certifired_img

Books and Documents

Islamic Society (01 Dec 2018 NewAgeIslam.Com)



Why Does a Play Rile Islamists in Kerala?

 

 

By Arshad Alam, New Age Islam

01 December 2018

An innocent play performed as part of an annual school festival ended up offending a section of Kerala Muslims so much that they formally lodged a complaint against it.

 The play features a young Muslim girl who is in constant debate with her father, a muezzin in a local mosque. With aspirations to touch the sky, this young girl questions many notions of Islam regarding the supposed inequality between men and women.

 She questions why women are supposed to eat half as much as men. After being chastised by the father for her persistent questions, she asks if women really deserve half of what men get, then why is it that they (women) should not wear half the clothes as compared to men. The last straw is when she asks her father if she can make the call to prayer very much like he does in the mosque. Furious, the father locks her up saying that it is not allowed in Islam and that only men have the right to give a call for prayer. He reminds her that she will not reach heaven if she does anything like this. The daughter replies that she would not like to go in a heaven in which she cannot sing and dance. Fortunately, the play ends with the father relenting and allowing her to make the Azaan.

The play is about women’s right, dignity and gender justice. It is also certainly humanist in the sense that the father eventually relents and redeems his own humanity. Also, the play would have lent itself to the current Muslim women’s movement in Kerala which is demanding entry of women in mosques.

But then, all good things must come to an end. And in Muslim context, many a times it ends before it even starts. The SDPI (Social Democratic Party of India), which is the political front for Popular Front of India (PFI) raised a huge hue and cry and even took to the streets to protest against the proposed play. Raising the familiar cry of hurt religious feelings, they demanded that the school in which this play was to be performed pull it back and tender an apology. The SDPI said that the play was intended to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims. Had this been some other context, we would have seen debates about freedom of expression and the right to dissent but then we hardly hear about such things when there is a Muslim context.

 Unable to bear the pressure from SDPI and with no support forthcoming from anyone, the school now has decided to change the play and have promised not to hurt the religious feelings of anyone.

So how should we understand the claim of SDPI when it says that the play hurt the feelings of Muslims? How can a school play, performed in some corner of the country, end up hurting the feelings of the followers of a religion which is fourteen hundred years old? But then that perhaps is not the point. The larger point that SDPI is trying to make is that there can be only one version of Islam which should be acceptable to all Muslims and that they (SDPI) are the representatives of that religion. This religion, which they claim to be the sole spokesman of, is understood to be anti-women to the core. Any talk of women’s agency and this kind of Islam immediately starts talking about hurt feelings.

 On the other hand, this is also a clever way to stop any movement within the Muslim community which imagines a different relationship with God or a more equitable relationship between men and women. It is a serious affront to think that God will take offence because a child decides to question her father. What kind of Islam does the SDPI wants to project: one in which even the innocent questions of a child will be treated like a crime?

The argument of the SDPI, that the play was an insult to the Muslim way of life is equally unconvincing, to say the least. Like most organizations who have become the spokesman for Muslim culture, the SDPI is also ignorant about Muslim culture.

There is no one Muslim culture in India. What we call Muslim culture is contextualised by regions, languages and different historical trajectories. A Muslim considers it as part of his culture when he touches the feet of his mother in law in Bengal. A Muslim woman considers it part of her culture to wear the Sindoor post marriage in parts of Bihar, Bengal and Orissa. This would be simply an anathema in a different part of the country.

The point is that amidst this plethora of diverse Muslim cultures, which one should we believe is the standard towards which an average Muslim should look. The answer is that there is no standard and throughout centuries Muslims have believed that all cultures are equally valid.

But then, perhaps for the Islamist SDPI, Muslims must necessarily look towards the Arabian culture in order to become true Muslims. And that precisely is the problem. In trying to de-legitimize indigenous Muslim cultures of India, the SDPI wants to ingratiate Arabian Islam on the psyche of Indian Muslims. This trend is dangerous and it must be resisted by one and all, most importantly by the Muslims of Kerala themselves.

Related Articles:

 

Gender Equality in Islam

 

Is A Woman’s Testimony Worth Half That of A Man?

Arshad Alam is a NewAgeIslam.com columnist

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/islamic-society/arshad-alam,-new-age-islam/why-does-a-play-rile-islamists-in-kerala?/d/117035

New Age IslamIslam OnlineIslamic WebsiteAfrican Muslim NewsArab World NewsSouth Asia NewsIndian Muslim NewsWorld Muslim NewsWomen in IslamIslamic FeminismArab WomenWomen In ArabIslamophobia in AmericaMuslim Women in WestIslam Women and Feminism

 




TOTAL COMMENTS:-   5


  • The author Arshad Alam in his urge to create a new monster of ‘diversity hating Islamists’ in Kerala, ‘the Muslim counterpart for Sangh Pariwar’, employs many clichés, half-truths and sometimes outright lies while exaggerating some of the responses from people to the high school play ‘Kithab’, performed by Memunda Higher Secondary School students, Calicut and later withdrawn by the school authorities due to peaceful protests.  The conclusions he draws are based on his own bias and ignorance rather that the truth of the incident.

    Author casually concludes that it was ‘an innocent play’ and that it was only ‘a section of Muslims’ who are opposed to it. The truth is it was not an innocent play at all, nor was it merely ‘a section of Muslims who opposed it’.  One of the prominent people to come against the play was writer and movie artist is Unni R, the very author of the original short story Vank (Muslim call to prayer) on which Rafeek Mangalasheri, the director of Kithab clams his play to be based. Rejecting any connection with the play, Unni R said that the play makers had taken his story without his permission and distorted it to the point of demonizing Islamic faith. He adds that that such plays help reinforce the anti-Muslim sentiment or Islamophobia that has been simmering across the world in recent times. Academic writer and social critique J Devika was another prominent figure to come publicly against the play. She is of the view that the play is utterly anti-Muslim and it invisiblises the struggles of Muslim women and the remarkable socio-economic and cultural progress they have made lately against all odds. Poet Sachidanandan and State Academy Award winner novelist N S Madhavan too have criticised the content of the play. The list may get even longer.

    It is safe to say that the play was shamelessly Islamophobic. Muslim women in the play do not even remotely represent today’s Muslim women in Kerala or discuss their real problems. It simply denies them their true representation and agency and reduces them to mere ‘damsels in distresses. When Arshad Alam hopes that the play would have lent itself to the demand of Muslim women for entry to mosques’, it becomes all the clearer that his ignorance is laughable. Kerala Muslim women have been going to the mosques since more than half a century.

    It is utterly untrue that the SDPI, or for that matter any other Muslim organization formally lodged a complaint against it.  The complaint against it was made by writer Unni R to Kerala Education Department, that too on copy right grounds. School authorities themselves have made it clear that the decision was not because of any pressure. Notably, the appeal against the withdrawal of the play was rejected by Kerala High Court. It is true that many prominent Muslim organizations in the state representing various streams of Islam like SKSSF and SSF too registered their protest in peaceful and democratic ways. Campus Front activists responded with another play and it was widely applauded by people as a creative and meaningful exposition of the anti-Muslim politics behind ‘Kithab’. But half-blind author only sees ‘Islamist’ SDPI behind every ‘evil’.

    Even though the responses were completely peaceful and democratic, for the author, they are a dangerous trend to be resisted. In other words, he does not even allow the space for Muslims to be offended or to feel hurt by a play that makes mockery of their faith. He ignores the playwright is well known as an Islamophob mostly spending his time in attacking Islam and Muslims. Ironically, the liberal tolerant author finds it hard to view Muslim responses as part of their freedom of expression. While he lectures Islamists about diversity and tolerance, he forgets the fact that in democratic and plural India people can respond to a work of art in diverse ways. Any work of art can be subjected to aesthetical, political and moral criticism. Denying space for it is sheer intolerance.

    In the latter part of the article, author singles out SDPI from among those who protested and hurls serious accusations against the party without bothering to substantiate it, proving himself driven more by ideology rather than evidence. Nothing is more absurd than the accusation that SDPI wants to impose only one single version of Islam and that the party clamed itself to be sole representative of this. In fact as a political party SDPI not only does not promote any version of any religion, but the party’s support base cuts across almost all major religions and sub sects. Party doesn’t concern itself with how its members practice their religion. The accusations that follows do not even any qualify for serious a response. (courtesty


    By Riaz Tanur - 12/13/2018 1:21:19 AM



  • "An innocent play performed as part of an annual school festival"

    The play is neither innocent nor suitable for the  annual school festival of a school. 

    "She questions why women are supposed to eat half as much as men....... she asks if women really deserve half of what men get, then why is it that they (women) should not wear half the clothes as compared to men."

    Why shouldn't women wear half the clothes as compared to men is not a question coming from a thirteen year old innocent girl but from a depraved activist -someone who wants the freedom to perform nude in a night club.

    Good that a ban for it is called for. They may perform in the streets if they like but not in a school and corrupt the minds of school girls.

    The School authorities should not have allowed it in the first place.


    By Naseer Ahmed - 12/1/2018 10:06:03 PM



  • Fanatical opposition to gender equality exists in both Muslim and Hindu communities in Kerala. They prevail only because progressive Muslims and Hindus do nothing.


    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 12/1/2018 12:14:05 PM



  • Islam does not want its followers to go the extremes of hardship. Allah Almighty says in the Quran,

    "Allah intends for you ease, and does not want to make things difficult for you" [2:185]; and "Allah does not want to place you in difficulty" [5:6].

    A number of ahadith explain such easiness; one of them is reported by Abu Hurairah (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said, “Religion [Islam] is easy…” (Bukhari). It is also reported that he said “The best of Your Religion is the easiest” (Ahmad)

    Such easiness is well explained in the hadeeth reported by Abu Hurairah, radiya Allahu 'anhu, that the Prophet, salla Allaahu 'alaihe wasallam, said, "Religion is easy..." [Bukhari], he also said; "The best of your religion, is the easiest." [Ahmad]


    By Kaniz Fatma - 12/1/2018 7:32:40 AM



  • why does Islam impose so much hardship on its followers?
    By Zakir - 12/1/2018 7:03:37 AM



Compose Your Comments here:
Name
Email (Not to be published)
Comments
Fill the text
 
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.

Content