourselves aware of it more about Moplah rebellion and Razakaras of Hyderabad to keep our points, because Muslims and one sided sickular want to use always Gujarat as play card even though that Muslims of Gujarat are still in Gujarat not like in Moplah rebellion whole Hindu pollution was wiped out to the extent no one return like now in Kashmir and Bangladesh.

    Whatever happened in Gujarat, Hindus have not thrown out Muslims completely like Kashmiri pandits.

    I can give many more evidence of Muslim atrocities on Hindus 

    Do not keep crying on Muslim victim.G
    By Aayina - 8/20/2016 1:51:46 PM



  • education of islam and education of world is must,not the modernity or modernisation is must By Azaz Ali - 8/20/2016 10:27:32 AM



  • @Ravi Nair why moderate people are needed to become secular , the people who are not moderate before 50,100 years are not secular? gandhiji, khan abdul ghaffar khan the freedon fighters are secular,so both of them is against moderate culture and believing in indian culture so they are not modern,but the truth is they are secular,so it's not in constition that be a modern person, and there is no rocket science that all moderns are secular or modernisism is a need of secularism, understand, and if you are talking about modern people most of the modern muslims becomes terrorist because they are modern they don't know islam and belives what terrorist interpret about islam By Azaz Ali - 8/20/2016 10:27:01 AM



  • no one is moderate. it is taquia only.they all are terrorists eventually By Ravi Nair - 8/20/2016 10:23:42 AM



  • @Bijay Choudhary i think you don't know how much muslim scholars given speech in front of muslims against terrorists more than 100 times ,please search on google islamic scholars speech against terrorsim
    By Azaz Ali - 8/20/2016 10:18:55 AM



  • Simple they loose nerve to oppose extreemists. If they oppose they will be sent to enjoy 72 hoors in hell. By Bijay Choudhary - 8/20/2016 10:13:23 AM



  • Islam is a vast religion..U some peoples and terrorists are polluting only....u peoples n terrorists have some commons simiilarities..They are affected by lack of knwldge on Islam ,un-employments etc.on the otherhand u peoples also dnt have any idea abt religions...even u dnt knew ur respectv religion also then hw cud knew abt islam....islam is a very vast religions...those who undrstnd it they nvr do any bad things....their was no place of terrorism inside islam...dont try to define islam according 2 ur own perspectives n by showing some terrors face......if u want to talk on islam then dibate by profect mohammad and by other urs.. By Mohammad Ahmed Ali - 8/20/2016 10:09:07 AM



  • Islam is better known as a symbol of terrorism throughout the world.Most of the world leaders have started blocking their entry in their countries in one way or the other. China has already banned some of their religious practices and cartain western countries are in the process of taking over their mosqus and madrasas as they have found enough evidence of these places being used for recruitment and training of terrorists and storage of dangerous literature and weapons.
    The islamic threat to resorting to terroristic approach to sort out every problem has compounded due to its intelligentsia neither openly condemning the fundamentalis nor taking any action against them.Their silence is sufficient indication of their support to those engaged in terrorist and zihadi activities.Therefore, ultimately it is going to add to the woes of muslims.
    By Mahendra Gupta - 8/18/2016 9:05:16 PM



  • Why are you silent as Indian terrorist troops are terrorising Kashmir? By Sheikh Haneef Mohamad - 8/18/2016 9:03:04 PM



  • VARIOUS THEOLOGICAL WORDS AND ACTIONS LEADING TO HATRED ARE NEEDED TO BE DEFINED. By Saifullah Khan - 8/18/2016 8:58:28 PM



  • Real Study before you express. Express things you are sure of. Educated- yet- fools make things complicated. Only Real people respect all religions. Love every human and allow their rights. Right to expression has nothing to with ridiculing and mockery. Say: this is correct, instead of saying: that's wrong. Say: According Islam Polyteism is wrong, but don't say: Polytheism is wrong. Don't be educated fools. Come on, let's make things better. Jai Hind. By Abdul Sattar - 8/18/2016 8:53:32 PM



  •  Impossible to disagree with you. By Umesh Sharma - 8/18/2016 8:44:51 PM



  • PS: Forgot to mention. Please do not trust me for anything but you should start reading the Quran, the life of the Prophet and the history as an independent and truth seeking individual to have a wholistic view of the world and people, without being under the influence of preconceived notions. Mind you Muslim historians have not written about the glories only they have recorded the mistakes and blunders of the Muslims with equal honesty, unlike the Hindutva that glorifies everything Hindu and supplies false stories in the name of history.
    Pandit or non-pandit, killing and violation of human rights can not be romanticized because the lives and future of the real people are at stake, be it in Kashmir or elsewhere.
    Thank you for your time..
    By Ziaullah Mohammad - 8/18/2016 8:36:21 PM



  • @Rakesh murder and persecution of any person or section of society is something only a lunatic will justify. There are innumerable evidences that point to the fact that burning of the coach was a handiwork of Hindutva brigade themselves. Their involvement in Ajmer blast, samjhauta exp, Malegaon and Nander explosion and many other only make this seem true. Still I do not support the view that my crime is better than yours. The point is why should we be blind to other perspectives to the reading of history? Why should we indulge in competitive communalism? Why it is so that a binary is created to split the people and we lap it up so eagerly? Whatever the examples from history you have given are disputed and contested one. From the point of view of Hindutva everything Muslim is bad. Distorting history and poisoning the young minds are their modus operandi. This chat forum is not the right medium to explain everything but I would suggest please think critically and independently to have a holistic view of the world and history. Otherwise we will have a society full of blood thirsty bigots and zealots.
    Btw, taking middle path is always better, though I understand your sarcastic reference to"middle" means something else. Take care
    Thank you for sharing your views.
    By Ziaullah Mohammad - 8/18/2016 8:28:57 PM



  • Expelling the native kashmiri pandits (kashmir is a land of pandits for past many centuries) from their own land and killing innocents..do u find it justifiable..what u expect from rivals..should we leave kashmir as such..kashmir is important for defense purpose otherwise no use for us. By Rakesh Lamba - 8/18/2016 1:19:12 AM



  • @Ziaullah Mohammad are u real source of islam. Can we trust ur thoughts...

    Please read how gujrat riots started and u will get ur one ans and guide us to truth plz how justified is that..-A coach of train full of Hindu pilgrims returning from ayodhya was attacked by a mob with stones and was set on fire after locking doors..lots of kids women and man were killed in this incident..what u expect next from that society..if ur society can have bad people so can other's..dont scream for that.
    Babri masjid- if Ram mandir can be destroyed and babri masjid can be stationed why not vice versa..destroyers are everywhere..read after 50yrs and it will be sam as today we read about Ram mandir...why Ram mandir was destroyed..is that justified to destroy our mandirs.

    Akhlaque is a fresh case..let it be concluded and start debate then..
    U will find a particularly pointing reason for every such incidence.. start reading history from that point and not from middle..
    By Rakesh Lamba - 8/18/2016 1:15:58 AM



  • Mr. Tiwari I am a humble student of Islamic history and theology and have special interest in different other cultures of the world. I do not denounce any culture but I do want that a healthy debate starts instead of hysteria and mindless abusing. Thank you:-) By Ziaullah Mohammad - 8/18/2016 1:07:21 AM



  • @Vikas do not read the RSS version of history only. Though I respect your freedom to interpret the history as per your own perspective. By Ziaullah Mohammad - 8/18/2016 12:56:41 AM



  • Ziaullah Mohammad why not you read about the history of Islam how it spreaded by whom, by which means, how you became a muslim....you'll get actually what Islam is if you have guts. By Krishnanand Tiwari - 8/18/2016 12:48:36 AM



  • @Ziaullah Mohammad sir...u want to see true face of hindu..sir the true face z dat u r still in india with same right nd responsibility as all in india..even after ur forefathers ( muslim )had taken seperate land for them in name of pakistan...wtever u said above z dark spot for our culture..bt trail happen nd most got punishment...kasmiri pundit got throwed out of kasmir..bt hw many muslim left ?? fr a babari ( which z unfortunate) hw many temple z distroyed across pakistan nd bangladesh nd afganistan...in majority muslim counrty a non muslim cn not raise voice..bkz he cn face bleshphamy law.. ..sir u r right abt islam...bt wt abt preacher who r making suicide bomber in name of islam...its ur faith u cn only u cn prevent it frm takeover by extrimist mullas...other have no bussiness...evry society nd evry faith hv bad persons....bt look a larger picture..nd think u r educated.....nd there cn b explaination fr all deeds wheither good or bad By Vikas Yadav - 8/18/2016 12:38:39 AM



  • Just an advice to the chest thumping elements please read Islam through its direct sources and then comment. Ignorance based comments are as unhelpful as this personality based analysis of Islam. Especially for Hindu friends, please do not claim your humanity we know your ugly face through Gujrat genocide, Babri Masjid demolition, Muzaffar Nagar and Akhlaque murder and many more.having difference is not a problem but claiming exclusivity by any section is just unacceptable. By Ziaullah Mohammad - 8/18/2016 12:35:20 AM



  • the beggest terrorist of world is america, who attacked atom bomb in japan.. nd every body forget this.. why.. he is not muslim countries.. double standard By Nazim Ansari - 8/18/2016 12:31:56 AM



  • Accept common civil code first try to respect other religion By Ravichandran Sivasubramanian - 8/18/2016 12:25:13 AM



  • @Prashant Kurundodi Bhai aapka point abhot acchaa laga sachme By Mohd Arif Sheikh - 8/17/2016 1:41:33 PM



  • Good Muslims should not remain silent when some other Muslims is going against humanity. By Prashant Kurundodi - 8/17/2016 1:32:28 PM



  •  It is wrong conception of editor, Islam always been a religion of peace; Islam cannot be divided into moderate & ancient. It always condemned any type of brutal act. Of course sex allowed with slave by Sharia but does not allow rape .I think you may understand. By Sa Qasim - 8/17/2016 1:15:46 PM



  • Quran is the only book, which since the age of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is in its original. There is no change of even a single word or even a point and Islam is following the Quran and preaching of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH). On the other hand all the religious books of other religions have been edited, modified frequently by respective priests as per their comfort but there is no change in Islam but now many "Muslims" are bent upon to change the Shariat (Islamic Law) for their benefits. I suggest such Muslims to adopt other religion which they find more easy to follow.

    By Faisel Tasleem - 8/17/2016 9:47:41 AM



  • 99.9 % ulema dont watch t.v or read news paper. Ulemas r regularly condemning terrorism but the media dont show it so what their fault. We can what happen to naik who regularly condemn terorism and propogate agains isis. Don't propogat false things

    By Aftar Ali - 8/17/2016 9:33:29 AM



  • Appreciate your views. By Ashwinkumar Chibber - 8/17/2016 9:17:59 AM



  • Well, it doesn't matter who said what, Islam has always been the religion of peace, fraternity & humanity. By Afzal Khan - 8/17/2016 9:13:47 AM



  • I am worried for the safety of 'Sultan Shahin, Founding Editor , of New Age Islam... By Ram Avtar Gupta - 8/17/2016 8:55:28 AM



  •  Dr.Zakir Naik is a sincere, righteous, pensive, innocent and devotional person. He has n't any crime. Who against/defence/oppose by words etc about Dr.Zakir Naik, they are destroyed/haramfuled/exhausted in any field by the almighty Allah Subhanahu wa ta'ala. Dr.Zakir Naik never think about corrupt,illegal,abnormal,notorious,atrocious ...........etc for all mankind. He always think for the welfare/good of all mankind of any caste. After all He is a great man. By Rofiqul Islam - 8/16/2016 1:43:07 PM



  • Janab Sultan Shahin Sb. I feel sorry in saying that you have wasted so much of your intellectual and journalism talent in writing open letter to Maulana Firangimahli. If you really want to know the concept of Caliphate, you have to approach to the right people who better understand real Islam and it's Shariah . Please share your thoughts with any one of Ayatullah. By Syed Zargham - 8/16/2016 1:40:42 PM



  • @krishnananad tiwari....dont mind but you hindu blind beliver but muslim is not muslim jo bhi karte hai uska refrence hota hai Quran mein but ap log jo bhi karte hai uska refrence nhi dete bcs ap logo ko Hinduism book se dor kardya gya hai By Alfiya Quraeshi - 8/16/2016 1:38:44 PM



  • @Krishnanand Tiwari She' s better than the good for nothings like u !! By Noor Saba - 8/16/2016 1:32:04 PM



  • One more convert.... By Krishnanand Tiwari - 8/16/2016 1:29:58 PM



  • Read Quran veri Clearly than said about the Islam and Quran i know muslim is wrong like Bhagwa terrorist ; Vish hindu parishad terrorist ; Cow racha terrorist but not Islam or Not Hindu ok By Alfiya Quraeshi - 8/16/2016 1:21:53 PM



  • Amir ul mowminin or Amir ul zualimin/ Amir al mufsidin.

    With the following snapshot of ISIS carnage as reported by an international body of 120 Islamic scholars from across the world - al-Baghdadi may deserve the title of Amir ul zualimin / Amir ul mufsidin and those who support or pay allegiance to him as ahl az zulm or ahl al fasad - though God knows best:  

    •    Doctoring the interpretation of the verse 21:107 which reads ‘We have sent you as a mercy to all the worlds. ’(Al-Anbiya’,22: 107), He quotes: “We have sent you (with a sword) as a mercy to all the worlds”
    •    Killing thousands of prisoners
    •    Killing 600 unarmed captives at el-Zor.
    •    Destroying churches, and looting the homes and properties of the Christians.

    •    Killing some Christian civilians and forcing many others to flee their homes with nothing but their lives and the clothes on their backs.

    •    Fighting the Yazidis under the banner of jihad though they neither fought you nor Muslims.

    •    Giving the choice to Yazidiz to either convert to Islam or be killed.

    •    Killing hundreds of Yazidiz and burying them in mass graves.

    •    Had it not been for American and Kurdish intervention, tens of thousands of their men, women, children and elderly would have been killed.

    •    Coercing everyone living under their control in every matter, great or small, even in matters which are between the individual and God.
    •    Engaging children in war and killing. Some are taking up arms and others are playing with the severed heads of their victims.

    •    “Implementing Hudud (amputation) punishment without exercising utmost restraint and extending it to minor offences as well, which defy the spirit of the Qur’an and Sharia Law.

    •    (As per eye witnesses and their own claims) torturing and terrorizing people through beatings; murder, burying alive, decapitation with knives

    •    Committing massacres — their fighters mock those they are about to kill by telling them that they will be killed like sheep, bleating and then indeed butchering them like sheep. Not satisfied with mere killing; they add humiliation, debasement and mockery to it.

    •    Not only have they mutilated corpses, they have stuck the decapitated heads of their victims on spikes and rods and kicked their severed heads around like balls and broadcast it to the world during the World Cup.

    •    Jeering at corpses and severed heads and broadcasting these gruesome acts from the military bases they overran in Syria.

    •    Tying Syrian soldiers of the 17th Division in North-eastern Syria to barbed wire, cut off the heads of some of them with knives and posting a video of this on the internet …’.
        .
    Link:http://www.newageislam.com/books-and-documents/muslim-scholars-from-all-over-the-world/full-text-of-muslim-theologians--open-letter-to-abu-bakr-al-baghdadi,-refuting-his-ideology-of-jihad-that-justifies-killings-of-innocent-civilians,-muslims-and-non-muslims/d/99389

    The scholars issuing the letter unanimously agreed that each of the above listed crimes that ISIS committed in the name of Islam stands in stark contradiction with the Qur’anic message.

    The punishment for such zalim and ahl az zulm is prescribed as follows in the Qur'an:

    “(It is but) a just recompense (jaza’) for those who wage war against God and His Prophet, and storm about the earth causing corruption (fasad) that they are slain, or crucified, or have their hands and feet amputated from opposite sides, or expelled from the land. This has been their disgrace in this world, and a severe punishment (awaits) them in the hereafter (5:33), except (for) those who repent before you overpower them. (If so,) know that God is Most Forgiving and Merciful” (5:34).Amir ul mowminin or Amir ul zualimin/ Amir al mufsidin.

    With the following snapshot of ISIS carnage as reported by an international body of 120 Islamic scholars from across the world - al-Baghdadi may deserve the title of Amir ul zualimin / Amir ul mufsidin and those who support or pay allegiance to him as ahl az zulm or ahl al fasad - though God knows best:  

    •    Doctoring the interpretation of the verse 21:107 which reads ‘We have sent you as a mercy to all the worlds. ’(Al-Anbiya’,22: 107), He quotes: “We have sent you (with a sword) as a mercy to all the worlds”
    •    Killing thousands of prisoners
    •    Killing 600 unarmed captives at el-Zor.
    •    Destroying churches, and looting the homes and properties of the Christians.

    •    Killing some Christian civilians and forcing many others to flee their homes with nothing but their lives and the clothes on their backs.

    •    Fighting the Yazidis under the banner of jihad though they neither fought you nor Muslims.

    •    Giving the choice to Yazidiz to either convert to Islam or be killed.

    •    Killing hundreds of Yazidiz and burying them in mass graves.

    •    Had it not been for American and Kurdish intervention, tens of thousands of their men, women, children and elderly would have been killed.

    •    Coercing everyone living under their control in every matter, great or small, even in matters which are between the individual and God.
    •    Engaging children in war and killing. Some are taking up arms and others are playing with the severed heads of their victims.

    •    “Implementing Hudud (amputation) punishment without exercising utmost restraint and extending it to minor offences as well, which defy the spirit of the Qur’an and Sharia Law.

    •    (As per eye witnesses and their own claims) torturing and terrorizing people through beatings; murder, burying alive, decapitation with knives

    •    Committing massacres — their fighters mock those they are about to kill by telling them that they will be killed like sheep, bleating and then indeed butchering them like sheep. Not satisfied with mere killing; they add humiliation, debasement and mockery to it.

    •    Not only have they mutilated corpses, they have stuck the decapitated heads of their victims on spikes and rods and kicked their severed heads around like balls and broadcast it to the world during the World Cup.

    •    Jeering at corpses and severed heads and broadcasting these gruesome acts from the military bases they overran in Syria.

    •    Tying Syrian soldiers of the 17th Division in North-eastern Syria to barbed wire, cut off the heads of some of them with knives and posting a video of this on the internet …’.
        .
    Link:http://www.newageislam.com/books-and-documents/muslim-scholars-from-all-over-the-world/full-text-of-muslim-theologians--open-letter-to-abu-bakr-al-baghdadi,-refuting-his-ideology-of-jihad-that-justifies-killings-of-innocent-civilians,-muslims-and-non-muslims/d/99389

    The scholars issuing the letter unanimously agreed that each of the above listed crimes that ISIS committed in the name of Islam stands in stark contradiction with the Qur’anic message.

    The punishment for such zalim and ahl az zulm is prescribed as follows in the Qur'an:

    “(It is but) a just recompense (jaza’) for those who wage war against God and His Prophet, and storm about the earth causing corruption (fasad) that they are slain, or crucified, or have their hands and feet amputated from opposite sides, or expelled from the land. This has been their disgrace in this world, and a severe punishment (awaits) them in the hereafter (5:33), except (for) those who repent before you overpower them. (If so,) know that God is Most Forgiving and Merciful” (5:34). By muhammad yunus - 8/16/2016 11:52:10 AM



  • There could not be a more monstrous lie than the statement: “Islam has never been a religion of peace, not even for a day.”

    The reason is simple: the Qur’an which is preserved verbatim in the chest of the memorizers since the Prophet’s era offers undeniable testimony to contradict the above statement. The Qur’anic testimony – which is sketchy and in bits and pieces as characteristic of the revelation, is pieced together in the article referenced below, which divides the 23 year span of the revelation into four phases depending upon the challenges and priorities of the mission.  

     The conclusions corresponding to each phase of the revelation as tabled below demonstrate that for the first three phases spanning some 20 years of the revelation (610-630), the Prophet only waged defensive battles and struck peace alliances with his bitter enemies. Military action were taken against the Jewish tribes of Medina but they were provoked by breaches of treaty and high treason and not any religious motivation.

    Yes! The last two years of the Prophet’s mission (630-632), notably the Tabuk expedition and ultimatum to the Arab pagans for repeated treaty violations were militarily active but these natural constructs of history and needed to prevent Islam from disappearing like a flash in the pan upon the Prophet’s imminent death, to expose the treacherous character of the hypocrites and to lay the foundation of a model of peace treaty that offered peace with dignity and full religious, civil and economic rights in lieu of a levy that all militarily weak nations pay to their powerful neighbors.

    Phase-1 The Meccan Period (610-622).

    Conclusion: Not one single verse of the Qur’an from this period (610-622) carries any instruction or suggestion to the Prophet to taking to any form of violence in the face of bitter opposition, unmitigated fury, hostility and persecution. Islam, during this period remained completely non-violent, espoused complete freedom in religion and enjoined repelling evil with good.

     Phase-II: First five years of the Medinite Period (622-627) - Meccans’ Attacks and Internal Conspiracies.

    Conclusion: The Qur’anic allusions corresponding to this period demonstrate that in each of the battles (Badr, Uhud, Trench) the Prophet was forced to engage with attacking armies for survival. One can find no ground to charge the Prophet of giving false hope to his people such as assuring them of victory, or divine help in the battle-field, or enticing them with the promise of any kind of material reward or favor for valor in the battle-field or of committing any excesses. In fact the Prophet is shown to be lenient by taking captives rather than killing them all (at Badr) as was the normal rule of war in the era and remains so to this day. He is also seen to be lenient with a faction of his followers (the hypocrites) that deserted him on way to the battlefield (Uhud), readily exempting others from defending Medina at the Trench war without verifying their excuses and being mild to those who defied his orders in the battlefield of Uhud.  Thus there is no evidence to project him as a military leader commanding any trained or organized army or betraying the aura, temperament, martial astuteness, and moral imperviousness of an army commander. The actions against the Jewish tribes of Banu Qaynuqah and Banu Nadir are also seen to have been provoked by repeated treaty violations and not any religious consideration and were lenient in civilizational relativism. The alleged genocide of Banu Qurayzah in the immediate aftermath of the Trench War is no more than a legend, though undoubtedly the chief conspirators must have been slain for high treason that had put the survival of the Muslim community at stake.  

     Phase-III The Interlude of Peace (628-630)

    Conclusion: The Prophet’s determination to travel to Mecca virtually unarmed for pilgrimage speaks loudly of his faith in peace and reconciliation as a tool to win over the most bitter of enemies.  Occurring soon after the Trench war, this unarmed journey into the bastion of his powerful enemies demonstrates that he would have never crossed limits – let alone committing the alleged massacre of the Qurayzas just a little while ago in historical terms. The peace treaty with the Jews of Khyber who had surrendered under siege is another example of mercy in military history that is replete with most gory accounts of massacre of besieged people upon surrender. The bloodless integration of Mecca can stand out as a unique example of compassion and reconciliation in human history.

    Phase-IV – Militarily Active Phase (630-632)

    Conclusion: Human history is a succession of events that follow each other, sometimes in the cause and effect sequence - as historical necessity, and sometimes as a result of hegemonic aspirations or despotic and irrational whims of its rulers and leaders. Sometimes they bring good to collective humanity and posterity, and sometimes they bring evil to humankind and cause enduring sufferings to the posterity. The concluding militarily vibrant phase of Islam must be judged against these criteria. The battle of Hunayn was to be fought to defending the recently integrated Mecca. The Tabuk expedition pitted an assortment of tribal warriors with no experience of fighting an organized, drilled, resourceful and seasoned Royal army. Apparently not a historical necessity or rationally driven, the expedition fully exposed the treacherous character of the hypocrites and demonstrated the supreme trust of the Prophet in God. The expedition was beset with incalculable odds and fraught with colossal risks and no one other than a prophet of God could have embarked on it. Finally, Surah Tawbah was needed to set Islam on a permanent footing and rid the world – at least the Islamic world of the culture of loot, murder and arson that conquering armies committed through the Medieval ages for want of a model of treaty that offered peace with dignity and full religious, civil and economic rights in lieu of a levy that all militarily weak nations pay to their powerful neighbors.

     TO PUT IN A WORD THE MUSLIM ULAMA WHO DO NOT REFUTE THE NOTED STATEMENT ACT LIKE THE HYPOCRITES OF THIS ERA. AND THIS COMMENTATOR MUST THEM THAT:

     The Qur’an hurls divine curse on the hypocrites of its era (9:68, 33:73) calls them liars (9:42 , 9:107, 58:18, 63:1] and deviants (fasiqun) (9:96, 9:67), charges some of them to being intense in kufr and hypocrisy (9:97, 9:101), regards them as the most despised among the Prophet’s followers for opposing God and His Messenger, singles them out as the comrades of Satan (58:19/20) and relegates them to the lowest depths of the hell-fire (4:145)

     SO THOSE WHO DO NOT PROTEST THE MONSTROUS LIE AGAINST ISLAM MUST LOOK AT THEMSELVES IN THE MIRROR OF THE QUR'AN BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE

    ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE AND PLURALISM

    http://www.newageislam.com/islamic-ideology/muhammad-yunus,-new-age-islam/islam-is-a-religion-of-peace-and-pluralism/d/108249


    By muhammad yunus - 8/16/2016 10:52:21 AM



  • DR ZAKIR NAIK SAID :- every Muslim should be a Terrorist #against Anti Social elements 
    #Media- DR ZAKIR SAID- "EVERY MUSLIM SHOULD BE A TERRORIST" 
    WTH!! This is what The #Media does! This is our Chutyastic Media! _|_ 
    #ISupportZakirNaik #IslamIsARelegionOfPeace
    By Sk Asif Ali - 8/16/2016 9:42:05 AM



  • This is nonsense utter nonsense. Either you are ignorant about facts or you are notoriously proving yourself to be secular. The ulama always condemned terrorism in all its forms. THIS IS FALSE PROPAGANDA AGAINST MUSLIMS AS A PART OF STRATEGY TO ATTACK THEM PSYCHOLOGICALLY. ALREADY THE WEST HAS LAUNCHED WARS DESTROYING THE MUSLIM COUNTRIES WITH THE HELP OF THEIR OWN TERROR GROUPS LIKE ISIS. By Sayed Abdullah - 8/16/2016 9:37:35 AM



  • HE MAY ALSO BE IN A FEAR OF TRUNCATED By Hari Raman Gopinathan - 8/16/2016 9:30:05 AM



  • @Krishnanand Tiwari It's history of Islam after which science and technology grow it's Islam who cultivated it other wise people wore only leaves of plants By Mohd Danish Syeed - 8/16/2016 9:27:18 AM



  • @Mohd Danish Syeed which histroy book have this....the madarsaa one By Krishnanand Tiwari - 8/16/2016 9:22:35 AM



  • ,
    Dear Mohammed Azam,

    In your comment dtd Aug 5 you raise a question:
    "Instead of criticizing others, you should have put forth your arguments based on Quran and Sunna as to how Islam is the religion of peace."

    You get an indisputable answer in my recently posted article: Islam is a religion of Peace and Pluarlism.

    You are free to read the article and post your comment after reading it closely. 

    By muhammad yunus - 8/16/2016 7:09:09 AM



  • @Mohd Danish Syeed Why not you see the history of Islam before Israel and America, you'll have you answer...converted one. By Krishnanand Tiwari - 8/15/2016 1:16:53 PM



  • @Hiten Yadaf so when are you trying to make varna convertible. By Iqbal Husain - 8/15/2016 12:57:31 PM



  • Actually you don't have knowledge of history prophet never says Jews are your enemies Christian even didn't allow Jews to live in cities Muslim bring them in main stream when Muslim rule Europe but Jews betray Muslims and when Hitler through them out of Germany they with help of America capture Palestinian and majority Muslim of Palestinians are throughout by these Jews even they kill them now and why are we not bother about them they are our brother and sister
    By Mohd Danish Syeed - 8/15/2016 12:55:08 PM



  • @Mohd Danish Syeed bro..plz grow beyond a pedophile prophets saying that Jews are your enemy...which Israeli has personally attacked you..why r u bothered about palestine...and unnecessarily hating Israel.. By Hiten Yadaf - 8/15/2016 12:24:55 PM



  • Why not you ask similar question to Israel killer of innocent Palestine people you never ask because you are Hippocrate By Mohd Danish Syeed - 8/15/2016 12:23:19 PM



  • By Sazad King - 8/15/2016 12:16:28 PM



  • Rizwan sir, u nailed it !! By Noor Saba - 8/15/2016 8:17:22 AM



  • @Krishnanand Tiwari I don't want to argue with u brother as there wouldn't be any point to discuss on it unless u go through the teachings of Holy Qur'an. It never said to convert anyone or to create nuisance. everything which u see are delusions and are not facts. Research on it then lay any allegation against any religion. Yes, it asks us to convey the message of Holy Qur'an benignly but not with force. Hope u will understand and do some research and then come for a noble debate. Regards..... By رضوان واسق - 8/15/2016 8:05:39 AM



  • @ضوان واسق Beauty??....why is you are muslim you know convert ? Because it has beauty to convert or die. By Krishnanand Tiwari - 8/15/2016 7:47:09 AM



  • New age Islam = seeking amendment in Islam according to modern age to murder its beauty, thoughts & real values. To practice it according to self created beliefs that fits for their business and when true teachings are kept in forth, they say it an obsolete and consider themselves to be most evolved and intuitive however the fact is that they haven't got a clue even about their moronity. By رضوان واسق - 8/15/2016 7:32:09 AM



  • Sir I am hindu islam never preach violence or terrorism but few ppl getting bad name to islam By Ravichandran Sivasubramanian - 8/15/2016 7:23:09 AM



  • Mr sultan shahin, want to have a conversation with you. May i have the opportunity ? By Nazmul Hussain - 8/15/2016 7:16:52 AM



  •  In Islam there is no moderate, radical or else. There is practising Muslims or non-practicing Muslims. By Siraj UA - 8/15/2016 7:11:08 AM



  • @Imi Bhat  They are not involved in terrorism, Jehad , booming , suicide , population explosion.. These are found by religion of peace. By Kiran Jadhav - 8/15/2016 7:06:59 AM



  • @Imi Bhat Ufff...converts. By Krishnanand Tiwari - 8/15/2016 6:54:06 AM



  • Shiv sena RSS bajrandal are all terrorist By Imi Bhat - 8/15/2016 6:35:05 AM



  • The quran and islam is mentfor whole of the humanity......it hardly makes any difference who fallows it or not. if any body has any doubt u plz may see the life of the prophet Mohammad he was the real model of religion. some one has written above dt muslims have 3/4 wives...brother u dont know there is condition for it but have u ever read the life history of baghwans...many of them had wives in thousands wt dt without condition. further there is misqutation of mr. zakir sb ...every muslim must be a terririst...kindly go though the complte speech he says....muslim must be terrirost for.....rapist. for thief...for sinner....etc. so plz dont misqute any speech or verse...it creates misconceptions. do u know the no of people/bfothers killed by the adhoka. have u ever heared about millions of persons killed by your Hitler. Masolani...napolian besides in gulf war in iraq afganistan Burma.quait. phalestine etc. organised militancy in the world is appriciated by all of us bcz their media is strong to create sense of their own taste like u people. last but not the least on the basis of religion two largestajorities in the world r 1st christans and 2nd muslims. there is race of world control the 1st party has succesfuly made all others as their dum and deaf suporters like u. so u wil never dare to speak againt them though they wil make u slaves for another 500 years. last but not the least u r at loberty to fallow any religion but respect all as the islam says dont ill speak about any religion it will create disturbance and hurt the feelings of others. hope it wil find u all in gud mood. By Ayoub Mir - 8/15/2016 6:31:19 AM



  • I love you Manzurul and your statement What a great scene for a non-serious website”. Criticism is very important for critical thinking. Critical thinking is the disciplined art of ensuring that you use the best thinking you are capable of in any set of circumstances. If you don’t know what others think of you, in this case about your religion, you may lose contact with reality. You should at least appreciate that Sultan is doing a yeoman’s service to make you understand what others think of your religion and your beliefs. He is also helping to introspect and ask question. Without introspection we will not be able to move from one level to another.

    You shall know the truth, the truth will set you free.

    By Royalj - 8/14/2016 6:19:11 AM



  • @krishnanand Does not matter from where you came, what matter where you stand. The real thing is you are still in dark, reveal yourself. By Nihal Ahmad - 8/13/2016 2:41:49 PM



  • @Nihal Ahmed Hello I think you forgot you are a convert. By Krishnanand Tiwari - 8/13/2016 2:39:49 PM



  • Its our misfortune that even Muslim knows so little of Islam. People like you are adding to this misconception, Islam is the life of Mohammad (sav) not the life of xyz Muslim or their deeds. Just don't go with a line, explain the whole story, don't take the line of your choice. Stop defaming Islam, please. By Nihal Ahmad - 8/13/2016 2:36:12 PM



  • Khushu This calls for no comments.world knows who are terroists and why.
    By Shiban Krishan - 8/13/2016 2:22:42 PM



  • Zeliang peace loving is best solution for human ,killing one another well not bring solution, as Jesus said love your neighbourhood love you enemy pray for them, for repent, By CH Dikambo - 8/13/2016 11:49:29 AM



  • Dear Sir I am very respectfully telling you the very fundamental truth of Islam .Islam does not believe in if and but it is straight path ;Islam doesn't fulfilled the desire of human being it is human being who fulfilled desire of Islamic sprit in every walk of their life;if you do not like or not able to follow Islamic rules and regulation then it does not means that Islam is not true ;this is the version of people like you;Islam is never preach intolerance and terrorism and it does not allow to criticise or abuse to any other religion but it have very right to put the point of view of Islam regarding every aspect of life.As for as Dr Zakir Naik is concern he is nothing doing wrong he is only putting the one point of view of Islam it may be Salafi or any other ;it is depend upon you to follow it or not. By Mohd Yunus - 8/13/2016 11:15:44 AM



  • It not hard hard to belive Manzural is Lawer, a who twist words and accused sultan shahin for writing comments under different Pesudo name and republishing and damaging Islam and Prophet.

    Sultan Shain is honest in publishing his editorship.

    Accusing him is making more mockery of your relgion, rather answer the serious question arised by people of other faith.
    By Aayina - 8/12/2016 11:16:35 PM



  • I like to agree with Manzural comment on Mata.

    I like to belive also Adam and Eve as Mata and Pita of single human race with all of produce as INCEST kids including him as well. A great scholar of Islam Israr Ahmed admits this point with Luckman on media as guest, thanks to this type of scholars they teach human history of reproduction through their Relgions.

    Best can be laugh of certain belife of Muslims, Christian and Judaisim 
    By Aayina - 8/12/2016 10:59:28 PM



  • To Anand Rai, Hiren Yadaf
    Insanity and abusive is on both side of community.
    Hindus and Muslims on this website use this type of language.
    The question in regard to 
    1)Ayesha's marriage age have no rational answer, any good Muslim scholar will reamain shun, 
    2)same is true for marrying his मुँह बोला son wife
    There are many problems related to women's in Quran and Hadits but as Indian Muslim had mostly practiced Hindu traditions more they get more short-temper, as they are confused, Tablige Jamat is working to make Muslim perfect because they are contaminated by Hindu traditions.
    Once the perfection is achieved, our Indian Muslim brothers will able to sale(sorry marry) their minor girls to rich Arab  Muslim for money, which Pakistan is already doing.
    By the way if you say same thing to Arab they are not upset as they are practicing this tradition of marraying minor, Yemen is champion of that, Yemen follow the sunnah better than Indian Muslims and rest of world Muslims 
    In relation to women the behaviour and explanation given by Quran and Hadits contradicts and sometime, and some time facilities to treat women more as object.
    May be Hindus also following some tribal part of India who knows, but atleast the source will be not relgious, it will be traditions 
    By Aayina - 8/12/2016 1:30:24 PM



  • Hiten Yadaf (a false name), Aayina, flunky logic, cowdung, gomutra - these are some of the names used by honorable Janab Sultan Shahin sb to get the prophet of Muslims abused, then he as editor deletes some particularly filthy abusive words (Muslim that he is, I believe ) but leaves 'pedophile' and 'sex maniac' as honorifics for his peophet ! What a game plan ! And then there is ever present Ghulam Mohiyuddin  sb hoping to civilize these filthy beasts with his good behaviour, and then scholarly brilliant minds like  Naseer Ahmad, mohammad yunnus and so many other great scholars trying to cajole the Hindu urchins (commenting here), for earning their (urchins') acceptance ! What a great scene for a non-serious website. I don't ask Muslims to tell these urchins what and who they are, but my suggestion is to laugh them out. Laughter is the best dose to destroy the bed-bugs. By Manzurul Haque - 8/12/2016 10:46:58 AM



  • Hindus may, but rest of mankind cannot believe in maata without there being a pita. When they call the cow their maata, inevitably our mind goes to the question who is the pita ? Now if you raise this entirely rational question, these fictitious logicals/rationals get infuriated and start abusing Muslims and Islam. However they do not abuse the foreigner Christians or Chinese when the latter make similar rational comments because of fear.  By Manzurul Haque - 8/12/2016 9:55:56 AM



  • ^Exactly for this same (Abusive word deleted.... Editor) wwf joker fights religions must be replaced with humanity. By V Krish Naturalist - 8/12/2016 9:55:16 AM



  • American Muslims are very American. Many many of them. European Muslims throng churches and show solidarity for a priest of 85-years killed by ISIS. Gratitude to your homeland is an automatic outcome if you follow religion. Entitlement gives nothing but negativity. If the Prophet was anyway leaning to Arabia, it's because he lived there. That's gratitude. Pan-Arabian attitude is not helping. By Deepa Natarajan - 8/12/2016 9:49:48 AM



  • Logic and reason are for civilized people. Not for Muslim's. By Prafulla Kar - 8/12/2016 9:45:47 AM



  • What a ignorant person. And gives threat also. By Prafulla Kar - 8/12/2016 9:40:39 AM



  • Mr Hiten.. if you try to be rational, logical with these brutes, they will respond in same insane manner as there founders... By Anand Rai - 8/12/2016 9:32:36 AM



  • @Hiten Yadaf, tere baap logg bakwas kargaye, magar Prophet ka kuch bigaar nahi sake, Teri dusmani Prophet se In sha Allah tujhe zaleel aur khaar karegi dunya mey aur maut ke baad bhi, aur agar tumne tauba nahi kiya to In sha Allah, teri maut bahut boori hogi, zaleel marega By Khalid Lateef - 8/12/2016 9:20:59 AM



  •  Bhai Mohammad ka (Abusive word deleted..... Editor)...he was a pedophile sex maniac n bigot...u want I will give reference of hadith...waise America mein bhi Hindus yahan jaise hi hai...peace loving...agar Islam ko defend nahi kar sakte to dusre religion ko gaali mat do...is this is fine. ya main Mohammad ki khadijah se Ayesha ki story sunau aapko... By Hiten Yadaf - 8/12/2016 9:18:39 AM



  • America me kaun si maa ki jai bol rahe hai Hindus? Tutu Pradhan, jis maa se janame ho uski jai bol le bhai, bahuton ko Vrindavan me laachaar paya, aulaad rahte By Khalid Lateef - 8/12/2016 9:07:13 AM



  • Yes Khalid u are right..
    But mostly are not having thought like u...
    By Aalok Nandan Choudhary - 8/12/2016 9:03:51 AM



  • @Khalid Lateef Fir bhart mata ki jay bolne me aapko itna yetraz kiun By Tutu Pradhan - 8/12/2016 8:55:41 AM



  • @Jayaraman Subri thts wht yr parents taught u...Dnt shw yr illmannerd upbringing here... By Ahmad Jaffery - 8/12/2016 8:43:38 AM



  • To Khalid Lateef
    Can you bring confirmation letter to send sultan shahin to hell.
    Such irrational thinking and judging for the celestial world which no one had seen.
    By Aayina - 8/12/2016 1:43:07 AM



  • @Jayaraman Subri to hell with manuvadies and racist , upholders of varna system. This is the way to reply people who insult our beloved prophet (PUB H) . By Iqbal Husain - 8/11/2016 1:48:43 PM



  • @Khalid LateefTo hell with your prophet..& his teachings.. By Jayaraman Subri - 8/11/2016 12:50:01 PM



  • Prophet said ,Don't argue with fool, he will bring you to his level' so serious advice to Sultan Shaheen, desist from hypocrisy, otherwise you know the worst hell awaits you By Khalid Lateef - 8/11/2016 12:41:32 PM



  • Naxal terrorist s are hindu By Imi Bhat - 8/11/2016 12:32:14 PM



  • Islam is peace religion in world By lmi Bhat - 8/11/2016 12:31:29 PM



  • 2012 Defense Intelligence Agency document: West will facilitate rise of Islamic State “in order to isolate the Syrian regime”:
    On Monday,18 May 2015, the conservative government watchdog group Judicial Watch published a selection of formerly classified documents obtained from the U.S. Department of Defense and State Department through a federal lawsuit.
    A much “bigger picture” admission and confirmation is contained in one of the Defense Intelligence Agency documents circulated in 2012: that an ‘Islamic State’ is desired in Eastern Syria to effect the West’s policies in the region.
    While a number of analysts and journalists have documented long ago the role of western intelligence agencies in the formation and training of the armed opposition in Syria, this is the highest level internal U.S. intelligence confirmation of the theory that western governments fundamentally see ISIS as their own tool forregime change in Syria. The document matter-of-factly states just that scenario.
    Astoundingly, the newly declassified report states that for
    "THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING A DECLARED OR UNDECLARED SALAFIST PRINCIPALITY IN EASTERN SYRIA (HASAKA AND DER ZOR), AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE SUPPORTING POWERS TO THE OPPOSITION WANT, IN ORDER TO ISOLATE THE SYRIAN REGIME…”.
    By Ejaz Ahmed - 8/11/2016 12:05:06 PM



  • I totally agree with the content of this open letter. The Wahabi or Dobandi sect which is sponsored from Saudia Kingdom is the driving force behind all the menacing Jihadi.movement and activities the world around. All of my Muslim ulema of other sects know this, but they they abstain from saying it PUBLICLY because of fear of terrorist revenge. Though the majority of the muslim world believes in the peaceful Islam. Yet, they are helpless in countering the armed terrorists, the self styled Jihadis. The non Wahabi governments of Muslim countries face the dilemma should they suppress their own people. By Mohammad Sadiq - 8/11/2016 11:55:43 AM



  • here u may read and watch what he had exactly said and how media fooled us https://m.facebook.com/story.php...
    '#DebateWithZakirNaik
    Here you can read what Dr.Zakir Naik had exactly said (Watch the attached original speech too) :
    But nothing could you find in his speech that may inspire any person to attack innocents. In the other hands he denounced such acts in the same speech.
    Hand off to the cleaver Indian media and saffron Govt. who are playing with the minds of the people........Below is the words he spoke. 
    Actually when answering whether  MUSLIMS ARE FUNDAMENTALISTS AND TERRORISTS, he jokingly said "It is duty of every muslim to be a terrorist" 
    Here is what he had exactly said:
    "I tell my non-Muslim friends and brothers that do you know it is a duty of every muslimf to be a terrorist? He is shoked. What is Zakir Naik saying that every Muslim should be a terrorist. 
    Now, I am trying to explain him what is the meaning of terrorism. A terrorist is a person  who causes terror.You know the policeman whenever a robber sees a policeman he is terrified. The policeman is a terrorist for the robber. 
    Right?  or wrong?
    He is. 
    In the same way every muslim should be a terrorist for the anti-social elements. Whenever any anti-social element looks at the muslim, he sees a muslim, he should be terrified. Any rapist, any robber, any thief, when he looks at a muslim he sould be terrified, as this is a muslim now they will put me behind bar. Every muslim should be a terrorist for anti-social elements.
    I am aware that the word terrorist is more commonly used for causing terror to the innocent people. In that context no muslim should be a terrorist. He should not at all terrify any innocent person. He should be a selective terrorist, terrorist only to the anti-social elements."
    Now look at these sentences:
    "Any rapist, any robber, any thief, when he looks at a muslim he sould be terrified, as this is a muslim now they will put me behind bar."
    "Every muslim should be a terrorist for anti-social elements."
    "I am aware that the word terrorist is more commonly used for causing terror to the innocent people. In that context no muslim should be a terrorist."
    "He should not at all terrify any innocent person."
    Now I don't know why and how any person after listening these would be inspired to attack innocents?'
    01:12
    148 Views
    Witnessing the TruthLike as Your Page
    July 7 · Garden Reach · 
    ‪#‎DebateWithZakirNaik‬
    Here you can read what Dr.Zakir Naik had exactly said (Watch the attached original speech too) :
    But nothing could you find in his speech that may inspire any person to attack innocents. In the other hands he denounced such acts in the same speech.
    Hand off to the cleaver Indian media and saffron Govt. who are playing with the minds of the people........Below is the words he spoke.
    Actually when answering whether MUSLIMS ARE FUNDAMENTALISTS AND TERRORISTS, he jokingly said "It is duty of every muslim to be a terrorist"
    Here is what he had exactly said:
    "I tell my non-Muslim friends and brothers that do you know it is a duty of every muslimf to be a terrorist? He is shoked. What is Zakir Naik saying that every Muslim should be a terrorist. 
    Now, I am trying to explain him what is the meaning of terrorism. A terrorist is a person who causes terror.You know the policeman whenever a robber sees a policeman he is terrified. The policeman is a terrorist for the robber. 
    Right? or wrong?
    He is. 
    In the same way every muslim should be a terrorist for the anti-social elements. Whenever any anti-social element looks at the muslim, he sees a muslim, he should be terrified. Any rapist, any robber, any thief, when he looks at a muslim he sould be terrified, as this is a muslim now they will put me behind bar. Every muslim should be a terrorist for anti-social elements.
    I am aware that the word terrorist is more commonly used for causing terror to the innocent people. In that context no muslim should be a terrorist. He should not at all terrify any innocent person. He should be a selective terrorist, terrorist only to the anti-social elements."
    Now look at these sentences:
    "Any rapist, any robber, any thief, when he looks at a muslim he sould be terrified, as this is a muslim now they will put me behind bar."
    "Every muslim should be a terrorist for anti-social elements."
    "I am aware that the word terrorist is more commonly used for causing terror to the innocent people. In that context no muslim should be a terrorist."
    "He should not at all terrify any innocent person."
    Now I don't know why and how any person after listening these would be inspired to attack innocents?
    By Ejaz Ahmed - 8/11/2016 11:40:55 AM



  • Apne jaan sabko pyari hey !!!!!! By Debaprasad Mohanty - 8/11/2016 11:40:16 AM



  • One sided. Biased view By Faiz Saeedi - 8/11/2016 11:16:35 AM



  • @M Sultan Lone Truth is always bitter, hence the provision for Taquiya in Qur'an. No Muslim want to see his reflection in a mirror. By Vijayan Chemmangattil - 8/11/2016 11:10:47 AM



  • Sultan shahin ' s write up is inspiring only antimuslims. So why shall Muslims get inspired by him. His mask in this write up is over laying him naked as antimuslim platform. By M Sultan Lone - 8/11/2016 9:48:36 AM



  • I read few comments below and have few questions:
    1. Why islam allows 3 wifes in todays world?
    2. Why islam allows sex with the slaves?
    3. Is zakir naik correct in all the words which he speaks?
    4. Who is saccha musalman, the 1 who explodes bombs or the 1 who spreads terrorism, the 1 who orgainzes the gathering nd particaptes in funeral of terrorist, 1 who defends terrorist or the 1 who never has guts to say that, yes muslims too do wrong.
    5. Every other muslims claims that he is saccha and not thw other 1, may it b isis, normal peple, ulema, imam. Every 1 has it's own interpretation and each 1 of them will say it is wrongly interpretated, if it is so, who has interpretated, other religions??
    6. Why did the ujjain madarsas denied the mid day meal because it was offerd to god at first by that logic u must not eat single piece of crop because farmers pray land, crop, tools for agriculture..
    7. There is religion of national anthem, national song, yoga, mid day meal but yes religion of terrorism cannot b defiend yet.
    8. Why burka is still practised?
    9. Why women are not allowed in masjids?
    U could chant blindly and won't listen to world at any cost but just get the answers.

    I could give u the biggest evidence but just read it with open mind, will understand where the problem is.
    India was divided in pakistan in 1947, reason a large mass of muslims were not ready to live with other religions, they seperated and formed a differnet country. Now in that country there were other religions too which today after 70 years have been chocked to death, converted, raped, forced to leave that country, who were they who did this, who is majority in pakistan, where they not indians? Now coming on to who were left in india, they agreed to live with bhaichara, point here is again muslim got divided in their approach, so if they act acc. To 1 Book they again misinterpretated it, who is responsible, so they decided to live in india and again today they have problems with anthem,song,even mid day meals..... so who the he is responsible again???
    U could cite, britishers, russians, us people for massacre but couldn't hide it, just give it a thought and if u really want people to understand, give we the justification why this has happeNed nd why is this happening????

    U know why muslims r used? People r not able to take care of 1 or 2 kids because they have to educate them, give them a good life but who says that muslims should have no of kids?? Nd if there are more kids with less income, why will they not be used, they need money, nd if they get it from any source, they will do whatever is asked, so again who is responsile?
    By Gaurav Mishra - 8/11/2016 9:46:11 AM



  • Muslims can never be SECULARS By Mukesh Acharya - 8/11/2016 9:38:58 AM



  • it must be answered by Mauianas . By Omprakash Pandey - 8/11/2016 9:33:31 AM



  • Your best weapon is abuse and branding. You cannot engage in decent and argument based sensible debate. By Ziaullah Mohammad - 8/11/2016 9:31:16 AM



  • Why Isis is killing shias?they are also Muslims. By Prashant Kurundodi - 8/11/2016 9:23:54 AM



  • Yes..Dr. Zakir Naik said... All Muslims should be a terrorist but the context has been completely manipulated and distorted...... Media and some so called very secular and patriotic group has never broadcast his full statement... He said, all Muslims should be terrorist while facing the criminals and terrorise them.... Those elements who are threatening and terrorising people should be terrorised.... Like for police, a thief is terrorised..He always condemning and blaming ISIS..... It might be possible that while studying all the holy books and comparative analysis with Quran has some harsh but truth outcome and statement he uttered but its the part of their preaching..... By Neyaz Ahmad - 8/11/2016 9:18:17 AM



  • I oppose if Zakir Naik says all Muslims be terrorists ; I oppose who subscribe sex with slave woman as also slavery of men and women ; I oppose permitted polygamy as per religion .Be rational and humanistic in applying all primitive religions in our life . By Afsar Husain - 8/11/2016 9:14:14 AM



  • Most of the Muslims just follow their leaders order and assume it is as per kuran they don't use their actual wisdom, judgement, reasoning, gratitude,. By Prashant Kurundodi - 8/11/2016 9:01:02 AM



  • Which is the preferred country of Muslim people who would like to stay there happy? This is just to know what type of rule they prefer. Do they want to satisfy all the rules as mentioned in kuran or would they like a democratic setup. Or do they want to have all the goodies of Democratic and Islamic rules and not the stringent rule of Islam. By Prashant Kurundodi - 8/11/2016 8:57:46 AM



  • Islamists running after Riches nd Women,it is their need not Religion By Baldev Singh - 8/11/2016 8:51:47 AM



  • Top Five Misquotations of the Holy Quran

    By Ghulam Ghaus - 8/11/2016 6:27:09 AM



  • Mr. Editor Apna home work karo baith ke ....ye 'new age Islam' Kya h??? Kya ye Naya Islam h??? Kiske agent ho? Kya tum bhi moosad(Illegal Israel's Spy agency) ke agent toh nahi??? Lag toh Aisa hi Raha...Rushdie,Taslima aur tum ek hi family ke dikhre....... By Sayed Ahmed - 8/10/2016 9:41:45 PM



  • Judge a tree by the fruit it bears. By Devasia Paraparakath - 8/10/2016 9:39:30 PM



  • This is not a tussle between violent muslims vs non violent muslims 
    This should be between violent people's vs non violent peoples
    By Akhtar Hashmi - 8/10/2016 9:34:53 PM



  • Haan..! ye to sahi bolrahi hain. By Guilouba Kadeikeime - 8/10/2016 9:32:55 PM



  • No one will support when thos kind of rediculous deed is done... this line is out of context... dnt frame it unjustly n made a clash amongst muslim brothers... see the whole speech first then comment on it.. By Rafiqul Islam - 8/10/2016 9:28:02 PM



  • I Sanghtit deshbhakat Hindustani samarth bharat jatpat dharma ko bhulakar sab deshbhakat Hindustani sanghtit hokar vote BJP KO DO kayonki bjp deshbhakat honest rashtravadi deshpremi pm modiji ki party h humkö deshbhakat Hindustani party Bjp ko vote dena h deshhit sabse upar rakhana h modiji 125 caror bharatwasio ki barabar samjhte h modiji jaise deshbhakat imandar neta MUSHKIL se milta h jaihind Jaibjp JAIMODIJI By Manoj Kumar Jain - 8/10/2016 9:25:27 PM



  • Practical, moderate, and inteligencia of Muslim have to speak up now before its too late By Rajiv Krishna - 8/10/2016 9:18:53 PM



  • Kindly put your views about Role of USA and other western countries in Iraq. Afghanistan Libya .............. By Razaullah Khan - 8/10/2016 9:09:45 PM



  • ur seeing all world all terror r only muslim why. only islam all r fool why By Manoj Singh - 8/10/2016 9:05:22 PM



  • THE BONDED SLAVE OF QURAN WILL NEVER PROTEST AGAINST IDIOTIC TEACHINGS OF QURAN By Arjun Chandra Paul - 8/10/2016 9:01:29 PM



  • This chap is illiterate bcos top moulanas condemned the terrorists nt once bt many times . Bt since he deaf dumb blind hypocrite n slave of anti muslim forces so he keep posting crap to get some favours frm his masters . By Haris Syed - 8/10/2016 8:58:34 PM



  • Mr. Sultan Shaheen Sb. With due regards and the best possible respect I wish to ask from you that is it the duty of the Ulama Kiraam only to give proper replies to these absurd and baseless allegations on Islam and Muslims falsely alledged by the big conspirators sitting there with the lone purpose to spread these type of totally incorrect misconceptions and foolish allegations and who are working round the clock to defame Islam and Muslims spread all over the world. Don't you understand this hard and an open fact that by doing this their only motto and intention is to constantly misguide the world population about Islam hence forcing the Muslims to put their total best abilities, energy and resources always and constantly in defending Islamic laws and its glorious teachings. Your goodself, being a devout and a responsible Muslim intellectual and many others like minded intellectuals had done any thing concrete in this matter by giving them authentic and fit reply to shut their mouth which is full of lies? How you and other so called intellectuals had assisted the Ulama Kiraam in preparing their authentic reply with proper references from the Holy Quran, Saheeh Hadees and as per the practise of Sahaba Kiraam Ajmaeen specially the first four Caliphs of Islam. By Aamir Rizvi - 8/10/2016 2:05:31 PM



  • Are bhayya. Islam Ke bare main Jo dikhay our sunaya jaraha hai .uspar Mat jao Khud Quran ki study karoge to Islam ko samajh loge. To hamin Ummid hai Ke Galat Fahmi door hogi, our musalman ho jao ge.Kiyon Ke ,Islam is a peace Religion of the world,
    Please Read the Quran, Quran for Every Bady,
    By Niyaz Suhail - 8/10/2016 2:05:01 PM



  • Hum agar islami cellophane ki baad kare toh lekin Ramrajya ya crusade ki baat kare toh sahi,Hum Mayne hai ki islam k naam par violence karna galat hai par ye Isis aur dusre terrorist mara kisko rahe hai ye bhi toh dekhiye harr jagah sirf musalmaano hi mara ja raha hai By Nadim Shaikh Shaikh - 8/10/2016 2:04:11 PM



  • @Dalchand Chauhan what you have to say about parhsuram ji fight with kshatriyas in which unlimited number r of kshatriyas were massacred By Iqbal Husain - 8/10/2016 2:01:34 PM



  • I surprise a lot when I hear so called hindu intelligentia artficially discovering lost glory of Islam whereas no islamists even mention of something like lost glory. When will the slave psyche of hindus come to the senses, I mean your lost glory. Islam has never been a sane, humane and harmony even for a single day. It is incepted, founded and spread through bloodshed. Hindus leave daydreaming is better By Dalchand Chauhan - 8/10/2016 1:58:16 PM



  • well dis should be defined who is progressive ulema or naiks supporter one of so called ulema of lucknow also praises baghdadi one year before he congratulate baghdadi on killings of shia but no ulema u found speaking in favour of palestine when the issue of shia killings raises they started praising killers of shia either dey r in pak or iraq i saw many of my freind they kept silent on killing of shia but speaks in favour of zakir naik By Amaan Haider - 8/10/2016 1:50:41 PM



  • This man is nothing By Imran Khan - 8/10/2016 1:49:27 PM



  • Why 1st of all every body world wide blame Islam for blood bath, if all the people who r in here know that there were crusades against Muslims and not a single crusade from Muslims, 
    The teachings of our beloved Prophet PBUH is that if non violence, but u people r forgetting Israil how many Muslims they kill everyday, invasion of USSR of Afganistan, Bosnia.
    If a follow history that Humfrey a spy of England was entrusted to create a division, which he succeeded read book the spy who confessed, and go by that u people will come to know that if u try to bring death and miserable conditions to any one one falls himself in there.
    USA attacked Iraq and created ISIL supported by Israil whic Russia claims , it is USA who created terror groups and exported to other countries and now this has bounced back, like Indra Gandhi created Binderawalla and the Sikh killed her, so the Moral of the story is
    As you sow so shall u reap, so I future before saying Islam is not Religion of peace u should go through this comment
    By Khalid Kamili - 8/10/2016 12:26:41 PM



  • @Rasheed Hassan Nigeria brother here is blind beliver cant belive your sentence about the jesus By Alfiya Quraeshi - 8/10/2016 12:19:04 PM



  • I don't wanna argue.... I just wanna convey u to go through full lessons or I may say full topic....please don't cut and paste..... Little learning is a dangerous thing.... And Alhamdulillah I m a proud Muslim..... And Islam is religion of peace...... By Gn Ganie - 8/9/2016 10:45:20 AM



  • Actually Muslims are going away from Islam ( i mean from Qur'an ) I think so. 
    let me give you examples : 
    Now a days modern Muslim people says don't behave like kissing when I face a mosque ....
    (let me explain) Brother This is a mosque for you which may be build by cement and stone for you but for me Its a miracle of Allah almighty , Its a part of my almighty , I don't know how but its a part of Almighty , 
    if I can I want to take it on my chests dude. 
    perhaps I love it more than you so I don't hesitate to give a handful kiss towards my mosque , It actually increases the bond between me and my almightys mosque. it decreases my faults because where there is no my Abba or Amma There's obviously standing a Mosque. 
    secondly, I absolutely believe in building someone's shrine . obviously not to ask something other than Allah (we know what types of helps) .
    I just want to keep examples of some great personalities. 
    Now For me , I am maintaining a good distance between Sariyat or Hadith and Book of almighty ( The holly Qur'an) .
    Because For me law is enough , Who should have to write the explanations , he didn't write and someone came after a long time and I would believe everything like my Qur'an . 
    Yes , I believe but I obviously deal with my conscience and with my own lords books. 
    please don't deal directly with any Darywala ....because of his departmental status.
    By Hanif Uz Jaman - 8/9/2016 10:32:30 AM



  • हमला मस्जिद पर हो या
    मंदिर पर हिंदू पर हो या
    मुसलमान पर, आतंकवाद
    किसी भी सुरत बर्दाश्त
    नहीं- दारुल उलूम देवबंद
    hindi.siasat.com/news/मस्जिद-पर-हो-या-मंदिर-पर-हि-825804/
    By Habibur Rahman TR - 8/9/2016 10:26:57 AM



  • Gaddar ghar me hai By Dr Ramji Gupta - 8/9/2016 10:16:48 AM



  • It is a matter of inquiry whether Islam recognizes other religions. By Nirmal Singh - 8/9/2016 10:12:39 AM



  • Muthe :) W¡LL Be Back Soooon :) keep Supportng By Roshan Momz - 8/9/2016 10:09:31 AM



  • Jesus worshiping his God,
    Luke 5:16 "And he (Jesus) withdrew himself into the wilderness and prayed to his God."
    Matthew 26:39 "And going a little way forward, he (Jesus) fell upon his face, praying and saying 'My Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass away from me. Yet, not as I will, but as you will".
    Matthew 26:42 "Again, for the second time, he (Jesus) went off and prayed, saying: 'My Father, if it is not possible for this to pass away except I drink it, let your will take place".
    Matthew 26:44 "So leaving them, he (Jesus) went off and prayed for the third time, saying once more the same word."
    Jesus is God's servant 
    Matthew 12:18 "Behold my servant, whom I have chosen",
    Acts 3:13(RSV) "The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, hath glorified his servant Jesus",
    Acts 4:27(RSV) "For of a truth against thy holy servant Jesus, whom thou hast anointed",
    Let us look at what Jesus said about himself and about GOD Almighty:
    "I do nothing of myself (From the NIV Bible, John 8:28)"
    "My Father (Creator) is greater than I (From the NIV Bible, John 14:28)"
    "Father (Creator), into thy hands I commend my spirit (From the NIV Bible, Luke 23:46)"
    "And Jesus said to him, ‘Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone. (From the NIV Bible, Mark 10:18)"
    "No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. (From the NIV Bible, Matthew 24:36)"
    *** *** *** *** *** ***
    In actually, the correction is, the Biblical culture being called the Son of God does not make you equal with God since others were called sons of God and children of God in the Biblical times. 
    Secondly, Jesus calling God his Father, or own Father does not mean much. What every Christian forgets to mention is that Jesus called God the Father of his people to, so when Jesus reffered to God as my Father he was doing this when he was adressing himself, it is common self if you are adressing yourself you will say my Father, or my house etc. When Jesus adressed other people he calls God their Father:
    Mat 5:48 "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect"
    Mat 6:1 "Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven"
    Mat 5:16 "Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven"
    Mat 6:4 "That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly"
    Mat 6:9 "After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name"
    Mat 7:11 "If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children, how much more shall your Father which is in heaven give good things to them that ask him?"
    Mar 11:25 "And when ye stand praying, forgive, if ye have ought against any: that your Father also which is in heaven may forgive you your trespasses"
    Mar 11:26 "But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses."
    Luk 6:36 "Be ye therefore merciful, as your Father also is merciful"
    So as we can see, when Jesus adressed other people he would call God their Father as well. So hence if one of those people were alone, they could adress God as their Father and say MY Father in Heaven. Would that mean that the people are equal with God? Certainly not !!!
    Father inside bible stand for creator according to matthew 23:9, isaiah 64:8, quran 2:107,255,
    ALL CHRISTIANS SHOULD READ THIS:
    What Father & Son relationship bibles is talking here?
    Exodus 4:22 "Thus saith Jehovah, Israel is my son, even my firstborn."
    Jeremiah 31:9 "I am a father to Israel, and Ephraim is my firstborn".
    Psalm 2:7 "Jehovah had said onto me (David), thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee".
    Son inside bibles stand for slave as you do good that God want u to do according to matthew 5:9, romans 6:16,22 quran 10:68-69,
    By Rasheed Hassan Nigeria - 8/9/2016 10:02:25 AM



  • It is not surprising as ganga jamuni tehjib is only for majority to shut their mouth. Muslim in country abuse day in day out ,they issue fatwas against Hindus and their belief system .Islam can not coexist with others why cant we accept and allow Muslims to ask for another partition and live there so that we buy permanent peace with them , I do not find any other solution .The community which identifies itself with rapists and murderers of their forefathers and euoliges them then we can understand how far and how deep they are rottened, there is nothing called moderate in Islam , Islam is Islam and it is purely barbaric and can not exist with others, when in minority ask for complete freedom and when come in majority they subjugate others completely, all Islamic majority countries are examples. I have no doubt left in my mind about this. Majority of country understand this face of Islam and ask for another partition and let Muslim go to there in live with their belief system.history teaches us that every fifty years boundaries change ,let us change again, let us carve out another country and send all these people from every part of country to that place . By Arvind Tiwari - 8/9/2016 9:49:12 AM



  • Terrorist it doesnt means killed the human being its means terror for person _ like Police is a terroist for Thief you knw why ? if you remember Nasen Mandela ; why the people said nasen mandela is terrorist but when he is free from Jail than Africa country give peace prize for humanity why ? By Alfiya Quraeshi - 8/9/2016 9:39:34 AM



  • Mr.Thomas Nelly u r arguing with the wall, they never changed their attitude all these yrs how do u expect them in future By Jagadish Thantry - 8/9/2016 9:33:56 AM



  • @Saud Hassan Kazia, I am not anti Islamic. I am anti violence inflicted in the name of religion and god. As a world citizen I have every right to talk about violence and cruelty unleashed against innocent citizens by any religion or nation (as much as I have about global warming)be it Islam, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism or any other innumerable religious denominations, ISIS, Pakistan, USA, India or any other country in the world.
    I am a born and brought up Christian alike Taslima Nasrin or Saud Hassan Kazia a Muslim. The difference in me and Taslima with you and many of your ilk is that we refused to carry our brought up baggage by thinking free and scientifically. 
    Dear brother Saud I urge you to just shed your baggage for a while, come out free and think and ask questions as to how one could hate or kill a unknown innocent fellow human being just because it is sanctioned in a book.
    (As long as you and other fellow Muslims blindly believe that this book is the very Word of Allah and practice what is commanded by it , I am sorry, you and your brethren will continue to defend and justify everything done to honour the words of that book.) 
    Believe me, I can't hate or harm you or anybody else for that matter just because I and them believe differently. 
    I am simply not that stuff..
    By Thomas Nelly - 8/9/2016 9:33:14 AM



  • @Thomas Nelly so now being anti-Islamic gives you a right to talk for Muslims and Islam. Thomas. No matter how much people try to slander Islam, the truth will always defeat falsehood. 
    What punishment she doesn't get in this life I am sure Allah will give her in the after life. Muslims should just ignore such pathetic people.
    By Saud Hassan Kazia - 8/9/2016 9:23:07 AM



  • @Wasim Ansari meant that terrorists, salafists, wahabists and people like Zakir Naik who spread violence and hatred in the name of Allah knew right things about Islam. 
    That's what precisely the whole sane world,including Taslima, are trying to tell 'nonviolent' Muslims like you.
    By Thomas Nelly - 8/9/2016 9:08:58 AM



  • @Thomas Nelly Bertrand Russel also called spade a spade when he wrote "why i am not a Christian ". By Iqbal Husain - 8/9/2016 9:05:30 AM



  • @Thomas Nelly Tasleema nasreen knew nothing abt islam she is just hired to insult islam only.and the rest of world is hires.. By Wasim Ansari - 8/9/2016 8:48:36 AM



  • Taslima Nasrin is one among those few Muslim intellectual thinkers who could call a spade a (bloody) spade without bothered with which side of the bread is buttered. And, she, painfully, is right always so far as Muslim ideology is concerned. 
    Incorrigible these zealous Muslim bigots are. Never can you take them on their face value for they are fanatic Islamists in their core no matter what they wear or where from.
    It is hardwired into them to love everything related to their religion howsoever illogic they are. They support and justify all deeds and misdeeds of fellow brethren regardless their nationality.
    One cannot be a moderate or progressive in Islam. Either you believe and practice textbook Islam and hate non Muslims or you are a non Islamic Muslim.
    And the apologists and victimists among them are the clever wolves in sheep coat who want to have the cake and eat it too. 
    Now count on them to come out in thousands to hate this comment.
    By Thomas Nelly - 8/9/2016 8:41:37 AM



  • @By Parvez Jamasji. In the absence of any reply so far to your question, I, as a commoner venture to do so:-

    “DOES islam QUALIFY TO BE CALLED A RELIGION ? AS PER COMMON KNOWLEDGE OF THE MEANING OF THE WORD RELIGION ? ? ?”

    In common terminology it means any system of worship of a deity(s) to attain spirituality and piety and as propagated by a particular CHURCH – a generic term for all such systems.

    If this is even closer to the mark, then Islam is NOT a religion. In fact it can be argued that Islam as an ideology came to abolish Religion, its church and its professional operatives (often recognised by their religious garbs and stance). Particularly the later as they are then accepted as a class “above” than the rest of the mankind--including womankind, and therefore the rest of humanity is below them in rank and status.

    As given in its source book the Quran, then the above is a negation of the ideology of Islam, which says is also the common message of all divine Messengers of the Creator of the Universe-- not a deity for worship but to obey. Hence it differentiates between:

    - Muslims who claim to belong in Islam but ACT out of and contrary to it……And

    - Momin who “Believe in Islam and ACT in accordance” to its commands that benefit humanity as a whole!

    On a lighter note a late friend of mine had put it nicely:

    "naam musalman, kaan may aazaan oar dulhan kay sar parsay- Quran" does not make one a musulman.

    By Rashid Samnakay - 8/8/2016 11:58:34 PM



  • It’s no surprise the media is trying hard to portray Dr Zakir Naik as a terr0rist influencer. They are desperately fighting back what is seen as a mass exodus of the dominating religion to one that is hated regardless of what may be actually true. Noble preachers like Dr. Naik need to brace themselves for a period where their words WILL be taken out of context in an effort to brainwash those who are shallow minded and cannot think for themselves.

    By YdL1968, Doha, Qatar - 8/8/2016 12:34:09 PM



  • Excellent post By Ritu Gupta - 8/8/2016 8:47:24 AM



  • @Mohd Shakeb Yes.. By Mohd Shakeb - 8/8/2016 8:35:05 AM



  • @Mohd Shakeb  While the ISIS are at their zenith I presume ? By Arumugam Venugopal - 8/8/2016 8:34:24 AM



  • Dear editor please read the history of the farangimaheli. Once of great erudation, now they are big psychophants of governments. Their character has reached its nadir. By Mohd Shakeb - 8/8/2016 8:22:37 AM



  • @Saud Hassan Kazia Differing from Naik must not be opposed ... debates are essential for understanding. And any state or religion that encourages debates are secure. What Naik must do is to share his narratives and clear miscommunications. By Deepa Natarajan - 8/8/2016 8:18:15 AM



  • Newage Islam. Using Islam in your name doesn't give you any legitimacy when you are down-right anti-Islamic. Did you even listen to what Dr Zakir Naik said about terrorists. You are making the same mistake as the other enemies of Islam by taking words out of context. Most people support Dr Zakir Naik because he has brought Islam into the home of millions and Allah has guided thousands if not hundreds of thousands through him. What the people who were against him at some point realized and you don't is that an attack on Dr Zakir Naik is an attack on Islam. First they come for the practicing Muslims and the masjids where true practicing Muslims gather, then they attack books and groups that are helping spread dawah. soon or later they will make it difficult for anyone to be a practicing Muslim. 
    The Indian government and police had nothing against him so why the heck are you having any problems with him. Stop trying to fool the masses.
    By Saud Hassan Kazia - 8/8/2016 8:06:11 AM



  • Due to their silence the terrorists get invisible support and go on massacring the innocent people around the world By Rakshpal Singh Salathia - 8/8/2016 7:58:09 AM



  • @Arvind  War and violence is constantly legitimized by many Muslims. They misuse the sword verses to favor their divisive agendas.

    By Deepa Natarajan - 8/8/2016 7:53:29 AM



  • Fanatics Muslim' have to cut some one on daily basis. If they do not find Kafirs ( All other than Muslims) ,they start slaughtering each other in name of Wahabies, White, and do many sects who think that they are the only ones following Sharia correctly. Other on has to be killed. This is going on since days of Mohammed.

    By Arvind Bhel Manit Srivastava - 8/8/2016 7:28:12 AM



  • Writer is confused and biased about islam.islam never nourishes rascals as others do.

    By Saifullah Khan - 8/8/2016 7:16:29 AM



  • Silence is approval.

    By Anand Kumar - 8/8/2016 7:08:58 AM



  • Actualy the purpose of this page new age muslim is always playing to gallery ,n ur getting gud reposnse from the gallery to whom u want to cater ,labelling dr naik as notoroius in itself shows ur hatred toward those to whom u dont like, dr zakir naik may have so many shortcomings but u can not deny his knowledge of all religions n fiaths thats why he is the most poular preacher of any faith around the world,like evry haters u r also distorting dr naik what he said i.e it is complete distortion of the fact when u claim that that he called evry muslim to be a terrorist ,he has already clairifired that many times recently,to undesrstand what he meant listen to his tormentor in "times now" tv news channel mr arnab gowsawmi hhow he used this anlogy to counter a bhagav bhakts who r killing people in the name of cow ,he said to him(cow bhakt) i quote ,u should be a terrorist to a rapist ,a criminal ,a corrupt burocrate ,why r u terrorising innocent people

    By Shuaib Naqvi - 8/8/2016 7:01:17 AM



  • Islam has been victimized for many centuries. The culprits are not only non Muslims... But Muslims too. But as a religious ideology somehow it survived and still continues its survival. This shows that there is an actual from to it. I remember a quranic verse that there will be some Muslims who would get the material gains in the name of Islam. Salafi discourse of Islam belongs to this group.

    By Samad K Kadavan - 8/8/2016 6:55:47 AM



  • DOES islam QUALIFY TO BE CALLED A RELIGION ? AS PER COMMON KNOWLEDGE OF THE MEANING OF THE WORD RELIGION ? ? ?

    By Parvez Jamasji - 8/8/2016 6:47:14 AM



  • No smell of humanity in those discourse which are misleading .all the prophets aims fraternity and love.pity on them.

    By Khageswar Das - 8/8/2016 6:41:20 AM



  • Ulema can not be moderate or non-moderate like terrorist can not be good or bad. It is this so called ulema and moulavis who have radicalized Muslim's and made them terrorists By Prafulla Kar - 8/8/2016 6:24:39 AM



  • I salute U for ur dare....
    I think U r the frst from Islam who raise ur finger Publicly against bad people from Islam who defame the Islam....by using Gun n Bullet n hving bloodshed.
    By Ajey Vishal Laxmi - 8/8/2016 6:08:04 AM



  • @Karan Raajput Yehi toh unki "kaumi ekta" hai By Aalok Nandan Choudhary - 8/7/2016 12:24:17 PM



  • No body will find only one muslim who says against islamic terrorist...while terrorist declares if going to the way of allah...is atankwad then he is atankwadi...bt no muslum maulvi jakir ets reacts...its shows terrorist has only one majahab nt any dharma or religion that is islam By Karan Raajput - 8/7/2016 12:14:39 PM



  • Who are you? Why do you lie And why do you spread rumours..all you have said are false and fake.. Out of context...I am giving you an example of what Dr Zakir Naik said like " if terrorist means the person who terrorize others then A policeman is like a terrorist for a thief, a freedom fighter for example bhagat Singh was a terrorist for the British and the same way a true Muslim should be like a terrorist for wrongdoers ", not exactly same but the statement was alike.
    And I can challenge you on all the misquotes you have done with a bad motive.
    Please stop this nonsense u fool...
    By Rehman's Rehman - 8/7/2016 12:06:21 PM



  • Sir how can Ulemas contradict scriptures By Sanjay Narain Saigal - 8/7/2016 11:35:02 AM



  • Bakwas By Asef Ahemad Kazi - 8/7/2016 11:17:48 AM



  • Firangimahali! The name itself says it all. They were with British then and with nobody now atleast not with India and Indian Muslims. Those who can't stand for truth can fall for anything! By Wanderer Ali - 8/7/2016 11:11:47 AM



  • I like it By Rajeshwar Pd Sinha - 8/7/2016 10:08:52 AM



  • Pls first read the history of firangmehel , think about open letter, you don't know about firangimehel. you r educated uneducated By Saman Khan - 8/7/2016 10:03:35 AM



  • Do you know BHASMASURA? By Avoya Das - 8/7/2016 9:30:12 AM



  • no answer is ever to come By Brijendra Singh - 8/7/2016 9:12:30 AM



  • Gross misquotation and misplaced logic By Syed Hossain - 8/7/2016 8:28:26 AM



  • After 1400 years every religion needs reformation to survive. By Beni Agarwal - 8/7/2016 8:22:43 AM



  • I surprise a lot when I hear so called hindu intelligentia artficially discovering lost glory of Islam whereas no islamists even mention of something like lost glory. When will the slave psyche of hindus come to the senses, I mean your lost glory. Islam has never been a sane, humane and harmony even for a single day. It is incepted, founded and spread through bloodshed. Hindus leave daydreaming is better By Dalchand Chauhan - 8/7/2016 8:16:55 AM



  • HUH, ulama - e- kiram is always speaking against terrorism and its attachmnt to islam. See website of Zamiat ulama e hind.
    Indian hypocritical media always hiding this, to blame Muslims frequently.
    Just keep your eyes open before blaming anyone.
    By Jubair Ahmed Mazumder - 8/7/2016 8:00:31 AM



  • This is sad fact that most Muslim refrain to critici ze condemn terrorists are they afraid or dont feel its their duty to condemn it

    By Anil Kumar Sharma - 8/7/2016 7:41:43 AM



  • 99 percent ulema don't who zakir is By Aftar Ali - 8/7/2016 7:29:18 AM



  • DOUBLE STANDER .LOVE BLOOD SHED AND NOT PEACE By Romesh Gupta - 8/7/2016 6:24:55 AM



  •  U provide then platform mr editor By Aftar Ali - 8/7/2016 6:24:00 AM



  • Islam means uncivilized By Tutu Pradhan - 8/7/2016 5:56:37 AM



  • @Mujeeb Rahaman  What about your views about " Pakistan " ?......ISIS? Al Qaeda? Boko Haram? Taliban? .....I will be really exhausted about writing list " Islamic Terror " ( Jihadi) group. .....But it's true equally. .....They're not hypocrite. .....They act as instructed by Muhammad, Quran & Haadith. ...... By Rajat Guha - 8/7/2016 5:55:08 AM



  • @Rajat America and jews and others are peace loving  By Mujeeb Rahaman - 8/7/2016 5:41:41 AM



  • Islam & followes of Islam are the enemy of the humanity ......enemy of the civilization & enemy of the the peace, harmony & love. ..... By Rajat Guha - 8/7/2016 5:38:40 AM



  •  @Iqbal Hussain Toh kya aapke majhab me reservation bilkul nahi hai soch ke batao...
    Kya koi bh Muslim ban sakta h... 
    Kaji... 
    😈
    By Aalok Nandan Choudhary - 8/7/2016 5:21:29 AM



  • @venugopal Bhatt are you ready to make varna convertible. do you oppose current system of 100% reservation currently given to one caste for job of pujari / mahant By Iqbal Husain - 8/7/2016 5:12:29 AM



  • Hope some more gutsy people from muslim community come up and question all this nonsense which is going on in the name of islam. It does not become a religion of peace merely by claiming so. Let them prove so with their actions. By Bikram Jit - 8/7/2016 5:05:02 AM



  • Take care of you, Sir. By Prabir Acharya - 8/7/2016 3:41:28 AM



  • We should consider how the four caliphs , the Khulafai Rashdeen, were appointed . By Syed Ahson - 8/7/2016 3:28:56 AM



  • In simple words for those who have working brains--
    WHEN INJUSTICE BECOMES LAW RESISTANCE BECOMES DUTY
    By Aquib Bhat - 8/7/2016 2:53:28 AM



  • Maulana Maududi's book "Khilafat wa Malukiat" in which he has explained his viewpoint should be read read by all. By Syed Ahson - 8/7/2016 2:38:05 AM



  • You are very funny by the way😆😆😆😆 By Salman Ahmad Siddiqui - 8/7/2016 2:30:07 AM



  • There is none worthy of worship except Allah. Muhammad is Messenger of ALLAH...... #islam the religion of #peace By Fawad Khan - 8/7/2016 2:22:21 AM



  • No importance talk of about islam whose kill of men they are cannot be peace maker and no right to saying islam By Abdul Basit - 8/7/2016 2:21:59 AM



  • Islam me na modarate koi hota ,na peace lover koi hota , na ho sakta . Sab k sab Zihadi hi hay...kafir killer hay... By Gopinath Bedanti - 8/7/2016 2:11:54 AM



  • To
    Manzar khan

    Are you happy after saying him Dalal, very short minded which musilims are in while they accusing.

    Rather accusing sultan shahin ask him serious question, or to other Muslims brothers or to people of other faith.

    Or  logically prove that he is Jews agent.

    Do not fall into category of Ghulam Mohyidin, always do very good comment but as soon as Tufil Ahmed articles comes became crazy and accuse him same like Jews agent or RSS agent rather than asking serious question or refuting the article, intellectually.
    By Aayina - 8/6/2016 2:15:33 PM



  • No importance talk of about islam whose kill of men they are cannot be peace maker and no right to saying islam By Abdul Basit - 8/6/2016 11:50:08 AM



  • Islam me na modarate koi hota ,na peace lover koi hota , na ho sakta . Sab k sab Zihadi hi hay...kafir killer hay... By Gopinath Bedanti - 8/6/2016 11:44:06 AM



  • Well said. By Nazar Abbas - 8/6/2016 11:12:58 AM



  • Perhaps they are receiving money from the Zionist enemies of Islam and Muslims. :) By Mohammed Mahmood - 8/6/2016 11:09:57 AM



  • Mostly preachers of islam are defaming Islam by preaching barbarians mode
    Mostly Muslims silent for their mode
    It is deeply thinkable
    By Anil Kumar Chaudhary - 8/6/2016 11:08:48 AM



  • ये दलाल है, यहुदियों का। By Manzar Khan - 8/6/2016 11:08:16 AM



  • This is perhaps the reason why Muslim countries around the world are restless, coping with aggressive nature of its own people. I think, time has come to define Islam in a different way by the truly educated if they want to see a glorious Islamic religion. People like you can become the saviour of not only Islam but also of the humanity. Because, those self proclaimed guardian religious leaders are selfishly guarding their own interests rather the community. Growth and prosperity comes with knowledge and accepting new ideas that are rational and holistic and not by binding thoughts By Debajit Kumar Das - 8/6/2016 11:07:39 AM



  • Solution is very simple.  Just say that 5 pillars define Islam reSt is just politics of ulemas.  By Mannu lal - 8/6/2016 8:43:57 AM



  • Venugopal Bhat, agreed with you and but add another thing that there are as many hypocrites that will tell you that likewise to deceive non-muslim (people of other faith)this deceiving started  centuries ago apart from violent method of converting, but let say in modern days also this deceiving is going,violence is not achieving anything nowadays because peace is offered by all other religion even though all of them had their violent past.

    Here are some example of deceiving
     
    1)It is Muslim who are bad not Islam.

    2)New scholars try to projects it is universal and give the permission to follow whatever you what, New Age Islam website Authors purely writing for NAI falls under this category.

    3)Quote from the scripture of other faith which they have hardly respect for to prove Quran is similar starts from similarity and ends up proving superiority of Quran and Mohammed is last prophet, I always asked this category of deceivers why you need others scriptures to prove your point, when you say we do not know this scriptures are right or wrong.

    4) They use Universal reality of Birth as weapon to take over the other faiths and ideology, this has many categories.

    Sub Categories
    4a)Muslim born kids has to remain muslim, no freedom of faith after you born as muslim.

    4b)Any kids born with Muslim-Nonmuslim union nearly maximum time, the opposite partner has to convert and obvious, the kid is  will be Muslim.

    4C) This is the deceiving and dangerous category , kids born out of Muslim-Nonmuslim union the other partner(moslty women) is not forced to convert muslim allowed to follow his/her religion but kids are made sure they are muslim, they advertises and maximum benefit is taken out of it to fool the nomuslim(people of other faith), Islam and muslim of this category then make lot huha of this as respect and tolerance towards other faith.

    Examples of 4C) category1)the website runner  Sultan Shahin 2)Amir Khan and so on..

    Hindus are surprised(Christians are not see note1)when they see this attitude of Muslim that, kids are 100% sure made muslims because hindus themselves had forget to read their own scriptures.

    Here are some hints in relation to category 4  in hindu scriptures, The conversation between king Vasu and Indra in relation when Asurs decided to to come to earth in exile from the Swarg.

    I do not propagate to called muslim Asurs by saying that but whole physiology of Birth as weapon is explained in it, Hindus will never surprised of behavior muslim after reading this conversation between Vasu and Indra and how Asurs are going to take over earth, which fits the ideology of muslims. 

    Note1: Christians had similar ideology of converting, they are in direct competition with Muslim, on the contrary Christian create Atrocity literature  against the non-Chrsitians and than take approval from the parliament of their own country to invade.
    By Aayina - 8/6/2016 3:04:42 AM



  • The problem with Islam is , Whoever follows it will automatically have a psychological problem of superiority complex. 
    They are brainwashed to believe that ALL OTHER RELIGION AND GODS ARE INFERIOR , WRONG OR CORRUPT.

    This kind of a ideology which is based on preaching abusive, insulting, or degrading words towards other religion will surely not lead to peace but conflicts ULTIMATELY to violence ..... It even preach ARMED JIHAD against others.
    By Venugopal Bhat - 8/5/2016 10:14:52 PM



  • Is there is any thing called moderate & progressive in Islam? Irrational , savage, brutal nothing else it is... By Anand Rai - 8/5/2016 10:10:47 PM



  • Scholarship without empathy can result into distortion of the path that leads to Truth. It is thus that the Maulanas distort. And it is also thus that the critics of Maulanas didtort !  By Manzurul Haque - 8/5/2016 9:09:03 PM



  •   "Islam is undoubtedly a religion of peace and pluralism, love for all and spiritualism".

    This assertion of yours is tucked away in a single line out of  your long tirade against long list of ulemas.

    I agree with the spirit of your article but your presentation inadvertently will re-enforce in the minds of young readers what you apparently want to demolish. Unwittingly, you have become propaganda tool for the very forces who put such arguments to brain-wash impressionable minds.

    Instead of criticizing others, you should have put forth your arguments based on Quran and Sunna as to how Islam is the religion of peace.

    I suggest your readers should listen to Javed Ahmed Ghamidi. That should be some help;
    By mohammad azam - 8/5/2016 2:32:08 PM



  • Neither Hadiths nor the pronouncements of earlier exegetes have authoritative status. The sole criterion that should guide us is whether a message is fully consistent with Quran's universal message, namely peacefulness, nonviolence, righteousness, justice, equality, rationalism,  compassion and "no compulsion".

    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 8/5/2016 12:03:44 PM



  • Moderate and progressive ulema have a duty to denounce all hijackers of Islam who advocate violence, intolerance and medievalism. Silence is tantamount to concurrence.
    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 8/5/2016 11:52:56 AM



  • The moderate Ulemas don't exist in this world, the only condition to be an Ulema is radicalism.  By Abdullah - 8/5/2016 11:19:56 AM