certifired_img

Books and Documents

Interfaith Dialogue

9 - COMMENTS

  • watch how kashmir was converted to islam :
    youtube.com/watch?v=FhiXbwPKN9Y
    By Raman - 7/7/2017 12:58:34 AM



  • Naseer Ahmed, Hats Off is speaking the truth. Read conquest of Syria - a primary source - 3 options were laid to the conquered people : 1, Convert, Fight or live life as a dhimmi.

    Do u think that Persians got convinced of Islam within 20 years and left their ancestral religion of their own will?

    Apart from sword - they other factors for conversion in India were : a) Caste discrimination, b) allurements of high office & gifts of land and money c) spiritual quest ie hindus have always been in quest of spiritual upliftment and they were influenced by sufis - they entered islam not knowing that it is one way street - u cannot seek to go back - so they got stuck with it.

    The above 4 reasons r mentioned by Eaton - though he emphasized the main reason was  'the spiritual quest - with one way valve'.

    One cannot deny the historical records written by the muslims throughout the ages.

    Regarding the people who were left non-muslims in Islamic lands - the reason is that they accepted dhimmi status and also muslims needed to collect Jazia from them for their own well being (in fact there was opposition to hindus converting to islam during Nizamudin era (?) just for the reason that it will decrease jazia tax.

    What ever be the reason of the 4 mentioned above - knowing koran & hadith is definitely not the reason. My estimate is that not even 0.01% of conversions would have taken place due to non-muslims reading islamic literature and getting  convinced of the truth mentioned in it. 


    By Raman - 7/7/2017 12:25:32 AM



  • Hats Off says: "only india has successfully withstood the assault for nearly a thousand two hundred years. no other country could. persia, syria, byzantium, the whole of north africa, indonesia, and malaysia all were converted nearly one hundred percent."

     How did India resist so successfully? What about Greece? How many became Muslim there? How many became Muslim in Spain? How many Jews and Christians in Jerusalem become Muslim? Why are there large number of Christians in Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria to this day? Why couldn't Indonesia and Malaysia resist even though these countries were never even attacked let alone being conquered? Why wasn’t the Islamic Caliphate a Muslim majority area for several centuries? Why aren’t their martyr stories of people in any of these countries who gave up their life resisting imposition of Islam? Is there such a story in any commentator’s family of their forefather having sacrificed his life resisting forced conversion?

     Hats Off knows the truth but he cannot help his personal hatred coloring his views. He is a sick man riven by his hatred for his father’s religion.

    By Naseer Ahmed - 7/4/2017 12:54:47 AM



  • What a hateful rant from Hats Off! He thinks that only the anti-Islam histories that he has read convey the truth. That fits in quite well with his ongoing execrable war of hate against moderate Muslims.

    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 7/3/2017 11:14:24 PM



  • the only thing islamists and islamist supremacists have been trying to do from the day one of the advent of islam - is white washing its barbarity and its love of beheading and sex slavery. the ridda wars are proof that the bedouins converted out of fear and threat.

    now they have the water-boys of white guilt historians and self hating jews for support.

    read the accounts of the muslim historians accompanying the blood thirsty hordes that did not leave a single minority community in any territory they invaded.

    only india has successfully withstood the assault for nearly a thousand two hundred years. no other country could. persia, syria, byzantium, the whole of north africa, indonesia, and malaysia all were converted nearly one hundred percent.

    it was only the subcontinent that resisted successfully even to this day.

    the prophet who was oh so peaceful simply blackmailed the persians into coercive conversion by threat of war.

    notice the persians have not forgotten the insult. they managed to create the great schism in the monolith of islam and have ever since been engaged in a brutal power struggle with the desert barbarians. i need not say about what they think and say about the favorite wife of the prophet and some the sahaba.

    the christian, jewish and islamist historians (with their own blood soaked histories) have everything to lose by telling history as it occurred. by whitewashing brutal islamic conquests they are simply covering for their own horrendous, blood-dripping histories.

    ms. audrey truschke is a fine example of this abrahamic white washers. if she manages to turn an ogre like aurangzeb to a gentle saint, she will have succeeded in whitewashing the bloody, gory history of the spread of christianity, the genocide of red indians, the rape and massacre of the south americas and of course the holocaust. in a scratch my back style, already islamist extremists and christian extremists are agreed upon bringing back religious instruction into public schools and offering creationism as an alternative to evolution to cater to the religious bigots in each other's ranks.

    the muslim historians are remarkably clear and honest about their intentions, methods and they faithfully recorded the horror that followed islamic invasion of the subcontinent.

    guilt ridden white historians, self hating jewish historians and supremacist islamists are in firm erotic threesome embrace. see any interfaith. its always these three middle eastern siblings. neither hindus nor buddhists can be found in the average interfaith circus.

    it is a warning for the non-prophetic religions, from the conversion crazed, menacing street dawa thugs and money bag christian evangelists.

    now the converters (either through word or through sword) have converged. they are covering for each other. birds of the same feathers.they always feed together.

    trump in bed with the saudis and the israeli overtures to the saudi barbarians does not bode well for the non-prophetic, non-converting religions of the east.

    everywhere islam spread, it wiped out the local traditions and culture under the concept of "jahiliyya". no where in any muslim majority nations can you find any local tradition and culture thriving.

    it is not a joke that most muslim majority nations are surprisingly free of minorities. the prophet himself drove out the jews from hejaz.

    it is not a joke that everyday pakistani muslims (among the most devout louts in the world) are every day raping hundreds of hindu girls and christian girls into islam.

    they have proved it in britain in rotherham by raping thousands of white underaged girls for the past thirty years with the entire muslim communities shielding the rapists and demonizing the girls as white trash.

    the islamist-christian conclusion is that jizya is ennobling for the dhimmi, sex slavery is honorable for the kaffir women and children, conversion by threat is a blessing for the kuffar.

    rape-conversion of christian and hindu girls in pakistan (and its justification by all the pakistani islamic scholars) is one fine example of the standard islamic practice in conversion.
    By hats off! - 7/3/2017 7:18:44 PM



  • The source of article, itself tells how petrodollar would have worked to make this fake stories, it can be seen all,books are of this century.
    It eveidence are enough when non-muslim and Muslim marriage happens, the other partner has to convert, this lie is easily told by hypocrates.
    We cause sultan Shain himself is big example of it, he made sure his kids are made Muslim.
    Any type of force is is force, it is not necssary that it has to be violence, economic sanctions, use of love to convert partner in marriage (used lot in India) all is forced conversion.
    By Aayina - 7/3/2017 3:35:00 AM



  • I don't go only by historians since they put their own narrative on facts & figures, so take their words with grain of salt but use their sources for data collection. Secondly one can always check out the primary texts or translations of the texts which were written by rulers which provides a good look into contemporary lives of those times. persian.packhum.org/persian//main Lastly we all can see the Islamic theology which has remained more or less constant throughout in most regions where it ruled & thus we can gain a certain idea of "Second class citizenship" aka "Dhimmi" rules along with Jizya rules & see why even peaceful conversions were result of such theological laws & hence most probably they were not peaceful at all. By DSB - 7/2/2017 9:20:45 PM



  • Non- Muslims with an inferiority complex will however disregard all historical facts and keep arguing otherwise. By Naseer Ahmed - 7/1/2017 10:58:14 PM



  • I do not know if forced mass conversion is even possible. It is more likely that the ideology of a dominant conquering power has an attraction for some groups, especially for  deprived groups such as the Dalits in India.

    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 7/1/2017 10:13:53 AM