The Wahhabi theology barely allows its followers to
survive without resorting to violence. Its
enclosure movement that considers only those agreeably currying favour with the
Wahhabi theology as Muslims, and the rest as “Mushrik” or “Kaafir” or “Bidati”
while simultaneously justifying the killing of these “Mushrik” is what can be
seen as a primary source of terrorism.
Given the condemnatory words outspoken by the general
secretary of JAH, Maulana Asghar Ali Imam Mehdi, it is not unfit to say that
the Wahhabi theology is implicitly engaged in manufacturing terrorists and then the Wahhabi leaders
condemning and blaming them for being terrorists.
Janab Sultan Shahin Sb has been doing his level best for
the reformation of the wrongdoings in Islamic practices within his limited
resources even risking his life and honor. There is hardly any appreciation and
recognition from the elite group of different sects testing the patience in
good work to the fullest.
In India, especially, the Muslims have greater problems of
bread and butter, education and employment, equality in government establishment
and job opportunities than triple talaq, halala or polygamy etc. No religious
leader or political minority group pays attention to these genuine problems
except lip service. That is why the leaders of various sects are busy in garnering
riches for them forming their parties or by supporting others.
Some scholars are trying to raise the issues related to
the wrong ways of Islamic practices that also goes in vain, as no takers are
there in field of the Muslim society; we are unable to solve our problems-social,
economical, educational, political, nor religious.
Why Salafi-Wahhabis refuse to accept that their own
theology causes so much of turmoil in the Middle East and other parts of the
What do they think of Islamic Justice and
Why their common sense failed to see the truth even
after witnessing the horrendous death and destruction by al-Qaeda, ISIS,
Taliban, Al-Shabaab and Boko Haram?
Is there any statistician in this Salafi-Wahhabi
group? At this rate how many millions of Shias, Sufis Ahmadis etc will be
massacred in the future? How many billions of non-Muslims will be massacred
until the end of the world? How many cities in the world will be destroyed like
In the circumstances how can we blame the Americans
for choosing Donald Trump as President? Or blaming Britons for Brexit?
“We cannot to
claim to love Allah and pray five times while we hate and abuse His beautiful creatures”
Mohd. Yunus/ Mohammed Arif
First premises the Qur’an expounded for all
humanity is the use of reason. From both of your comments you do not seem to be
using reason. You say, “those who were killed were actually committing most heinous
crime and in the same breadth you say, Islam does not allow any kinds of
mascara or violence against any one Islam is for peace”
” If your second premise holds the first
premise is contradicted. That is, how a religion that does not allow any kinds
of violence can at the same time allow some of its followers to carry out a
massacre in the Mazar.
Obviously you are advocating ‘takfirm’ – an
ideology that allows a Muslim to declare other Muslims who commit shirk as
kafir and kill them simply on account of their religious orientation. An internationally
reputed scholar of Islam has denounced Takfirism through his following article
the caption of which speaks for itself:
Takfiris Are Friends Of Satan, The
Enemies Of Allah And His Messenger, Foremost In Shirk, Hypocrisy,
And Apostasy And No Muslim Must Support Them In Any Form Or Fashion
Based on the above fatwa, those who
support the massacre at the Mazar stand as Friends of Satan, the enemies of
Allah and His Messenger, foremost in shirk, hypocrisy, and apostasy and no
Muslim must support them in any form or fashion.
In one word, the Qur’an does not allow any
Muslim to kill a Mushrik or people of any other faith on the ground of
their religious beliefs.
The ugliness in Islam’s religious thoughts
in this era is expounded in my following article the caption of which speaks
Under The Banner Of Islam Is Mutation Of Islam Into A Cult Of Satan – So
Muslims Must Create An Anti-Radicalization Narrative To Defeat And Disown It –
An excellent and well researched piece - it fills the gap in my simultaneously posted
article re German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s call to delimitate Islam from
terror. My article questions whether Islamic clergy and authorities really
believe that Islam is a religion of peace. The article answers it upfront. If
Abdul Wahab advocated the killing of mystic Muslims and mushriks on account of their
religious beliefs and practices – then he certainly does not believe that Islam
is a religion of peace. Posthumously, he appears to be an ideological ally of al-Baghdadi
– chief of ISIS who claims that Islam is a religion of violence, and the same
may be the case with those Ulama and religious authorities of this era who
follow his doctrine – assuming it is reported correctly.
The problem in Islam’s theological assumptions and
determinations is that people take their ‘masters’ of the past virtually like
prophets (who must be obeyed and followed) and their writings virtually like
the word of God. al-Baghdadi goes on his killing rampage as in his subconscious
mind he takes Abdul Wahab as his prophet and his discourses as God’s words. And
this tendency can be traced back to the Prophet’s era.
As long as Islamic religious thought are dominated by the
examples of their predecessors, the Muslims can commit the most heinous crime in
the name of Islam depending upon their choice of mentor. This deification of
mortals has stripped Islam of its divine heritage and is at the root of all kinds
of violence in the name of Islam including sectarianism, violent extremism.