certifired_img

Books and Documents

Islam and Science (05 Dec 2019 NewAgeIslam.Com)



Islam Does Not Inhibit Science: Islamic Culture Has Produced Many First-Rate Scientists Who Were Also Devout In Their Religious Observances


By T.O. Shanavas

05 December 2019

A well-known scientist wrote in the National Centre For Science Education Report (NCSE): ‘The progress in learning achieved by Arab astronomers and mathematicians ground to a halt when necessary ability to seek where the data led conflicted with the strictures of Islam that anything important was already available in the Qur’an.’

I believe that it is the lack of familiarity with Islamic culture that preserves this mistaken impression in the Western world. It is not Islam, but some Muslims’ interpretations of Islam, that is responsible for the supposed conflict. In many ways, this confrontation of science and religion in Muslim countries is not very different from Christian countries of the west. Although in both religions there are those who seem to think that no reconciliation or constructive dialogue is possible, neither religion prevents or inhibits science per se. The evidence for Islamic culture shows that it does not inhibit or prevent the science and its growth. It is a historical fact that Islamic culture has produced many first-rate scientists who were also devout in their religious observances.

The Qur’an instructs Muslims to engage in science with expectation that ‘signs in the earth and heavens and in your own self’ will be comprehensible to them.

“There are signs in the earth for those who are firm in their faith, and within yourselves. Can you perceive? (Qur’an 51:20-21).”[1]

“Say Muhammad: ‘Travel in the earth and see how God originates creation; so will God produce a later creation: For God has power over all things (Qur’an 29:20).”[2]

These verses from the Qur’an guided early Muslims to investigate Nature and the creation of human and other life. Moreover, according to the tradition of the Prophet (pbuh) (Hadith):

When a judge gives a decision, having tried his best to decide correctly and is right, there are two rewards for him; and if he gave a judgment after having tried his best (to arrive at the correct decision) but erred, there is one reward for him.)[3]

Therefore, Muslim scientists are allowed to ‘take chances, make mistakes, and get messy’ in the investigation of nature as long as the intention and efforts are to arrive at the correct meaning and the fair judgment in any matter.

On specific issues, the Qur’an is consistent with the current scientific hypotheses and models. For example, the Qur’an anticipates the contemporary Big Bang Theory:

“Do not these unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were an integrated mass, then We split them and made every living thing from water (Qur’an 21:30).”[4]

It also refers to the expanding universe:

“And it is We who built the universe With [Our creative power]; and, verily, it is We who are steadily expanding it (Qur’an 51:47).”[5]

Creation/Evolution:

The Qur’an states that man as a species was created through a gradual process. It states:

“Seeing that He (Allah) created you in successive stages’ (Qur’an 71:14)[6]

Centuries before Darwin, when the West was in the Dark Ages, the Muslims believed that the appearance of humans was not an instantaneous event but a gradual process in which humans were derived from earlier forms. Ibn Khaldoun, a Muslim scholar, wrote 500 years before Darwin that man belongs to the animal kingdom:

…[M]an belongs to the genus of animals and that God distinguished from them by ability to think, which He (Allah) gave man and through which man is able to arrange his actions in an orderly manner.[7]

He further states:

One should look at the world of creation. It started out from the minerals and progressed, in an ingenious, gradual manner to plants and animals…The animal world then widens, its species become numerous, and, in a gradual process of creation, it finally leads to man, who is able to think and reflect. The higher stage of man is reached from the world of monkeys, in which both sagacity and perception are found, but which has not reached the stage of actual reflection and thinking. At this point we come to the first stage of man after the world of monkeys. This is as far as our physical observation extends.[8]

The last sentence of the above quote shows that Muslims reached these conclusions by observations.

Creation/Evolution of Adam and Eve

Ibn Arabi, who lived about 800 years before Darwin is one of the most respected exegetes of the Qur’an. His views on the origin of life and man can be summarized in his own words from the “Uqlatu’l-Mustawfiz:

“On they rolled to perfection: Thus the meaner world was born. Mineral passed to vegetable life, out of which animal life was born.”

“Then creation continued on earth, minerals, then vegetation, then animals, and then man. God made the last of every one of these kinds. The last of the minerals and the first of the vegetations is the truffle. The last of the vegetation and the first of the animals is the date palm. The last of the animals and the first of mankind is the monkey.”

“Since the perfect man is in the perfect form, he deserves the vicegerentship and deputyship of God in the Universe. Here we shall explain the evolution of this vicegerent, his position and form as they are. We do not mean Man only as animal, but on the other hand, as Man and vicegerent . . . This is the intended Perfect Man. The others are animal men. The relation of the animal man to the Perfect Man is that of the ape to the animal man.”

“As for the animal man, he is not a man essentially. His case is like that of animals. But he is distinguished from another through differentiae peculiar to every one of the animals.”

“The goal of all this was man coming in perfect form. When the field was thus prepared, Man came in the nicest form.”

“When God desired the perfection of human evolution, He collected and bestowed on Man all realities of the Universe and illuminated him with all His names.”

“When this comprehensive name became capable of two aspects by itself, it became fit for vicegerentship and organization and gradation of the Universe. If Man does not reach the stage of perfection, he is an animal whose appearance resembles the external appearance of man. Here we are concerned with Perfect Man. The first of human species whom God made was the Perfect Man. He was Adam (may peace be on him). Thus God demonstrated the stages of perfection for the species. He who attains to it is the man who attains perfection, and he who goes down from that stage is one who possesses the human quality in proportion to where he is.”[9]

Ibn Arabi wrote in Futuhat al-Makkiyyah Vol.3:607: ‘I recollected the saying of Holy Prophet to the effect that God has created hundred and thousands of Adams and between each Adam there is a period of seventeen hundred years.'[10]

Active Nature

The secular as well as religious West have the notion that nature’s actions within itself violate the Jewish, Christian and Muslim tenets. I will not comment on the Judeo-Christian perspective on nature’s actions. The Muslims in their classical period (500-1200 AD) had no problem with nature changing anything on the earth. Those Muslims who lived before the dawn of science in the West believed that active nature was an office of the God with delegated duties and tasks. For example, Al-Biruni (800 years before Darwin) wrote:

“…when Nature, whose task it is to preserve the species as they are, finds some superfluous substance, which she forms into some shape instead of throwing it away; like wise, animals with imperfect limbs, when Nature does not find the substance by which to complete the form of the animal in conformity with the structure of the species to which it belongs”[11]

In this matter of active nature, Ibn Khaldoun wrote:

“…soil becomes plants and plants become animals. This can come about only with the help of living spirit and active nature which has the ability to generate substances and change essences.”[12]

Age of the Universe

The West also assumes that Muslims believe in the Judeo-Christian 6,000-year-old earth. For example, Stephen W. Hawking states in his History of Time: “…according to a number of early cosmologies and the Jewish/Christian/Muslim tradition, the Universe started at a finite time and not very distant time in the past.”[13] In contrast, Al-Biruni (800 years before Darwin) rejected the young earth doctrine. He wrote:

…Again, those with a book of divine revelation, like the Jews, the Christians, and others like the Sabians and Magians, have all agreed about dating events by the Era of the Creation of Mankind, but they differ greatly in their estimation of the duration of era. They have not referred to the Era of the Creation of the World, except in the opening two verses of the Torah, which have the following content but not the exact wording: ‘In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form and void, and the spirit of God was moving upon the surface of the waters’ (Genesis I: 1, 2). They considered that to be the first day of the week in which the world was created, but that was a period of time which cannot be measured by a day and night, for the cause of these periods is the sun with its rising and setting, and both the sun and the moon were created on the fourth day of the week. How is it possible to imagine that these days are like the days of our reckoning! The Qur’an says: ‘A day in the sight of thy Lord is like a thousand years of your reckoning’ (Koran 22: 47). In another verse God says: ‘In a day the measure of whereof is as fifty thousand years’ (Koran 70: 4). Thus it is obvious that we cannot estimate that period with our method of reckoning, and that it is unverifiable since the beginning of creation.”[14]

Moreover, Al-Biruni states that God initially scattered the celestial bodies and the time between creation and present could be billions of years. He states: ‘For it is quite possible that these (celestial) bodies were scattered’when the Creator designed and created them. If you then ask the mathematician as to the length of time, after which they would meet each other in a certain point, or before which they had met each other in that identical point, no blame attaches to him, it he speaks of billions of year.'[15]

Muslims and the ‘Deluge’

The Universal Flood of Judeo-Christian faith is not a Muslim doctrine. Muslims, on the other hand, believe it was a localized flood. For example, al Biruni (800 years before Darwin) wrote:

“Persians, and great mass of the Magians, deny the Deluge altogether;…In denying the Deluge, the Indians, Chinese, and various nations of the east, concur with them. Some, however, of the Persians admit the fact of the Deluge, but they describe it in a different way from what is described in the books of Prophets. They say partial Deluge occurred in Syria…but did not extend over the whole of then civilized world, and only few nations were drowned in it.”[16]

Al-Biruni also said that the water level marks on the pyramids suggest that the flood did not reach enough to cover the whole pyramids.

In summary, Islam compels no major conflict between the results of science and the Qur’an. From the time of the Prophet (pbuh), early Muslim scholars believed: (a) nature is an office of God with delegated duties and tasks, and it can make changes within nature itself; (b) the earth is not very young; and, (c) in the evolution of life from minerals to plants, plants to animals and finally the Homo Sapiens emerged from the world of monkeys.

Islam and Advancement of Science

If an assumption that the Qur’an inhibited science is correct, science should have been dead soon after the advent of Islam and the Qur’an. On the contrary, we see science flourished during the first centuries of Islam. Instead of drowning themselves in ignorance with advent of the Qur’an and Islam, Muslims became masters of Science for centuries. The defining event that provided the foundation for this mastery was Islam and the revelation of the Qur’an. Therefore, I would argue that the Qur’an promoted science. Moreover, Islam was not at the uplifting service for Muslims alone. Islam helped to create the Golden Age of Jews who lived under Muslim rule. Jewish thinker Max I. Dimont states:

‘The improbable but true tale of a camel driver’s establishment of a world empire in the name of Allah, wherein the Jews rose to their Golden Age of creativity, only to be plunged into a Dark Age with the eclipse of the Crescent and the ascent of the Cross.'[17]

In contrast to the sentiment echoed by Scott in her review, George Sarton, Will Durant, and Bronowski among others found that the Qur’an promoted science and learning in Islamic societies.

George Sarton, Professor of History at Harvard, wrote:

“The Creation of a new civilization, of international and encyclopedic magnitude within less than two centuries something that we can describe but not explain.”[18]

I do not see any difficulty to explain ‘the creation of a new civilization.’ We use the following method in biology to explain evolution. If we cannot see many explanations for a phenomenon, then we take the event before the occurrence of the phenomenon to explain it. The only event that happened before the rise of the “new civilization” of Muslims was Islam and the revelation of the Qur’an and creation of Muslim community under guidance of Prophet Muhammad. Therefore, the Qur’an and early Islam promoted science.

Furthermore, Will Durant wrote:

“…Muhammad, unlike most religious reformers, admired and urged the pursuit of knowledge: ‘He who leaves his home in search of knowledge walks in the path of God…and ink of a scholar is holier than the blood of a martyr’;”[19]

Similarly, J. Bronowski wrote:

“Muhammad had been firm that Islam was not to be a religion of miracles; it became in intellectual content a pattern of contemplation and analysis.”[20]

So it is clear that Historians, scholars, and the text of the Qur’an itself concur that there is nothing intrinsically inimical to science in its pages. On the contrary, much of the Qur’anic scholarship and scripture seems to support the endeavour that we recognize today under the rubric of science.

References

1. Ali, Ahmed. Al-Qur’an. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. (1977)

2. Ali, Yusuf. The Holy Qur’an, Translation and Commentary. Indianapolis: American Trust Publication, 1977.

3. Al-Bukhari, Adherence to Holy Qur’an and Sunnah. Hadith No.6805.

4. Ali, Ahmed. Al-Qur’an.

5. Asad, Muhammad. The Message of the Qur’an. Gibraltar: Dar Al-Andalus, 1980.

6. Ibid.

7. Khaldun, Ibn. The Muqaddimah. Trans. by Franz Rosenthal. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1967.

8. Ibid.

9. Hussani, S.A.Q. The Pantheistic Monism of Ibn Arabi. Lahore, Pakistan: SH. Muhammad Ashraf, 1979.

10. The Holy Qur’an (Transilation by Allama Nooruddin). Hockessin, DE: Noor Foundation International Inc, Glossary page 3-B.

11. Biruni, al.(1000 A.D) The Athar-Ul-Bakiya (The Chronology of Ancient Nations). Translated by Dr. C. Edward Sachu. London: W.H.Allen, 1879.

12. Ibn Khaldun. Muqaddimah.

13. Hawking, Stephen W. A Brief History of Time. New York: Bantam Books, p.7.

14. Biruni, Al.(1000 A.D.) Kitab Tahdid al-Amakin Listashiah Masafat al- Masakin (The Determination of the Coordinates of Positions for Correction of Distances between Cities). Translated by Jamil Ali. Beirut: The American University of Beirut, 1967. p. 14-16

15. Al-Biruni, Abu Raihan.1000AD. Athar-ul-Bakiya (The Chronology of Ancient Nations), trans. Edward C. Sachu . p. 30

16. Al-Biruni. Fi Tahqiq Ma Li’l-Hind (Alberuni’s India), Vol.I, pp. 378-379.

17. Dimont, Max I. Jews, God, And History. Penguin Books USA, 1962.

18. Sarton, George. The History of Science and the New Humanism. George Braziller, Inc. New York. (1956)

19. Durant, Will. The Story of Civilization. New York: Simon and Schuster, Inc., 1950. Vol.4.

20. Brownoski.J. The Ascent of Man. London, U.K: The British Broadcasting Corporation, 1981.

 

T.O. Shanavas is a native of Kerala, India and is now based in the USA. He is the author of “Islamic Theory of evolution of Evolution the Missing Link between Darwin and The Origin of Species.” Co-author of the book, And God Said, "Let There Be Evolution!” Reconciling the Book of Genesis, The Qur'an, And the Theory of Evolution. Edited by Prof. Charles M. Wynn and Prof. Arthur W. Wiggins.

(Author of book: “The Islamic Theory of Evolution: The Missing Link between Darwin and the Origin of Species.”)

 Co-author of the book: And God Said, “Let There Be Evolution”: Reconciling the Book of Genesis, the Qur’an and the Theory of Evolution, by Prof. Charles M. Wynn and Prof. Arthur W. Wiggins (Editors) 

URL:  http://www.newageislam.com/islam-and-science/to-shanavas/islam-does-not-inhibit-science--islamic-culture-has-produced-many-first-rate-scientists-who-were-also-devout-in-their-religious-observances/d/120445

New Age IslamIslam OnlineIslamic WebsiteAfrican Muslim NewsArab World NewsSouth Asia NewsIndian Muslim NewsWorld Muslim NewsWomen in IslamIslamic FeminismArab WomenWomen In ArabIslamophobia in AmericaMuslim Women in WestIslam Women and Feminism




TOTAL COMMENTS:-   15


  • heaven and earth were never an integrated mass. you seem to be much more ignorant than those who wrote the Qur'an.
    By hats off! - 12/6/2019 6:00:24 PM



  • معاف کیجئے گا جناب ، میں نے آپ کے لیے ادھرملازمت کرکے ادھر  بھی لڈو اور ادھر ملازمت کرکے ادھر بھی لڈو کا استعمال کیا لیکن کبھی جو مخلوق جیسی زبان سمجھتی ہے اسے ویسے ہی سمجھانا چاہیے تاکہ سمجھنے میں کوئی تکلیف نہ ہو۔حدیث پاک میں ہے اماطۃ الاذی عن الطریق یعنی مخلوق کے راستے سے تکلیف دہ چیز ہٹانا بھی ایمان کا ایک شعبہ ہے ۔میں نے اس تکلیف کو آپ سے دور کیا ۔اب آپ سمجھ گئے ہوں گے کہ الزام تراشیاں اور افترا بازیاں اور بد ظنی کا کیا نتیجہ ہوتا ہے ۔

    کسی مخلوق کے اندر خواہ وہ مدرسے سے تعلق رکھتا ہو یا خارج مدارس سے کبھی بد ظنی نہیں رکھنی چاہیے ۔اصلاح طلب امور پر گفتگو کرنی چاہیے مگر اصلاح کرنے کی توفیق  اور زبان وبیان میں تاثیر اسے ہی حاصل ہوتی ہے باعمل ہو  اور مخلص ہو۔بے عمل خواہ عالم ہی کیوں نہ ہو لاکھ اصلاح کی کوشش کرے اس کی زبان میں کوئی تاثیر نہیں ۔


    By Ghulam Ghaus Siddiqi غلام غوث الصديقي - 12/6/2019 4:11:26 AM



  • The question is: are you indirectly blaming newage for paying for dishonesty? My answer is: not at all. You should think are you showing your own dishonesty by blaming it for that? Newage freely allows everyone to write, including you, on the subjects that can help establish good society. Rozi roti har koi kamata hai is duniya me. Aap bhi kamate hain magar aapke dono haathon me laddu hai, idhar se bhi aur udhar se bhi. Above all, the Lord of rozi roti is none other than Allah Almighty. The human beings are just the source of one another. Lekin apne imaan ko bechkar rozi roti kamana, Allah ki panah, ye mere zahan ke kisi dareeche me bhi nahi aur insha Allah naa kabhi hoga. Aap is buhtan se duur hi rahen warna apne ruhaniyat ka hi nuqsaan karenge. Khamakha you are developing doubt in your spirit. But you think You have freedom to do so. And of course this is so, but you are damaging your own ruhaniyat.

    20 or 25 years are not condition for knowledge. Thinking it, I think, is a kind of arrogance before God Almighty. The fact is that Blessings of Allah Almighty are the source of knowledge and Marifat.  

    In the early morning I read your comment, and this led me to unnecessary talks. I was doing a worthwhile work on the usage of zulm in the Quran but your personal comments diverted me to futile work. 
    By GGS - 12/6/2019 3:39:11 AM



  • Alhamdulillah, since 6 years I have been writing on newage but I have never been forced to write against my faith and ideologies. There were the times when I had been in extremely disagreement with many commentators and writers and the Founding Editor of New Age Islam but I never left the path that I were on.

    If I have pledged to spend all my life being a Hanafi, Sunni, Sufi-oriented, I will remain on the same path, but with all their spirits and not in the ways that apparently appear to you.

    I do not worry about my personal things. You can blame me for dishonesty or whatsoever. I know my heart better than anyone else on this earth. And I am pleased that my Lord, Allah Almighty knows my heart well. Then why to worry about your blame? My masters and teachers have already taught me that I need to remain honest for the whole life. I try to remain honest but I fear and worry that if my honesty is not acceptable to My Lord, it will destruct my ‘everything’. I should not be arrogant to feel that it is the worthy of my honesty and dedicated study that I have gained something in knowledge but that if I have gained anything as such, it is all by the blessings of Allah Almighty. I am full faith in My Only God Almighty that He will grant me More blessings.  

    You call me arrogant but this is not the case, whereas I must feel proud that My only Lord is the Most Knowing and it is He Who gives knowledge. If you think this faith of mine or idea makes me ‘superiority complex’ then your idea ‘mubarakh to you’. You can be happy with your perception. 
    By Ghulam Ghaus Siddiqi غلام غوث الصديقي - 12/6/2019 2:59:37 AM



  • I do not need to be accountable to you or Mr Sultan Shahin on religious issues. I may be accountable to him for office hours but not for what I should write.

    I write and I know that I will have to be accountable to My Lord Almighty. 

    And I did not need to say this to you but I have said it. 

    And Yes we should fear God Almighty for what we are speaking. 

    You did not mention the names of Ulama whom you want me to criticize. If you mean by the Ulama Imam Abu Hanifa or any other equivalents then you should know that I will never criticize them.

    You can call me whatever you want. Blind or whatsoever. Those who have done systematic study of Hanafi Methodology understand it well, and will have sympathy with your scholarship.  

    Political or social issues are extremely easy for me, Alhamdulillah, where I do not need to worry as much as I have to do when writing on religious topics. While writing on religious topics, I must worry the consequences that If I am intentionally wrong I will have to get the divine punishment.

    Sohail Arshad sb, people have made religion their business. They should fear it.  Yes we all human beings need to earn for livelihood but we must keep into mind that we should first be the slaves of the One Who is truly managing our livelihood. But it does not mean that we should sell our faith for livelihood.


    By Ghulam Ghaus Siddiqi غلام غوث الصديقي - 12/6/2019 2:39:30 AM



  • Astaghfirullah.
    By GGS - 12/6/2019 2:16:25 AM



  • GGS, apki tabiyat kharab to nahi hogayi hai.
    By arshad - 12/6/2019 1:48:55 AM



  • GGS, when you refute jihadi ideology, you should honestly criticise not only the ihadi organisations but also those ulama whom they qoute like Mr Sultan Shahin does. Since you are not honest, you just criticise the organisations that spread violence but not those ulama whom they claim inspired them. Dont fool people. You are proving yourself a fool.
    By arshad - 12/6/2019 1:48:11 AM



  • GGS, once again you proved that you are suffereing from a superiority complex. Read my comment once again. I had not written that all madrasa products are fools. I had written that all madrasa products  believe that all  others (non madrasa scholars) are fools. I think you commented without reading my comment. And my father was a madrasa graduate but after coming out of madrasa he did not open a madrasa but a higher secondary school. What have you done apart from promoting sectarianism, abusrd theories like Uncreated, Abrogation. Maulana Ali Mian or Syed  Sulaiman Nadvi were great scholars and every Muslim respects them but what have Maulana Salman Nadvi and Qardhawi done? They both supported isis. You cannot discuss with arguments and are good at making absurd comments. You think that since you have come out madrasa with a degree you have become authority on Islam and what ever you write we all should support. Whereas the fact is that you did not have any standing as a Islamic writer when you joined NAI. Your study of the Quran was poor. Gradually you started writing absurd articles and Sultan Shahin sb encouraged you and even paid you for learning to write. You speak less but have mishchief and grudge in heart. Such people are called bhitarghunna. Teach love and forebearance and peace to those who spread hatred and violence in the name of Islam like Maulana Salman Nadvi and  Qardhawi. Recently, Maulana Salman Nadvi had criticised Hadhrat Muawiya on the basis of historical facts. But other Maulana's started abusing him. Why do you people have so much hatred and impatience and lack of restraint in the name of religion. When once I had criticised Tahirul Qadri you had become very angry though the Pakistani media was calling him monkey. Why did not you say anything when maulanas abused Maulana Salman Nadvi? Do you have respect only for Pakistani ulema? You are producing nothing new at NAI, what ever you have learnt by rote in madrasa, you are regurgitating here and trying to impress people. You are promoting Abrogation theory though Sultan Shahin sb does not believe in this theory. What dont you become angry at him. Because you cant be angry with him. Once you refused to translate his article saying you did not believe in the ideas expressed in it. You also beleive that the punishment for blasphemy is death. Please come out with your ideas on  Ahmadis if you are honest. You wrote that the isis considered the yazidis pagans. But you did not tell from where the isis got their beliefs. They qoute f rom classical ulama to justify their beliefs. But you never refute those classical scholars who first promoted this ideology of hate and violence. I am not saying this but Sultan Shahin sb has written this in his article but I know you cant be angry with him. You stared writing articles at NAI and do not have any credentials as a Islamic writer but you have developed a superiority complex that you have become an Aalim-e-Deen and whatever you write we should accept in toto. Many readers also criticise and abuse  Sultan  Shahin sb but he never retorts and gets angry. You are refuting the ideology of hate and violence with the help of abrogation theory which itself promotes jihadi ideology. What a fool you are. And what a joke. 
    I dont  write article 'easy come easy go'(I laugh at your lack of vocabulary). If I or any other person  does a work easily that does not mean that work is easy. If you could do the translations, Sultan Shahin sb would not ask me to do the translations or other  write ups. The fact is that you dont have many choices since your area of  study is very limited. You can only write on fiqhi issues that too from the  point of view of a madrasa product. So you just keep finding issues and write on the same topics from different angles. Thats why you wrote on abrogation to refute jihadi ideology. what else can you do. You cant write on social issues, political issues, literary issues. So keep doing what you are best at. I started writing in 1990 and have a wide range of interests. So you can only be jealous. You are twenty years junior. Spend a few years and learn to accept criticism instead of being haughty and arrogant. Today religious literature is written in modern style like  Wahiduddin Khan does. You try to impress readers by using complex terminology making your own writing difficult for general readers. Maulana Wahiduddin Khan and others know more about Islam and Quran but they do not try to impress readers by their language but by their  ideas. I can write more but as of now I stop.

    By arshad - 12/6/2019 1:41:57 AM



  • G, khushfahmi dur karne ki niyyat se zarur likhen.
    Yahi maqsad rah gaya hai
    Khulus irada lekar likhen aur sitaron se aage jahan aur bhi hain ka misdaq ban jaaen

    By GGS - 12/5/2019 9:16:59 PM



  • Qur'an had nothing to do with the scientific explosion in the islamic age.
    they werre conquering countries, appropriating their knowledge, calling it islamic and selling it to the world as if islam did it.
    you are just an innocent but complicit victim of arabian imperialism.
    with your logic, judaism should be the only true religion because jews continue to dominate most scientific discoveries and knowledge.
    and by the way being such a great muslim, it is really a surprise that you did not migrate to saudi arabia (not that they would accept a brown muslim), but chose to migrate to a binge drinking white supremacist, half naked, freely fornicating nation.
    a real muslim i guess.

    By hats off! - 12/5/2019 5:25:57 PM



  • Allah ka Karam hai.Zara masruf tha isliye apke comment ka jawab nahi de paya. Aap khush fahmi me mubtla ho gaye. Inshallah Kal kuchh likhunga
    By Arshad - 12/5/2019 10:22:08 AM



  • शहद दिखाए ज़हर पिलाए, कातिल डायन शौहर कुश
    इस मुर्दा र पर क्या ललचाया दुनिया देखी भाली है

    By Paaji - 12/5/2019 8:28:45 AM



  • Wow. Tabiyat kaisi hai Janab 
    By GGS - 12/5/2019 8:19:31 AM



  • Later madrasa products shunned science and engaged in the " created uncreated debate promoted extremism and militantism. Now they are writing refutations to wash the sins of their ideological father's.
    By Arshad - 12/5/2019 5:03:22 AM



Compose Your Comments here:
Name
Email (Not to be published)
Comments
Fill the text
 
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.

Content