FOLLOW US:

From the Desk of Editor (09 Jun 2012 NewAgeIslam.Com)
Baitul Muqaddas-Masjid-e-Aqsa complex: Why are we Muslims so obsessed with it as our Qiibla-e-Awwal contrary to Qur’anic teachings?

 

 

 

By Sultan Shahin, Editor, New Age Islam

 

June 9, 2012

 We are reproducing in original Urdu and in English and Hindi translations a widely syndicated article in India’s Urdu Press by Maulanama Nadeemul Wajidi of Deoband seminary detailing Muslims’s love for and claims to Haram Ash-Sharif Baitul Muqaddas and Masjid-e-Aqsa, also known alternatively as Temple Mount and Solomon’s Temple or First Temple in Jerusalem. Muslim Press the world over is constantly full of Muslim lamentation over the loss of full control over Baitul Muqaddas and Masjid-e-Aqsa since Israeli occupation of East Jerusalem. Fighting an occupation is one thing. All Justice-loving people in the world are with Palestinians on that issue. But world Muslim community making an ideological claim over a building complex that God told us belongs to our religious cousins, the Ahl-Kitab Jews and Christians, is something quite another.


Muslims revere these structures as their first Qibla, as it was this direction they faced in their prayers in the formative phase of Islam when Prophet was still hoping for reconciliation with and acceptability as a Biblical prophet by the Jews and Christians. Even though the Prophet and other Meccans always wanted to use Kaaba Shareef as their Qibla, this was one of the concessions they were willing to make as per God’s advice in the interest of wider acceptability by other Biblical religions. However, when all these attempts failed and Jews had to be expelled because of their perfidy in times of war which would not be acceptable to any besieged city, the Prophet and the Muslims from Mecca started looking towards Heaven for permission to change their Qibla from Baitul Muqaddas to Kaaba Shareef.


This is how God responded while recording the Prophet’s desire for a separate Qibla: Surah Baqra 2: 144. “We see the turning of thy face for guidance to the heavens. Now shall We turn thee to a Qibla that shall please thee. Turn then thy face in the direction of the Sacred Mosque. Wherever ye are, turn your faces in that direction. The people of the Book know well that that is the truth from their Lord, nor is Allah unmindful of what they do.”


This is what most Muslims remember and follow. But the very next verse explained to them that Baitul Muqaddas was the Qibla for Jews and Christians, something Muslims have forgotten; our self-righteous ulema are of course in the habit of ignoring inconvenient Qur’anic verses, verses that do not support their rapacious, self-righteous, male-chauvinist, Islam-supremacist attitudes. Let us read this verse and see what it says:


Sura Baqra: 2: 145: “Even if thou wert to bring to the people of the Book all the signs (together), they would not follow thy Qibla (Kaaba); nor art thou going to follow their Qibla (Baitul Muqaddas) nor indeed will they follow each other’s Qibla. If thou, after the knowledge hath reached thee, wert to follow their (vain) desires, then wert thou indeed (clearly) in the wrong.”


To buttress this proposition, let us also consult, the Tafseer (exegesis, interpretation) of the authorized Saudi translation in this context. It says: “A very clear glimpse of the old Jewish practice in the matter of the Qibla and the importance attached to it is found in the book of Daniel, V1. 10. Daniel was a righteous man of princely lineage and lived about 606--538 B.C. He was carried off to Babylon by Nebuchednezzar, The Assyrian, but was still living when Assyria was overthrown by the Medes and Persians. In spite of the “captivity” of the Jews, Daniel enjoyed the highest offices of state at Babylon, but he was ever true to Jerusalem. His enemies (under the Persian monarch) got a penal law passed against anyone who “asked a petition of any god or man for 30 days” except the Persian King. But Daniel continued true to Jerusalem. His windows being open in his chamber towards, he kneeled upon his knees three times a day, and prayed, and gave thanks before his God, as he did aforetime.”


Were we thus to read the entire Qur’anic exhortation on the issue of Qibla, we would not have fallen into the ever deepening morass of intra-Ahl-e-Kitab conflict. We can continue to revere the sacred places in Jerusalem according tour traditions while recognizing God-ordained rights of the Judaeo-Christian religious communities to their Qibla in Jerusalem as we have ours in Mecca. Exactly what shape our expression of reverence for our original Qibla takes and whether we are allowed to visit and when and how frequently, etc, can be peacefully and easily negotiated once we concede their God-given right to their Qibla.


In the meantime let us also try and remember another of God’s commandments that will help us come out of our Qibla fixation.


Surah Baqra: 2: 115 “To Allah belong the East and The West: Wheresoever Ye turn, there is Allah’s Face. For Allah is All-Embracing, All-Knowing.”

URL: http://newageislam.com/from-the-desk-of-editor/sultan-shahin,-editor,-new-age-islam/baitul-muqaddas-masjid-e-aqsa-complex--why-are-we-muslims-so-obsessed-with-it-as-our-qiibla-e-awwal-contrary-to-qur’anic-teachings?/d/7574


COMMENTS
  • Dear  Mr  Binyamin,  I have  merely mentioned  Urdu  Press  here  in  India  has  come  up  with  the  news  of Jews desecrating Prophet  Joseph  AS’s  Tomb. Islam  is  a  religion  of pluralism.  Its  holy  book  and  books  of  Ahadith are  full  of  such  messages.  Only that,  it  has  to  be  understood  and  practiced.


    By Arman Neyazi - 6/22/2012 1:59:09 AM
  • I  wish  Muslim readers  of  www.NewAgeIslam.com would  read  at  least  this  much  unbiased  information  from  Wikipedia  to  expand  their  horizons:  
    Joseph's  Tomb  (Hebrew:  ???  ?????,  Qever  Yosef,  Arabic:  ???  ?????,  Qabr  Yusuf)  is  a  funerary  monument  located  at  the  eastern  entrance  to  the  valley  that  separates  Mounts  Gerizim  and  Ebal,  325  yards  northwest  of  Jacob's  Well,[1]  on  the  outskirts  of  the  West  Bank  city  of  Nablus,  near  Tell  Bala?a,  the  site  of  biblical  Shechem.[2][3]  Biblical  tradition  identifies  the  general  area  of  Shechem  as  the  resting-place  of  the  biblical  patriarch  Joseph,  theeponymous  ancestor  of  the  northern  kingdom  of  Israel,[4]  and  his  two  sonsEphraim  and  Manasseh.
    Joseph's  tomb  has  been  venerated  throughout  the  ages  by  Jews,  Samaritans,  Christians  and  Muslims.[5][6][7]  Post-biblical  records  regarding  the  location  of  Joseph's  Tomb  at  this  site  date  from  the  beginning  of  the  4th-century  AD.[8]  The  present  structure,  a  small  rectangular  room  with  acenotaph,  dates  from  1868,  and  is  devoid  of  any  trace  of  ancient  building  materials.[9][10]  While  some  scholars,  such  as  Kenneth  Kitchen  and  James  K.  Hoffmeier  still  affirm  the  essential  historicity  of  the  biblical  account  of  Joseph,  many  others,  such  as  Donald  B.  Redford,  argue  that  the  story  itself  has  ‘no  basis  in  fact’.[11]

    Modern  scholarship  has  yet  to  determine  whether  or  not  the  present  cenotaph  is  to  be  identified  with  the  ancient  Biblical  gravesite.[12]  No  Jewish  or  Christian  sources  prior  to  the  5th  century  mention  the  tomb,  and  the  structure  originally  erected  over  it  appears  to  have  been  built  by  the  Samaritans,  for  whom  it  was  probably  a  sacred  site.[13]

    At  key  points  in  its  long  history,  Joseph's  Tomb  has  witnessed  intense  sectarian  conflict.  Samaritans  and  Christians  disputing  access  and  title  to  the  site  in  the  early  Byzantine  period  often  engaged  in  violent  clashes.[13][14][15]After  Israel  captured  the  West  Bank  in  1967,  Muslims  were  prohibited  from  worship  at  the  shrine  and  it  was  gradually  turned  into  a  Jewish  prayer  room.  Interreligious  friction  and  conflict  from  competing  Jewish  and  Muslim  claims  over  the  tomb  became  frequent.[16]  Falling  under  the  jurisdiction  of  the  Palestinian  National  Authority  (PNA)  following  the  signing  of  the  Oslo  Accords,  it  remained  under  IDF  guard  with  Muslims  prohibited  from  praying  there.[17]  At  the  beginning  of  the  Al-Aqsa  Intifada  in  2000,  just  after  being  handed  over  to  the  PNA,  it  was  looted  and  razed.[18][19]  Following  the  reoccupation  of  Nablus  during  Israel's  Operation  Defensive  Shield  in  2002,  Jewish  groups  returned  there  intermittently.[20]  Recently  the  structure  has  been  refurbished,  with  a  new  cupola  installed,  and  visits  by  Jewish  worshippers  have  resumed.[21]


    By Parnach - 6/22/2012 12:53:12 AM
  • Dear  Mr.  Neyazi,  How  can  saying  Talmudic  prayers at  the  tomb  be  considered  desecration?  All  that  Jews  want  to  do  is  to  pray  there,  naturally  with  all  the  reverence  that  we  give  to  all  those  whom  Muslims  too  consider  prophets.  Why  can’t  we  both  communities  say  prayers  in  a  tomb  in  our  own  ways?  We  do  have  to  co-exist  in  this  world.


    By Binyamin - 6/22/2012 12:11:19 AM
  • Now  Urdu  Press  is  reporting  that  Jewish  settlers  accompanied  by  the  Israeli  military  have  again  invaded  Nablus  city  in  the  occupied  West  Bank,  desecrating  Prophet  Joseph  AS's  Tomb.  Prophet  Josef  AS's  Tomb  has  been  closed  to  Israeli  settlers  since  2000,  after  their  visits  to  the  holy  site  caused  violent  confrontations  in  the  region. 


    By Arman Neyazi - 6/21/2012 11:49:30 PM
  • Nice  article!

    By Ajay Pal - 6/21/2012 11:45:42 PM

Compose Your Comments here:

Name
Email (Not to be published)
Comments
Fill the below text
 
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.