Books and Documents

Interfaith Dialogue (23 Jul 2019 NewAgeIslam.Com)

Modern Scientific Mind Is Highly Welcome In Questioning the Authenticity of Religion

By Amir Suhail Wani

July 22, 2019

A voice lost to wilderness or the madman’s rubric, any talk of religion, God, metaphysic, values and reality suffers any of two possible consequences. Giving him the advantage of anonymity, a top notch Jamat i Islami scholar pertinently described modern epistemology with all its offsprings as the means and instruments of ensuing and securing a revolt against the God and religion. Never before was civilization so shallow in matters of faith and never before a unanimous and collective onslaught was launched against the sacred, Transcendent and divine. A mere mentions of words like “Divine”, “sacred” or “Transcendent” makes people, experiencing the opiedation of modernism, to rise their eyebrows.

Any talk of worlds beyond the sensual is termed as intellectual backlog. World has seen, now and then, people rising, out of their intellectual sincerity or otherwise rising against religion and God. But historically they could never enjoy the status of meta-narrative, but were always, by virtue of historical entelechy confined to margins of civilization. In post renaissance era world has succeeded, by and large, in constructing a civilisation and culture with man rather than God as its ontic reference. This man cantered civilization has paved all the possible ways for criticism and demolition of religious Meta narrative.

Let’s come to philosophy first. Modern philosophy, starting with Descartian scepticism and evolving through the stages of Positivism, Naturalism, Materialism Nihilism and Existentialism, modern philosophy seems to have ultimately ended up at postmodernism. The possibilities of future development can’t be ignored nor can it be claimed that postmodernism is an all pervasive philosophical trend claiming universal adherence. But the broader picture of things has unfolded thus. Postmodernism maintains incredulity towards meta-narrative and has brought with it a host of questions. Traditionally and even up to recent past man seemed to be unanimous on ontic and epistemic stability of things. But with postmodernism not only have been the institutions of religious and traditional impotence held under scrutiny but the very fundamentals of human existence like language, society and all other institutions of human importance have been deprived of their ontic reference and have been made to float freely in abyss of uncertainty. The case with science has been no better. Being a victim of excessive and inordinate empiricism, the Modern day science has surrendered its inquisitive and rational spirit to sheer scienticism.

Ibn Arabi, a classical theorizer of Islamic mysticism noted that “God is a percept, not a concept”. In this single line, the master has resolved an age old question and the problems associated with it. The notion of “conceptual scheme” as it has been adopted unquestionably alike by scientists and philosophers have brought with it an equal number of goods and ills. Man has turned obsessive to reduce everything to his conceptual categories.

The human attitude of dividing a problem into subunits, though it has paid heavily in scientific realm, but has simultaneously brought irreconcilable problems in other affairs of human existence. Modern medicine treats biology disentangled from psychology and this piecemeal approach has landed us in an era where we know more and more about less and less. In a sense we know everything about nothing and nothing about everything. Traditionally things were seen associated and entangled in the cosmic Web.

Coming back to human methodology of understanding things by dividing them into subcategories and then understanding things in terms of local mental categories has distorted and ruined our understanding of God, sacred and divine. We need to understand that the laws formulated by human mind are refuted within the physical realm itself. Thus the laws obeyed by matter aren’t obeyed by light and the laws applicable to fermions are completely defied by bosons. So within our physical immediacy are instances to cleave apart our ultimate trust in the laws of physics. The unending quest for unified theory in physics might bring further insights in this direction. Thus we need to be careful and watchful to the fact that the laws of matter do not apply to the realm of spirit.

Coming back to God who is neither material nor spiritual, neither defined by material boundaries nor circumscribed by contours of space we need to be all the more careful. While we try to understand God in terms of mental categories derived from our physical realm we need to be very cautious that all these categories do not hold true beyond this material universe.

Our conceptual schemes, which in the final analysis rest on the categories of mundane material realm are too coarse and inappropriate to conceptualise and theorise the realm of divine, sacred and godhead. At a point where despite all boasting scientific discoveries man is yet incapable of understanding his basic biology and where despite of conquering the vastness of space man is yet to gain a glimpse of his psychological depths any sweeping statements and miscalculated statements oriented towards reduction of divine to categories of psyche seems but a naive affair. The enlightened theologians, mystics and philosophers of the past have explicitly denounced the access of finite human mind to infinite cosmic intelligence. What God has informed us here and there in sacred texts is to contemplate the nature and our own selves. This unbiased contemplation is sure to bring forth some indirect aspects of divine.

Though we shall be fully conscious of the fact that within the physical universe and human civilization there are instances which are heartrending, discouraging and at times they run quite contrary to the notion of divine. But the mystics and enlightened men throughout the history have been able to dissect the veil of appearance and have succeeded in looking at the essence of existence. On having this enlightened vision they bowed their heads and understood the essence of these apparent vagaries of nature. Ibrahim, the father of modern monotheism, Buddha a silent contemplator, Nanak, a socially conscious religious purgatory amply demonstrate this state of enlightenment.

 Modern scientific mind is highly welcome in questioning the authenticity of religion, aspects of divine and the apparent chaos that is witnessed everywhere in physical and social landscape. There can be no proper understanding in absence of questioning.

Likewise doubt is an essential ingredient of faith. But while one raises questions in atheist or any such frame one must have patience, tolerance and wide sightedness to understand theistic point of view. To dub religion irrational for its simple disagreement with science seems a rather constricted opinion. Religion has been a great architect in shaping the course of human civilization and to unfasten our knots with this perennial source of wisdom, learning, inspiration and exaltation will amount to gross intellectual injustice. The need of hour is not to posit theists and atheists as antithetical but to encourage each to understand the point of other. Maybe in this collective endeavour humanity discovers a paradigm that has still not been thought of.

Amir Suhail Wani is a freelance columnist with bachelors in Electrical Engineering and a student of comparative studies with special interests in Iqbaliyat & mystic thought. He contributes a weekly column for this newspaper that appears every Monday.

Source: The Kashmir Monitor

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/interfaith-dialogue/amir-suhail-wani/modern-scientific-mind-is-highly-welcome-in-questioning-the-authenticity-of-religion/d/119272



  • By publishing such half-baked articles NAI is throwing red meat to hate propagandists such as Hats Off! He would never miss such an opportunity to spew his venom.

    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 7/26/2019 1:58:54 PM

  • "But with postmodernism not only have been the institutions of religious and traditional impotence held under scrutiny but the very fundamentals of human existence like language, society and all other institutions of human importance have been deprived of their ontic reference and have been made to float freely in abyss of uncertainty. The case with science has been no better." what a wonderfully pregnant sentence that threatens to abort!
    By hats off! - 7/26/2019 6:55:29 AM

  • this kind of writing can be automatically generated by using many of the freely available scripts in Perl - i think.
    generally they can also be created out of websites that provide a chomskybot.
    the illiterate hoi-polloi always called this kind of rambling 'word soup' - if they were well fed, and gobbledygook if they were hungry.

    By hats off! - 7/26/2019 6:53:38 AM

  • And finally for someone following both science and religion, Indic traditions have no conflicts between both. In fact, they moot the individual to arrive at the Universal Truths experientially (objective). There is no intermediary whatsoever like with Abrahamic traditions.
    By Dr. D. Natarajan - 7/25/2019 5:54:20 AM

  • Too lofty words. Too complicated writing.
    Leave it to the individual to arrive at his truth at his time and station.

    And try to be open to Hinduism. I see how you amply quote every religion other than India's root. Develop objectivity yourself.
    By Dr. D. Natarajan - 7/25/2019 5:53:53 AM

  • The freedom sought was from control ... control from the church in every sphere of life ... and that's how secularism was born.
    By Dr. D. Natarajan - 7/25/2019 5:53:20 AM

  • Wani, Islam must grant freedom from religion to Muslims. Muslims tend to feel threatened of atheists in many Islamic countries: it feels really odd because atheism is not a sin in Sanatan Dharma. An atheist is as welcome to the fold as the sadhu is.
    By Dr. D. Natarajan - 7/25/2019 5:51:33 AM

  • Trying to reconcile the spiritual with the scientific is a wild goose chase.

    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 7/23/2019 10:03:55 AM

  • Be careful what you say to others because you may not get a chance to take back your words. You may say things you don’t mean at the height of anger & live to regret it. It is so easy to get worked up on a daily basis. Don’t. It’s not worth it!
    By Kaniz Fatma - 7/23/2019 6:26:00 AM

Compose Your Comments here:
Email (Not to be published)
Fill the text
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.