FOLLOW US:

Islamic Culture (14 Jun 2012 NewAgeIslam.Com)
Pakistan Education: War between Saudi and US Curriculum

 

By Rafia Zakaria

June 5, 2012

ON June 2, 2012, Karen Freeman, the deputy director for the United States Agency for International Development, spoke at a pre-departure orientation event held for some members of the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan.

The event marked the initiation of a programme through which 172 deans and university officials and provincial and national education secretaries from colleges and universities all over Pakistan would be travelling to Columbia University in New York. While there, the officials will receive training on strategic planning and policy development as it relates to education in Pakistan.

The trip is only one of the many initiatives related to education that have been funded by USAID. A perusal of the USAID Pakistan page reveals several more such programmes, schools funded in rural areas, plans to improve women’s education — all in all a heartening bouquet of good intentions in a land where a large percentage of the population lives in extreme educational poverty.

The timing of the US-funded trip for Pakistani educators is also fortunate. Last week, the budget was marked on the Pakistani calendar as the moment for a collective national lament over the lack of funding for learning and the overspending on bombs amid similar complaints.

How comforting then to hear of a benevolent project to educate our educators on improvements in this ignored sector.

The United States is not the only benefactor interested in popularising the love of learning in Pakistan. Saudi Arabia, Pakistan’s other faithful benefactor, has over the years been involved in similar philanthropic contributions. One of these ventures, the International Islamic Relief Organisation runs a large orphanage in Islamabad, which educates, houses and clothes thousands of young destitute Pakistani children.

This orphanage is but one public face of Saudi investment in Pakistan education; the private face is equally well known.

One Wikileaks cable from late 2008 by the American consulate in Lahore records in detail the activities of Saudi charities in funding hundreds of Deobandi-oriented religious schools in those areas. Like the Americans, the Saudis also fund teacher training and invite hundreds of madarsa educators to Saudi Arabia on fully funded trips for just this purpose.

The Saudi and American efforts to educate Pakistanis are substantively different. The Americans are pushing a curriculum that ostensibly promotes democracy and pluralism, imagines the child as a budding scholar and not a soldier, the world as holding opportunity and not only temptation.

The Saudi curriculum banks on other truths — of salvation gained in another life, of a world of ascetic self-sacrifice, of the necessity of domination and the inevitability of destruction. The American promises are of here and now — open to being evaluated on the scales of reality — the Saudi ones for the hereafter, untouchable and perfect in their utopic potential.

The distinctions between the two kinds of education can occupy several tomes but their substantive differences and the superiority or relevance of one over the other often camouflages the common threads.

For both, the provision of learning, the construction of schools and the task of opening the poverty-stricken Pakistani mind is aligned directly and inextricably to warfare.

For the Americans, the construction of schools, training of teachers and provision of textbooks are meant to stanch the moral depravity of other killings — some targeted, others accidental — the grisly and sometimes meaningless horror of hovering drones, of war.

If there can be a school or training for every wedding party mistakenly targeted by a Hellfire missile and vaccination programmes used to catch a terrorist, war can be made to look like a campaign to uplift and empower.

The Saudi education recipe enables not some surreptitious camouflage of bombings but the creation of bombs themselves and cheaply produced foot soldiers.

There are ironies in the mix: the Saudis and the Americans are friends who chat frequently but never seem to see the opposing directions of their projects in Pakistan. Such are the friendships of the wealthy — the sportsmanlike tolerance of dear friends at the hunt, where one allows another to corner the deer and fire the rifle with the gentlemanly benevolence of those enormously endowed. The delivery, regardless of the one who fires the shot, is death.

Pakistan’s educational woes are of long standing and well-known. In our current time of hardship as we beg and borrow to fill our tanks with petrol and light our stoves with gas, few have tears left to shed over the inaccessibility of the ABCs to the children weaving in and out of traffic at intersections, knotting up rugs in poorly lit mud huts.

Those costs of education Pakistan shares with scores of other developing nations that bend under the weight of demographics stuck in the darkness of illiteracy. What is unique to Pakistan, what amounts to a war on education in this country is the subjugation of education to warfare both from within and without, and the transformation of learning from a weapon against war to a weapon of war.

The agendas of Saudi Arabia and the US may be markedly different, but their strategies and their sly co-option of the good, the eye-opening, the liberating into mere packaging for warfare, make education the empty morsel that fills the stomach but provides no sustenance.

The war on education in Pakistan then is a consequence of the tying together of war and education. The consequences are not just the threat of continuing illiteracy resulting from the performance of a government that cannot deliver or refuses to do so, or a military that takes for the barracks what was meant for books and blackboards.

They also entail a population sceptical of school because it is linked to soldiers and teachers who teach first about fighting and only sometimes about the future.

The writer is an attorney teaching political philosophy and constitutional law.

Source: http://dawn.com/2012/06/06/the-war-on-education/

URL: http://newageislam.com/islamic-culture/rafia-zakaria/pakistan-education--war-between-saudi-and-us-curriculum/d/7621

 


COMMENTS
  • Dear Mr JB, Please let me share good news with you. There are a lot of Hindus who tend to think like you (since you may be believing in numbers); and this fact is not lost on a lot of Muslims. My experience is that with gentlemen like you, arguments don’t work so I will not come out with my logic. I shall only state some sporadic facts. 1. Afghanistan is more in ruins than Iraq and Iraq in more in ruins than Pakistan. Though, Pakistan and/or Iran may in future beat both in the matter of accumulating ruins, by the kind courtesy of some ‘democratic humanitarian’ states, and the courtesy may extend to nuking them.
    2. Human life lost will not be a matter of concern for the majority of citizens of such ‘democratic humanitarian’ states. They are pathologically hateful and bereft of ideology and full of greed and lust (their identity card).
    3. But those getting nuked will not regret it. Human being is the only life-form that chooses to die for the sake of ideas in the head.
    4. Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan were beautiful landscapes with peace all around until very recently though they have been Muslims (divided in various sects to demonstrate that Islam accepts diversity of views within its fold) since ages.
    5. What you call as scientific progress I call a move towards developing more and more powerful destructive bombs and delivery systems.
    6. There is nothing called Hinduism as an ideology –a word coined by the Muslims. Buddhism, because of lack of the doctrine of self-defence, was routed by Vedic peoples until Bangladeshis as the last receding post of Buddhism saw salvation in Islam.
    7. Islam is a religion sent by God, and human beings need not worry about its destruction – even as the best part.
    8. You and I and we – all will die unto dust but this universe will go on as per the wish of its designer – This is self-evident.
    9. If tomorrow you, Mr. JB, and Mr. Satwa Gunam (Please don’t be angry. This is just an academic question, and I agree with you, no possibility of this happening ever) decide to become Muslims, that is you start believing in an unseen God as a creator, sustainer and destroyer of this universe, and accept Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as the Prophet who has brought these divine commandments, then what am I supposed to do except to discourage you not to do this because you will lose so much in life?
    Nevertheless, suppose you still insist that no, no this life is a Maya and I am looking for eternal salvation, then am I supposed to beat you back to your camp? This is the dilemma. God Rajneesh had openly said that his religion was for the rich and the entry to the ‘Sex-Enhanced-Prolonged-Samadhi’ had a forbidding fee for the poor. Unfortunately Allah has openly offered to extend succour to the poor, the wretched of the earth, the emaciated by asking him/her to just knock the door. Tell me brother how do you expect me to give up an ideology such as Islam’s just to earn a certification from you that I am not a fanatic. Though I beseech you to award me this certificate without asking me to change my religion
    PS: One thing was left out – this Mughal-e- Azam thing. Satwa Gunam wants to go back to Gupta and Maurya empire (please don’t go that far; you will land up in Buddhism). JB thinks I am the only convert. But we are all converts. Surely the apes whose descendants we all are were no Hindus.
    Now, “Manzoorul Haque is the typical example of a fanatic (I have already placed my request) converted (we all are) Muslim who believes Indian civilization the way it exists today is because of Mughal rule”. Well, I do not understand why Pakistan could not have continued with the cultural continuity of Mughal e Azam culture, as shown in the movie called Mughal e Azam (why this hallucination of Mughal rule and empire I don’t understand, because I have not even mentioned these things). As far as India, as it exists today, is concerned I have not even let known my views.
    With the presence of persons like JB and Satwa Gunam around, I have no reason to doubt that India as exists today culturally is a continuation of Gupta empire (It was a small sized nebulous political entity) merging straightaway with the culture of British godfather, by- passing the nearly 800 years of Muslim cultural influence. Today an Indian ‘kanya’ who has conquered the West in erotic sciences, and earned recognition for India such that she can be recognized in the West even by her most concealed private part, is coming back to India to reclaim Khajuraho-art in Mumbai film industry with ‘Jism2’. Who can doubt about the redundancy of Islam in India? After all the farthest that a Muslim muashra could accommodate was Kathak, which to my mind continues to be the highest art-form. Anything beyond is dirt being produced in Mumbai film industry by quintals.

    By Manzoorul Haque - 6/16/2012 2:29:04 AM
  • @Manzoorul Hauqe I never expect anybody to agree with me nor with you. If you have an expectation of gold moghul time, i have an expectation of golden gupta / mauriaya period. Then you cannot say that your secular and i am communal. You get that right. Best part of Islam is that today it is on self destruction mode and that need not require anything other enemy but its medieval tribal hatred.
    By satwa gunam - 6/15/2012 10:14:20 PM
  • Manzoorul Haque is the typical example of a fanatic converted muslim who believes Indian civilization the way it exists today is because of Moghul rule. Hence his thoughts. When muslims demanded a land for muslims, i.e. Pakistan and ruined it, now all of a sudden that does not represent islam.All along, islam has only borrowed from other cultures like the persian, byzantine , punjabi & Afghani Hindu cultures. It usually takes about 100 yrs for the mullahs to kill all that progress and push the people into darkness.

    In the early days of Islam, there were continuous military conquests that allowed for new converts and hence new source of knowledge. Now muslims claim that period as their glory days where science flourished. What is hidden from public view is that science flourished in those civilizations even before Islam took over those lands. Its the same same gene pool in Iraq/Iran- the persian. Its still the same gene pool in Egypt. Why did all the progress in science & knowledge stop? The Punjabis have the same gene pool that great Indian

    kings/musicians/artists/philosophers/scientists evolved from. Bengalis have their own greats scholars in the history, great scientists like Bose, literateurs like Tagore etc. Why is Bangladesh so backward. The common line is Islam. May be Islam was intended to be a great religion. But the religion that is being practised world over as Islam is not great and will only bring darkness to its followers. This will happen as long muslims worry about converting others and imposing islamic law or following it rather than worrying about themselves as human beings and making the world a better place to live.

    For that matter any religion that places an emphasis on proselytization may have short term gains in terms of numbers, but will die a natural death over time. Same reason why Buddhism never survived in India, inspite of India being majority Buddhist about 1500 yrs ago. Buddhism borrowed from Hinduism and flourished due to proselytization. But its essence was not anything new.


    By JB - 6/15/2012 1:06:05 PM
  • For the simple reason, Mr Gunam, that even though you may be a Hindu, you lack the basic ability to understand language. My agreeing with you does not automatically mean that you have to agree with me because the first condition to agree is the ability to understand what the other person is saying.
    By Manzoorul Hauqe - 6/15/2012 9:11:51 AM
  • @Manzoorul Haque Why must india look upon only going back to mogul rule. Further it reflect the tone of imperialism of muslim. There could be some who would like to go back to the Gupta or mauriya empire. Coming back to the islamic belief of no culture but in reality what thrives in the islamic world is wine and women in the name of tourism in the desert wilderness. Your comparison of kathak to blue film is deplorable and probably you are one of the perverted muslim flock of gcc.
    By satwa gunam - 6/15/2012 4:43:26 AM

Compose Your Comments here:

Name
Email (Not to be published)
Comments
Fill the below text
 
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.