By Arshad Alam, New Age Islam
18 July 2018
Sometimes back, there was a proposal in JNU
to teach a course on Islamic terrorism. There was severe criticism from
different sections of society as to why such a course was proposed in the first
place. The academic world argued that the course should be more inclusive and
therefore should teach about uses of terror in various religions not just
Islam. Now there cannot be any argument with the historical fact that various
religions have used terror in one way or the other. To single out Islam, as the
course did, lent credence to the perception that the course was ideologically
On the other hand, when so much of
contemporary terrorism seems to be happening in the name of Islam, then it
makes sense to engage specifically with this phenomenon. And what better way to
do it but within the academia. It also must be kept in mind that clubbing all
religions together will de-focus the entire program. If what one is interested
in is the linkage between Islam and terror, then the entire focus should be on
that particular linkage itself.
Moreover, in this particular instance, the
sound liberal position to take would be to leave such academic matters in the
hands of the university or the teachers concerned. The problem is that liberals
in India have come to believe that while freedom and autonomy of teachers and
educational institutions should be paramount when they are in power, others
should be denied such freedoms.
Another level of problem was with the very
word Islamic itself. Critics were quick to point out that no religion sanctions
violence and therefore using the word ‘Islamic’ for a course on terrorism was
going too far. After all, the argument continued, we don’t use Christian
terrorism or Hindu terrorism so why should we use the term Islamic terrorism.
This narrative is historically uninformed.
Christians, Muslims and Hindus, acting out their belief system have all used
violence at some point of time in their histories. If not then how do we
understand the crusades, the burning at the stakes and the persecution of
Buddhists? The problem is not so much that religions have used terror; rather
the bigger problem is that there is no consensus on how to define terror.
For example, the history of independence of
third world countries is replete with example where our prominent freedom
fighters have used terror and violence as a viable and respectable means to achieve
their ends. But then we do not have a problem with this kind of terror. Terror
has also been used by various states in the developing and developed worlds on
their own population but then since the state has a monopoly of violence, we do
not understand this as terror. So it is the word terror which is very difficult
to map and define because one’s terrorist might well be the other’s martyr.
However, this should not deviate us from the
more fundamental question of religious terrorism. If acts of terror are carried
out in which religious motivation is the prime motivating factor, then why
should we shy away from calling the name of religion associated with the
terrorists. And more importantly, if those who are carrying out such attacks in
the name of Islam, then who are we to say that they are no truly Muslims?
Disparate Muslim groups opposed the
proposed course simply because it would bring a bad name to Islam. They were
quick to point out that Islam means peace and that there is no place for violence
in this religion. Nothing can be further from truth.
Firstly, it has become fashionable these
days to start with the faulty premise that Islam is a religion of peace. No
religion is completely about peace or violence. With Islam in particular, the
history of the religion is filled with violence right since its inception. What
is worse, Muslims started fighting each other over political power soon after
the death of its prophet. It is not that Muslims are unaware of their own
history. Rather the problem is just the opposite: they are too aware of their
violent historical past. And that’s the reason why they now want to proclaim it
as a religion of peace.
Properly speaking, Islam should mean
submission more than anything else and the Muslim in one who submits. There is
no need for Muslims to deny their past: all religions have been violent at some
point in their history. The point is to accept the problematic history and see
to it that it is not repeated. Merely saying that Islam is a religion of peace
will not make Islam into one; Muslims have to actively construct an alternative
hermeneutic tradition if they want to proclaim Islam as a peaceful religion.
Against this backdrop, it was rather rich
of AMU students Union and the Delhi Minority Commission chairman to write to
JNU to change that particular course. The AMU needs to answer some tough
questions in this regard. Why is it that it is taking interest in the affairs
of another university? Shouldn’t the job of AMU students union be to take care
of the needs and interests of student community in their own university?
Granted that they have a right to political critique, but then when will they
start critiquing the situation in their own campus? If they demand from JNU
that it respects ‘their’ sentiments, isn’t it about time that AMU shows the
same sensitivity towards its own diverse student population.
How about starting a course on Hinduism in
AMU? Similarly, it shouldn’t be the business of a minority commission to seek
clarification from a university over the contents of an academic course.
Muslims are facing far serious problems in this country and it will be better
if the commission actually focuses on the daily humiliations which Muslims are
facing today. It is better to leave academic matters to the concerned
After a huge uproar, JNU decided to drop
the course and even denied that they were planning to introduce any such course
at all. However, it is now learnt that they are planning to introduce it as a
research theme by altering the title from ‘Islamic’ terrorism to ‘Islamist’
terrorism. But even the research theme has run into trouble. Muslim critics
have been quick to point out the ‘nefarious’ designs of the university behind
introducing the research theme. Even if we grant that given the political
discourse in the country, the usage ‘Islamic’ terrorism might have disturbed
Muslims, one doesn’t understand why ‘Islamist’ terrorism should have the same
We need to differentiate between Islamic
and Islamist: the latter only attests the political use of Islam to capture
state power where violence is indeed one of the many options. Isn’t this the
ultimate aim of Islamists the world over and isn’t it that they have used
terror as a method to achieve that end? How do we understand the Taliban and
more recently the ISIS except through the lens of Islamist terror? Worldwide,
even amongst Muslim scholars, there is now a consensus that it is the ideology
of Islamism which needs to be resisted.
what’s the problem in a course or a research theme which is intends to teach
and research different aspects of this phenomenon and why should Indian Muslims
resist it? The only reason seems to be lack of clarity to differentiate between
Islam and Islamism. Additionally, Indian Muslims seems to have a problem with
any usage or reference of Islam made by others which is non-flattering.
This is a huge problem and the sooner
Muslims address it, the better it will be for them. They should have the
willingness to openly debate any existing criticism of Islam. Without this
self-introspection, it is difficult to see how we as Indian Muslims, can come
to terms with the world around us. Not accepting that Islam, like any other
religion, can lend itself to terrorism will only push us towards a dystopic
worldview where Muslims become the perpetual victim and terrorist incidents
like 9/11 appear to be the handiwork of the Zionists.
Arshad Alam is a NewAgeIslam.com columnist
New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in
Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In
Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women
in West, Islam Women and Feminism