certifired_img

Books and Documents

Ijtihad, Rethinking Islam

172 - COMMENTS

  • Muslim ulema still demand rajam stoning of adulterers though there is no verse in the Quran to that effect. Even if such a verse existed in the Quran it has been abrogated. So for that they have discovered a wahi-e-Khafi allegedly narrated by the prophet pbuh according to which even if the Quran tells Muslims to only flog adulterers, they insist that the hadith which is weak should be given precedence over the statement of the Quran. And ulema of the ISIS did impose stoning, flogging and amputation in their so called khilafat for two years because they do not understand the meaning of urf and maruf in the Quran. However, development the world may make they will insist on adopting the path of the people living in the sixth and seventh century ignoring the teaching of the Quran that Muslims should make advancement according to the time. By arshad - 6/3/2018 6:54:15 AM



  • @Praveen Gutta , Mohammad Ashraf Mr Gutta not secular but say manuvadi laws. unde r income tac you get benefit of hindu undivided family By Iqbal Husain - 10/12/2016 9:38:21 AM



  • @Mohammad Ashraf  Yes, apply Sharia criminal laws for Muslims, rest of us will follow Secular laws for us. :) By Praveen Gutta - 10/12/2016 9:35:41 AM



  • I endorse your suggestion for implementation asap and I assure you that the glaring problems like raping a daughter in front of a helpless father will not recur. By Mohammad Ashraf - 10/12/2016 9:34:17 AM



  • New Age Islam, Pls enlighten us about sharia. What is Sharia? By Mohd Abu Rayhan - 10/12/2016 9:33:26 AM



  • No Muslim in his senses will ever support ISIS. Indian Muslims scholars have already condemned its unIslamic acts. Moreover, Muslims know very well that this outfit has been created by the US in order to defame Islam and distort its teachings. There are many fake videos made by vested interests showing the cruelty of ISIS. But it cannot be denied that they are masters in perpetrating cruelty and Muslims know why. It should also be noted that this outfit has killed more Muslims than others. It gets orders from Tel Aviv. By Serajuddin Khurram - 10/12/2016 9:30:09 AM



  • @Iqbal have you read those books by Dr.B.R Ambedkar or by Periyar or by poula richman or by Doniger......and what to say about these books....in your last comment you have asked about reservation....he have made reservation only for low level casts and minorities.....do you think Muslims are low level cast or is minor now....the answer is "NO".....i intentionally avoided your point.....which point....of debating with zakir naik....hmmm first of all now his telecast are not acceptable and next he is not present in India....and last but not the least he have never accepted any debate challenge form anyone....and I m not wasting my time here....i m giving information about true Islam not that "filtered Islam" which you followers know....you answer me "Do you support ISIS?" Please briefly explain me your answer and be in the topic related to "religion".....XOXOXO By Subhashish Rock - 10/12/2016 9:26:02 AM



  • @Subhashish Rock be specific . tell me about rejoinders / rebuttals written till date for these books "Riddles of Hinduism" by Dr Ambedkar and his book "annihilation of caste" , "True ramayana' by Periyar , "many ramayana's " by poula Richman , "many books of wendy Doniger like "alternativae history hindyuism" , "shiva lingam ---- ..." etc etc. you intionally avoided my points on zakir. why not going and confornting zakir saheb in OPEN FORUM debates instead of wasting your time of facebook By Iqbal Husain - 10/12/2016 9:23:19 AM



  • Yes we can find multiple books out in market but we can also find books like Quran,hadiths out there and people like me are referring from Quran and hadiths.....according to Vedas cast system is not by birth but by profession....same cast system is shown in China's flag....4stars and 1 star shows communism and sati system....Hinduism was included by some evil Brahmins in the 10th century....but Hinduism is much more greater than just a cast system.....and Late Dr.B.R Ambedkar made sure reservation for only Hindus is lol😁😁😂😂.....he was more brilliant than more peoples know him to be.....no such reservations can be granted to Muslims because you all cant say that Muslims are SC and ST or OBC.....if you can then reservations are for you also😉 By Subhashish Rock - 10/12/2016 9:19:13 AM



  • Hmmm for question (2).....yes in market multiple books are there...but book like Quran and hadiths are also there and people like me are not referring from other books but only from Quran and hadiths..... By Subhashish Rock - 10/12/2016 9:18:50 AM



  •  @Iqbal Husain And for your first question my answer is "YES"...yes we should preach our religion....but the thing is when someone's religion is producing back to back something which is not acceptable by humans then how can you think of preaching that religion and people to accept that.....conversation by self will is different and force conversation is different....like I m preaching my religion not Hinduism but "agonistic".....i want people to understand that in past few people made these rules to control humans from crossing their limits.....from hurting nature else there will be no difference left between humans and animals. By Subhashish Rock - 10/12/2016 9:18:26 AM



  • @Krishna Kumar Saboo, let me remove your misunderstandings about Islam. Islam does not allow killing of those who do not follow it. If anyone claiming to be Muslim does so, he violates and disobeys the holy Quran and will be punished in the hereafter also. Says the holy Quran: "No compulsion in matters of faith"(2:256). The holy book also says: "....Whosoever kills an innocent human being, it shall be as if he has killed all mankind, and whosoever saves the life of one, it shall be as if he has saved all of mankind"(5:32). By Serajuddin Khurram - 10/12/2016 9:13:36 AM



  • The issue here  is triple talaq, on which Privy Council had famously put the lid by pronouncing that triple talaq may be bad in theology but is good in law (being strongly customary in India). The fact however is that there is urgent need to reform statutorily,  the talaq  laws for the Muslims in India. One question I had raised which nobody took up to clarify. The issue requires deeper study. By Manzurul haque - 10/8/2016 1:07:15 PM



  • Introspection is required and the religious heads shall take initiative By Gangadharan VG - 10/8/2016 5:57:15 AM



  • To rethink Islamic Theology, one should have wide knowledge in that field. By Basheer Ahmed - 10/8/2016 5:54:35 AM



  • Braves like you only can uplift the society....adorable By SriPabitra Gangopadhyay - 10/8/2016 5:53:03 AM



  • Your thought appreciate for every Muslim youth

    By Rahul Dubey - 10/8/2016 5:43:32 AM



  • Awesome.hats off to your stand for the truth. By Rubina Tabassum - 10/8/2016 5:40:21 AM



  • yes faraz you are absolutely right..Apply the laws of shariat for bad deeds too.why should they apply only for triple talaq.. people agree that it is sinful and invalid ...why do they beat about the bush and push a man for quick exit and an unreasonable bigamy at the cost of others rights..You have rightly pointed out the deficiency.Today our women stand for their rights and the society should stand up to protect them. By Rubina Tabassum - 10/8/2016 5:33:03 AM



  • Faraz Kazmi...I appreciate your guts....the root cause of disharmony among Indians is differential treatment by law based on religion. But we call our self a Secular country. Religion is personal matter it should not be brought in politics, sadly our country has failed in this regard.

    By Amit Lingras - 10/8/2016 5:30:27 AM



  • Why in India Sharia should be practiced where Great Dr Ambedkar only asked to have common civil code....I think those who want sharia law are not willing to accept common law for all no matter what the religion is ....So they all are against Dr Ambedkar thought.....Anybody wants sharia or fantasy law can go and implement elsewhere and stay there out of India.....Neruian thought has messed and confused the vision of Bharat ....where world is moving towards the develop and some evils are wanting to impose Sharia ( own law ) in multi religious country like India.... By Prafull Goriwale - 10/8/2016 5:28:00 AM



  • Hats off to Faraz... Wish everyone had the same ability to be able to differentiate between right and wrong without being blinded by ones religion. Mr Mahmood, i feel pity for you at the same time. You seem to have lived your life under the influence of radicalism and find it hard to come out of it...but sadly for you your days of radicalism seem to be over soon with the new youth brigade of the likes of Farazs taking over.. By Neeraj Gururani - 10/8/2016 5:26:11 AM



  • who is preventing the govt..??
    We Muslims support Criminal part of Sharia for Muslims is the govt and the paid Author have any concrete plan to implement it...??? if sharia for criminal aspect is allowed we will have the same kaafirs crying human rights abuse......!!!!
    By Ahmed Etq - 10/8/2016 5:23:44 AM



  • yes punish the adultrous muslims according to sharia laws then...why do the male patriachial men ise triple talaq a quick exist and pave a way fr a quick shaadi under cover.have they ever thought of the woman who is rendered helpless and without a home.show these people what law of the land is.woman are no longer uneducated.They can understan quran and interpret it better . By Rubina Tabassum - 10/8/2016 5:19:55 AM



  • Faraz Kazmi bhai u'r words are only assuring that Indian muslims are non radical while upholding the real values and morals of a peaceful islam....but the thing is even 1 bad fish can pollute the whole pond... By Saswat Biswal - 10/8/2016 5:16:09 AM



  • @ Faraz Kazmi: You are a shameless person. No customary laws can be enforced by the state judiciary unless they are enacted by the sovereign parliament. Why should the Indian Supreme Court enforce the penal rules of the Shariat when they have not been enacted by Parliament? Try to understand the difference between Canon law and the positive law. Now join the LL.B. class to learn something of law. By Mohammed Mahmood - 10/8/2016 5:13:52 AM



  • When it is matter of punishment specially physically then in an united state country none can be given freedom except it's original law and order according to one constitutional code and conduct! By Navadya Bharat - 10/8/2016 5:11:24 AM



  • @ Faraz Kazmi: First ask Mahashay Mukhtiyar Abbas to get the penal law of Islam enacted by Parliament then only you are entitled to demand that Muslims should be flogged or stoned to death. For the time-being only that part has been enacted which deals with the personal and family matters of Muslims, as other religious communities are allowed to be governed by their own personal laws. What is medieval about it? If you say Holy Quran is a medieval book then 1000 damns for you. By Mohammed Mahmood - 10/8/2016 5:09:49 AM



  • Comal Mahadevan Amrtheswaran Please define Sharia Laws. Also to the author Please quote verses from the Quran relating to "'Except for drinking alcohol, punishments for all other hudud crimes (mentioned in the Quran, considered crimes against God) are to be amputation, flogging and beheading. By Nasreen Ebrahim - 10/8/2016 5:07:23 AM



  • Don't be selective , if you wani khalifa vacars India settle in those country. As long as you live in India you are covered under IPC and constitution. Our earlier rule by congress govt. has created special privileges on religious ground because Indiraji is not Indira Gandhi but Indira Khan.Time has come for common civil code and law . By Krishnan Duraisamy - 10/8/2016 5:05:43 AM



  • While all laws should be man made, they should follow the Quranic requirement that laws have to be fair, just, rational and egalitarian. By Ghulam Faruki - 10/8/2016 5:03:37 AM



  • Ur views are good.with changing time,we should also change but for good.
    Wat is hurting islam and hinduism is xtremism of its own people
    By Shiv Rathore - 10/8/2016 5:00:47 AM



  • @Faraz Bro it's not sharia law basically government has given right to profess n propagate their religion in article 25 of the Constitution 
    And also give rights to make religious personal law board in civil matters like distribution of property,marriage,divorce n etc.
    Other punishment can not be implement according to islam because we have uniform criminal law in india
    And to implement sharia law internal and external security must in the hand of muslim within that state n they must hve khalifa/leader
    And triple talak is totally wrong thing.
    Which is not permitted in islam.
    It has some condition.
    If u r muslim then And hve some knowledge about islam 
    Before speaking these rubbish ...
    #faraz
    By Zulquarnain Azam - 10/7/2016 9:29:44 AM



  • @Faraz Kazmi Hats off brother. You are cent percent correct. By Krishnan Duraisamy - 10/7/2016 9:27:55 AM



  • Ya faraz well said I totally admire your content :) By Shashank Shekhar Tiwari - 10/7/2016 9:27:08 AM



  • Mr Subrata Roy Ji thanks for ur kind words. Yes,I will try my level best to do what u said but before doing so, I will try to read abt his work and contribution made to the country.... By Faraz Kazmi - 10/7/2016 9:25:53 AM



  • Mr Faraz you sound very balanced in your comments. Today many Indians have not heard about the great bangla poet lyricist and composer and a reformer second to none. He and his works are so relevant in todays world. Can you make people aware of the great Quazi Nazrul Islam? His contribution towards Indias freedom struggle is immense. By Subrata Roy - 10/7/2016 9:19:58 AM



  •  And y to worry on the matter of triple talaq, if our intention is not to take divorce...I will never worry on it because I don't have any intention of speaking it thrice and getting remarried.... Baki app log apna soche muje Na triple talaq SE dar hai Na single SE kynki mera koi aisa irada ni hai jinka irada hai aisa k wo teen baat bol k dubara krna chahte hai unko dar hoga muje ni By Faraz Kazmi - 10/7/2016 9:17:24 AM



  • @Ziauddin Avais If it's not Muslim country then y r u implementing Sharia law only in one matter...u suggest y it's so...Dr firoz Ali..... By Faraz Kazmi - 10/7/2016 9:08:28 AM



  • They say the God spelt the Sharia, and hence it should be adhered to. But, they reject the criminal codes and reject it in its entirety. Is it not tantamount to blasphemy? Or else, one has to conclude they have no belief in their own statement. By Comal Mahadevan Amrtheswaran - 10/7/2016 9:05:49 AM



  • @Faraz Kazmi  it is not islamic country By Ziauddin Avais - 10/7/2016 9:01:54 AM



  • So Mr. Faraz Kazmi. plz suggest what should we follow? By Dr-Firoz Ali - 10/7/2016 8:56:22 AM



  • SULTAN SHAHIN, HOW MUCH UR GETTING FOR UR LECTURES FROM ANTI ISLAMIC FORCES? KEEP UR NRW AGE ISLAM FOR UR SELF. WE DO NOT WANT UR ISLAM , WE WANT ISLAM AND ISLAM ONLY By Mohammad Sulaiman - 10/7/2016 8:51:59 AM



  • *to derange.. By Manzurul Haque - 10/6/2016 12:55:05 PM



  • The worst thing that absence of a decent religion does to men is to deranged them mentally.  Pray for them, don't communicate with them. By Manzurul Haque - 10/6/2016 12:52:12 PM



  • Hmmm #Iqbal you got another question...you mentioned something abut debate....yes they are conducted all those places u have mentioned but your zakir naik wouldn't accept challenges na....have you seen any debate of zakir naik...no as I know he was challenged by more than 20 experienced debaters throughout the world but he didn't even replied them....do you know why because he knows it very well that he is strong infront of those people who dont know anything what he is speaking but listen to him because he is speaking related to them.... By Subhashish Rock - 10/6/2016 10:00:00 AM



  • Subhashish Rock , Arbaaz Saiyad debates are not conducted on fb. debates held on TV or in seminars and in OPEN forums. we believe in ONE GOD almighty the GOD of all humans and not in any moulana or fakir. nevertheless make an appointment with zakir and present your faith there. you have not answered previous question (1) do you agree that all anti conversion laws enacted by various states govt must be removed . let every community and leader including you my dear should be allowed to preach their religion and convert other people to their faith. AGREED or NOT. (2) in markets you will find hundred of rejoinders written for the books criticizing islam . but at the same time til date no one cound rebut or contradict Dr Ambedkar's riddles of hinduism. periyar's many ramayana's , By Iqbal Husain - 10/6/2016 9:53:57 AM



  • The above clip explains oops sry Muhammed explains the power of camel urine😂😂😂😂.....yes its "muut ke baadboo"....check this....Indus valley farmer.....anyways thanks for responding....but give relevant answer else you guys cant compete me😉 By Subhashish Rock - 10/6/2016 9:45:57 AM



  • Hmmm u mentioned that which is true religion "goo ke badboo me hai ya Gulab ke Khushboo"....this makes me to ask few questions....right....1st) There were no "Gulab ke Khushboo" when Islam came or started as because Arabian peninsula doesn't have any fertile soil to grow "Gulaab ke Khushboo".If it had please explain me briefly?.........2nd) you mentioned about " gooo ke baad boo" hmmm I think that you know it well...anyways I have clip for that also....I will post in the following comment.....
    Fun Islamic Facts 4: Drinking Camel Urine (David Wood)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvdXTNjHKaw
    By Subhashish Rock - 10/6/2016 9:44:13 AM



  • I got a farmer from Indus valley....#Nishachr....u are feeling petti for me....really thanks alot for that...but guess what I feel more petti when someone like you try to defend Islam without knowing anything about Islam......itz a supreme power and it requires supreme mind....no no its a thing which contains multiple multiple multiple errors and when someone tries to explain it to a believer(Muslims) like you....you guys totally change it;what it was written and what u r explaining but yes I can believe that not everyones thinking is same so I wouldn't listen to u.....i will listen to the pattern of conduct(Muhammed) last Prophet of Islam😉 By Subhashish Rock - 10/6/2016 9:42:36 AM



  • Check that clip....ur zakir have a great logic to defend....but ur Muhammed clears it well....so now u have to decide whom you want to believe logical zakir naik or commander Muhammed...#arbaaz only and only for you....Muhammed have destroyed all your logics..... By Subhashish Rock - 10/6/2016 9:40:29 AM



  • Cool #Arbaaz you want to say that Islam and Quran need logic....lol great😂😂😂😂 for you my frnd I have a clip....wait m tagging....😝
    Quran and Science: Does the Sun Set in a Muddy Water? Zakir Naik Refuted by David Wood
    youtube.com/watch?v=Wmp_4VGo6ZQ
    By Subhashish Rock - 10/6/2016 9:39:14 AM



  • Cool #Arbaaz you want to say that Islam and Quran need logic....lol great😂😂😂😂 for you my frnd I have a clip....wait m tagging....😝
    Quran and Science: Does the Sun Set in a Muddy Water? Zakir Naik Refuted by David Wood
    youtube.com/watch?v=Wmp_4VGo6ZQ
    By Subhashish Rock - 10/6/2016 9:39:12 AM



  • hahahahahahaha.....the supreme power can never be understandable by mind, no mind, no book can explain the power of Supreme-power. banane wale ne itni kuwwat nhi di hamare dimago ko k hum usse samjh sake, IT ONLY CAN BE FEEL AND NOTHING, or jo log iss bhram (khayal) me h k koi book uss supreme power ko explain kar sakti h toh unke upar daya karni chahiye, unse bahas karke koi fayada nhi...anyway me kisi religion k burai-achchhai nhi kar raha....but mann me sawal aata h k supreme power kaha h kon h, kya wo gooo ki badboo me h ya fir gulaab ki khusbooo me....hahahahahahaha...banane wale ne sab kuchh banaya........or kuchh log faraq karna sikhate h, me kafir hu tu musalmaa h......hahahahahahaha......my experience is- a protocol/code of conducts can never b a spiritual-religion. By Nishachar Frm Indus Valley - 10/6/2016 9:37:44 AM



  • My brother Subhashish rock ...u dont know the meaning of verses of Qoran...if u understand,then u become muslim...Qoran is very logical holybook...only people with mind can understand...nd if u want u know everything about islam nd u can prove this,then pls ,i recomend u to go to Dr.Zakir naik nd debate with him...hope u wil get ur answers :-) :-) By Arbaaz Saiyad - 10/6/2016 9:36:38 AM



  • Coming to me....m not lying.....Muhammed himself commanded in Quran 4:36 that when Allah and he have decreed a matter,no believe shld have any objection against their decision and if have objection then u r not a follower..... By Subhashish Rock - 10/6/2016 9:34:51 AM



  • Next question is ....is the earth is flattened or flat in shape according to Allah and Quran?...hmmm please read the context of Quran 88:10-20.....you will know everything.....you mentioned correct Quran 88:20 (And the earth-how it has been spread.)....surah 88 explains how everything was created by Allah and how it was done....read all verses u will know how sky was erected how mountain were raised...
    ..m.youtube.com/watch?v=UPLqVL4GHVU

    By Subhashish Rock - 10/6/2016 9:29:01 AM



  • Next question Is Islam wrong or write?.....again simple answer "YES!" it is....and I have multiple multiple reasons and proofs to prove it wrong....the problem with Muslims like you is....you know only filtered Quran that you might have read in Arabic or taught by mauvies...you guys have never bothered about Islam is always accused let me find it out.... By Subhashish Rock - 10/6/2016 9:25:00 AM



  • Hmmm at first you asked abut if I had read about Hinduism??...frankly speaking I have just started to research in religious topic ....not only read Hinduism but also Christianity and Islam....yes I accept that I didn't completed from A-z but yes I m in "P-Q".... By Subhashish Rock - 10/6/2016 9:22:52 AM



  • Jo baat Kar rahe ho 88:20 ki usme hai 
    'And the earth-how it has been spread?'
    -Al Quran 

    To tum Subhashish Rock apne aap ko jhootha mat mano Kyu k jhoothey tumhare Bhadwe hai Jo tumhe kuch bhi jhoot rata Dete hai or tum hamare samne wo hi boltey ho par galti aapki nahi hai Kyu k aap zaahil ho 
    Or zaahil ko Bewakoof aasani se banaya ja sakta hai...
    By Junaid I. Rana - 10/6/2016 9:17:48 AM



  • @Subhashish Rock jao pehle apne dharm ko padho fir mere dharm k baare me bolna..
    Musalmano ko Islam sikhaney ki jarurat nahi agar ye Islam galat hota to Duniya me har jagah na felta or to or tum apne aap ko Dekho tum kitney sachchey ho..
    By Junaid I. Rana - 10/6/2016 9:08:46 AM



  • Check them please and then ur faith in zakir will gradually decrease By Subhashish Rock - 10/6/2016 9:03:34 AM



  • Lol yes truth he conducts open challenges......okay please check this clip By Subhashish Rock - 10/6/2016 9:01:48 AM



  • What if indecency is the 'dharma'. What makes you think that everybody should follow decency.  Are you new to this forum? By Manzurul Haque - 10/6/2016 6:36:58 AM



  • @Sanjay Sharda Prasad Upadhyay your indecent language shows that you are logically cornered. By Iqbal Husain - 10/5/2016 9:17:27 PM



  • @Subhashish Rock why should any any one any body. zakir saheb conducts his debate in OPEN forum where each and every one is welcome. Even worst critics of islam participate in these events . one more point . if your are so much confident then why not remove all anti conversion laws enacted by various states . let there be open competition . every one should preach his religion. Indians are intelligent enough to choose the best option . By Iqbal Husain - 10/5/2016 9:16:41 PM



  •  Or call your ZAKIR NAIK.....i will be very happy to defeat him in his strong subject only By Subhashish Rock - 10/5/2016 9:16:18 PM



  • Anyways...Muslims doesn't know who was Muhammed.....how stupid he was......what is real Islam......they just know "filtered Islam"....i openly challenge each and every Muslim...if anyone of you have guts to debate me....pls come....we will have a nice chat....just prove me that Islam is great,Muhammed was a good guy.....islam is peaceful.... By Subhashish Rock - 10/5/2016 9:15:58 PM



  • For you junaid.....i just want to ask....what is the shape of earth according to islam😂😂😂😂😂😂😂??....and if you dont know then for you quran88:20....go check...lol😂 By Subhashish Rock - 10/5/2016 9:09:15 PM



  • Kuch bhi kehle jitna kudna hai kuddlo Ghar Ghar Islam pahochega ..
    Or ye baat humein na kaho k tum Pehle Hindu they humein pata hai hum pehle Gumrah(galat Marg par they) ...
    By Junaid I. Rana - 10/5/2016 8:55:51 PM



  • Manuvadies are also responsible perhaps for the birth of mayawati ki beti this passi troll ... By Sanjay Sharda Prasad Upadhyay - 10/5/2016 8:54:09 PM



  • @Dipanjal Kakoti , Noor Saba , Junaid I. Rana , Samadhan Patil Muslims are really really very innocent people they can easily be misled. APJ Abdul kalam was strong RSS man a TRUE MANUVADI. during gujarat riots 2002 and orissa anti chriatian riots he remained mum . indirectly helping the rioters. sister study Dr ambedkar , pariyar in order to grasp reality of manuvadies . as regards ancestry it is most stupid concept. a seeker of truth never bothers about forefathers but searches for truth even if it goes against beliefs of his parents By Dolly Passey - 10/5/2016 8:53:29 PM



  • @Noor Saba APJ is thorough in Geeta also and followed...otherwise from Quran, he can only become a JIHADI..Nothing else.

    By Dipanjal Kakoti - 10/5/2016 8:46:07 PM



  • @ Rana...you should not forget that your forefathers were Hindu once at a time...I think you belongs to Rana Pratap ancestors

    By Samadhan Patil - 10/5/2016 8:40:28 PM



  • @Prashant Singh U r r8...😡😡 By Junaid I. Rana - 10/5/2016 12:14:07 PM



  • @Prashant Singh I agree with you - Shahruk Salman can be forgiven as they were doing Taqqiya By Mahesh Shende - 10/5/2016 12:13:23 PM



  • Please change your name according to your faith. People get confused.
    By Tarique Khan - 10/5/2016 12:12:16 PM



  • Noor saba...this is not a propaganda against muslims...But an exposure of your dualistic islam. By Naree Masand - 10/5/2016 12:09:36 PM



  • Logics cant be explained to illogicals and liars, Apj Kalam sir was a devout muslim who prayed namaz 5 times a day, and never supported racism, coz he was a muslim , people who object to other faiths should learn from this great soul, and this post should be renamed as " anti muslim propaganda !! By Noor Saba - 10/5/2016 12:02:50 PM



  • hahaha...ist indian bno bhai..muslim bdme By Sameer Sinha - 10/5/2016 12:01:54 PM



  • counter logically..and tell me what is the punishment for idol worship,alcoholism according to quran and sharia law? By Prashant Singh - 10/5/2016 9:11:19 AM



  • shahrukh,salman,amir,saif, and every muslim actor or cricketer or public figure would long have been stoned to death because they either drink alcohol,worship other gods or idols,visit temples and say that other religions too can lead to heaven which is absolute blasphemy in islam..the point is that the only good muslims are those that dont follow quran..apj kalam read gita daily,visited temples and worshiped goddess sarasvati..does that sound muslim? By Prashant Singh - 10/5/2016 9:09:47 AM



  • @Farogh Mahmood .......in paksitan and bangladesh Hindu and Christine population has gone down to 1% from 22% at the time of independence .....if the same has happened in india ....in India muslims are now 20 crores ..... By Abhishek Agrawal - 10/4/2016 12:22:59 PM



  • @Abhishek Agrawal  Why are muslims and dalits and christians are being killed in the name of an animal(cow), love jihad, ghar vapsi, conversion etc. By Farogh Mahmood - 10/4/2016 12:20:10 PM



  • @Abhishek Agrawal All non Muslims killed? Sure? By Syed Kaleem Mohiyuddin - 10/4/2016 12:18:21 PM



  • @Abhishek Agrawal When idiot like u talk with out knowing the real message of islam only the language of hatred comes. From ur mind don't b fool to follow the media all non believers r against islam but islam is gaining day by day as ALLAH say I have chosen u islam as the religion I will protect the Quran till the last day of this world islam will enter every house & corner of this world By Nisar Ahmed - 10/4/2016 12:17:13 PM



  • @ Babu George .......dont u think the same should be given back to muslims all over the world ...... By Abhishek Agrawal - 10/4/2016 12:04:35 PM



  • @Abhishek Agrawal Because muslims are not tolerant. They believe others are kafirs ie non believers and hence should be killed. By Babu George - 10/4/2016 12:02:02 PM



  • I want to know only one thing why in Paksitan and in bangladeah all Hindus and Christines have been kiiled on the name of Islam  By Abhishek Agrawal - 10/4/2016 11:40:39 AM



  • when people will have time to determine the gaps between a hadeeth narration actuall time and Qur'an verse revelation actuall time ...then there will be no existing doubts By Hanif Uz Jaman - 10/3/2016 9:01:52 PM



  • Hindi Idol: The implementation Shariah Laws as a whole in all spheres of life will positively affect the Muslims as it will become a deterrent to their criminal cravings, but Alas! the Hindus will become the dwellers of the Hell. By Raihan Nezami - 9/30/2016 12:11:55 AM



  • I think only a Muslim should talk about it, who fears Allah and love Muhammad(SAW) and read and follows noble Quran.
    for others it just time to abuse Islam and its followers.
    in Islamic countries they are practicing shariah only, India is a secular country not an Islamic country.
    Secular means in the matters of governance no religion is allowed. People who does not understand and follow it are confusing us with wonderful English.
    By Mastan Shaik - 9/29/2016 9:16:11 PM



  • Most of the religious codes are drafted bu exponents based on exposure to time frame and the extent of foresight at the relevant time. Technological innovations, like our mobile sets, leave yesterday, far behind us. The essence of art of living is to accept today. All todays have seed of yesterday and yester- years By Parthasarathi Ramaswami - 9/29/2016 9:15:02 PM



  • Hindus would be more than happy to implement Sharia ONLY for muslims. It would end the lawlessness and riots from muslim criminals.  All punishments for muslim criminals must be as per sharia by our criminal courts.  You speak against our idolatory and we will punish you as per sharia blasphemy laws. Good.  Be ready.   By Hindi idol - 9/29/2016 7:48:41 PM



  • Reading all of above comments especially by Muslims , am Amazed at the intellectual deprivation of this community, and their willingness to follow the dictates framed thousands of years ago when humanity was largely barbaric. The  mentality of this community remains barbaric , and that's why compared as a ℅ of population Muslims achieving anything other than violence is miniscule. It's almost like they exist to kill or die  By Raghu - 9/29/2016 11:37:17 AM



  • while some parts of the argument on a religious issue (raised by this journal) may be sound and rational, the conclusions drawn on basis of such rationale by these non- scholars are not always correct. It is only our ulema (be them of any sect) who are the eligible and legal authority on deciding religious matters. It is important that our youth be not carried away by rhetoric of reformers, whether these reformers are of new age or old age.These people want to give the Indian judiciary the right to interpret Quran with regard to Muslim Personal  Law. This is a dangerous trend started by Indian ultra-seclarists

    Their argument rests on the premise that since we are not following the Islamic criminal laws in this country, why should we still  stick to the  150 year old Muslim pesonal Law Act and not allow Indian judiciary to reframe it . They forget that there are certain pre-requisites for penal laws of Shariat'(like cutting of hands for theft) fto be fully implementated in a Muslim milority country which are absent in our county( like collective Zakat by State is a pre- requisite). But for personal law,it can be observed on individual basis in a society. Just because penal laws(complete shariat) is not enforced ,does not give us an excuse for scrapping of the personal of Sharia (MPL) or make sharia less sacrosanct This is devious thinking and wrong conclusion and  will lead to fitna in our country.

    By Shaik Hafeezullah - 9/29/2016 8:14:43 AM



  • As they say change is a constant. People have to change adapt to the change in time and space otherwise they will simply perish. Evolution is about that.

    By Subrata Roy - 9/27/2016 1:26:42 PM



  • The elementary but unsurmountable problem is how to impress on the vast population of mullahs and maulvis the importance of an open and dispassionate mind that is willing to imbibe spiritual knowledge from other sources also.

    By Venkataraman Srinivasan - 9/27/2016 1:24:33 PM



  • @Nisar Ahmed That is why thousands of true follower r dying daily and living their life like hell.....Kafiro ki roti pe jeene wale mujhe mat Sikha true religion kya hota hai ....

    By Vikram Singh - 9/27/2016 1:17:13 PM



  • @Vikram Singh If you don't no any thing about islam & it's rule then don't interfere I our religion who r u to ask to change the law of Quran it's the creater who has given the guide lines & it cannot b changed or alternet because he has taken the responsibility of protecting the holy Quran not like ur srecptures all r changed & corrupted see into ur religion not others it's my duty to call u to the true religion that's islam accept it u will b in the right path

    By Nisar Ahmed - 9/27/2016 1:12:37 PM



  • Thanx for bringing one of the controversial talk(because it is related to islam) ...this is what we want .if Muslims want sharia law for them ,let them also accept these thing ,until or unless if they don't agree with these things they should be banned from using these inhumane triple talaq and burqa .....

    By Vikram Singh - 9/27/2016 1:11:13 PM



  • The whole debate is lengthening only becoz of theological illiteracy . 
    Non of us had ever read Quran or Gita or any such as a whole. Understanding part is far away....
    Becoz ...once we read and digest any one or all such books , we will become silent/mute, for knowledge brings enlightenment . 
    Persons with true knowledge doesn't argue.
    By Durgesh Nandan Mohanty - 9/27/2016 1:04:32 PM



  • @Janu Naqvi Bohot sahi farmaya hai aap ne, new age Islam ke naam se is page k admin ne muslimo aur unke mazhab ko nishaana banane ka ek platform taiyar kiya hai, aur hamare mazhab k bare me woh log rai zyada de rahe hain jinka is mazhab se koi lena dena nhi hai !! By Noor Saba - 9/27/2016 11:20:10 AM



  • Islam ek dhram hai dharam ke kuch kanoon hote hne woh hi shariya kehlata hai . par hindu ko dhram nahi hai yeh supreme court of india bhi keh chuka hai ke hindu ek jivan paddti hai phir hindu dharam par yeh kese lago hoga sirf musalman par hi lagu karna chahate ho to phir musal mano ka khalifa bhi bana pare ga yeh sab bekar ki baatne hai tum aap na dil khush karte raho .50 lakh hindu middle east mai rehrahe hne janha islamic law lagu hai kesi hindu ko koi shikayat nahi hai wnha ki hukumat say koi danga nahi koi farzi gurakshak nahi koi bhirasta char nahi koi balatkar nahi dekh lo islamic kanoon ki bangi ko bhur hatya nahi kanhi sharab nahi kanhi suar jaisa ganda janwar nahi By Janu Naqvi - 9/27/2016 11:08:44 AM



  • Aayina: Have you responded to my comment addressed to Mr. Ghosh regarding his opinion about Shariah Laws and common civil code? You have addressed to me another point in your comment.

    I have reminded him that even BJP leaders favor ultimate and instant punishments of Shariah laws in some cases as he has blatantly criticized the laws.

    I have opined, Shariah laws are not without usefulness. In some cases, astringent and ultimate punishment given to the criminals instantly, serves as a deterrent to severe crimes.

    My opinion is regarding the defunct and redundant Indian penal codes where one lawyer charges the criminal with an IPC, and the other finds a loophole in the IPC to save the criminals-rapists- killers etc.

    By Raihan Nezami - 9/26/2016 11:39:57 PM



  • To Raihan Nezami,
    Just blaming BJP is not going to work, every political power structure through out history had remain business friendly and all other subject made to live hard life.
    Also war business in the past also, when Kings had not enough money left out for their kingdom they invade other country, the only difference in the past and now is humans were also consider product to sell and buy.
    In the past people use to lose the property, their belongings and thier own life in war, in recent era we lose through bank.
    I see bank as blessing the mighty thief are always going to steel from the public only difference in this era humans are not losing life as war business.
    I know you will argue that war is still as business, but my opinion is that the means of earning more money in past was either war or loot the people travelling, this has stopped as bank is looting.
    By Aayina - 9/26/2016 8:57:23 PM



  • Sanjay Gosh Ji: Your BJP leaders even demand Shariah Laws to be implemented in India to punish the rapists. You are right, no need of Common civil code, rather  you should make Shariah laws the common civil code. Your judicial system is already politically-affected, out-dated and billionaires-friendly.

    By Raihan Nezami - 9/26/2016 1:52:52 PM



  • When Islamic Sharia (The Quran & Sunnah )is medieval for you then just leave Islam. Islam doesn't need deviants.
    for us the teachings of the Quran and Sunnah are above all. People like you and Jawed Akhtar jaisey bhandd to kabhi bhi khudko Muslims k representative banne ki sochey bhii matt .
    By Shahid Sayyidain - 9/26/2016 9:34:43 AM



  • Very relevant question... By Vani Vinayak - 9/26/2016 9:25:28 AM



  • Indian Islamists are they prepared to accept Ulema demand Med.punishment ???? In the caseof Kerala many muslims willbe introuble as they are majority doing all illegal activities. By Sivasankaran P Nair - 9/26/2016 9:01:22 AM



  • Undoubtedly Shariah is Divine Jusy and Universal. The Ulemas should strongly demand IT's application on India's Muslims all aspects Cvil and Criminal. Good Idea brought on by this post. By Mohammed Shafi - 9/26/2016 8:57:51 AM



  • Answer is simple this civil law is envitable for all muslim like marriage. .inheritance. .etc.but regarding the criminal thngs like adultery. .drinking. .killing it is not a matter of pious muslim By Haris Koodakkal - 9/26/2016 8:53:00 AM



  • No need to implement common civil code; just implement sharia criminal law for Muslims. By Sanjay Ghosh - 9/26/2016 8:49:37 AM



  • It is compulsory for all Goans to register marriage before civil registrar before their religious marriage,only in case of catholic Church marriage is performed first then Church itself send papers to civil registrar.In cases of divorce all has to get marriage nullified by civil court Catholics has to take extra step for nullification of marriage by religious authority also.There are provision man can get married second time provided his wife is suffering from incurable sickness she is infertile can't bear children provided wife permit second marriage this is applicable to all.Goa is having 65 percent Hindus 30 percent Catholics 5 percent Muslim and we have no complaints,our children are well protected with this provision. By Mp Naik - 9/26/2016 8:44:47 AM



  • The right word for a Muslim is 'enlightened one' like Buddha. Wonder if in Brahminic traditions there is place for enlightenment!? By Manzurul Haque - 9/26/2016 5:04:32 AM



  • Mohanty I will be happy to answer you . Ring me @ +917008404897 
    Or WhatsApp me @ +919853350056 
    For New Age Islam and Kabir
    I am basically governed by Natural Laws
    By Durgesh Nandan - 9/25/2016 9:11:18 PM



  • So many converts and offsprings of converts teaching Islam see see😂😂😂 in comments. By Krishnanand Tiwari - 9/25/2016 9:09:57 PM



  • Anyone knows about science and still believe quran and Islam is directly transported to mankind from god, they must stop using internet and facebook. By Krishnanand Tiwari - 9/25/2016 9:06:48 PM



  • @Mohammad Nazir Fida You wear a tie it's haram in Islam sir. By Krishnanand Tiwari - 9/25/2016 9:05:38 PM



  • @Mohammad Nazir Fida Everyone does everything for belly ...don't you By Hanumanth Vaddalli - 9/25/2016 9:03:22 PM



  • one who criticizes shariah has no right to speak on behalf of shariah or suggest to follow it or not.They are worst enemies of Islam.Comming to Javed Akhter he is a beggar rather a Maskhara of Filims who writes not for Urdu literature but for his own belly. By Mohammad Nazir Fida - 9/25/2016 8:53:27 PM



  • Islam is a religion which believes in one Allmighty.its not a democracy,that rules will keep changing,neither it is a man made religion with 33million gods. it has only one allmighty n one Quran. respect Islam and Muslims. You are not the Allmighty nor the Prophet PBH to propose laws for Islam By Kabir Zeeshan - 9/25/2016 8:50:57 PM



  •  I agree with what he is saying, if Muslims wants Sharia law in the matter of divorce (talaq ) then they should ask the supreme court that whenever a Muslim commits a crime punish him according to the Sharia law...y only in the matter of divorce to implement Sharia law,implement it in other things too like if a Muslim is cought doing adultery the law systems should punish him according to Sharia by throwing stones until he die or lashes if he is a thief cut his hands etc etc By Faraz Kazmi - 9/25/2016 8:49:51 PM



  • Muslims want to define Islam through eyes and mouth of fundamentalists. Even so called moderate one has one view in private and other in public. And they call it enlightened. One school says killing of Kafirs is permissible and other says Holy Quran says treat oersons from other religions well. Is it human to kill anyone who does not follow your religion ? By Krishna Kumar Saboo - 9/25/2016 11:50:10 AM



  • hahahahahha guys this post for serious talk not for jokes and ravi islam teach peace i agree but you know what i am not in mood to learn peace then u know what will happen with me they scare me that they(Some true follower of Islam) cut my throat and they did so many times to millions of people to teach religion of peace :P :P so guys lets play joke joke who is next to comment joke here By Manjurul Bush - 9/25/2016 11:48:38 AM



  • Sorry for the People, 
    Whatever they read, they keep following . 
    But you are a student and you must have to get good marks in you coming exam-then a good job -money - so you work hard ,manage your things well or organize things well and often take good ; faithful references -you reconcile things. 

    But most of us are great liar .... we say day of justice - but not well prepared.
    Just we have read or heard from others and keep following. Liar ! Obviously. 
    We don't give us a chanch for reformation. ( a big problem)
    By Hanif Uz Jaman - 9/25/2016 11:12:36 AM



  • Ask these bloody tarek tufails and Shahins ... Can they use their modern English education and teach the muslim brothers thru thier columns like how I am saying . Instead of critiquing the ulemas , I suggest these educated muslims take up the responsibility of disseminating the correct knowledge and guide the muslims to maximum extent possible. Can any other friends here agree with me . By Ravi Kumar - 9/25/2016 11:05:40 AM



  • Wao...you are demonstrating my innermost thinking. ... 
    Don't marry untill you first wife's death. ...
    Marry at age 25 -first sunnah (men / women)
    Be a servant of your wife (sunnah)
    By Hanif Uz Jaman - 9/25/2016 10:58:38 AM



  • As Hazrat Ali said ... When I want Allah to speak to me , I read the Quran . When I want to talk to Allah , I say my Namaz . Subham Allah! By Ravi Kumar - 9/25/2016 10:53:43 AM



  • In Qur'an there is a beautiful saying or teaching bro -Follow Allah and Allah's messenger. By Hanif Uz Jaman - 9/25/2016 10:51:46 AM



  • Hanif Uz Jaman don't give too much importance to that . Know the Quran . Follow your 5 pillars . Give zakat without cheating . Say your salah 5 time . And the 6th pillar is .....be a good human being and don't lie . Forget about your beard , pyjama , etc etc . By Ravi Kumar - 9/25/2016 10:49:33 AM



  • Wao ! Insallah....(for hadith reconciliation still in lack in the light of Qur'an and people are giving birth new new baby hadith -its unfortunate) By Hanif Uz Jaman - 9/25/2016 10:45:43 AM



  •  And if every muslim reads like this then you will not need the MPLB and these tarek tufail shahin will go out of businesses . Each one will be an ulema in his own home and you will not need to go to these stupid regressive MPLB members . Seek knowledge on your own . By Ravi Kumar - 9/25/2016 10:43:04 AM



  • Hanif Uz Jaman wasak. I am a student of Islam and islamic history . Bro pls all of you read only 1 Surah everyday . In 114 days you will finish the whole quran . Or take 3 days to finish 1 Surah with meaning . In 365 days you will finish . Then Ramadan will come . Just recite 30 paras in 30 days . You will win in sha allah By Ravi Kumar - 9/25/2016 10:14:49 AM



  • the author of the post needs some education on islam..please contact a scholar or i too can give u some idea about islamic justice to u .....do some research buddy before making such sweeping statements...u look ugly by doing this By Ahmad Sheikh - 9/25/2016 10:09:46 AM



  • @Ravi Wao....ASSALAMU-ALAIKUM bro By Hanif Uz Jaman - 9/25/2016 10:05:55 AM



  • So if any anti islam guy cherry picks a verse from here and there , then muslims should be able to immediately hit back giving the background of the verse and complete the entire sentences giving correct meaning . By Ravi Kumar - 9/25/2016 10:04:46 AM



  • Hanif bro please read your quran with meaning and Tafseer. You will understand the logic and reason behind each Surah and verse. It is an absolutely beautiful book .. Each chapter is so different in prose and poetry. When you read it feel the rhythm . For eg Surah mulk has its own rhyme , so does Surah Rahman. Surah muzzammil and muddassir has a different rhyming pattern . Lovely . And try to read the Quran in its chronological order . Start with Surah Alaq , then Qalam ... Pls note that Surah Baqarah which is the 2nd chapter in the book was actually the 87 th Surah to be revealed in medina is after 620 ad . I am sure all muslims if they read in this manner will be able to answer the bigots. By Ravi Kumar - 9/25/2016 10:02:57 AM



  • @Ravi Yes, so most of our people are blind believer. ...have not time to understand Qur'an and only put intention reading hadith but reads blindly. By Hanif Uz Jaman - 9/25/2016 10:01:51 AM



  • @Hanif Uz Jaman you have not answered my question . So you mean reconciliation is the only task left between the strong and the weak hadeeths ? By Ravi Kumar - 9/25/2016 10:01:15 AM



  • Sahi Bukhari , sahi Muslim , tirmidhy all are in save place dude. ....only left task is resemblance By Hanif Uz Jaman - 9/25/2016 10:00:24 AM



  • Do you know that out of 2800 odd hadeeth, with duplications making it up to 8000 plus , how come 2200 odd hadeeth is attributed to Aisha only ? What about the prophets other companions and wives ? By Ravi Kumar - 9/25/2016 9:58:07 AM



  • Implementation of total Sharia is possible when Islamic government is ruling the country...basic thing is when constitution is formed then for every religion personal law was formed and decided. Earlier there were no problem to any body,,,but soon as the colorization of Hindutva started and people has created lot of confusion and brought the matter to screen a weak system and not serving justice. Personal law in the constitution taking care mainly for marriage and property distribution......as far as triple Talaq is concerned is not a big issue and can easily solved with the mutual discussion of Ulema of all masaalik ,.....in fact media has publicized too much and presented it as a very big fault and sin,  on other hand they are not looking in to the matter of group rap, torching the girls, throwing acid on girls, corruption in ministry and administration, black money----openly  income tax people leaving big company s and business group to charge the real income  tax and un necessarily issuing the letter to retired persons of the age of 65 to 75 year old to show in office records that they are doing some work to get official money and making fool to public---alas I remember the old incident of shah Bano case when people approached the erstwhile pm of India Mr. Rajiv Gandhi and elaborately explained the method of Talaq in Islam ,then after hearing he told that it should be incorporated in Indian constitution, it is a very balance rule and serve other aspects of life........unfortunately the worldly systems implement the rules regulation where guarantee of poor and weak sector of woman is not taking care off. 

    By Mohammad Naseem - 9/25/2016 9:36:51 AM



  • Mr. Ravi Kumar, you could find a free version at  islamic-laws.com/download/Islaamic_Sharia_Law_sunni.pdf
    However, this may be the interpretation of only a particular Sunni sect.
    By Ashok Sharma - 9/25/2016 9:23:01 AM



  •  @Ravi But traditions were continuing. .. ..then they were undergone resembling procedures by four times or by four collectors. 
    Now we should again again resemble any metter existing In hadiths .
    By Hanif Uz Jaman - 9/25/2016 8:43:52 AM



  • Is there any book of sharia law? I want to read it . By Ravi Kumar - 9/25/2016 7:58:03 AM



  • @Hanif Uz Jaman The Hadiths was compiled after 200 years . How authentic can it be ? By Ravi Kumar - 9/25/2016 7:56:24 AM



  • No god made any laws laws are made by peoples only. By Mrinal Dey - 9/25/2016 7:55:17 AM



  • @Prabhakar Katkar  yes it should be applied . Rape will stop in india . Daughters will get thier share from property which non muslims don't get . And triple talaq should be over 3 menstrual cycle for reasons known. By Ravi Kumar - 9/25/2016 7:54:06 AM



  • First we have to understand Allah ...from Allah's book ...not by any other hadith. ... sahabas did it -we have historical hadith By Hanif Uz Jaman - 9/25/2016 7:46:42 AM



  • Worth considering. By Syed Ahson - 9/25/2016 3:15:42 AM



  • Mollah Mostly because a controversial issues,surely sharia,&it's propagation,,meaningful proliferation,, is based Islamic faith,,following the directives of holly qurrans,hadish ... In the name of so called jehad,,beheading,,both,Muslim s,,other people s,,of other religions,,hve no options,,,in Islam,,,,shariah... Annihilation,murder,etc which they Isis dids,,,is strongly against the ethics of Islamic sharia,,, the ullemas, to reconcile their best efforts to give a meaningful education in society and to erradicating suchincidents ,curse s frm the society of Islamic faiths,,,, By M A Ohab - 9/25/2016 2:39:21 AM



  • Sharia Laws Should Be Applied To Indian Muslims . By Prabhakar Katkar - 9/24/2016 11:37:43 PM



  • CRITICISM OF SULTAN SHAHIN?
    First of all, had it not been for the efforts of men like Sultan Shahin and millions of others, you and I would not even had a right to speak out against tyrants – Indira Gandhi’ s emergency rule would have made her president for life – if Modi is spared he could become a Hitler, and the Mullahs, Pundits and Pastors could become tyrants… who will stop them?
    The World is a better place to day because of free speech, without which political, religious and simply men tyrants would have kept billion of souls in misery.  
    God would not have give us the brains, if he did not want us to have freedom. Question everything and then accept o reject. 
    Except the creator, nothing is divine as all of them are finite items subject to erring.  Sharia is not divine at all, it is a system designed to do good, but is flawed and need to be fixed.
    Please check these two pieces Genesis of Sharia Law and fixing Sharia Laws at  World Muslim Congress. worldmuslimcongress.org/genesis-of-sharia-law-by-mike-ghouse/  and worldmuslimcongress.org/fixing-sharia-laws-by-mike-ghouse/
    By Mike Ghouse - 9/24/2016 11:26:26 PM



  • Three utterances of talaq by husband in one sitting in a state of anger or under influence of liquor Orr otherwise,  cannot confer legitimacy to the act of  ivorce. In fact impulsive talaq should not be counted at all even if uttered ten times.  Even Islamic talaq should be the result of sober deliberation after the conciliatory efforts have failed. The husband should then tender his talaq either evidenced by writing ( and delivery confirmed) or by witnesses present before both the parties. 

    However I am not clear about a special situation. If both husband and wife are willing to part ways, that is, if aversion is on both the sides, then perhaps quick completion of divorce would me more just and desirable. The three month quranic formula may not work in that case. 
    By Manzurul Haque - 9/24/2016 2:12:42 PM



  • Sir:

    The real trouble with Muslims all over the globe,is quite simple,we will accept whatever suits us

    or FLAVOUR OF THE DAY'

    the rest we will leave it for others to interpret,whether it is right or wrong

    A faith as pure and simple as Islam has been made ever so complicated particularly by our Maulanas of the day.

    I rest my case though simplisitic it may sound. Syed Ali

    By Syed Ali - 9/24/2016 1:54:50 PM



  • Triple Talaq is not in the Quran

    The Process for Divorce in the Quran

    By Naseer Ahmed - 9/24/2016 7:49:55 AM



  • At least Ulema and Imams, if not others, must be punished in accordance with Shariah criminal code. And if it cannot be delivered here, they should go to S Arabia for execution of the Shariah law. By Anand Kumar - 9/24/2016 6:32:24 AM



  • Guys like tarek fart, Tufaan ahmed and hey sultan have never any good things to say about a beautiful religion . They know that if they praise , then they will not get any applause from the right wingers . Just for a few likes you guys have sold your conscience. Criticise by all means but don't be one sided .
    By Ravi Kumar - 9/24/2016 6:03:29 AM



  • Do Muslims of India have such problems only i.e. 'triple talaq, halala, polygamy, entrance of women in shrines and graveyard, madarsa textbooks etc etc?  By Raihan Nezami - 9/24/2016 5:06:48 AM



  • Firstly Javed Akhtar is self claimed atheist .And as such forfieted the right to speak as Muslim on Muslim matters.Secondly the aimplb is inviting trouble by its stubborn attitude not heeding advise by Muslim elite to ban Triple Talaq.The shariah is being maligned for it.
    The introduction of Triple Talaq was temporary and based on Ijtihad by Hazrath Umer to curb the misuse of Triple Talaq by the people of his time. The board has a precedent to follow and bring about the change. Why is the the door of Ijtihad Is shut.
    By Syed Qamar Hasan - 9/24/2016 2:50:31 AM



  • I always thought so and wondered. By Anand Kumar - 9/24/2016 1:28:15 AM



  • The clerics questioning Supreme Court’s jurisdiction should understand that the Muslims are as much subject to the Indian Constitution and its interpretation by the Supreme Court as any other citizen. Muslim personal law is a part of the Constitution and the Supreme Court has every right to interpret it. Progressive Muslims are not committing a sin by encouraging the courts to intervene in the matter. By Deepa Natarajan - 9/24/2016 1:25:03 AM



  • On criminal side, want the soft,reformist Western laws but on civil side want Sharia ! And what muslims are willing to give Kafirs if they are in majority & ruling ? Affection,love and what not !!!! Watch : twitter.com/TarekFatah
    /status/778336928424980480
    By Sahadev Kunapuli - 9/24/2016 1:11:21 AM



  • Today's 'The Indian Express' reports: "The Centre is set to inform the Supreme Court that the practice of triple talaq is unconstitutional and also against gender equality."
    indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/triple-talaq-unconstitutional-govt-to-tell-sc-3047286/
    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 9/24/2016 1:10:50 AM



  • Though am from other religion i wanna say that every religion some core value i.e. love humanity.besides this all laws are according to external situation means it can be changed.muslim women show respectful courage.permanent solution is education By ଜ୍ୟୋତିର୍ମୟ ପଣ୍ଡା - 9/24/2016 1:08:06 AM



  • The medieval punishments of flogging, amputation and beheading can not be implemented in India by AIMPLB as the constitution has given very limited powers to the religious groups.                

    Article 26 of our Constitution has given to all the religious minorities theright                                     (a) to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes;                                                 (b) to manage its own affairs in matters of religion;                                                                                     (c) to own and acquire movable and immovable property;and                                                               (d) to administer such property in accordance with law                   

    Recently, India's Supreme Court rejected a petition seeking to ban Sharia courts, but stressed that they had no legal powers over Muslims and their decisions could not be enforced. The top court said that Islamic judges, who interpret religious law, could only rule when individuals submitted voluntarily to them and their decisions, or fatwas, were not legally binding.  “Sharia courts are not sanctioned by law and there is no legality of fatwas in this country,” C.K. Prasad said as he read out the judgment from a two-judge bench”.

    By Raihan Nezami - 9/23/2016 11:53:17 PM



  • The article has raised a recurring issue of “Triple Talaq” which has been under debate for so long, but the outcome has been zero till the date except that it has got some voices like Jawed Akhtar. The scholars agree that “Triple Talaq” in one go is un-Islamic, and the right way of its execution is well explained in the article. If the Muslims scholars emphasize upon the Islamic way of implementation of the “Triple Talaq”, this issue will die a natural death. Its benefits can not be undermined as it saves our time in getting a formal divorce from the court which is already over-burdened so much that 70% of the prisoners are under-trial, a convict-cum-prisoner comes out of jail innocent after 23 years of imprisonment. There are so many dowry- deaths, bride-burnings and domestic violence causing even deaths by the in-laws to save themselves from the painstaking trials in the courts to get legal divorce. The “Triple Talaq” or the Islamic way of divorce saves women from domestic violence causing unnatural deaths and life-long torture. There will be no objection to the jurisprudence of supreme court as all the concerned parties will be satisfied. By Raihan Nezami - 9/23/2016 4:10:02 PM



  • There is nothing divine. There is no proof of that except conflicting claims. Dinosaurs ruled this planet for 180 million years. Humans have arrived on the scene barely 50,000-200,000 years ago. The oldest traces of human civilization are not more than 10,000 years old. Even if we believe that all this was done by a God, then why the hell the so-called God remembered to arrive on the scene only 1,450 odd years ago and that also in a desert to enact a law for all times to come ? Why he did not create a law on cyber crime, shipping, mining, aviation, nuclear power or, telecommunications ? May be, he was not educated enough and knew about only sheep, camels and donkeys. Come on, show maturity and stop fooling people. Even a college student knows more than the writers of Sharia today. Let us frame all laws through debate and discussions and not because of the whims and fancies of less informed people of medieval times.  By Ashok Sharma - 9/23/2016 3:19:39 PM



  • There is no Muslim personal law. There are family laws of every community. Every law needs to be reviewed from time to time. But a family law in Muslim societies would be effective, if it does not contradict the essence of Islam. By Manzurul Haque - 9/23/2016 1:36:53 PM



  • While all laws should be man made, they should follow the Quranic requirement that laws have to be fair, just, rational and egalitarian.
    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 9/23/2016 12:22:54 PM



  • I believe there is nothing wrong in thinking sharia is a divine law. All religions seems to have their own version of sharia but majority of religions went through reformation and abandoned in most instances archaic laws and created their own constitutions which gets changed depending on situations and which cannot remain constant. As Muslims believe Quran and its derivatives are divine and cannot be changed under any circumstance non Muslim or secular governments are in a bind which seems to be very difficult to overcome ex: India and UK. I sympathize with Muslim women who become victims to selective sharia and no support from constitution ex: shahbano case. As Islamic reformation is not acceptable in secular countries due to minority fear mongering, and in case of India constant meddling by Pakistan to extort Muslims against India ex: Kashmir. In my humble opinion I think of solutions like

    1. A conference of ulema of all major Muslim institutes and Muslim countries to convene and codify sharia so as to give justice to women, men, children as per sharia and Islamic jurisprudence.
    2. Muslims moving to Islamic nations and follow that countries version of sharia and where Muslims as majority have a major say and acceptable to them as per Islam. This prevents them to have an option of going through country based constitution which Muslims seem to oppose in secular nations. As per Mr.Shaheen it seems Pakistan has amended its personal laws which became acceptable to its awam. 

    Staying either in India, UK, France, USA seems to be triggering a lot of insecurity in Muslim younger generation and we need to find a solution in order to prevent future URI attacks, San bernadino, Orlando, Paris, London, Brussels airport attack. We all vow this humanity what ever our religious beliefs are.
    By Prisha - 9/23/2016 10:59:04 AM