FOLLOW US:

Muslims and Islamophobia (19 Aug 2012 NewAgeIslam.Com)
Islamophobia or White Racism? Re-reading the Book of Page

 

By Saif Shahin, New Age Islam

19 Aug 2012

 

Two Sundays ago, Wade Michael Page walked up to a gurdwara in Oak Creek, Wisconsin and started shooting randomly. He killed six people and injured four more before one of his bullets caught him in the head. Muslims in the country were quick to call it an example of Islamophobia in which the Sikhs were mistaken victims. The mainstream American press largely agreed.

 

Wajahat Ali, a commentator for Salon.com, linked the attack with right-wing politicians’ anti-Muslim fearmongering. “The exploitation of Shariah, or Islamic religious law, as being a fictional ‘threat to America’ was used by nearly every major mainstream Republican candidate running for president... Instead of using their position of influence to build bridges of understanding, (Michelle) Bachmann and four GOP (Grand Old Party, a euphemism for the Republican Party) colleagues recently decided to stoke the flames of fear-mongering by engaging in a witch hunt against fellow Americans,” he wrote.

 

CNN.com reported that Sikhs have faced such attacks since 9/11. It went on to explain: “Mistaken for Muslims because of their beards and turbans, they became ripe targets for zealots seeking revenge.”

 

All such reports and commentaries emphasised that Page wore a 9/11 tattoo. What they, however, seem to have overlooked is that that was not the only tattoo he wore. Page was an open book, and an illustrated one at that. His whole body was apparently “tatted up”, and all these other tattoos had little to do with Islam, even though they were steeped in racial hatred.

 

For instance, Page also wore the Cog Wheel tattoo of The Hammerskin Nation, one of the world’s leading “white power skinhead” groups, according to The Wall Street Journal. He even wore the group’s t-shirts in many of his photos. He had another Nazi Death Head tattoo, and “WP”―for White Power―written on his hand. On his right shoulder he had a Celtic Cross, another symbol of white pride, and the number “14”, which represents the slogan: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.”

 

Not just his skin but even his larynx were racist. He used to sing in so-called hate-rock bands, showering abuses at all “non-whites” for “overrunning” the United States. “What has happened to America, that was once so white and free?” goes one song of Definite Hate, a band of which Page was a member.

 

These songs don’t just lament this national tragedy and stop―they go ahead and call for war. Sample these lines from Youngland, Page’s first band: Activist or terrorist depends which side you're on /  Defend against the invader, this war will greet your son / Hey you gotta go, not your home anymore / If you don't move quietly you'll be forced to war…

 

Given that Muslims form less than 1 percent of the US population, I find it hard to believe that all of Page’s anger was directed solely at this one community, or that the gurdwara shooting was a case of mistaken identity. Sikhs, in fact, have been targeted more than Muslims since 9/11. Have all these been cases of mistaken identity?

 

Indeed, contrary to CNN.com, Sikhs have been victims of violence in the United States from well before 9/11―from the time they started arriving on American shores, when there was no Islamophobia worth the name. As have been other non-white communities. And what about the dramatic spurt in the number and activities of hate groups since the election of America’s first Black president?

 

Page, and others of his ilk, may be Islamophobes, but they are not just that. They are White Racists, and they should be seen as such.

 

Calling the gurdwara attack an instance of Islamophobia masks this deeper reality. It restricts the larger phenomenon of White Racism to anti-Muslim bigotry, which can be explained away by 9/11 and other acts of Islamist extremism. Islamophobia, while deplorable, can be shown to be the result of political causes, a manifestation of “zealots seeking revenge”. The charge of White Racism strikes deeper into the heart of Western civilisation. It tears down the façade of ‘Enlightenment’ that the West prides itself in, which in fact loops back to feed the racial supremacism that drives people like Page.

 

Islamophobia exists of course, but as a subset of White Racism. Right-wing politicians and press have channelled racial supremacism into anti-Muslim prejudice over the past decade. This allows them to claim that if “Americans” (and not “whites”) bear an antipathy towards Muslims (but not towards people of other faiths), then there must be something wrong with Muslims themselves and their religion. Liberal/progressive politicians and press―as well as American-Muslims―may not buy this accusation, but they still end up buying the larger narrative and reinforcing it.

 

Instances such as the gurdwara attack are empirical evidence that this narrative is a lie. Page was not motivated as much by anti-Muslim hatred as by a sense of white superiority, and a desire to rid his country of all non-whites. Shrouding this truth in the cloak of Islamophobia doesn’t help Muslims, doesn’t help Sikhs, and certainly doesn’t help the would-be victims of future attacks.

 

Saif Shahin is a research scholar at the University of Texas at Austin. He writes regularly for New Age Islam.

 

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/muslims-and-islamophobia/saif-shahin,-new-age-islam/islamophobia-or-white-racism?-re-reading-the-book-of-page/d/8343

 


COMMENTS
  • The senseless killing of the Sikhs can not be taken as a case of mistaken identity, is it digestable to believe that a person who is going on a killing mission is unaware of the place and the people worshipping there. It is a simple case of hatred and despise the Americans possess in their heart against other communities, the case of 9/11 is non-issue here as Islamophobia is a self-created phenomenon as terrorising groups or deviated people belong to no religions - terrorism is itself a religion for the terrorists.
    By Raihan Nezami - 8/21/2012 2:32:09 AM
  • Islamopohia is potentially far more dangerous and in real terms, far more pervasive than KKK type white supremacism. Page may have been a white supremacist but in all probability he picked the gurdawara for his shooting spree as he took the Sikhs for Muslims. 

    By muhammad yunus (1) - 8/20/2012 7:57:37 PM
  • Dear Dr Kant, I greatly appreciate not just your kind words but also your very constructive criticism. And I concur that Europe underwent a great burst of scientific and intellectual energy through the Renaissance and later. But my point, which you also seem to agree with, is that this burst was stimulated by the influx of Eastern knowledge. Therefore, if the notion of civilisation is based on scientific and artistic advancement, I don't see how the West could be viewed as a distinct civilisation.

    Purely in terms of people, I think a case could have still been made until a century or so ago. But over the past 100 years, we have had so much of criss-cross human movement across the globe. We now have people of all backgrounds populating every part of the world -- not just living wherever they are but calling it home.

    That is why I believe that ideas of West and East are racially motivated political constructs, meant to create artificial differences and help a small number of people rule. Politics if often about engineering social divisions; we manage to see it at smaller levels but we need to discern it at larger, global level too.

    By Saif Shahin - 8/20/2012 1:33:51 PM
  • Very warm Eid greetings to you, Saif. First, let me suggest that you may see my remarks as those of an elder man rather proud of the very obvious and huge talents of a young man! That is perhaps why even a single stray unnecessary phrase in your articles appears jarring to me. This one on western civilization was one such. And earlier on Fareed the words 'humpty dumpty' did not match with the otherwise exceptional quality of that article. And my reference to jealousy was not directed at you at all.

    Now coming to the achievements of the western civilization I would whole heartedly agree with you that the Chinese, Indian, Islamic, pre-islamic Persian, and even the pre-historic civilizations have all contributed a lot to the evolution of the western civilization. None of the civilizations have grown in a vacuum and the western civilization is no exception. The civilizational confluences occur not only during peace time exchanges of algebra and silk but also during wars. The tales of Saladin's extraordinarily humane conduct towards his enemy during the long and brutal crusade were carried back to the European heartland by the returning soldiers and monks and greatly influnenced the evolution of their own war ethics which then influenced their civil laws too which today, you would agree, form the bedrock of the much admired European civil life.

    But these influences, howsoever deep, were only influences, only important inputs. They did not create the western civilization. The western civilization was still created by the western people. Their creations are theirs as are their flaws and limitations. Take the sciences. One could hardly say Newton, Gallileo, Copernicus and later Einstein were merely transferred knowledge. Or Da Vinchi and Michaelangelo were just building on the arts of the past. One could name countless others. How come they all happend only in the western world? There must have been something which enabled west to allow such a tremendous burst of renassaince and post renaisance talent. I think it was Martin Luther who provided the spark of protest against the rigid walls of ignorance. But then I do not imagine a Martin Luther would have survived long enough except among the people of the north western Europe of that period.

    The point I am labouring at is that geniuses are born everywhere in the same proportion but it is the civilization around these geniuses which enables them to live their lives and contribute to breaking barriers without which civilizations not only do not progress but wither quickly into anonymity. And my humble thesis is that at a time when the rest of the world was busy persecuting the deviants and trampling the weak the western civilization was profiting from the creativity of its scientists, writers, merchants, soldiers and sailers because it was able to create a religio-cultural environment in which the creative people could create and get rewarded.

    I find it very difficult to separate the European colonial period from the earlier external agressions starting from Alexander onwards. External agressions were always  an expression of the ability of the powerful combined with the ambitions of the ruler of that period. I do not think the European colonialism was in any way driven by the desire to 'civilize' the world or its inhabitants. There was ofcourse an element of feeling of superiority of the victorius people and conversions were certainly driven by a sense of teaching others how to live a morally superior life! But then wouldn't one say the same for all conversions!

    By Dr Promode Kant - 8/20/2012 8:50:48 AM
  • Thank you all for your comments. Dr Kant, I do not belittle Western civilisation, but simply question some of the hypocrisy that has been built into the notion. And I do not belittle Enlightenment either. On this website and elsewhere, I have often eulogised the scientific and philosophical achievements of the West in the past few centuries, and urged Muslims to embrace them. I am no scholar of Islam, and my own arguments are derived chiefly from the works of Englightenment philosophers and their successors, whom I try to interpret in the context of issues we face today.
    It is, in fact, for these very reasons that I feel pained by White Racism. Enlightenment philosophy achieved by logical reasoning what religions of yore had divinely proclaimed―the equality of all human beings. It gave us the French Revolution and the slogan “liberty, equality, fraternity”. From that have followed the fundamental rights of all humans, which most nations respect today, at least in law.
    The actions of people like Page defile this great heritage. But we also need to ask what makes Page and his ilk believe that whites are superior to others? From where do they derive their chauvinism?
    It is fed by the very same ideas that you talk about in your comment. I quote you: “…there could be little doubt that of all civilizations it is this one which has brought the greatest advances in all fields of human endeavour, in arts and sciences, in technology and business, in sports and management, in war and in entertainment. And this consistently over almost two centuries. How else would one measure enlightenment? Whatever greatness others might have had in the past, today others either copy them, or seek to destroy them out of sheer jealousy!”
    I do not believe that. Why? Because I do not believe that all of this is “Western” achievement. Much of what is considered to be Western achievement―in science or technology, arts or philosophy―is built on “Eastern” and “Islamic” advancements in these fields centuries ago. Talking in your terms, one could even argue that it was the West that tried to either copy them or destroy them out of sheer jealousy!
    But of course that is not true either. The West didn’t just copy but, like I said, built on it, taking civilisation forward as a whole. So my basic point is that there are no distinct civilisations. We all live in a human civilisation. We stand where we do today thanks to all people from all parts of the world, and we wouldn’t be here if any of them had been missing.
    The notion of a “Western civilisation” defies this fact of history. It situates all that is good in the world today in the “West”―a West populated by whites. And so these very wonderful ideas of equality and brotherhood become the basis for supermacism, and lead to actions like the gurdwara attack. And this is not a new phenomenon by any means. All of colonialism was supposed to have been a “civilising mission”―the West civilising the East by enslaving and exploiting it.
    The “Western civilisation” thus is, and has always been, a political construct, employed to achieve political ends. I do not grudge the West any of its science or arts, nor am I jealous of it― because I think it is my science and arts too. It is as much my heritage as it is yours or Page’s. But there are those who do not think so. And they are not entirely to blame, because the myth has been built over centuries.
    Which is why the “West” needs to rethink how it thinks about itself. These notions of distinct civilisations are lies that will go on perpetuating themselves unless we see them for what they are. And they will do so in very violent ways.
    By Saif Shahin - 8/20/2012 5:10:38 AM

Compose Your Comments here:

Name
Email (Not to be published)
Comments
Fill the below text
 
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.