certifired_img

Books and Documents

Islamic Society (08 Aug 2019 NewAgeIslam.Com)




TOTAL COMMENTS:-   20


  • Talha's comment shows how talaq has been turned into a joke. People have derived new types of talaq according to their own understanding. Owaisi said in Parliament that there were sixteen kinds of talaq and we are happy with that. The government should not interfere with our talaq system.the mode of Nikah is one but mode of talaq is sixteen.one is automatic talaq. That is. If there is no rain this Friday then Talaq to you. And if really there is no rain on Friday, the husband says talaq ho Gaya. The woman goes to mufti. She says my husband did not pronounce talaq but had said on Monday that if there is no rain on Friday talaq to you, the mufti says talaq hogaya.
    By Arshad - 8/18/2019 3:10:25 AM



  • The comment was posted thru mobile phone. And while typing on mobile, some errors occur and also it's automated dictionary takes pushes some words into the text.
    By Arshad - 8/18/2019 3:01:05 AM



  • Very interesting discussion, specially the brand new concept of "duty-free divorce." But Arshad Sb's otherwise sensible comments need to be proof-red before being posted. Nikah become Nilah, etc. one has to read several sentences several times to make sense. 
    By Sultan Shahin - 8/17/2019 5:50:05 AM



  • Talha sb, so CE majority of Muslims during the life of the prophet p uh were illiterate, they would do things wrongly. For example read some hadiths on Qurbani on Baqar Eid. Some Muslims would sacrifice animals before Namaz. And the holy prophet would tell them that the Qurbani was not valid so they should do Qurbani again after Namaz.Another example is that while offering namaz in the iqtida of the holy prophet pbuh some People while pervor.ing sal at the end of namaz would raise their hands upto the forehead as we do while greeting someone. The prophet did ask them to do but some of them started this on their own. The prophet told them not to do so. So in the prophets time, some people would start a new practice and others would start following them. There were people who also started pronouncing triple talaq during prophets time which the prophet p uh disapproved saying you are doing this injustice (zulm,)while I am alive among you. Talha sb please open your inner eyes.Man ki ankhein khol Munney.
    By Arshad - 8/10/2019 10:35:15 AM



  • Talha sb Nilah inQuran is called aqd an agreement. And an agreement is between two parties on certain conditions. Before solem using the agreement of Nikah the Qazi reads out the conditions of the agreement before both parties. And when both the parties agree then only Nikah is solem ised. Right? So when the agreement is broken only one Arty tAkes the arbitrary decision.how can that happen? It cannot happen. That's why Quran says both parties should sit together and try to resolve differences. And if the want to separate it should be with mutual consent as is at the time of Nikah. Quran has laid down this principle.we don't know when this practice of three talaqs started and who started?
    By Arshad - 8/10/2019 10:21:10 AM



  • Yes yes this is a new ki d of talaq which can be named duty-free talaq invented by Maulana Talha.
    By Arshad - 8/10/2019 10:11:14 AM



  • you are wrong in understanding me. if by intention someone means talaq to break marriage it is talaq to break marriage but if he intends to free her from house duties and uses talaq to free her from them then it is not talaq that breaks the marriage
    because talaq means to free. the word is common to both meanings, to break marriage and to free from other thing intended by that man

    By Talha - 8/9/2019 6:03:57 AM



  • Oh a new kind of talaq invented by Talha. Triple talaq only frees a woman of her duty and does not break her marriage. Ulama should take note.
    By Arshad - 8/9/2019 4:23:23 AM



  • Those who are support instant talaq and halala are Ulama and those who are supporting Triple talaq bill are also Ulama. But only those Ulama who promote and support ISIS and promote wrong practices are criticised here.not all Ulama.
    By Arshad - 8/9/2019 4:19:47 AM



  • You also argued With GS over Ulama. It seems you have descended here to defend Ulama. 
    By Arshad - 8/9/2019 4:15:41 AM



  • Ulama are not ruling over me they are ruling over the entire Muslims and this has led Muslims to where they are today.
    By Arshad - 8/9/2019 4:11:41 AM



  • Actually what you say is devoid of logic. Your o ly concern is Ulama should not be criticised e en if they support ISIS or support triple talaq or halala. If a khadim has done wrong he will be criticised not all the khadims. Why does it have pepper effect in someone's you know where? 
    By Arshad - 8/9/2019 4:08:49 AM



  • Who are the people opposing triple talaq bill Ulama or Juhala? 
    By Arshad - 8/9/2019 3:40:31 AM



  • "in a fit of anger, under the spell of wine, ganja or bhang"
    you should raise voice that those in a fit of anger and under the spell of wine, ganja or bhang, kill other human beings should not be punished by law. 
    in one case your principle leads to some logic and in another to something else. so heavy contradiction. therefore not able to consider your argument solid. 

    By Talha - 8/9/2019 12:38:37 AM



  • @ Muhtarahm Arshad, 
    why are your bringing ulama everytime in your discussion?
    do you know the situation of ajmer and other dargahs. khuddam have captured dargahas for their personal reasons not for the khidmat. 
    ulama have condemend many of their practices.. they do not follow ulama so what is the mistake of ulama here?!!!
    it seems ulama have issued many fatwas against you therefore you are too much concerned about you. 
    actually ualama are ruling over you. you want to save from ulama but you have to bring them into your discussion; it means they have great following in the community and you do not have. 

    By Md. Anjum - 8/9/2019 12:25:32 AM



  • Correct your knowledge about what ama have been saying about triple talaq and then argue.
    By Arshad - 8/9/2019 12:13:12 AM



  • "all of them agree that if the word is pronounced without intention, it is not applicable."
    clarificaiton:
    talaq means to free. if husband means by talaq to free her from her duties and not from marriage then this talaq will not break her marriage.
    By Talha - 8/9/2019 12:08:38 AM



  • you have weakend your arguments in several ways, 
    you say "Here, he is considered fasting though his stomach is full because it was not his intention to eat. But in the case of divorce, the mufti says that since he spoke out Talaq three times, the Talaq has occurred though the husband insists that he did not have the intention to divorce his wife." 
    i think you should correct your knowledge as no mufti of any sect believes so. all of them agree that if the word is pronouced without intention, it is not applicable. 
    your arguments extremely disturbed and the reason is that you have made flimsy arguments withotu knowing the facts. 
    criticizing is good but without knowledge is disliked. 

    By Talha - 8/8/2019 10:29:44 PM



  • There is a report about the khadim of Ajmer who allegedly gave triple talaq to his fifth wife. Every . Muslim knows that a Muslim is allowed to have four wives at a time. He has five. More interestingly, he is over sixty.He married the woman in 2017 and has some children. An FIR has been lodged against him. The woman alleged that he kept her at a rented house though he owns a number of houses. Probably the khadim rest assured that since he is a khadim Shariah is in his pocket and the Qazi wiil not have the courage to go against him.Our ylama have to reply did they support triple talaq to favour people like this khadim? 
    By Arshad - 8/8/2019 9:59:29 PM



  • If the ulama do not reform our laws towards greater justice and fairness, we have to reform the ulama, or even remove such ulama.


    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 8/8/2019 12:11:22 PM