certifired_img

Books and Documents

Islamic Sharia Laws (17 Oct 2012 NewAgeIslam.Com)



Is Marrying Non-Muslims (read Hindus) Allowed in Islam?

 

By Aiman Reyaz, New Age Islam

16 Oct 2012

One of the most common misconceptions about Islam is that it prohibits Muslims from marrying non-Muslims. Most people, both Muslims and non-Muslims, believe this to be true, and the Ulema insist that that is the case. They commonly cite verse 2:221 from the Quran to make their point:

“Do not marry unbelieving women, until they believe: A slave woman who believes is better than an unbelieving woman, even though she allures you. Nor marry (your girls) to unbelievers until they believe: A man slave who believes is better than an unbeliever, even though he allures you. Unbelievers do (but) beckon you to the Fire.  But Allah beckons by His Grace to the Garden of Bliss and forgiveness, and makes His Signs clear to mankind: That they may celebrate His praise.”

The Ulema interpret “unbelieving” as “non-Muslim”, but that is not quite correct. The Arabic word used in this verse is “al Mushrikun”, which means pagans. It obviously refers to pagans at the time of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). These were people who often buried their daughters’ right after their birth, for whom women were merely for carnal pleasures. Women among the pagans had no rights, they lived entirely on the mercy of men.

So it was specifically for the protection of (Muslim) women that the Quran forbade marriages with the pagans – and them alone. As no divine faith preaches such treatment for women, even a literal interpretation of this verse does not prohibit marriage with a man or woman belonging to any other religion.

Abduallah Yusuf Ali says: “Marriage is a most intimate communion, and the mystery of sex finds its highest fulfillment when intimate spiritual harmony is combined with the physical link. As religion is a real influence in life to both parties or to either party, a difference in this vital matter must affect the lives of both more profoundly than differences of birth, race, language, or position in life. It is therefore only right that the parties to be married should have the same spiritual outlook. If two persons love each other, their outlook in the highest things of life must be the same. Note that religion is not here a mere label or a matter of custom or birth. The two persons may have been born in different religions, but if, by their mutual influence, they come to see the truth in the same way, they must openly accept the same rites and the same social brotherhood. Otherwise the position will become impossible individually and socially.”

During a question-answer session, a woman asked televangelist Dr Zakir Naik about marriage between Muslims and non-Muslims. He said: “For a car to run smoothly it requires nice tyres, clean machine and good maintenance. Sister, I want to ask you, what if one tyre is of the tractor and the other is of a bicycle? Will the car run properly and smoothly?”

In his inimitable style, Naik avoided getting into the details of the issue, and instead cited a vague and irrelevant analogy by way of answer. Like many other Ulema, he cited verse 2:221, but did not interpret it correctly. Nor did he say anything about the Quran’s express permission to marry among the People of the Book – people who have been recipients of divine revelations.

In verse 5:5, the Quran says: “This day are (all) things good and pure made lawful unto you. The food of the People of the Book is lawful unto you and yours is lawful unto them. Lawful unto you in marriage are not only chaste women who are believers, but chaste women among the People of the Book, revealed before your time when ye give them their due dowers, and desire chastity, not lewdness, nor secret intrigues.”

This clearly means that marriage with a Christian or a Jew is allowed. It also means that marrying Hindus, Buddhists and members of various other faiths is not prohibited either. The Quran says that “In every age have We sent a revelation… to every nation have We sent a Warner”. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) has said that Allah has sent 1, 24,000 prophets to the face of the Earth. Only 25 of them are mentioned by name in the Quran. The rest are not, but that does not make them lesser prophets, and nor should it deny their followers the status of People of the Book.

Let’s look at Hinduism. The Hindu scriptures also teach the concept of One God, who begets not and nor is he begotten. The Brahmasutra says: “There is only one God, and not a second.” Yajur Veda adds: “Of thy God there is no image, no idols.” This is exactly like the concept of Allah in Islam. It is not such a big leap of faith, then, to conceive of Ram, Krishna and other “avatars” of Vishnu as prophets, and of Vedas and Upanishads as divine revelations. Ditto for Buddhism. Even Mughal emperor Akbar considered these books to be the word of Allah, and his concept of “sulh kul” embraced all religions into a common fold that was “peace to all”.

Clearly, then, the received wisdom that Islam forbids Muslims to marry non-Muslims is incorrect. This notion is little more than another means by which the Ulema seek to divide the world and build walls between Muslims and their brethren.

Differences among communities have their own significance. In verse 22:40, the Quran says: “…had not Allah checked one set of people by means of another, there would surely have been pulled down monasteries, churches, synagogues and mosques, in which the name of Allah is commemorated in abundant measure.”

But we must always remember that, as the children of Adam and Eve, we are all eventually members of one big human family, and that makes us more similar than different from each other.

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/islamic-sharia-laws/aiman-reyaz,-new-age-islam/is-marrying-non-muslims-(read-hindus)-allowed-in-islam?/d/9017

 




TOTAL COMMENTS:-   102


  • Good Nice Site

    By PRATEEK SHAKYA - 4/28/2015 6:18:25 AM



  • Impressive writing!
    By sadaf mirza - 11/17/2012 1:53:39 PM



  • Rational says, "Halala is an inhuman practice prescribed by the Islam...."
    True! But instead of fighting it, you left Islam like a rat!
    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 11/14/2012 2:55:47 AM



  • Rational says, " What about your dishonesty? When an issue on women suffering is raised, either all sects in Islam remain silent ...."
    How does that make me dishonest? I am one of the strongest supporters of  Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan. Do you think before smearing people or do you do it just out of habit? 
    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 11/14/2012 1:41:23 AM



  • @sadaf. If killing a man is like killing of whole human kind and if religions are against human killing why on the earth so many people are killed by religion inspired people.

    One more link to refute your claim. Please concentrate on the issue not on the source as I know you may say it is from the enemy of Islam site.

    http://www.islam-watch.org/authors/82-jabali/65-killing-humanity-obama-misinterprets-quran-532-passes-noble-jewish-teaching-as-islamic.html


    By rational - 11/13/2012 10:41:36 PM



  • @sadaf. If killing a man is like killing of whole human kind and if religions are against human killing why on the earth so many people are killed by religion inspired people.
    One more link to refute your claim. Please concentrate on the issue not on the source as I know you may say it is from the enemy of Islam site.
    http://www.islam-watch.org/authors/82-jabali/65-killing-humanity-obama-misinterprets-quran-532-passes-noble-jewish-teaching-as-islamic.html
    By rational - 11/13/2012 10:31:24 PM



  • Dear Rehan Nezami saheb.  You need to fight with Mr Mohammed Yunus, GM sahiban etc on Halala and Triple talaq etc.
    I have read your views on Halala and of Mr Mohammed Yunus as well. First convince Mr Mohammed Yunus an erudite scholar of Islam and then come to me.
    Halala is an inhuman practice prescribed by the Islam to insult the entire female population.
    By rational - 11/13/2012 10:23:53 PM



  • @Sadaf. Kindly go through the following link. and comment.

    http://www.bigpicweblog.com/exp/index.php/weblog/comments/does_the_koran_really_say_that_to_kill_one_man_is_to_kill_all_mankind/

    I am an ignorant person and imbecile as well. Don't worry about it. I posted a link on predestination. Though you are free to not respond, I think that link deserves an answer from your intelligent high majesty. 


    By rational - 11/13/2012 10:07:44 PM



  • Dear Ghulam Mohiyuddin Saheb,  I am ignorant. Let it be. What about your dishonesty?
    When an issue on women suffering is raised, either all sects in Islam remain silent or justify the injustice by any method. Take the case of Shabano, Imrana etc. Have you heard Muslims organized a rally against any injustice done to women or any ill in the Muslim society.. Whole world is witnessing Muslims's  violent protest against useless issues but show me a single protest against ills in Muslim society.
    If you say NewAgeIslam is bringing some issues and voicing against these ills I am with you.
    By rational - 11/13/2012 9:50:51 PM



  • Sorry Aiman for disagreeing to your point of view on status of women in islam. And if you read quran from the eye of a rational person, you will find that women having lesser rights to men. One example is absence of polygamy and permission to polyandry; another is relevant to the original article of you, i.e. inter religious marriage. If I am not out of context, then while men are allowed to marry among women of books, but women are allowed to marry only muslims.
    And there are instances where witness of two women equates that of one man.
    By Pankaj - 11/13/2012 11:57:52 AM



  • @ Pankaj, here also your comment is unfinished.


    By Aiman Reyaz - 11/13/2012 6:53:54 AM



  • @ Pankaj, I truly think that you are a gentleman, your comments send me a positive feeling. Firstly you say that idol worship, offering chadars etc are not supported by holy books. I completely agree with you. They are harmless, but they promote superstition, according to me. I would say "To you is your way to me is mine".

    Secondly you say that some things in religion like the status of Shudras in Hinduism and women in Islam are harmful. My response to it is that if religion goes against human integrity then religion should be shunned. We are not for religion; religion is for us. (While preparing for a class presentation in my college, I was discussing some things with my friend and suddenly this line struck me, it is- 'Evil is necessary for God to exist' or I can also say now that satan is necessary for God to exist). Am I sounding blasphemous? I don't know.

    Anyways I think I have deviated from the subject, let me focus here. In Rig Veda, in ch 10 verse 90, Brahma says "Out of my mind I have created the Brahmans, out of the chest I have created the Kshatriyas, out of the thigs I have created the Vaishyas and out of the feet I have created the Sudras". (Refer A.L Basham's The Wonder That Was India) I think this goes against human integrity so I do not approve of it. But regarding polygamy and others, I have to disagree with you. Islam allowed polygamy only because of a particular context. The Quran is the only religious book on the face of the earth which says 'Marry only one'. The Verse of Ch 4 reads, "Marry women of your choice in two, or three or four but if you can't do justice then marry only one". Just a few verses later in the same chapter God says that "you will not be able to deal with them justly". Regarding witness, there have been instances were women's witness is considered equal to men's. Men and women stand equal in Islam but they are not identical. Modern science also confirms this. Psychologically, emotionally, physically, biologically they are different.

    Happy Diwali to you and all :)


    By Aiman Reyaz - 11/13/2012 6:52:57 AM



  • I am clueless, how my comments was lost, so reposting it.
    Dear Aiman Reyaj ji,  I know some people will always search communalism in everything, so I am giving example from both the major religion of the sub continent.
    A) Harmless, may not be supported by religious statements : - idol worshiping, offering chadars to dargah etc.
    B) Harmful, supported by religious statements: - status of shudras in hindus, status of women in islam (having lesser rights as witness, polygamy and a part of war booty).
    My emphasis is on choosing what is right, useful, or harmless (even if useless); rather than what is harmful, discriminatory or
    By Pankaj - 11/13/2012 1:43:26 AM



  • Dear Aiman Reyaj ji,  I know some people will always search communalism in everything, so I am giving example from both the major religion of
    By Pankaj - 11/12/2012 10:28:21 PM



  • If Rational considers "Halala" and "Triple Talaq " un-Islamic and a crime; he is of course crazy. There is a problem with the masses in the execution of such practices. Halala is a simple practice of re-marraige, if chances are there; the only objection is that it should not be organised on record. Triple Talaq, in one sitting, is also a wrong process of being separated from each other. Actually, it should be practiced in a span of three months through proper consideration, once and for all so that there should not be any chances of re-unification. That is why remarriage with the same husband is made a bit tough.
    By Raihan Nezami - 11/12/2012 9:43:27 PM



Compose Your Comments here:
Name
Email (Not to be published)
Comments
Fill the text
 
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.

Content