FOLLOW US:

Ijtihad, Rethinking Islam (29 Aug 2008 NewAgeIslam.Com)
There is no prohibition on the innovation, extension, and re-interpretation of the existing laws in Islam

By Sidrah Unis

 

THE laws of Islam comprise rules of conduct revealed by God to His Prophet, whereby people are directed to lead their lives. Thus, revelation is the source of Islamic law which is available to us in the form of the Quran and the Sunnah of the Prophet.

 

A unique aspect of Islamic law is that it attributes the authority of making laws to God only. According to Islam, no man or body of men can ever be capable of or allowed to make laws for other men; “.... We have bestowed from on high upon thee, step by step, this divine writ, to make everything clear, and to provide guidance ....” (16: 89)

 

However, where there is no room for the making of new laws, there is also no prohibition on the innovation, extension, and re-interpretation of the existing laws. This very process is denoted by Ijtehad. It is the method of Ijtehad by which God has enabled Muslim jurists to: (1) make provisions for the developing circumstances; and (2) prove Islam as a system of life practical for all times.

 

In Islam, unlike the western legal systems, there is no room for the authorities to be immune from the law. Even the head of an Islamic state may be challenged, in both official and private capacity, in the court. Obedience to a ruler for that matter is contingent on his enforcement of Islamic laws. In other words, if the government fulfils the requirements prescribed by the Quran and the Sunnah, its claim to the allegiance of the people becomes absolute. The Prophet said: “A Muslim has to listen to and obey (the order of his ruler), whether he likes it or not, as long as his orders do not involve disobedience (to Allah). But if an act of disobedience (to Allah) is imposed, one should not listen to it or obey it.”

 

It also becomes evident that the accountability of the ruler of an Islamic state is twofold: (1) he is answerable to God, as power bestowed on him by God is a sacred trust; and (2) to the people who are his subjects.

 

The office of judge is independent of all executive control and he can exercise his authority without any form of interference from influential quarters. He decides all disputes in the light of the Quran and the Sunnah. Further, a judge is required to be impartial and decide on the merits of the case.

 

The following statement of the Prophet, which he made while deciding the case of a noble woman who had committed theft illustrates the same: “Verily those who were before you were destroyed because when a noble man from among them committed theft, they passed no sentence on him. By Allah, had Fatima, the daughter of Muhammad, committed theft, I would have cut off her hand.”

 

The Quran and the Sunnah define the main responsibilities of a judge. The Pious Caliphs issued detailed instructions about the qualification, appointment, and conduct of judges. Letters written by Caliph Ali to his governors regarding the administration of justice in their territories thoroughly explain who should be a judge and what should be the conduct of a judge. Caliph Umar’s case is an example of how unsuitable judicial behaviour must be dealt with. He once had a lawsuit against a Jew. When both parties went before the judge, the latter rose in his seat out of deference to Umar who looked upon the act as an unpardonable judicial weakness and dismissed the judge at once.

 

Source: The Dawn

 

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/NewAgeIslamIjtihadRethinkingIslam_1.aspx?ArticleID=663


COMMENTS
  • I agree mostly with what sister Sidrah and brother Asadullah wrote and now i would like to tell my readers a few things about ijtihad:

    1. Ijtihad cannot ne carried on the ahkam given in clear nusoos i.e. Quran and sunnah. We have to obey them as this is the only choice left for us, and any attempt to disobey leads to kufr.

    2.Since a'qayid are based on nusoos, no ijtihad could be carried on them. Most of the sects came into being and got themselves separated from the mainstream islam due to their wrong a'qayid. The first sect that separated from the main stream was that of KHAWARIJ, who thought with their tainted intellect that the decision maker is only Allah Subhanuhu wa Ta'ala. In fact the HAQEEQI decicioun maker is Allah, but one cannot differ in the role of HAKAMS from the either party in case of deciding the matter of talaq. Such are the MAJAZI HAKAMS, WHERE AS THE HAQEEQI HAKAM IS ALLAH. Allah has instructed to institute hakams from muslims in divorce and other cases, and to deny their role is a blasphemy.

    To decide the differences between Hazrat A'li KarramAllahu Wajhahu and Hazrat Mu'awiyah RaziAllaho A'nhuma, who fought wars and many sahabah a'laihimurRidhwaan and tabiu'oon got killed in them, deligent sahabah suggested to institute hakams from either side. This enraged the khawarij, who got separated from Hazrat A'li thinking wrongly that it was not permissible in Islam and they did khurooj on Hazrat A'li KarramAllahu Wajhahu, considering him to be (mua'adhAllah) a kafir.

    3. To be from among the khawarij it is essential for them to consider other muslims as kafirs. The khawarij of this time are wahabi, salafi, najadi, ghyr muqallids, ahlehadas, maudoodi, tanzeemi, tableeghi, doobandi, tableeghi,
    ikhwani, albani, binbazi, uthymeeni etc.
    who think that muslims other than their dharam are kafir, mushrik, grave worshipper and bid'ti, worthy to be killed. Thats Ibn Abdal Wahhab Najadi did with the help of saudi rebels of the eastern provinces and with the support of western countries two times. the last being in 1924 to create the illegitimate kingship of present day ruling junta in saudi arabia, who built their kingdom on the heads of the MUSLIM people of Hijaz and other provinces.

    4. Ijtihad is possible on fiqhi masayel i.e. on the matters of af'aal and civic life of muslims like trade, administration etc.
    This too has very stringent conditions to perform e.g. it is necessary for mujtahid to have perfected the memory of 400.000 ahadeeths together with their chains and scrutiny of the people who are involved the transfer of these ahadeeths, lnowledge of Arabic Qawai'd, grammar, language and literature, usool of tafseer etc. making a list of a modest 30 u'loom.

    Now consider the shuyookh of all these sects and judge them through these stringent conditions of ijtihad and see whether Ibn Abdal Wahhab, Binbaz, Albani, maudoodi, dr. Israr, syed Qutub etc. qualify to be mujtahids to make loudest hue and cry that the door of ijtihad is not closed. No doubt that this door is still open but the question is whether these people qualify to be mujtahids or the people who don't follow the 4 GRAND FIQHS justified in being ghyr muqallids? If they honestly revise their erroneous stand, they should come back in the folds of Islam and this door too is still open for them.


    By Syed Ahmad -

Compose Your Comments here:

Name
Email (Not to be published)
Comments
Fill the below text
 
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.