By Dr. Qaiser Shamim, New Age Islam
20 July 2018
The announcement of All India Muslim
Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) to establish Darul Qaza, in every district of the
country for the reconciliation/amicable adjudication of civil matters of the
Community has provided fuel to the Sangh Pariwar for polarization in its
favour. The lack of political wisdom in announcing it when Lok Sabha elections are
nearing, has given yet another issue to BJP to divert attention, whose
government has failed to keep its election promises and is faced with general
discontent. The timing of the announcement is significant because earlier, just
weeks before the UP assembly elections, the Board, in its press conference at
the Press Club of Delhi, had announced a countrywide agitation beginning from
Lucknow.
A sizable section of Muslims have been
accusing the Board for providing fuel to the Sangh Parivar on such occasions.
After the court’s verdict in the matter of triple Talaq, the Board organized
agitations by women in various cities and towns, culminating in a big rally at
Patna under the leadership of its General Secretary. There were allegations
that it was being done to show their strength to the government which has made
the Muslim vote ineffective and does not listen to the voices of such outfits.
Within days of the rally at Patna, one of the main organizers was made MLC by
the JDU, which is running a coalition government with BJP in Bihar. This
immensely damaged the credibility of the leaders attached to the Board.
In this background, while discussing the
issue of Darul Qaza, or any matter related to Muslim Personal Law, certain
basic facts need to be kept in view:
(1) Except for Waqf, other areas of the
personal law have not been codified. The main purpose of the establishment of
All India Muslim Personal Law Board in the eighties was codification of Muslim
Personal Law. The Board has failed to do that because of the dominance of a
particular school of thought which did not agree to accommodate other schools
in the codification. The recent example is that of non-Quranic practice of
instant triple Talaq which is not acceptable among Wahhabis, Shias etc. Now
what would be the basis of adjudication or reconciliation in the absence of
codified law? The court has declared it invalid but the dominant group of the
Board still considers it a valid form of divorce. One of the purposes of the
present move is also to make the court verdict ineffective in the Community. By
this, in their wisdom, they want to save the Shariat.
(2) Similar is the question of polygamy. On the
complaint of a woman, the general attitude of the Darul Qaza is to ask the
woman to "adjust", to keep the family intact. Neither they are
trained to adjudicate nor do they understand the meaning of ‘right to life and
dignity’, enshrined in the Constitution. They do not appreciate the modern
concept of "equality". Resultantly, in one of the "model
Nikah-Namas” circulated by one of their co-thinker outfits, the very first
clause had stipulated that after Nikah, if the man desires sex, woman cannot
refuse, as if a woman is a Rasogullah or Chamcham which a man can
enjoy after Nikah and the woman's desire has no value. I wrote back to them
followed by discussions on the WhatsApp forum of All India Muslim Majlis e
Mushawarat (AIMMM). Those supporting this provision failed to explain the
basics. What kind of reconciliation can be expected from such people? Those engaged
in this exercise are the same set of people who never spoke even on the
violation of women's Quranic rights in property and domestic matters.
(3) They have also maintained a studied silence
on circumcision of women allegedly performed in a sect against which women of
that sect have been protesting. After all Nikah of those who indulge in
the un-Islamic practice of dowry are
also performed by these Maulvis, without any hesitation or showing any disgust
against such practices. They never object to the extravagance in marriages, the
brunt of which is always borne by the bride. They perform Nikah, take their
Nazrana money, have a good dinner and return happily. Reconciliation requires
an innate sense of justice.
(4) Like slavery, polygamy and triple Talaq are
also just permissible, and not obligatory. At the time of the Prophet, the
entire economic structure was based on slavery. Therefore, it was not possible
to ban slavery. However, before his death the Prophet desired the Muslims for
two things: continue to set the slaves free and respect the rights of women.
This emphasizes the direction in which he desired Muslims to move further. With
time, when slavery was banned, the practice was stopped in the Muslim world
too. Can anyone now dare to keep slaves on the ground that in Islam it is
permissible? Similar reforms have been made in family laws in Muslim dominated
countries. In India, after losing the legal battle in the case of instant
triple Talaq, the Board is insisting on polygamy. What kind of justice, in the
name of reconciliation, women can expect from them?
(5) There are other factors also. Since 1970's,
opening of madrasas has become a profit making enterprise and have mushroomed
which posed the problem of employment. Some 50-60 years ago, large number of
mosques did not employ any Imam. Those gathered, would request the eldest
person to lead the prayer. Slowly, it became necessary to have an Imam in every
mosque. The common practice of saying Azan in the ears of a new-born by any of
the family member also became the domain of the Imam of the nearby mosque.
Despite all this how many products of the madrasas could be employed in Masjids
as imams? Therefore, they started opening new madrasas. However, there is a
limit to opening new madrasas too. Now to enrol children, they travel long
distances to backward states. The police and child rights groups have started
objecting to this practice. There have been numerous reports in the press about
police detaining them at the railway stations. The vigilantism cannot be ruled
out, but taking a child of 6-7 years from Jharkhand or Bihar to Karnataka or
Kerala cannot be defended. There is a common observation in the Community about
the mistreatment of children in such cases. In this situation, new opening is
possible in establishing Darul Qaza in every district, which may be followed by
similar bodies in sub-divisions. This will also tighten their grip in the
Community, which they are losing very fast due to various factors.
(6) 37 Darul Qazas are already working in the
country, many of them under the administration of State Waqf Boards. They do
not want them to function under Waqf boards which are statutory bodies. Despite
the existence of Darul Qaza in certain places how many cases are finally
settled to women’s satisfaction? If Muslims had faith in this institution,
large number of Muslim women would not have approached the courts of law.
(7) Much before the governments’ move, when
cases of child marriage with aged Arabs had appeared, I had personally pleaded
for making arrangements for registration of marriage in the (then) 29 Waqf
Boards of the states. Except for the state where it is in existence, it was
vehemently opposed. They want to keep Darul Qaza also under their control where
the Muftis, whose level of knowledge is known to those who know them, can be
appointed, opening new employment opportunities. Most of them do not know
elementary arithmetic and are therefore unable to properly calculate annual
Zakat or the share in the property under Sharia law.
All those having faith in the
Constitutional provision of gender justice need to consider the above points
without getting misled by the fallacy being created by the Board that Darul
Qaza will be meant only for reconciliation, saving time and money which otherwise
will be spent if the matter goes to court. Large number of cases decided by
them is already in the courts. This has made it more cumbersome to first
approach them, and then dissatisfied with their unprofessional dealing finally
go to the court.
Related Article:
Darul
Qazas or Sharia Courts: Why both must be Opposed?
http://www.newageislam.com/islamic-ideology/arshad-alam,-new-age-islam/darul-qazas-or-sharia-courts--why-both-must-be-opposed?/d/115821
Dr
Qaiser Shamim is a former secretary of the Central Waqf Council, New Delhi and
former Administrator of the Punjab Waqf Board, then a common Board of Punjab,
Haryana and Himachal Pradesh
URL: http://www.newageislam.com/islam-and-politics/dr-qaiser-shamim,-new-age-islam/the-politics-of-darul-qaza/d/115888
New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in
Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In
Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women
in West, Islam Women and Feminism