certifired_img

Books and Documents

Islam and Spiritualism (10 Nov 2016 NewAgeIslam.Com)


Believers – So Turn Away From Blasphemers and Say ‘Peace’


By Rashid Samnakay, New Age Islam

10 November 2016

On Friday the 4th of November a huge protest, estimated by as many as hundred thousand people, took place in Jakarta, capital of Indonesia- a majority Muslim country - against the incumbent governor of Jakarta, a Christian, Basuki Tjahaja known as Ahok.

He is alleged to have blasphemed by saying that the opposition to his election next year is being orchestrated by Muslim ‘hard-liners’ by using a verse from Quran. According to this verse given below, Muslims are not supposed to elect a non-Muslim leader even if he is a Christian – people of the Book.

It is reported that one person died and scores were injured during the protest and because of that protest President Joko Widodo had to postpone his planed State visit to Australia; a neighbouring majority non-Muslim country!

The verse in Question is supposed to be 5:60- O you who believe, take not for friends (Auliya) and protectors those who take your religion for mockery or sport- -whether among those who received the scripture before you, or among those who reject faith; but fear God if you have Faith. ‘The holy Quran’ by Y. Ali…. A simple play on two different words ‘leaders’ and ‘friends’ is noteworthy. J. M. Rodwell and many others too translate ‘Auliya’ as friends.

However none of them seem to associate mockery and sport with Blasphemy as it is understood today. Unlike the Bible, there is no punishment ordained in Quran and the judgment and punishment for mockery and ridicule is left to God.

To speak impiously of or profanely is termed as blasphemy. Today it specifically means against God, Prophets and Religion so that it causes deep offence to religious people. Presently in many Muslim countries blasphemy is punishable by law and in some “Islamic” countries on the basis of religious traditions/Sharia, the punishment is stoning to death!

In the Biblical scriptures too it is given as punishable by stoning to death but is never put in practice anywhere in the Western Judeo-Christian world. So Muslims today are better followers of Biblical commands than the Christians themselves.

Reams of pages have been written by Muslim and non-Muslim scholars on the subject condemning the laws against blasphemy and its punishment by death, citing it as being against the teaching of Quran, the Book that Muslim nation professes to adhere to. In it the specific word for ‘blasphemy/insulting Deen’ in Arabic, the language of Quran تجدیف؛ سبّ الدین is not mentioned. Instead there are such words as nonsense, jest/sport, mockery, ridicule etcetera, uttered by ignorant/illiterates. There is no suggestion given in there of punishment to be given!

What is interesting is that in today’s language where blasphemy is alleged to be committed and offensive language is used, the Book instructs Believers to: so turn away from them and say to them Peace-43:89; and similar dozens more verses containing the word peace. The onus of maintaining peace سَلام and harmony is therefore placed on the Believers rather than on the blasphemers! Instead the Believers are directed to argue with them in a beautiful way:

6:125- Invite all to the way of your Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious: For you Lord knows best, who has strayed from His Faith and who has received guidance.

Ignorance of or deliberate disregard for the contextual reference of the verses of the Book, where the enemies of Muslims of the time used to mock and ridicule them is today: in itself making a mockery of the scripture! Therefore, in today’s terms it must be blasphemy!

It requires a very long stretch of imagination to connect the alleged statement that Ahok made with blasphemy and the alleged interpretations given by the religious leaders to the protesters.  So it appears that they conveniently used the verse to incite their followers for political gains and as a result an innocent life was lost in addition to scores injured!

It is universally accepted that it is the ‘right’ of every citizen to prevent a wrongdoer from being elected to public office and to remove such a person from the office if he or she is holding it. But the reasons have to be sound, intelligent, moral and ethical and not couched in dubious interpretations of scriptural text to mislead the innocent people and use them as fodder to do the dirty work.

This mind set has been the legacy ever since the Codes of the Book have been turned into for the use of ‘religion’ by the church and clergy for their specific benefits, a few centuries after Muhammad the Apostle’s death. The innocent victims are the illiterates who follow the religious mind-controllers; without any regard for the consequences and repercussions of their actions.

By all account Ahok seemed to have had a successful political career in Indonesia. He has been elected to Nations political positions and supported by many Muslim organisations, including the present position he holds as governor of Jakarta, where he was Vice Governor under President Widodo’s governorship before him. So what has changed now one may ask?

Professor Hal Hill from the Australian National University writes in Financial Review that ‘the demonstrations have "shaken Indonesia" and was "arguably the most serious in the country since the May 1998 demonstrations that led to the demise of the 32-year Suharto presidency’.

Have the white-robed religionist suddenly woken up to realise that the country and the Nation has been wrong all along in being peaceful and harmonious and that therefore is NOT in the interest of the nation. And according to their different interpretations of the Book Governor Ahok’s mere reference to the scripture constitutes blasphemy?

Who then is a bigger blasphemer and who is mocking its verses to use it for miserable gains at the expense of the whole nation? These sentiments are expressed in the Book as:

2:78- And there are among them illiterates, who know not the Book, but see therein their own desires, and they do nothing but conjectures. 2:79- Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: ‘This is from God’. To traffic with it for miserable price! Woe to them for what their hands write and for the gains they make there by.

Indonesia as the most populist Muslim country has been a proud example of harmonious- coexistent country in the world since the overthrow of Suharto’s regime. But here too the “oil field” politics of a decade ago instigated by vested interests of its neighbors and now the “Islamist” baton holders are conducting their overtures, of deafening cacophony of disharmony instead of the symphony of “Salaamun A’laikum, may peace be with you always”.

Dear Indonesians, since you claim to follow the commandments of the Book and not the illiterate disharmonious conductors - “so turn away from them and say to them ‘Peace’ -43:89. As is the national salute of all the Believers of the world, and set an example for the Muslim world which is in dire need today of at least one such example!

A regular contributor to New Age Islam, Rashid Samnakay is a (Retd.) Engineer

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/islam-and-spiritualism/rashid-samnakay,-new-age-islam/believers-–-so-turn-away-from-blasphemers-and-say-‘peace’/d/109062

New Age IslamIslam OnlineIslamic WebsiteAfrican Muslim NewsArab World NewsSouth Asia NewsIndian Muslim NewsWorld Muslim NewsWomen in IslamIslamic FeminismArab WomenWomen In ArabIslamophobia in AmericaMuslim Women in WestIslam Women and Feminism

 





TOTAL COMMENTS:-   4


  • TAKING JEWS AND CHRISTIANS AS FRIENDS

    A very frequent question I receive from readers is whether Muslims can keep Christians and Jews as friends. This question is usually a result of an isolated reading of Quranic passages such as verses 3:28 and 5:51 which advance a general prohibition.

    Those astute with Quranic methodology should be aware that many verses of the Quran are elaborated in other parts of the Quran and any 'summary' verses should ALWAYS be understood in light of the more elucidatory verses.

    If one just relied on verses 3:28 and 5:51 alone, one would conclude that the prohibition was absolute against not only the disbelievers but also the People of the Book without distinction.

    However, verse 5:57 provides the elucidatory narrative and the complete context:

    005:057
    "O ye who believe! take not for friends / allies / protectors (awliyaa) THOSE WHO TAKE YOUR RELIGION FOR A MOCKERY OR SPORT / RIDICULE OR FUN (huzuwan wala'iban), whether among those who received the Scripture before you, or among those who reject faith; but fear ye God, if ye have faith (indeed)"

    The above verse clearly clarifies both verses 3:28 and 5:51 by including both categories and makes it clear that the prohibition is ONLY restricted to those that take religion for a mockery or sport / ridicule or fun (huzuwan wala'iban).

    To those who have never shown any animosity, one is only expected to show them kindness and deal with them justly.

    060:008
    "God does not forbid you respecting those who have not made war against you on account of (your) religion, and have not driven you forth from your homes, that you show them kindness and deal with them justly; surely God loves the doers of justice"

    We must always be aware of reading passages in an 'isolated manner' and should be prepared to subject the Quran to a thorough reading / understanding of its complete narratives.

    - Joseph Islam
    www.quransmessage.com

    By Mubashir - 11/11/2016 7:25:17 PM



  • hats off- how appropriate is your rage. Your list is true and more

    “2:78- And there are among them illiterates, who know not the Book… 2:79- Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands…”

    Double standards of the practitioners? The world is full of them!

    The sages who wrote “All men are CREATED EQUAL…” possessed over hundred slaves themselves—both men and women and some say black and white too. And they were not illiterate!!

    But, we should NOT stop pointing out to whoever might be able READ …what long forked tongues the practitioners have. “Dear Indonesians, since you claim to follow the commandments of the Book and not the illiterate disharmonious… “so turn away from them and say to them ‘Peace’ -43:89”.

    I am with you and am disgusted too; keep up your rage while faithfully distinguishing between the two.

    May the force too be with you!


    By Rashid Samnakay - 11/10/2016 6:40:08 PM



  • Only those who are insecure in their faith need blasphemy laws.


    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 11/10/2016 1:47:01 PM



  • what a free for all!

    every (so-called) moderate muslim claims
    1) there is no punishment for blasphemy
    2) there is no punishment for apostasy
    3) there is no hijab requirement
    4) there is no triple talaq
    5) there if no compulsion in religion
    6) there is no inequality in islam
    7) there is no discrimination
    8) democracy is compatible with islam

    yet, these same apologists seem to suffer from no dissonance when all over the world, (almost) every muslim majority nation or the self-declared islamic countries swear by most of these tenets in default.

    indonesia is a de facto islamic caliphate!

    islamic countries have no equality of faith, but muslims are most vocal when they invade shores of kuffar countries. they set out to carve out enclaves and conclaves wherever they go, they demand ban on pork, demand enforcement of halal diets, demand forcible closure of pubs, disallow gender mixing, prevent bonding with local traditions and customs and cry islamophobia at the drop of a hat! never mind the judenophobia in-built into the koran! never mind the denigration of pagans in the koran! never mind there is no significant religious minority in any islamic country!

    but when it comes to complaining theirs are the loudest, shrillest and most demanding voices.

    hindus migrating to europe do not demand ban on beef. jains migrating to americas do not demand ban on meat, but muslims feel so entitled to special considerations and extraordinary privileges wherever they swarm, that even to point it out is islamophobic! what double standards!

    By hats off! - 11/10/2016 10:47:27 AM



Compose Your Comments here:
Name
Email (Not to be published)
Comments
Fill the text
 
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.

Content