By Beena Sarwar
31 July, 2018
As dust from Pakistan’s general elections
and Imran Khan’s victory settles, it is time to re-assert that democracy is
messy business. It is a process, not an event. Controlled democracy, while not
quite democracy, is better than dictatorship. It’s complicated.
Despite the surface optics, this may well
be the best of times for Pakistan – a time of despair, but also uplifting. The
country is moving in the right direction politically, but the process is marred
by interference from within and outside its borders.
Noteworthy within the larger picture is
that Pakistan has recently completed an important cycle in the democratic
political process: the peaceful transition of power from one elected government
that completed its tenure to the next. This has happened only the second time
in the country’s history.
The first time was when the government
elected in 2008 (the late Benazir Bhutto’s Pakistan Peoples Party, PPP) handed
over power to the next elected government in 2013 (Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan
Muslim League-Nawaz, PML-N). Both governments completed their tenures despite
noisy, distracting opposition often seen as having military support.
Now, the PML-N is handing over power to
cricket legend Imran’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (“Movement for Justice”, PTI).
Most political parties have rejected the election results, but hopefully they
will stay in the system. As Benazir once said, “Boycott, and then what?” There
are many factors behind the election – or “selection” – results.
First, there is Imran’s charisma coupled
with his emotive rhetoric that appeals to many who came to political
consciousness during General Pervez Musharraf’s military dictatorship
(1999-2008). They include youth as well as adults who initially supported the
“liberal” dictator seen as symbolising a change in ideology from his
predecessor General Zia-ul Haq’s oppressive rule (1977-1988).
Coupled with this is the disillusionment
with the old political parties – “desperation” as one PTI supporter put it.
PTI’s slogan “Tabdeeli” (change) and its anti-corruption rhetoric speak to the
desire for change among such people.
These factors together could well have made
the PTI the election frontrunner in any case. But the process was not allowed
to take place on its own. Various other elements pushed the PTI past the finish
line further and faster than it may have reached on its own.
These include massive, unprecedented
censorship in the run up to the 2018 elections that helped forge a narrative
loaded in favour of the PTI. Journalists, particularly in the broadcast media,
were forced to not only virtually black out the PPP and the PML-N, but also
mention their leadership only in a negative light. Of course, the dominant
narrative does not determine how people vote – party loyalists will vote for
their party regardless – but it certainly can influence the undecided voter or
one who is on the fence.
Additionally, the judiciary was deployed to
disqualify candidates belonging to these parties. Further, candidates
(especially from PML-N) were threatened, coerced or blackmailed into giving up
their party tickets at the eleventh hour and either withdrawing from the race
or contesting as independents.
Perhaps, the most significant factor behind
the electoral results is the lack of electoral transparency and post-polling
manipulations. Polling agents in dozens of stations were not allowed to be
present for vote counting. Many also complained of not being provided copies of
Form 45, a document containing data about each candidate with names as well as
number of votes they received, which is to be signed by Returning Officers and
polling staff after the vote count.
Results for some constituencies came in an
unprecedented 72 hours after polling ended, causing further suspicions about
this most “rigorous” election process as columnist Nadeem Farooq Paracha
sarcastically termed it.
Significantly, all the parties except for
the PTI have complained of these manipulations and irregularities. Imran has
magnanimously promised to look into all electoral complaints. Not a word about
the censorship and other pre-poll manipulations though.
But whatever be the factors behind the
PTI’s electoral win, Pakistan must ride this wave. There are positives to focus
on and strengthen. For example, the clear desire for change among the people –
beyond the superficial “tabdeeli” promised by the PTI.
These aspirations have led to the emergence
of some promising electoral candidates, including women and representatives of
religious communities other than Muslim. Some have won provincial and national
assembly seats against daunting odds. Others, even if those like lawyer Jibran
Nasir in Karachi did not win, continue to challenge the dominant narrative,
raising important questions about identity, inclusion and pluralism.
It is such real changes taking place on the
ground that are so threatening to the establishment and the politico-religious
forces. Citizens are no longer satisfied with treading the path they are
expected to follow because of where they were born and into which community. A
groundswell of growing awareness about basic rights and human dignity is
leading more and more individuals to reject the old order and to cross or
aspire to cross socio-economic, class, caste and gender barriers.
This is the real “Tabdeeli” that is
taking place, regardless of Imran’s rhetoric. Changes on the ground will
continue to challenge the status quo in ways that only make news when there is
As Pakistan braces for the next phase in
its polity, there are lessons to be learnt from countries like India and the US
where fear of change has led to the emergence of similar ‘strongman’
Those who voted for Narendra Modi or Donald
Trump are not all bigots, misogynists or racists. Many are just ordinary people
desperate for “better days” and to make their country “great again”. This is
not too dissimilar from Imran’s supporters seeking “change”.
Change, like democracy, is a process, not
an event. And so, we continue to march along that road.
Sarwar is a Pakistani journalist, editor, filmmaker and teacher.