certifired_img

Books and Documents

Radical Islamism and Jihad (19 Sep 2014 NewAgeIslam.Com)



Let Jihadist Theology Of Violence And Hatred Flourish! A Muslim Fundamentalist Response to Editor Sultan Shahin Calling for Refutation of the Jihadi Theology of Islam-Supremacism at UNHRC, Geneva

  

 How to Fight the Growing Trend of Young People Succumbing To the Lure of “Jihad”?

By Naseer Ahmed, New Age Islam

19 September 2014

Why are young people attracted to the war in Syria and Iraq or to other similar causes?

In a different context, Cormac Burke writes in his book on Covenanted Happiness: Love and Commitment in Marriage:

“Young people have always had a great capacity for enthusiasm, for big things, for high ideals, for everything that is genuine - St. Josemaría Escrivá.

….the idealism of youth - what an inexhaustible subject! Psychologists explain it, educators build on it, and demagogues exploit it!

In the past, the young were drawn to Marxism in India, protest against Vietnam war and the revolt of “flower children” in US, sudden student uprising in France.

In order that people never lose the ideals of their youth, it is important that they choose their ideals well.

….that we are all called to the highest possible ideals was constantly accompanied by the reminder that we are all equally capable of the greatest possible crimes, and must therefore be prepared for a life-long struggle. Now, if the struggle hits all of us, it obviously hits harder when it hits first - which is in adolescence. Let us take a closer look at those early teen years when a boy or a girl is no longer a child, but is not yet a man or a woman either, and stands therefore in special need of his or her parents' understanding.

"You can't give up fighting, because our life is nothing but one continuous tug-of-war. The craziest things attract us. It's humiliating, isn't it? St Augustine used to say that his passions were constantly trying to pull him to the ground. But at the same time, along with these crazy ideas, we feel a great urge to do something worthwhile, to serve other people, to live a pure life, to work in things that can help others, to sacrifice ourselves. Isn't that true too? And it is then that the struggle breaks out between our passions seeking to pull us down, and those other wonderful longings that spur us upwards. We have got to fight. There's just no alternative".

Ideals

An ideal is something great. It is essentially felt to be something greater than one's self. It is something which, by the sheer force of its beauty and nobility, makes a person want to get away from himself, to forget himself, so as to defend, to admire, to love, and to serve that ideal, and strive upward toward it. A person with a true ideal is ready to live for it and, if necessary, to die for it. There are not all that many true ideals: love, family, country, God...

For a life without ideals can only be selfish and vain, and therefore unhappy.”

(Quote for Cormac Burke’s book ends)

What Is Attracting The European Youth To “Jihad”?

“Poverty does not explain the lure of jihad for Western fighters. Many of them are quite middle-class. Nasser Muthana, a 20-year-old Welshman who goes by the name Abu Muthana al-Yemeni in IS videos, had offers to study medicine from four universities. Nor does a failure to integrate into the societies around them. Photographs of Muhammad Hamidur Rahman, another British fighter thought to have recently been killed, show a young man in a snazzy suit with a slick hairstyle. He worked at Primark, a cheap retailer, in Portsmouth, a city on the English coast. His father ran a curry restaurant. Nor does religious piety. Before leaving for Syria, Yusuf Sarwar and Mohammed Ahmed, two young men from Birmingham who pleaded guilty to terrorism offences in July, ordered copies of “Islam for Dummies” and “The Koran for Dummies” from Amazon. Some fighters are religious novices, says Mr Maher.

More plausible explanations are the desire to escape the ennui of home and to find an identity. “Some individuals are drawn out there because there is not a lot going on in their own lives,” says Raffaello Pantucci, an analyst at the Royal United Services Institute, a London think-tank. Images of combatants playing snooker, eating sweets and splashing in swimming pools have sometimes suggested that jihad was not unlike a student holiday, without the booze. For young men working in dead-end jobs in drab towns, the brotherhood, glory and guns seem thrilling. Many of Belgium’s fighters come from the dullest of cities, where radicals have concentrated their efforts to get recruits.

According to Soufan Group, a US security intelligence service, about 12,000 militants from 81 nations had joined ISIS by the end of May, with about 3,000 of them coming from the West. Alarmingly, the number of European jihadists is likely to have increased in the last months, the Economist notes. ISIS fighters from Britain and France have formed two large groups of European-born Muslim insurgents. Remarkably, ISIS is attracting not only men in Europe, but women as well. According to Peter Neumann, the Director of the International Centre for the Study of Radicalization (ICSR), one quarter of all Westerners joining ISIS are female.

"Some are drawn for idealistic reasons – going to fight for a cause, defend people, or for some religious vision," explains Raffaello Pantucci, an analyst at the Royal United Services Institute, in his Op-Ed in the New York Times, "Others go for more prosaic reasons, fleeing trouble at home, or seeking redemption for a criminal past. And yet others are simply young people at a juncture in their lives where the idea of going to run around a training camp and shooting guns seems quite appealing."

"There must be a range of motivations — a sense of adventure, a misplaced sense of duty or idealism — some of those recruited are well-versed in ideology and the politics of their radical cause, others are surprisingly ignorant," says Innes Bowen, a BBC journalist and author of "Inside British Islam," as quoted by Business Insider.”

Source: http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21614226-why-and-how-westerners-go-fight-syria-and-iraq-it-aint-half-hot-here-mum

Richard Barrett of the Soufan Group, an intelligence organization.“These and others who share their faith commonly express their motivation as a religious obligation to protect fellow Muslims from attack.”

What is the draw? Why leave the relative safety of a Western nation for militancy?

The reasons are legion. The French have called their jihadists “disaffected, aimless and lacking a sense of identity or belonging,” Barrett wrote. “Presumably people are seeking a greater purpose and meaning in their lives.” There’s also the “desire to witness and take part in a battle prophesized 1,400 years ago.”

Their commitment to jihad on social media, experts say, attracts fresh recruits. Like Abu Sumayyah al-Britani, who went on the “ISIS Show,” other Western fighters answer questions on sites such as ask.fm, Tumblr and Kik. They often portray their life as warm and important. They “reassure and address the fear of the unfamiliar,” Barrett said. “For example there are many postings of fighters with pet kittens.”

The trend, which experts contend will deepen despite the mounting casualties, demonstrates the sway ISIS and other radical groups in Syria and Iraq have over some young Muslim Westerners. And now, with ISIS’s recent gains in land and newfound wealth, the attraction may be even more powerful.

“As money and manpower breed success, success will breed more success,” Haverford’s Barak Mendelsohn wrote. “ISIS’s popularity will likely rise among radicals and that will translate into more funding and volunteers for the group.”

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/06/17/how-isis-persuaded-thousands-of-westerners-to-fight-its-war-of-extremism/

The Solution

The perfect solution is to end all wars and to decide to resolve all disputes through negotiations, dialogue and arbitration.

Clearly it is not religious ideology that is attracting the youth but the idealism of the youth and their desire to fight the gross injustice and suffering inflicted on a people for the last 30 years or more in which more than a million have been killed and many more maimed and hundreds of thousands of children born disabled or seriously affected by nuclear radiation from the depleted uranium bombs fired by the US.

Who or which institution represents a moral force today that the young people can rally around and support? There isn’t even an anti-war movement like there was against the war in Vietnam which provided an outlet for the idealism of the youth.

The US succeeded rather too well in their objectives using strategies that they developed based on their learning from the past. They lost the Vietnam War when Americans refused to join the army. The US ensured that there were more volunteers than required for the Gulf wars and the war in Afghanistan by farming out their manufacturing jobs to China raising the unemployment levels among the blue collared workers. The unemployed were left with no option but to join the army. Now that they have ended their engagement in Iraq and are in the process of ending it in Afghanistan, they are bringing back the manufacturing jobs to the US.

The US media ensured that despite the fact that the US is the biggest villain, it is the Muslims who are made out to be the villains and put-on the defensive:

•        It was the US who lured the Russians to invade Afghanistan by getting involved with rebels against the communist government in Afghanistan in 1979

•        It was the US that financed, trained and armed a civilian force of “Mujahideen” so that they could give the USSR their Vietnam. They achieved their objective with the defeat of the Russians. The war also destroyed their economy and the USSR just disintegrated.

•        After the defeat of the Russians, the US washed its hands off the problem of dealing with about three hundred thousand fanatical religious fighters from 35 countries that they helped create to fight their proxy war with the USSR. Unlike an army, these people are not subject to any command/control structure or discipline. They are armed, militarily trained and indoctrinated to wage “Jihad” or religious war and are engaged in the same ever since. To expect anything else from them is insanity. The proper thing to do was to retrain them for productive purpose and give them employment or absorb them in the army and bring them under its discipline. Hillary Clinton acknowledges this in the video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLhRKj6633w).

•        Pakistan which had set up around a thousand madrasas to produce “Jihadists” has not a closed down a single madrasa ensuring a steady supply of young recruits. Apparently they intend using some of them against India. The US and Saudi Arabia continue to finance their government.

•        The US invaded Afghanistan ostensibly to apprehend a single criminal Osama Bin Laden and killed a million civilians in the process and called it ‘collateral damage’

•        They invaded Iraq based on lies and killed another million civilians there. They destabilized that country, installed a sectarian despot in power and the ISIS is a result of these actions.

Thanks to the highly effective media, in popular public imagination, it is the Muslims and Islam which is responsible for everything. The disproportionately large number of people killed by the US does not even register on people’s mind as that is not accompanied by a daily barrage of graphic pictures and videos from every TV channel. In the imagination of the people, the US is only rendering great humanitarian service at a tremendous cost to an ungrateful people. You do not therefore see a people’s movement the like of which we saw against the war in Vietnam to which the youth driven by idealism can be drawn. The effectiveness of the media in painting the victims as villains has prevented popular outrage against the great injustice of killing more than two million innocent civilians in two countries for the less than three thousand killed in 9/11 WTC collapse. The small numbers of people who are deeply affected by what is going on do not find any ‘non-violent movement’ that they can join to fight the injustice. Having shut off safe avenues for the idealism of the youth to find an outlet, the unintended consequence is that they are taking sides in the war on the side of what they see as the underdog. This infatuation will end with either disillusionment or grow stronger. If what they find is revolting and if their dreams are shattered, they will return disillusioned and can be used to dissuade others from joining similar movements. On the other hand if they find any good in what they see, then such a movement will grow stronger. The West will then be forced to act to end this `fatal attraction’ of their own young by ending all wars which are today possible only through their encouragement, help and machinations.

It is a sad commentary on our generation that we have nothing worthwhile to offer for the idealism of the youth because of which they are taking to a path of violence. Let us end all hypocrisy and call spade a spade and demand that the governments of US, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia be held responsible for the problem of so called ‘Islamic terrorism’ and demand visible action on their part to end it. The action that is required is:

•        Close down the 1000 madrasas in Pakistan that have been set up to produce “jihadis”

•        Account for every past student of these madrasas and all known Jihadis by either:

o        Rehabilitating them

o        Imprisoning those that cannot be rehabilitated

o        Executing those that are guilty of serious crimes and are beyond redemption.

Only visible serious action will have an effect. Liquidation of all known terrorist organizations will have a salutary effect on all radicalism in general, and people can then go back to leading normal lives as before.

 

Naseer Ahmed is an Engineering graduate from IIT Kanpur and is an independent IT consultant after having served in both the Public and Private sector in responsible positions for over three decades. He is a frequent contributor to NewAgeIslam.com. The author initially used a pseudonym "Observer" for this article.

 

Related Article:

 

 

Facing Massive Appeal Of Radical Islam, Moderate Muslims Must Refute Jihadist Theology Of Violence With A Coherent Narrative Of Islamic Moderation, Says Sultan Shahin At UNHRC In Geneva

 

http://www.newageislam.com/radical-islamism-and-jihad/sultan-shahin,-editor,-new-age-islam/facing-massive-appeal-of-radical-islam,-moderate-muslims-must-refute-jihadist-theology-of-violence-with-a-coherent-narrative-of-islamic-moderation,-says-sultan-shahin-at-unhrc-in-geneva/d/99112

 

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/radical-islamism-and-jihad/let-jihadist-theology-of-violence-and-hatred-flourish!-a-muslim-fundamentalist-response-to-editor-sultan-shahin-calling-for-refutation-of-the-jihadi-theology-of-islam-supremacism-at-unhrc,-geneva/d/99162

 

 




TOTAL COMMENTS:-   19


  • The editor declined to publish an article submitted by me which was titled "Understanding the problem of so called Islamic Terrorism" because it does not represent the views of NAI!

    Well friends, I am not here to conform to the views of the editor and this is a parting of ways.

    My apologies to anyone whose feeling I may have hurt while debating/discussing.


    By Observer - 9/23/2014 5:47:01 AM



  • Dear Prof Naim,

    You say: "Whatever the US did did not do without the connivance of Muslims, be it in Pakistan, Afghanista, Iraq, or West Bank. Do remember that the original Palestinian state mandated by the British was taken over by the Jordanians in 1948."

    Very true! The purpose of my article is not to lay the blame on any door but to point out that there is a grave problem which needs to be understood correctly before we can solve it. What we find however, is that despite the mess that has been created using civilians to fight wars who after the war turn into terrorists, the US, Saudi Arabia etc continue to use them in Syria and have used them in Libya and Pakistan has used them against India and will do so again after the US leave. If terrorism has to stop, then the first step is to resolve to fight all wars using the army alone and begin the process of accounting for every Jehadi as suggested in the article.

    You have also said "The brutality inflicted on the Vietnamese did not turn them into the kind of monstrous misogynists that we have now in the form of Talibans et al. Nor did all Afghanis become Taliban. 
    Avenging the dead Muslims does not mean inflicting oppression and murder on other Muslims".

    The Vietnamese fighters were their country's army or under the control of the government which took care of them after the war.

    The Jehadis who fought the war to drive out the Russians were drawn from 35 countries. There was no government (in Afghanistan or in exile)  to manage and control them and therefore none to take care of them after the war. They were left to fend for themselves. 

    If the US were to disband their army and leave the soldiers with their arms to fend for themselves, we can expect them to behave just like the Taliban or perhaps worse.
     
    Hillary Clinton understands this very well and said in an answer to a question “To be fair we had helped to create the problem we are now fighting. Because when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, we had this brilliant idea that we were going to come to Pakistan and create a force of Mujahideen equip them with stinger missiles and everything else to go after the Soviets inside Afghanistan and we were successful. The Soviets left Afghanistan and then we said great! good bye! and washed our hands off leaving these trained people who were fanatical in Afghanistan and Pakistan leaving them well armed creating a mess frankly that at the time we didn’t recognize but we were so happy to see the Soviet Union fall, and we thought OK, fine we’re OK now everything is going to be so much better. Now you look back the people we are fighting today we were supporting in the fight against the soviets.”

    The US army  applies several filters in their recruitment process and a candidate veering to the religious right spells trouble and is not selected . Such people have been found to be the ones more likely to remain maladjusted after a war and indulge in senseless violence such as shooting sprees.

    In the case of the "mujahideen", normal boys were put through a process of indoctrination in religious extremism using experts from Palestine! Expecting them to behave differently from the way they are behaving is insanity. 

    The US understood the risks very well but didn't care and  I doubt if Pakistan and Saudi Arabia were capable of anticipating the problems these fighters would create after the war.

    Saudi Arabia, Pakistan etc should absorb those who can be retrained for Army discipline  into their armies. The rest should also be accounted for by imprisonment if necessary.

    Is it not hypocrisy that while the US, UK, etc continue to back the foreign civilian fighters in Syria, they are worried about the very small numbers from their own country who have got involved? Are they not worried sick what these small numbers will do after they return? Why do they not worry about the  thousands from Muslim countries who got involved in Afghanistan and now in Syria? If they are worried about the small number of what their own nationals may do after the war, why is it so difficult for the world to understand what half a million of such people spread across 35 countries have been doing which goes in the name of Islamic terrorism? For such people they are doing what they have been taught to do and it is normal behaviour.

    Yes, it is a huge problem and must be tackled as a problem. Blaming does not help. Understanding what the problem is and and how it came about is necessary to prevent more of the same and to reverse the process.

    The first step is to close down those 1000 madrasas which were set up specially for the purpose of churning out jihadis. Although the Russians have left, not a single madrassa has been shut down or transformed  into a normal madrassa. Yes, the US cannot be blamed for this but only Pakistan, except that the US is aware of what is going on but will not do anything to put an end to the nonsense. Pakistan obviously intends using these people against India.
      
    What we can do is to raise awareness among the general public of what has caused the problem in the first place and what needs to be done to put an end to it and count on public pressure on their governments to effectively deal with the situation and bring the problem to an end.
     


    By Observer - 9/21/2014 1:05:50 AM



  • dear hats off
    extreme moderates? yes, we have identified them. he will think he is not one of them.

    By rational mohammed yunus - 9/20/2014 10:31:53 PM



  • Another example is Japan.
    Japan attacked Perl harbor and as a result received atomic attack. what the Japanese did later? is that not exemplary? where is the Japan and where are the Muslim countries.
    why only Muslims turn jehadis?

    moderates will cry. Islam has nothing to do with it.
     if the Islam can be glorified for the past achievements why it can't be blamed for the current situation.
    and the cause of achievements is also debatable. 


    By rational mohammed yunus - 9/20/2014 10:27:14 PM



  • Islamic sources are full to their brims with supremacy. it expels it from the domain of religions and put as extreme ideology.

    By rational mohammed yunus - 9/20/2014 9:58:59 PM



  • Yes, whoever added the heading and the lede behaved very badly.

    Let me however, add a few more things to the pot, so to say. 
    The brutality inflicted on the Vietnamese did not turn them into the kind of monstrous misogynists that we have now in the form of Talibans et al. Nor did all Afghanis become Taliban. 
    Avenging the dead Muslims does not mean inflicting oppression and murder on other Muslims. 
    Whatever the US did did not do without the connivance of Muslims, be it in Pakistan, Afghanista, Iraq, or West Bank. Do remember that the original Palestinian state mandated by the British was taken over by the Jordanians in 1948. 

    Yes, idealism of the youth is a big factor to consider but why are at least some of the same youth not going into humanitarian work, working among the poor and the sick of the world? 

    I do not for a moment suggest that Islam as such has anything to do with it. All religions, yes ALL religions are good if they are used by their believers to design their lives morally and ethically. However, if ANY religion become identified with a quest for power and supremacy then it is no better than any ideology. 


    By C M Naim - 9/20/2014 8:16:58 PM



  • Much of the evil in this world is wrought by demagogues exploiting the idealism of the youth. When there is a war, both sides to the war attract enthusiastic youth in large numbers. They are all driven by idealism. Idealism although not morally neutral, is usually blind to the other side of the story.

    Idealism is a moral force that most young people experience in  a phase of their life beginning usually with college. Some find causes that they remain faithful to all their lives because they have been fortunate to espouse  causes which are worth devoting their life to. The majority however are disillusioned with the causes that they espouse and make compromises with life and hopefully become more pragmatic.

    Some examples of famous `causes' that were espoused by the young in the past are:

    1. The student revolution in France in 1968. It brought the entire country to a standstill. "May 68" had a resounding impact on French society that would be felt for decades to come. It is considered to this day as a cultural, social and moral turning point in the history of the country. As Alain Geismar - one of the leaders of the time - later pointed out, the movement succeeded "as a social revolution, not as a political one" 

    2. Support for marxism was common on all campuses of elite universities in India during the 70's. In my own institute (IIT/K) we had a strike by the "karmachari sangh" supported by the students which was a huge success  resulting in regularization of jobs of all temporary workers and increase in their salaries.
    Every student leader was also the first to apply for admission to US universities on nearing completion of their course! The idealism died early.

    3. The revolt of the flower children in the sixties was against the materialism of their society. It also petered out. Bill Clinton and his wife were also in it.

    4. Protests against the Vietnam war was also a means to say 'no' to conscription besides a genuine concern for the ravages of war and the suffering of the people. This time around neither there is conscription nor body bags arriving in large numbers to provide the trigger for anti war protests.

    Youthful idealism looks for a worthy cause to espouse. It could have been concern for the ecology. That is why neither Islam in itself or its ideology in itself  are the trigger points. Once people adopt a cause, certainly the particular aspects of that cause come into the fore.


    By Observer - 9/20/2014 12:17:08 AM



  • Dear Sultan Shahin.
    it seems you suffer with OCD. you need urgent psychological treatment. you have Dr Ghulam M and sufficient funds.
    Dr Ghulam M may treat you with the psychology based on the Quran and hadith.

    Muslims initially with the help of Marxists  invented that poverty is responsible for Muslim's attractions to jehad. it failed. then they invented Madarsa education is responsible.
    then they invented idealism of youth is responsible. you must praise Observer for this invention.
    let us give the credit to who deserves it. the prophet promised ideal justice, ideal society, ideal distribution  of wealth. His words were ideology. Initially it was rejected finally by all means it achieved acceptance. a new chapter in the history was written
    Is it not possible that idealism is working this time too.
    People are made convinced present system is corrupt, all other religions are corrupt,  there is injustice everywhere, Islam is the solution because it promise ideals of human ambitions.   
    why it can't be accepted if you can accept other alternative explanations.
    you too invent many ideas to save Islam So the Observer does. and other moderates do the same. what is strange in it?
    it is all to divert the attention from the QQuran and Hadith from which hateful jehadi ideology emerges.
    Core of Sufism is sharia their end dream is establishment of sharia.
    If you think Tahir ul qadri is a Sufi and a hope to end the jihadism, you are wrong. read his books anbd speeches carefully as you probably read of Wahhabis.
    Is Qadri against the capital punishment for apostasy? No he is not. Is his and wahabis shariat different? no, it is same.
    Qadri or any other sufi is opportunist  trying to turn the situation in his favor to fulfill his dream of implementation of the same sharia.
    just they want to stop their rivals.
    when we read observer, rasool, ghaus, mohammed yunus, zuma, we see distortion. by any crook or twist the Islam is to be saved from criticism.
    there was nothing wrong with Islam and Muslims. what they did, they did with Allah,s sanction.
    ghazwa was defensive war, jizia was mercy, loot was  maal e ghanimat, killing was saving, slavery was again mercy.
    killing is not killing but peaceful delivery of message. who says Muslim is not productive. it is over productive in such matters.
    and your sole refuge is Meccan verses abrogated by Medinian verses.
    it is a case of immature delivery.

    By rational mohammed yunus - 9/19/2014 11:25:33 PM



  • “Clearly it is not religious ideology that is attracting the youth but the idealism of the youth…”

    The above although true, in my mind it is incomplete.

    The injustices all around and the idealism of the youth is surely the driving fuel and energy but the driver is clearly the religion in this case.

    The word Jihad and its misinterpretation to achieve the end result by the mind controllers as shown by the following quote should not be discounted;

    “How to fight the growing trend of Young People Succumbing To the Lure of Jihad”?

    To do so is to half diagnose the disease and offer incomplete cure. That in itself is an injustice to the youth.


    By rs - 9/19/2014 8:13:39 PM



  • GM Sb,

    They are all active on the social media and are communicating every day. We don't have to wait for them to return alive.



    By Observer - 9/19/2014 8:12:39 PM



  • The last paragraph of my last post was dropped:

    Fair enough! But how many of them will die and will never be able to tell us about their disillusionment?
    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 9/19/2014 2:56:30 PM



  • Observer sb. says, "This infatuation will end with  disillusionment if what they find is revolting and if their dreams are shattered. They will then return disillusioned and can be used to dissuade others from joining similar movements." . . .



    Fair enough! But how many of them will die and never be able to tell us about their disillusionment?

    .



    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 9/19/2014 2:54:20 PM



  • Observer sb. says, "This infatuation will end with  disillusionment if what they find is revolting and if their dreams are shattered. They will then return disillusioned and can be used to dissuade others from joining similar movements." . . .




    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 9/19/2014 2:50:32 PM



  • GM Sb,

    If what you say is true then the highlighted portion will be the result:

    Having shut off safe avenues for the idealism of the youth to find an outlet, the unintended consequence is that they are taking sides in the war on the side of what they see as the underdog. This infatuation will end with  disillusionment if what they find is revolting and if their dreams are shattered. They will then return disillusioned and can be used to dissuade others from joining similar movements. On the other hand if they find any good in what they see, then such a movement will grow stronger. The West will then be forced to act to end this `fatal attraction’ of their own young by ending all wars which are today possible only through their encouragement, help and machinations.

    Idealism does not necessarily imply choosing the right path. Jonathan Haidt writes: "The major atrocities of the twentieth century were carried out largely either by men who thought they were creating a utopia or else by men who believed they were defending their homeland or tribe from attack. Idealism easily becomes dangerous because it brings with it, almost inevitably the belief that the ends justifies the means. If you are fighting for good or for God, what matters is the outcome, not the path. People have little respect for rules; we respect the moral principles that underlie most rules. But when a moral principle and legal rules are incompatible, we usually care more about the mission. The psychologist Linda Skitka finds that when people have strong moral feelings about a controversial issue – when they have a “moral mandate” – they care much less about procedural fairness in court cases. They want the “good guys” freed by any means and the “bad guys” convicted by any means. It is thus not surprising that the Administration of George Bush consistently argues that extra-judicial killings, indefinite prison without trial, and harsh treatment of prisoners are legal and proper steps in fighting the Manichaean “war on terror”."

    Please also note that I have quoted the economist and the washington post on the subject  What Is Attracting The European Youth To “Jihad”? and no part of it is my own opinion.


    By Observer - 9/19/2014 1:55:44 PM



  • What kind of youthful idealism would make  young men want to join an intolerant group best known for savagely murdering innocent civilians? Can we compare such young men to the young men who opposed the Viet Nam war, shouting, "Hell no, we won't go!"
    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 9/19/2014 1:08:31 PM



Compose Your Comments here:
Name
Email (Not to be published)
Comments
Fill the text
 
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.

Content