certifired_img

Books and Documents

Radical Islamism and Jihad (14 Nov 2013 NewAgeIslam.Com)


Wahhabi Impact: Influence of Wahhabi Islam on the Indian Muslim community is growing

 


By Sultan Shahin, Founding Editor, New Age Islam

November 14, 2013


I have been talking about the growing impact of Wahhabism in India, including on Sufi institutions, for a long time. Now an important article has appeared in the Frontline Magazine, which more or less substantiates the same point, though it does not talk about the Wahhabisation of Sufism in India. Before I offer this article to New Age Islam readers, let me provide some background in which to view the issue of grave concern to Indian Muslims. Unfortunately, few Muslims look at the issue with the gravity and concern that it deserves. Indeed, many simply criticise me for highlighting the issue and indeed accuse me of seeking to divide the community.

Though Wahhabism started making a noticeable impact since 1974 when Saudi Arabian economy started getting a massive injection of Petrodollars. But Wahhabism has been spread aggressively since the 1744 pact between Muhammad bin Saud and Muhammad ibn ʿAbdul Wahhab which marked the emergence of the first Saudi state. But even before that Mohammad Abdul Wahhab had started implementing his perverted ideas of stoning women accused of adultery to death and destroying Islamic heritage buildings with the help of Uthman ibn Mu'ammar, the ruler of his native village Uyayna in Najd. He had personally organised the stoning of a woman accused of committing adultery a la Taliban and Boko Haram in our times. Even before meeting Ibn-e-Saud he had destroyed the grave of Zayd ibn al-Khattab, a companion of Prophet Muhammad (saw), whose shrine was revered by the local population. After the pact with Ibn-e-Saud, of course, a wave of killings and destruction of Islamic heritage sites started.

 Thus, aggressive Wahhabi preaching and practice of forcible conversion to Wahhabism (which was considered synonymous with Islam, as Wahhabis do not consider non-Wahhabis Muslim), killing of those who did not convert, and destruction of Islamic heritage has been going on for almost 300 years. Wahhabis consider themselves non-sectarian, as they believe only their sect has the divine right to survive. Once all Muslims have been forced to convert to Wahhabism or been killed, sectarianism will vanish. Mohammad Ibn-e-Abdul Wahhab’s mentor Ibn-e-Taimiyya was violently opposed to the idea of different people interpreting Quran in their own way. He just wanted his own interpretation to prevail.

 However, petrodollar has given the spread of Wahhabism an immense impetus. It has been there for quite some time (discovery of oil in 1938 and large-scale exploitation after World War II), but the volume of petrodollar quadrupled all of a sudden at the end of 1973 following the Arab-Israeli war of October 1973. And since then the crude oil prices have been spiralling much to the detriment of peaceful, inclusive Islam.   

One of the mysteries of how Wahhabism spread around the world is the support it got from the West. The West did not object to Saudis massively increasing the volume of money they spent on indoctrination of Muslims around the world into Wahhabi ideology and forcing them to adopt seventh century Arab cultural norms and practices like stoning women to death if they dared to show the slightest amount of independence. All that happens in Saudi Arabia in terms of treatment of women or happened in Afghanistan under Taliban (and probably will happen again elsewhere, most likely in Africa and Middle East) was a manifestation of Wahhabi ideology in action. The West probably did not object because Wahhabism had helped them defeat the last Muslim Khilafat, Turkish Khilafat-e-Osmania, and would (they apparently hope, according to a widespread conspiracy theory among Sufi-Barailwis) help them destroy Islam finally, something crusaders had failed to do in the absence of Wahhabism. The conspiracy theorists ask: have you noticed the reverence with which Wahhabism is treated in the Western media: they call it a puritan sect. This leniency towards Wahhabism continues even after 9/11 in which 16 out of 19 terrorists were Saudi Wahhabis and the rest Egyptians schooled in Wahhabi ideology.

 According to this ideology, Muslims should never befriend non-Muslims including those Muslims who are not yet Wahhabi. There is a reason why the West is helping Saudi Wahhabism’s latest project: to install Al-Qaeda dictatorship in all erstwhile secular Muslim dictatorships. Have you not noticed the Wahhabi demand in largest-circulated Pakistani newspapers: “Kafirs (Shias) convert to Islam (Wahhabism), or pay jizya, or leave the country, or be responsible for being killed, your women being made concubines of your Wahhabi killers, and children being enslaved by them?”  This is not just a demand: it is actually being implemented.

However, I would like to clarify, that not all those i who consider themselves Wahhabi are exclusivist or takfiris, i.e. those who consider all other Muslims Kafir. Even those whose ancestors turned to Wahhabism a hundred years ago, may still be inclusivist, peaceful people, not aware of the details of Wahhabi ideology. They are merely opposed to qabr parasti (grave worship) and fateha khwani (offering sweets or food to the dead ancestors amidst recitals of Quran’s verses) and practised rituals like saying aaameeen loudly at the end of Surah Fateha in nimaz, as against non-Wahhabis who say the same Aameen softly. By and large, that is as far as their Wahhabism went. It’s only in the last decades that some Wahhabis’ mind-set has gradually changed towards exclusivism, xenophobia, intolerance and radicalism.

The 1.6 billion Muslims in the world would not abide by the tenets of Islam if they considered it a religion of violence and intolerance. Most Muslims live peacefully everywhere in the world. Yes, with the onslaught of Wahhabism and the massive propaganda unleashed by the US-protected Saudi regime, the situation is changing, has already changed quite a bit. Many people who still consider themselves Sufi/Bareilwi have also turned intolerant and are accepting force and coercion and violence as an ideology. Their madrasas have stopped teaching many Sufi books. They are becoming Wahhabi in their mind-set, though many are not even aware of it.

America is the biggest protector of Wahhabi Islam even after 9/11 in which all the terrorists involved were Wahhabi, 16 out of 19 Saudi and three Egyptians. It has not stopped Saudi Arabia from spending tens of billions of petrodollars exporting Wahhabi Islam. Scores of chartered planes fly from Jeddah practically every day carrying Tablighis to all corners of the world, seeking to impose Seventh-century Arab cultural norms on Muslims.

 Indian Muslims are inheritors of a 5,000-year-old civilisation. Our civilisation was the best in the world in every possible way. But we are being told we must now supplant our culture with the desert Bedouin culture of 7th century Arabia. We should all become illiterate 7th century baddus, if we want to remain Muslim, so we are told. We should start raiding rival sect’s colonies, kill the men, possess their women as concubines, and enslave their children, as is already happening in Pakistan.

 Read history. Wahhabi Islam would not have been able to install itself in what was then Hejaz (now the only country in the world to be named after a king and called Saudi Arabia) and destroy over 300 Islamic monuments from the earliest period of Islam without British help. It would not be able to destroy the remaining Islamic sites today without American help. There perhaps is a reason why all forces opposed to Islam call Wahhabi Islam as true Islam, never question their ideology, do everything possible to propagate Wahhabism as true Islam.

Opposing qabr parasti (grave-worship) doesn't make one a Wahhabi. It's simple common sense. A manifestation of our belief in tauheed. However, destroying Sufi shrines, raising to the ground all historical monuments associated with the earliest period of Islam, killing people who visit Sufi shrines, including some jahil qabr parasts (ignorant grave-worshippers), does make one a follower of the Wahhabi ideology as propagated by Syed Qutub and Maulana Maudoodi in the last century, Ibn-e-Taimiya in the 13th-14th century and Mohammad ibn-e-Abdul Wahhab in the 18th century. Even maintaining silence over the spiralling violence does make one a Wahhabi or at least a tacit supporter of Wahhabi violence.

[Incidentally most people who visit Sufi shrines are not qabr parasts (grave-worshippers). They go there to show their reverence to Sufis, and learn about people who spent a lifetime in the worship of God, lived a pious life, preached love of God and humanity, and who introduced our ancestors to Islam and were and are loved by all communities, thus making the occasion a multicultural event promoting integration.]

This inclusivist religious culture associated with Sufi shrines in the Indian sub-continent is now under threat. As a matter of fact, Wahhabi militants are not only threatening but actually going into Sufi mosques and shrines and blowing themselves up, having been convinced by their ideologues that by doing so they will go to Heaven. Easiest route to Heaven is push the button on your suicide belt in a mosque or a Sufi shrine or destroy a Muslim girls' school. The militant Wahhabi ideologues know that they will not be able to justify indiscriminate killing of innocents of any community, much less Muslims of any sect, on the basis of Quran. That would be well-nigh impossible. Quran very clearly stands for peace and compassion for all. So, instead of debate, terrorism is being encouraged. The earlier Muslims in India too realise the dangers of growing Wahhabi impact on their community the better. I hope readers would benefit from the following article, considering it an objective voice of reason.

--- Sultan Shahin, Editor, New Age Islam

-----

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/radical-islamism-and-jihad/wahhabi-impact--influence-of-wahhabi-islam-on-the-indian-muslim-community-is-growing/d/24413


The article in Frontline:


Wahhabi Impact: Influence of Wahhabi Islam on the Indian Muslim community is growing


By Ajoy Ashirwad Mahaprashasta

November 13, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE PHENOMENON of Islamist terrorism has received considerable attention in recent times. Pointing to a trend of increasing radicalisation of Indian Muslims, Indian intelligence has expressed concern that it is becoming a paramount national security issue. However, in looking at Islamist fundamentalism as one of the causes for communal polarisation in the country, many observers tend to portray the Muslim community as a homogeneous group. The Muslim society is equally worried about the growing radicalisation of Indian Muslims.

In fact, the increasing influence of radical streams, especially Wahhabism, within Islam; the rising Islamophobia across the world; and the strengthening of Hindu nationalist forces in India are issues that are frequently debated among Indian Muslims. The growth of radical Islamist streams became visible only in the past two decades. The unprecedented polarisation of the political environment in the aftermath of the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992 not only broke a long history of communal harmony in India but also gave rise to insecurities in both Hindu and Muslim societies. Fundamentalist groups in both societies, interested in creating communal disharmony, found ample scope for the radicalisation of the youth. Communal riots have erupted before 1992, but systematic campaigns to polarise religious groups gained currency only post-Babri Masjid.

The influence of Wahhabi Islam in the Indian Muslim community started growing around this period. Indian Muslims have a long tradition of Sufi Islam or what is called the Barelvi tradition. A milder form of Wahhabism exists in the subcontinent in the form of the Deoband theological school, which commands a large following but has always coexisted with other forms of Islamic traditions. This has made Islamic practices in India dynamic and syncretic. No wonder then that many sections of the Muslim community have resisted the strict code of conduct and practice of a “puritanical” religion advocated by the Wahhabis.

The time when Wahhabism was trying to get a foothold in India was also a time when the Muslim community was trying to strategise its resistance and highlight its concerns. The secular section of the community believed that in order to contain the growing radicalisation, the insecurities among Muslims would have to be addressed. A large section of the community believed that the problems could be resolved within the democratic framework of the Indian state, a reflection of the faith it reposed in India’s secular ethos. This has been the legacy of the Indian state since the founding of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) in 1969, in which many Muslim-majority countries participate. A second group of Muslims doubted the Indian state’s intentions to resolve the problems facing the community and campaigned against its inconsistency in upholding secularism. It challenged the Indian state within the constitutional and secular framework, by seeking political action through civil society groups. These groups also canvassed for Hindu-Muslim unity in the face of an adverse environment. The third group, comprising clerics belonging to a few revivalist schools and some Western-educated Muslims, denounced the capacity of the state to be secular altogether and believed that only the true practice of Islam could redeem the community. It is among members of this group that Wahhabism, a revivalist movement founded by the 18th century theologian Abd al-Wahhab in Saudi Arabia, started to gain ground.

The Wahhabi movement denounced all the Islamic schools of jurisprudence which it thought wrongly interpreted the Quran. It championed Tauhid (the oneness of Allah) and argued against the Shafi, Hanafi, Maliki and Hanbali schools of jurisprudence. It advocated “going back” to the Quran and the Sharia (Islamic law). It described Islam as a “code of life” and not a religion, in the same way the Sangh Parivar describes Hindutva as “way of life”. The Wahhabis demanded a return to the Salaf (golden age of Islam, the caliphate). The movement found political patronage in Saudi Arabia, which continues to adhere to its principles. In the early 20th century, Wahhabism flourished with renewed vigour when Maulana Maududi, the founder of Jamaat-e-Islami, and Sayyid Qutb, a leading member of the Muslim Brotherhood, espoused its ideals to form a “true Islamic society and considered proselytisation as true jihad”. Wahhabism considers the Western world and people from other religions Jahiliya (ignorant) and believes that fighting against them will lead one to Allah (God) because, according to Wahhabism, only Islamic law can ensure a just society.

The majority of Muslims find this strand of Islam fundamentalist. Ali Mamouri, a theologian based in Iran, says: “The fundamentalists emerged not out of conservative circles but rather out of reformist movements which were aiming for an ‘Islamic awakening’. The goal of fundamentalism is to return to the ‘sacred text’, carefully executing what it says, without any interpretations, and rejecting the official, and more conservative, historical interpretations of it.”

It is not surprising that most militant Islamist outfits, such as the Lashkar-e-Taiba and the Jammat-ud-Dawa, draw their inspiration from the strict theology of Wahhabism. Embracing this insular approach towards Islam, these outfits justify severe punishments such as beheading, stoning to death and flogging of people who do not follow the Sharia. Wahhabis consider all modern governments illegitimate as they are an intervention in the workings of the Sharia.

With the passage of time, this tradition of Islam gradually lost acceptance except in Saudi Arabia, only to find new strength in the 1990s. “Saudi Arabia pumped millions of petrodollars into the madrasas and mosques of the subcontinent to propagate the Wahhabi theology,” Javed Anand, general secretary of Muslims for Secular Democracy and co-editor of Communalism Combat, told Frontline. “This led to the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan and its influence travelled east for the ‘liberation’ of Kashmiri Muslims,” he added.

“No doubt the continued bleeding of Palestine, Bosnia and Chechnya provided extra charge to global jihad. But it is important to remember that Maududi had fore grounded global jihad on the Muslim agenda before the surfacing of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Qutub’s vision, too, was never limited to the solution of the Palestinian problem,” Javed Anand has written in an article in Seminar.

Observers have pointed out that Saudi Arabia’s brand of Islam was tacitly promoted by its most important ally, the United States. “We all knew it but it was exposed in the recent war on Syria. Recently, on the instruction of the U.S., Saudi Arabia stopped channeling Zakat’s [Islamic tax] fund to a few madrasas, which means that Washington controls where the money goes from Saudi Arabia. Recently, a Saudi Minister went on record saying that thousands of youth from his country have gone to Iraq to wage jihad. Both the U.S. and Israel are against Islamic fundamentalism but they shelter its most vociferous supporter, Saudi Arabia,” said senior journalist Md Ahmad Kazmi.

It is the promotion of Wahhabism in the Kashmir Valley that led to the bombing of Sufi Dargahs. The Wahhabis advocated a ban on music, a prominent feature of the subcontinent’s Sufi Islam, and issued directives to make the wearing of the Burqa by Muslim women compulsory. They also introduced new prayer rituals. “The attack on Charar-ei-Sharief and other Dargahs in the recent past can be contextualised within this Wahhabi campaign,” Md Ahmad Kazmi said. He said that the growing conflict between the Shia and Sunni sects could be attributed to the increasing influence of Wahhabism. “After the Islamic revolution of 1979 in Iran, the conflicts between Shias and Sunnis had decreased tremendously. The re-energising of Wahhabis in India is precipitating renewed conflicts. The Wahhabis teach that killing Shias will lead them [its followers] to Jannat [heaven],” he added. He pointed out that the influence of Wahhabism was spreading in the rural areas of north India and was leading to the destruction of Dargahs and Sufi shrines. (Wahhab had condemned the cult of saints, and shrine and tomb visits.)

Influence in South India

The influence of Wahhabism is much stronger in south India than in the north. Groups such as the Popular Front of India (PFI) and its political front, the Social Democratic Party of India, have gained considerable influence in Kerala and coastal Karnataka. Reports about the PFI running terrorist camps in northern Kerala surfaced last year, following which several PFI leaders were arrested. In July 2010, PFI activists reportedly chopped off a professor’s hand, apparently for preparing a question paper with blasphemous references to the Prophet Muhammad.

The PFI has been charged with kidnapping and also the murder of several Communist Party of India (Marxist) activists and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh workers in northern Kerala. Political observers have opined that Wahhabism in south India is an import from the Gulf region, where many south Indians have migrated for work.

One of the main activities of the Wahhabi groups in India is mobilisation of students groups in colleges. The PFI and its front organisations have begun to wield considerable influence in many private colleges. In their desire to take forward their understanding of puritanical Islam, they issue diktats against Muslim women who refuse to wear the Burqa. Rayana R. Kazi moved the Kerala High Court in 2010 seeking police protection after she received threatening phone calls asking her not to wear jeans and shirt. Similarly, Shirin Middya, a lecturer in Aliah University near Kolkata, was asked by the students union to wear a burqa if she wanted to teach. The students’ union even banned her from entering the university premises.

In Tamil Nadu, too, the influence of Wahhabism has increased in rural areas. The Tamil poet Salma said: “A woman writing is considered a sin. It was very difficult. People would come and threaten my family.” Pointing out that the level of intolerance had increased in recent years, she said that the Wahhabis advocate child marriage, discourage women from studying, and campaign among Muslim families to live according to the Sharia laws. “You cannot question the traditional way of divorce in front of them. They become militant,” she said.

The PFI is said to be an offshoot of the Student Islamic Movement of India (SIMI), which was banned in 2001. SIMI functioned as a student movement but bracketed Islam within the strict codes of Wahhabism.

“The nefarious nature of SIMI has been evident from the moment it emerged from the womb of the Jamaat-e-Islami in 1977. Character building to fight against the perceived twin evils of communism and capitalist consumerism with its ‘degenerate morality’ was the declared objective. But in less than a decade, this self-styled moral brigade metamorphosed into ‘the real inheritor’ of the legacy of the founder of Jamaat-e-Islami, Maulana Abul Ala Maududi, who argued that all Muslims must strive for an Islamic state. True to its ideological mooring, in the ’80s, SIMI produced eye-catching stickers proclaiming ‘Secularism, NO; Democracy, NO; Nationalism, NO; Polytheism, NO; Only Islam’. These stickers adorned many Muslim homes and shops throughout India,” Javed Anand has said in one of his essays.

At its Mumbai meeting in 2001, SIMI for the first time declared that the time had come for Indian Muslims to launch an armed jihad to establish an Islamic caliphate. Posters issued by SIMI following the demolition of the Babri Masjid had declared: Ya Ilahi, bhej de Mahmood koi (Oh Allah, send us a Mahmud), in reference to the Turkish conqueror Mahmud of Ghazni.

“These groups, while trying to impose a strict Sharia code of conduct in Muslim households, are also changing the language of Indian Muslims. They advocate the use of Allah hafiz as a parting phrase as opposed to the traditional Khuda hafiz,” Kazmi said. Allah, an Arabic word for God, is considered appropriate by the Wahhabis as opposed to Khuda, which is a Persian word. “They ask [Muslims] to keep chanting Allah hoo to call God, but they are strictly against finding meaning in Quran or studying the history of Islam. They are trying to box the religion,” Kazmi added. Similarly, these clerical groups force Indian Muslims to address the Islamic holy month as Ramadan (which is Arabic), as opposed to Ramzan.

Hard-Line Teaching

The phenomenal rise of two Wahhabi groups, Tablighi Jamaat and Ahle-Hadith, in the past five years is noteworthy. Tablighi Jamaat has been growing stronger, especially in Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Kerala, Uttar Pradesh and Gujarat. This group is trying to appropriate the syncretic culture of “Aalmi Tablighi Ijtema” (world conference held in Bhopal), which attracts at least 10 lakhs of the faithful every year. Tablighi Jamaat wants to hold similar Ijtema in Raipur (Chhattisgarh) and Hyderabad. Tablighis reportedly also control the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) and most Waqf boards. Its members visit villages and hold congregations of local Muslims and propagate the group’s six-point programme. The six tenets are: Kalimah, which teaches Muslims to follow only Allah and no other God; Salat, which stresses the need to pray five times a day; Ilm and zikr, which invoke the Hadith; Ikram-e-Muslim, which stresses the need to respect other Muslims; and Dawah, which urges every Muslim to live according to the Islamic virtues practiced by the Prophet. Apart from this, the Jamaat encourages its followers to go on Khuruj, a conversion tour.

Such hard-line teaching is also preached by the Ahle-Hadith, which denounces all other traditions of Islam and claims to follow true Islam. It invokes Hadith, accompanied by the Quran, and is strictly opposed to the Sufi tradition. Both these groups promote a minimalistic lifestyle and irreverence towards other cultures.

Influence on Politics

The growing influence of Wahhabism is having considerable impact on the Indian political scene, especially south Indian politics. Parties such as the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) and the Tamil Nadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam (TMMK), considered to be moderate parties, have started taking hard-line stances. The IUML recently supported the campaign for a separate Tirur district to be carved out of the existing Malappuram district.

This campaign was originally started by the SDPI in 2010 and subsequently it gained resonance in the Gulf region among the migrant Muslims of Kerala. The SDPI had originally demanded a new district comprising Tirur, Tirurangadi and Ponnani Taluks and some portions of the Chavakkad region in Thrissur district. This led to intense communal debates, especially between the upper-caste Nair community and the SDPI.

In another instance, the IUML quoted the Sharia in its circulars to demand that the marriageable age for Muslim girls be reduced from 18 years. The party leaders also declined to light lamps at public functions, claiming that it was a Hindu practice.

In Tamil Nadu, the TMMK has displayed aggression in its protests. It demanded a ban on Kamal Hassan’s Vishwaroopam and some other films ostensibly for being anti-Muslim. In 2008, it demanded that Muslims be allowed entry into a mosque located in a protected monument.

Kalanthai Peer Mohamed, the award-winning Tamil writer, commentator and observer of Muslim politics and culture, told The Hinduon August 5: “Within the TMMK itself, a radical wing emerged, led by the charismatic P. Zain ul Abideen, who formed the TNTJ [Tamil Nadu Tawheed Jamat]…. The TNTJ, largely a one-man show, eschews electoral politics and confines itself to its communal ideals. It blindly backs acts of omission and commission committed by the Arab world under the garb of Islam. When the whole world found the beheading of the Sri Lankan Tamil Muslim girl, Rizwana, revolting, Zain ul Abideen vociferously justified the act. It’s worrying that the community in Tamil Nadu does not have representatives who can articulate their voice in a reasonable manner within a broad humanistic and universalistic framework.”

Some political observers, however, say that parties such as the IUML and the TMMK have been courting and serving feudal interests of affluent Muslims. Behind most of the issues raised by them are the commercial interests of a few leaders of these parties. But the issues have subsequently been communalised. A case in point is the communalisation of the IUML’s campaign to start four universities in Malappuram district. It later turned out to be an effort to appease the real estate interests of the Muslim elite and some party leaders. A cause of concern for secular Muslims of Kerala is the increasing criminalisation of parties such as the IUML in recent years.

The electoral impact of these organisations and cultural fronts promoting “true Islam” has been minimal. However, several Wahhabi groups, such as the Gujarat Muslim Revenge Force, the Muslim Defence Force, and the Islamic Defence Force, were founded in the past decade. Most of these organisations engage in proselytisation activities. But there are no reports of their involvement in terrorist activities. Acting as the cultural vanguard of “true Islam”, these organisations invoke the sense of injustice among Indian Muslims and pave the way for their cultural assimilation. There is the possibility of working-class Muslims, already strained by poverty and injustice, getting carried away by such campaigns.

It would be inappropriate to say that the Wahhabis have been highly successful because they do face resistance from Sufi traditions. As opposed to the theories of Hindutva ideologues, it is the pluralistic practice of Islam in the subcontinent that acts as a strong defence against such insular radicalisation. Indian Muslims, not Hindus, are facing the brunt of such radical tendencies. However, if the Indian state fails to adhere to its secular ethos, a far worse situation could arise.

The anthropologist Irfan Ahmad noted in one of his papers on SIMI: “The formation of such illegal groups by a segment of Muslim population also points towards an affinity between the geography of riots and cartography of Islamist radicalism. Over 15% or 20% of SIMI’s members came from Maharashtra, Gujarat and U.P., States where the masculine, virulent Hindutva has far more impact, and which have a history of the worse riots in the past two decades.” It is, therefore, binding on the government to intervene positively to address the problems of Indian Muslims.

Source: frontline.in/cover-story/wahhabi-impact/article5338336.ece?homepage=true

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/radical-islamism-and-jihad/wahhabi-impact--influence-of-wahhabi-islam-on-the-indian-muslim-community-is-growing/d/24413

 




TOTAL COMMENTS:-   392


  • Mr Shahin, While extremism is confined to a fringe, the only principled and honest scholars you will find are among the non Barelvis. Even Maulana Maududi, who otherwise veers to the right, was principled enough to refuse to issue fatwas of Jehad for Pakistan's wars and acts of aggression against India and went to jail on sedition charges for it. Show me one Barelvi ulema who took a similar stand? 

     You have some cheek talking about Barelvi inclusiveness when your chief ideologue Raza Ahmad Khan was according to the claims of the Barelvis themselves the first to start the talk of partitioning the country, refused to meet Gandhi because he was a Hindu leader and issued fatwas of apostasy against Deobandis because they worked closely with the Hindus and Gandhi. The partitioning of the country took a half million lives. All the rioting was by your Sufis/Barelvis to achieve the objective of partition while the Deobandis participated in the freedom movement and opposed partition.

    After partition, Barelvis comprised 96% of the sunnis in Pakistan. They immediately started their nefarious activities by sending 'tribals' to occupy a part of Kashmir. It was a non Barelvi scholar who said that this was nothing but deceit and an act of hypocrisy for which a fatwa of Jehad could not be issued. He once again refused a fatwa of Jehad for the 1965 war.

    The same Barelvis have today made Pakistan the epicenter of terrorism. The only scholars who once again refused to issue a fatwa of Jehad for the war against the Russians in Afghanistan were non Barelvi ulema because of which many of the Deobandis did not join the effort. Not a single Barelvi ulema took a similar stand. But for the fact that the Saudis were ideologically against shrine worshipers, the Barelvis would have fully participated in Afghanistan.

    Since the government, army and the administration is dominated by the Barelvis, all credit must go to them for making Pakistan what it has become today.

    Honesty has never been a Barelvi virtue. They have all along been unprincipled and devious and you are one of its worst specimens.

    By Observer - 7/28/2014 11:28:39 AM



  • Dear Naseer Saheb Observer. All you say about Barailvism may indeed be true, some I know myself to be true. But Sufi shrines and Barailwi visitors to the shrines in the sub-continent and spiritually inclined peaceful Muslims everywhere are under attack. Saying that peaceful victims are also bad people is no defence of the terrorist. It is only an attempt by you, as usual, to divert the issue.

     

    However, one thing that we learn from you is that Wahhabi-Salafi extremism cannot be defended. There is no defence. Saying, as you and Mohd Younus Rational keep saying, that victims of Islamic terrorism are also bad people, given the opportunity they will also kill, does not exonerate the Islamist killers and destroyers of Sufi shrines and Islamist heritage.


    By Sultan Shahin - 7/28/2014 7:02:41 AM



  • I just can't believe Brailvis are tolerant and a chance cure for violence. they are just looking an opportunity to grab the power and settle their hatred against Devbandis.
    they call themselves Aashiq e rasool and everybody should know that Ashiq e rasool ask beheading of the blasphemer/apostate of the prophet because aashiqus don't use their mind.

    By rational mohammed yunus - 7/27/2014 11:50:52 PM



  • Mr Sultan Shahin,

    Can you name one person who has left the site because of me and publish his mail to you?

    By Observer - 7/27/2014 4:57:50 AM



  • Mr Sultan Shahin,

     Barelvi/Sufi extremism

    terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/29/html

    The myth of tolerance among the Barelvis was exposed long ago when Ahmad Reza Barelvi, the founder of this sect and his supporters did not participate in non-co-operation movement against the British on the plea that it was led by a Hindu leader Mahatma Gandhi. Pronouncing a fatwa he not only denounced the Deobandis as Kafirs and condemned them for accepting the leadership of a Hindu leader during freedom movement but also criticised those Muslims who joined hands with Kafirs (non-believers) even if it was for attaining Islamic objectives. His fatwa warned the Muslims neither to attend to the ailing non-Muslims nor to participate in their funerals.

     As a foremost campaigner of Sufism, Ahmad Reza was also responsible for bringing the Indian Muslims into conflict with the Hindus by providing the theoretical basis for asserting a separate national identity in support of two-nation theory. It was the joint effort of the Barelvis and the Muslim Leaguers who spearheaded a movement for creation of a separate state of Pakistan for the Muslims.

    A fact not to be missed is that except Deobandis, all the other Islamic sects in Indian sub-continent like Barelvis, Shias, Ismailis and Ahmadias joined the Muslim League and strongly supported Pakistan movement

    But a review of the history of Pakistan movement suggests that majority of the All India Muslim League leaders from Bihar, Bengal, Uttar Pradesh and the erstwhile undivided Bombay state who were from elite section of the community belonged to the Barelvi Sect. After partition they migrated to Karachi, the then capital of Pakistan and Barelvis still constitute the single ethnic majority in this city.

    It equally represents religious orthodoxy and share most of the perspectives of terrorism and want to establish Islamic political order as articulated by them.

    By the middle of nineteenth century the central authority of Islamic power in Delhi became weak and a sizeable section of Ulema took advantage of the Sepoy Revolt of 1857 and tried to turn it into Jihad which was crushed by the British. Another section of Ulema particularly the parental family of Ahmad Riza Khan and their clan remained aloof from this Jihad. The British exploited the situation and remained soft towards the followers of Ahmad Riza Khan.

    Barelvis have an unrelenting aversion to the Deobandis and Deobandi-aligned movements such as the Nadwat al-Ulema, the Tablighi Jamaat and Jamaat-e-Islami.

     If Pakistan which is dominated by Barelvi sunnis is the epicenter of terrorism, then who is responsible but the Barelvis who dominate both politics, army and the administration? 

     Who are in the forefront of blasphemy cases to harrass the minorities in Pakistan? The Barelvis of course. Who are in the forefront in the abduction and forced conversions of Hindu girls? The Sufi/Barelvis.

    eurasiareview.com/28012011-barelvis-and-deobandhis-%E2%80%9Cbirds-of-the-same-feather%E2%80%9D/

    From temple to shrine: Forced conversions?

    Formation of the Sunni Tehrik

    Pir Ilyas Qadri's reluctance to adopt violence against Deobandi jihadi groups led to a mini-rebellion among his followers, particularly those who had studied at Barelvi madrassahs. Consequently, a small group led by Saleem Qadri founded the Sunni Tehrik in 1990. Saleem Qadri wanted to meet Deobandi violence with more violence, as Pir Ilyas Qadri's "non-violence was not taking the Barelvis anywhere."  However, Saleem Qadri did not break his religious allegiance to Pir Ilyas Qadri even after leaving his group, nor did he ask his followers to break links with the Dawat-e-Islami. This approach worked and soon the ranks of the Sunni Tehrik swelled. The membership of the Dawat-e-Islami and the Sunni Tehrik also overlaps at the lower levels with several other Barelvi groups.

    The Jamaat Ahle Sunnat Challenges the Military's Pro-Jihad Policies

     Saleem Qadri had played an important role in radicalizing the Barelvi youth, though neither he nor his spiritual leader, Pir Ilyas Qadri, were able to provide effective leadership to the ever growing numbers of restless Barelvi youth. This leadership was eventually provided by the hitherto dormant Jamaat Ahle Sunnat, the religious party of the Ahle Sunnat ulema. Dawat-e-Islami and the Sunni Tehrik had played an important part in reviving the Jamaat Ahle Sunnat, which held a convention in Multan on April 1-2, 2000. It was the biggest gathering of Barelvi groups in more than a century. The convention was very critical of the Pakistani military's pro-jihad policy and support to Deobandi groups. In his speech, Jamaat leader Syed Riaz Hussain Shah came down hard on the military, saying: "If the civil war in Kashmir is the right policy, the government must involve all the Muslims in it. It will be dangerous, as is becoming evident, to arm only a few sects [such as the Deobandis]."  However, the most important thing was that the Jamaat Ahle Sunnat had adopted the Sunni Tehrik narrative of a forceful defense of Barelvi interests as its own. The Jamaat Ahle Sunnat emerged much stronger after the convention and began to play a major part in the country's Islamist politics.

     The first opportunity for the Jamaat Ahle Sunnat to show its strength came in the fall of 2005, when Denmark's Jyllands-Posten newspaper published 12 cartoons depicting the Prophet of Islam as a terrorist. The cartoons created anger among Muslims across the world. The fiercest demonstrations took place in Pakistan, where the Jamaat Ahle Sunnat and other Barelvi groups (including Dawat-e-Islami and the Sunni Tehrik), remained in the forefront of the demonstrations and sustained them for months. Every time the government indicated its intention of amending the blasphemy laws, the Islamists descended to the streets with a vengeance. Again, each time the Jamaat Ahle Sunnat and other Barelvi groups were in the forefront of the protests. The Jamaat Ahle Sunnat also led demonstrations against the release of Aasia Bibi, an illiterate Christian farm worker and mother of five who was accused of committing an act of blasphemy (insulting the Prophet Muhammad) and sentenced to death by a lower court based on the evidence of her lone accuser.

     Conclusion

     Although the Barelvis are the majority Muslim sect in Pakistan and in South Asia, Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), under Saudi pressure, did not allow them to take part in the Afghan jihad. When the jihad in Afghanistan started in 1980, the Saudis agreed to match American donations dollar for dollar, but also made sure that the Barelvis and Shias were kept out of the jihad although the Barelvis are more hardline than the Deobandis in many respects.  However, the Barelvis show their street muscle through their numerical strength. The groups discussed in this article make up the backbone of the growing Barelvi/Sufi extremism in Pakistan. While the Dawat-e-Islami prepares the masses and the Sunni Tehrik counters violence from Deobandi and Ahle Hadith groups with more violence, the Jamaat Ahle Sunnat dominates the street with its madrassah-educated cadres to promote Sufi Islamism. The assassination of Governor Salman Taseer shows that Sufi Islamism can be a bulwark against or an alternative to Deobandi and Ahle Hadith jihadism but it is in its own way as great a threat to international security as the militancy of the Deobandi and Ahle Hadith movements.

    Only the non-Barelvi scholars are known to take principled stands

    It was the Jamate Islami leader Maulana Mududi who refused to sanctify the incursions in Kashmir in 1948 with a fatwa of Jehad. He again refused to issue a fatwa of Jehad to support the war in 1965 for which he went to prison and was tried for 'sedition'. Similarly, several Deobandi ulema refused to issue of fatwa of jehad even for the war against the Russians in Afghanistan since there was no official declaration of war. Not one Barelvi/Sufi ulema took a similar principled stand. If they were kept out of the `jehad’ in Afghanistan, it was because of Saudi Arabia and not because of any reluctance on the part of the Barelvis who were only too eager to join and who agitated and got a piece of the action in Kashmir. 


    By Observer - 7/27/2014 4:48:03 AM



  • Dear Sultan Shahin

    Some moderate Muslims influenced by Christian views on sex in which sex is dirty are disturbed by the quoting hadith related to sexual behavior of the prophet. These Muslims have no guts to call spade a spade instead they accuse, malign, insult, demand ban, advocate penalty for apostasy just for quoting from the authentic sources of the Islam Those Imams who collected, wrote, distributed and earned huge profit are revered by all Muslims including moderates. Most of the Muslims don't consider these ahadith pornographic otherwise how could they be read for blessings.

    Only God may know (if he exists and posses the knowledge he is attributed with) what are the true intentions of people including you. All evils are done in the garb of goodness. All wars (including Islamic and unislamic) are fought with good intentions.

    Muslims went for jihad to save and propagate Islam (is there any doubt in the nobility of the cause?) and Christians went for crusades to save Christianity and their lands (is there any doubt in the nobility of cause?).


    By rational mohammed yunus - 7/27/2014 12:13:03 AM



  • @Shahin

    Right. No one should be banned. Only offensive comments could be taken out in some cases.

    But banning is backwards and defeats the whole purpose of this site.

    By non muslim - 7/26/2014 8:48:38 PM



  • Naseer Saheb observer loves calling me sectarian. I usually ignore his vile attacks as well as his foul language, though it has forced some people to stop posting comments for fear of becoming his target. . [Before leaving the site, they wrote to me demanding a ban on Naseer Saheb's postings ad incidentally, also of Mohd Younus Rational. But banning is not my policy Our own website remains banned in Pakistan yet.]

    However, while most readers know my position, I must reiterate my stand for the new readers.

     I am conscious of the myriad ills of Barailwis. But if they are not violent and I say they are not violent,  that cannot mean I have joined or am propagating their sectarian ideas. Perhaps there is not one article supporting  Barailwi ideology on this site. A lot of intellectual violence and gender injustice is inherent in Barailwi ideology too, for instance, on the issue of apostasy. All Indian subcontinent's Muslims used be Sufi-Barailwi at one time. Then gradually, with growing Saudi influence, following the setting up of the Wahhabi kingdom earlier last century, things started changing. Now perhaps few Barailwis are left as far as their mindset is concerned.  Many still go to shrines and say Aameen quietly but in their thinking they too have become largely Wahhabis. 

    It is Sufis who brought Islam to the sub-continent, not Wahhabis. Under Sufi influence, Muslims lived peacefully for centuries. Plunderers ad looters came and went but peace and amity largely prevailed, of course, thanks also to the large-heartedness and broad-mindedness of the local population which did not mind if their neighbours converted to Islam. Unlike Muslims who would kill the people they call apostates, Hindus accepted plurality of religion in its true spirit.

    Sufi saints too had a similar temperament of pluralism and harmonious co-existence. It's Wahhabis who have changed all that. India is still largely safe, but one can see things changing here too very fast. If opposing Wahhabi ideology of Islam-supremacism, exclusivism, intolerance of other religions, etc. means being called names like sectarian or whatever, then so be it. This does not mean that other sects of Islam do not have these and other vices. But you oppose those first who challenge you, threaten to kill you, threaten to destroy your way of life, destroy peace of the world. Hence the opposition here to violent Takfiri-Salafi-Wahhabi-ahl-e-Hadeesi ideologies.

    Barailwi ideology needs reform, but Wahhabi ideology needs to be fought.


    By Sultan Shahin - 7/26/2014 2:20:38 PM



  • Non Muslim,

    I have not accused you of stalking. That is another person.

    You publish your part of the story. I do not use an abusive word unless the other person has used in first. Start from your first comment in the same thread which I ignored even though you were offensive.

    By Observer - 7/26/2014 7:49:15 AM



  • Whoa!

    I did not abuse Observer before he said some nasty personal things.

    I don't do that anyone without being personally provoked.

    I was away for a while when this discussion was going on.

    Mr. Observer, why don't you also publish the comment to which I had responded.

    And I did not use any foul language for religion or religious figures.

    I was only talking to you.

    Also, I'm neither stalking you, nor am I hounding you.

    Sad that you feel defenseless against comments.

    By non muslim - 7/26/2014 5:53:16 AM



  • Mr Shahin,

    Get to the point and answer:

    1. Why is that your ardent follower is stalking me for the last four months with abusive posts although I have stopped responding to him? How come you don't find his posts abusive?

    2. Show me an Islamist who says that as per the Quran, if a Muslim girl marries and elopes with a Hindu, nothing can be done about it except to gracefully accept the marriage. The girl, as long as she does not renounce Islam, will also not lose her inheritance and other rights as a Muslim. She is guilty of breaking a prohibition but no more and that matter is between her and God.

    3. Show me an Islamist who says that circumcision (Male/female) is nothing but an ancient African tribal practice which was given religious significance and can be dispensed with.

    4. Show me an Islamist who says that the 'Muslim' conquest of India by the Mughals, Afghans, Turks and the Persians was unlislamic and therefore these rulers are no more than plunderers and rapists in the sight of God.

    5. Show me an Islamist who says that the Muslims should relinquish all claims on the Babri Masjid and hand it over to the Hindus

    6. Show me an Islamist who says that Pakistan blasphemes Islam and the Quran  through its blasphemy laws and accusing any member of the minorities of blasphemy is like accusing a 3 year old girl of raping a 30 year old man.


    By Observer - 7/26/2014 3:57:36 AM



  • The viciousness of an Islamist mind is truly unbelievable. And this after almost three months of fasting and longer durations of prayer in this holy month of Ramazan.

    Well, I shouldn't be surprised. After all, Islamists elsewhere continue to kill and maim and rape and enslave other Muslims in this holy month meant for training oneself in piety, self-sacrifice.

    That's why I recommend a serious dose of introspection for all Muslims.


    By Sultan Shahin - 7/26/2014 2:52:13 AM



  • Mr Shahin,

    Do you also find it strange that such language (calling somebody an imbecile) is  not used with atheists, non-Muslims and Muslims who are well behaved and are not abusive?

    Isn't calling somebody an Islamist an abuse? Can you justify the use of the term? Does this not call for a rap on your knuckles? And what are you but a shameless mischief mongering and lying sectarian? Do you need justification for calling you the names I have called you? I can provide you complete documented justification.

    And how about your own favourite foul mouthed followers whom you encourage when they are abusing while arguing on your side? 

    Also count the number of posts by your follower who by his own admission was brought in by you  who was called an imbecile who keeps abusing me though  I have not responded even once during the last 4 months to any of it.

    Here is an example of an abusive person who calls himself non-Muslim and there are others too. He cant even take an apology with grace!:
    ------
    • Last time I checked it was one Mr. Observer who apologized like an idiot for his inability to make sense, arrogance and stupidity.

      Keep that in your mind all the time and how rubbish most of your writing is before you end up apologizing again and again.

      And here comes another of your non sequitur: "The hadith covers a practical issue faced by all nursing mothers who are practicing Muslims and have to maintain the required level of cleanliness for them to perform their prayers etc on how to treat their clothes soiled by an infant's urine. The problem is faced by the Males also who handle infants."

      That maybe so. But that is not what you are discussing and that was never relevant to begin with.

      With your peanut brain and the intelligence of a sparrow, as you always do, give unbelievable, laughable, nonsensical twists.

      Look in the mirror when you have to know who is maligning Islam.
      By non muslim - 7/11/2014 5:03:03 AM

    By Observer - 7/26/2014 12:26:12 AM



  • The strangest thing, Dr. T.O. Shanavas, is, at least on my site, I have not noticed any non-Muslim or atheist use such foul language. Only Islamists deeply immersed in Islamic scriptures and ex-Muslims, compulsively obsessed with Islam,  seem to do that. If my childhood conditioning were correct, it should have been the other way round. But, of course, reality is always more surprising than fiction.
    By Sultan Shahin - 7/25/2014 1:59:12 PM



  • When discussants call names, such as "imbecile" or go tangentially to discuss about a person's name, such as Muhammad, rather than the topic in question I feel uncomfortable to participate in the discussion. We have to be civil to get anything out of the discussion.  Sorry to write this.
    By T.O. Shanavas - 7/25/2014 9:50:50 AM



Compose Your Comments here:
Name
Email (Not to be published)
Comments
Fill the text
 
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.

Content