Court’s suo motu decision delivered by Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justice U U
Lalit, to test the legal validity of triple talaq in one sitting in the
petition filed by Shayara Bano, has long been overdue. Shayara Bano – a
sociology postgraduate and a mother of two – appealed that triple talaq be
declared unconstitutional when her husband ended their 15-year-old marriage by
sending her a letter with the word talaq written on it thrice.
India Muslim Personal Law Board has declared that the country’s top court has
no jurisdiction to undertake the exercise as Muslim Personal Law “is
inextricably interwoven with the religion of Islam”, being based on the Quran
and not on a law enacted by Parliament. This argument has little logic. It
needs to be unequivocally stated that the Talaq-I-Bidat, admitted by the Muslim
Personal Law Board to be “sinful” and an “innovation”, finds no sanction in the
does the Quran sanction this form of divorce in one sitting nor was it legally
held permissible by the Prophet. Such a practice violates the fundamental
principles of gender justice, gender equity, good conscience and the dignity of
women strongly enunciated in Islam.
denounced the pre-Islamic, patriarchal notion of the husband’s absolute right
to divorce, stating that divorce was the most reprehensible of all things
permitted: “God has not created anything on the face of the earth that he loves
more than emancipation; and God has created nothing upon the face of the earth
more hateful to him than divorce” (AD 13:3). The Quran illustrates this point
by expressing approval when the Prophet recommended that Zayd should not
divorce his wife in spite of the fact that there was long standing dissension
between husband and wife. “Behold thou should say to one who has received the
Grace of God and His favour, retain your wife in wedlock and fear God” (Q
arbitrary, undisputed, absolute power of divorce by the husband with triple
Talaq in a single sitting was the common customary law practised in pre-Islamic
Arabia in the days of Jahiliyya or ignorance, where a husband would discard his
wife by contemptuously tossing his slipper saying “you are unto me like my
slipper”. This is a grave distortion of the law of divorce in Islam and was
condemned by the Prophet as the following Tradition demonstrates: “The
Messenger of Allah was informed of a man (Rukhana) who divorced his wife three
times together, his face became red and he stood up in displeasure and said:
‘Is the Book of Allah being sported with while I am still in your midst?’” (NS
of Talaq, once pronounced, is considered “bain” or irrevocable where rights of
inheritance cease immediately on pronouncement though the death of the husband
or wife may occur during the period of Iddat or period of waiting. Further, in
this form of Talaq, if the parties wish to remarry the wife undergoes Halala, a
humiliating pre-Islamic practice where the wife went through a marriage with
another man which is consummated and subsequently dissolved.
Ameer Ali points out, legitimacy of the triple Talaq seems to have crept into
Islamic jurisprudence at the instance of the Umayyad monarchs. Inexplicably,
although disapproved by the classical jurists, it has been accepted by most
the legality of this mode of divorce is upheld in India if the husband were to
repudiate his wife during her menstrual flow, if he is in a drunken state, in a
fit of temper, in jest, at the slip of a tongue, when the woman is pregnant and
other such situations, communicated even by means of a telephone call, an SMS,
through Facebook or over Skype.
say Talaq-I-Bidat has devastated the lives of many women and children.
Deprived of any opportunity for reconciliation, this mode of divorce has been
subject to criticism in several Muslim countries.
interpretation advocated by scholars introduced reform through the juristic
means of Ijtehad (creative interpretation). Several Muslim countries have
brought about reform through codification. Countries like Turkey, Tunisia,
Syria, Egypt, Morocco, Iran, Iraq, Malaysia, Indonesia and Pakistan have either
reformed the law completely or brought about legally stringent preventive
measures in this area. Tunisia brought about reform by de-recognition of the triple
Talaq within the circumference and perimeter of Islamic law.
has come for major strides to be taken to bring about reform and change in the
Muslim Personal Law in India. In order to accomplish this, codification of the
Muslim Personal Law is an imperative. The process of codification of Muslim Law
must now be seriously undertaken by a group of legal experts, experienced
jurists well versed in the Muslim law, legal experts, liberal Ulema and
scholars in the field. Gender-just laws must be the common denominator.
Alongside Muslim women, Muslim men’s organisations must push for change.
countries can bring about reform in family laws India must follow suit. In the
words of Justice Hidayatullah: “If the lead is coming from Muslim countries, it
is hoped that in the course of time the same measures will be applied in India
the judgment of the Supreme Court, seeking gender justice.
Zeenat Shaukat Ali is Director General, World
Institute of Islamic Studies for Dialogue, Peace and Gender Justice