Books and Documents

Middle East Press (22 Dec 2016 NewAgeIslam.Com)

A Pinch of Fear in Every Turkish Citizen: New Age Islam's Selection, 22 December 2016

New Age Islam Edit Bureau

22 December 2016

A Pinch of Fear in Every Turkish Citizen

By Fikret Bila

Assassinating an Envoy; Between Crime and Propagating Terrorism

By Abdulrahman Al-Rashed

Karak Attack Yet another Test of Jordan’s Resilience

By Raed Omari

Something Can Be Done To Help the People Of Aleppo

By Dr. Méguerditch Tarazian

Donald Trump's Cabinet Bodes Ill for the Planet

By Lauren Carasik

America’s Empty ‘Happy Talk’ On Palestine Coming To An End

By Ray Hanania

Lebanon — The ‘Post-Aleppo’ Government

By Diana Moukalled

Compiled By New Age Islam Edit Bureau


A Pinch of Fear In Every Turkish Citizen

By Fikret Bila


Russian Ambassador to Ankara Andrey Karlov was the victim of a hateful assassination. May the ambassador who we know was a very good person rest in peace. My condolences and regrets to his family and the Russian people.

The assassination against the Russian ambassador is not just a crude attack; it is a well-calculated, finely tuned professional assassination.

So professional that even if the cold-blooded assassin Mevlüt Mert Altintas may have not considered it, whoever led him obviously took into consideration the psychology of Turkish society.

We know that the murderer was a policeman. We know he entered the Çankaya Contemporary Arts Center where the exhibition was organized by showing his police ID. Apparently, those who planned the attack calculated the effect of being a police officer on society. 

If the assassin were not a police officer – if his police ID had been fake, he would again have been able to easily enter and take his place behind the ambassador. As a matter of fact, he would not even have needed to show a fake ID; he could have verbally said, “I’m a policeman” and with the help of that attitude, he would have passed the entrance and gotten in.

If he had been a soldier or showed a fake military ID, that could also have worked; he could have said “I am an officer” and gotten in; he could have taken his position behind the ambassador.

The reason is that in our society, you do not ask for the ID of a member of the military. You can’t, because our citizens do not question the police or the soldier. This is a psychological state. Our education system does not raise a person with the “courage” to ask questions to the police officer, the soldier, actually to the uniformed guard or even somebody wearing a private security uniform. This is because the civil servant, especially the uniformed one, is acknowledged as sacred. Our society is educated to obey the state with a culture of submission to the police, soldier and civil servant. 

Being an individual and using the rights of a citizen and the right to question the state and the civil servant are not taught. They represent the state authority and cannot be questioned.

A pinch of fear is planted into our people when they are very young. Respect, mixed with that fear, blocks us from asking for the identity of the police or member of the military. It deems it unethical to suspect them. This education system translates into a social deficiency.

Because this is so, the assassin police officer, Mevlüt Mert Altintas, I am sure, added a mysterious air as he showed his ID and easily found his way in. Nobody at the entrance asked him, “Let me take a look at your ID; are you assigned here and on which duty; are you guarding the ambassador?”

Those who planned this assassination calculated using the superiority of being the police and the military in our society.

There is also the oriental negligence in this incident. In the oriental person, there is always the belief, “Well, nothing is going to happen.”

Because of this culture, we applaud and appreciate the leader or the politician who goes without guards. Because our leaders and politicians know this, they please people by mingling with the crowds, risking their lives. They even scold the police trying to protect them, drawing applause when they tell them to withdraw.

This Is Oriental Business…

A similar negligence is observed in the Russian ambassador’s assassination. He has reported to have had a modest personality, going to places without guards. As a matter of fact, this is not correct behavior.

Especially after the Syrian incident, at a time when protests were being held in front of the Russian consulate, for him to wander around without protection is serious negligence.

Of course, it is a separate issue of negligence for the Russian embassy not to have asked for protection from the Ankara Police Department. Likewise, it is serious negligence that the Turkish police was not able to provide security at the most critical area where dozens of uniformed and civilian officers were on duty, where the United States, Germany and Austrian embassies are located as well as other official institutions. 

Another serious point of negligence is that the police department which has fired or suspended thousands of police after July 15 was not aware of a policeman such as Mevlüt Mert Altintas in the heart of Ankara.

There is a Western saying, “Trust but check.”

This is what we lack. We immediately trust the person we come across.

You cannot see a U.S. ambassador or an Israeli ambassador without protection. Even if they want to, their guards do not allow them to go free.

The difference lies there.

Source: hurriyetdailynews.com/a-pinch-of-fear-in-every-turkish-citizen-.aspx?pageID=449&nID=107597&NewsCatID=586


Assassinating an Envoy; Between Crime and Propagating Terrorism

By Abdulrahman al-Rashed

21 December 2016

Assassination of the Russian ambassador to Turkey is of major significance and is yet another terrorist operation that serves the interest of Iran and the Syrian regime. It also harms the cause of the Syrian people. The crime suggests, all over again, that global security is threatened more than before.

Unfortunately, some people continue to mix terrorism and regional affairs as is the case with Syria. The man who assassinated Russian Ambassador justified his crime by saying it was to avenge what is happening in Syria.

Around the same time, another terrorist ploughed into a market in Berlin in Germany which supported the Syrian people and looked after refugees the most. During the same week, ISIS bragged that one of its members killed 10 in the Jordanian city of Karak.

Those justifying the murder of the Russian envoy link it to Aleppo and Syria’s tragedy. They in fact try to exploit people’s anger toward Russia and use it to support ISIS, the organization which is responsible for turning the world against the Syrian people and their revolution.

Yes, there is anger toward Russia but we must not mix that with acts of terrorism. Russians had a decent image in the Middle East, particularly among Arabs, because they raised the slogan of fighting colonization and supporting liberation movements and supported the Non-Aligned Movement.

Russians were known for their stances toward major Arab causes, such as the Palestinian cause, and they did not get themselves involved in regional military adventures. Even when they invaded Afghanistan in the 1970s, many here thought it was a chapter of the axes’ struggle in a faraway area.

Intervention in Syria

All this changed after the Russians strongly and brutally intervened in Syria. Moscow thus ran out of its historical, moral and humanitarian capital which it had developed over decades. Reactions toward them became negative as their actions in Syria, particularly in Aleppo, triggered people’s anger.

Now, extremist groups want to ride this wave of hatred against Moscow in the region as they realize that the region’s governments want to negotiate with the Russians and try to persuade them to reach a reasonable political solution that’s accepted by the majority in order to end the war in Syria. Some governments in the region do not want to lose a major country like Russia and do not want to push Russia further towards Iran and the Syrian regime as there’s no political dispute with it.

If the Russian command wants a role in the region, then this role can be comprehended, and it is also possible to narrow the gap as this role is positive. There are no camps which oppose Moscow in the Middle East, including in countries which are close to Washington and the West in general, and these countries refuse to divide the region into opposing camps, like what happened during the Cold War.

Although there’s very little hope right now, Russians can play a positive and decisive role in Syria in order to achieve a reconciliation that eliminates extremists and extremism within the Syrian regime that is responsible for massacres during in recent years.

ISIS and other terrorist organizations want to sabotage these efforts and they know that by targeting Russian officials, it would be appealing to an angry popular sentiment and embarrassing regional governments which seem incapable of providing aid and protection to millions of Syrians.

Justifying Positions

Russia is aware that its reputation has hit a new low. Its propaganda through the Russia Today television channel and other state media platforms have not succeeded in justifying its stances, actions and responsibility for supporting the Assad regime and the Iranians in Syria.

Perhaps Russia does not care much about the opinion of the majority of millions of Arabs and Muslims as they do not elect and do not influence their governments’ policies. However, we do know for a fact that terrorism benefits a lot from this difficult situation, i.e. from people’s anger and government’s inability.

Most of those who approve the murder of the Russian ambassador are those who sympathize with ISIS and other groups, and they are not less dangerous than terrorists themselves. It is certain that by expressing their joy and justifying this crime, they push naive and angry people toward supporting terrorist groups; therefore, they grant terrorism the oxygen it needs in the form of propaganda and sympathy. ISIS and al-Nusra Front are two groups that are not less dangerous than the Syrian regime and the Iranian militias fighting in Syria.

Glorifying the crime in Ankara should be categorized as crime itself because it helps terrorists recruit and receive donations and grants them legitimacy. It also restores the popularity which terrorists were about to lose during the past phase as a result of the opposing propaganda against them.

Abdulrahman al-Rashed is the former General Manager of Al Arabiya News Channel. A veteran and internationally acclaimed journalist, he is a former editor-in-chief of the London-based leading Arab daily Asharq al-Awsat, where he still regularly writes a political column. He has also served as the editor of Asharq al-Awsat’s sister publication, al-Majalla. Throughout his career, Rashed has interviewed several world leaders, with his articles garnering worldwide recognition, and he has successfully led Al Arabiya to the highly regarded, thriving and influential position it is in today.

Source: english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/middle-east/2016/12/21/Assassinating-an-envoy-between-crime-and-propagating-terrorism.html


Karak Attack Yet another Test of Jordan’s Resilience

By Raed Omari

21 December 2016

At the time this piece is being written, Jordanian security forces continue to sweep Karak governorate to make sure the southern city’s Crusader-era castle is completely free of more “terrorist outlaws” after four of them were killed.

The late-night security operation ended with the killing of four assailants, the Public Security Department announced, saying that the so far unidentified “terrorists” were holed up in the castle and were shooting randomly at police personnel, citizens and tourists, killing 10 and injuring 34.

Seven security personnel, two civilians and a Canadian tourist, were killed by the gunmen, who shot at police targets in the southern town earlier Sunday before heading to the castle. The hostage situation ended following a five-hour rescue operation, minister and spokesman Mohammad al-Momani said.

Although no details about the identity of the gunmen; their affiliation and their motives have been given so far, authorities and citizens have termed them as “terrorists” – a word referring to ISIS and al-Qaeda members and supporters or those carrying the two radical groups’ deviant ideology.

Circumstances leading to the Karak incident include manufacturing of explosives, shooting of civilians and security personnel and holding hostages all of which make it a terrorist act more than a criminal one from an academic more than political perspective. That is not the question anyway.

Why Jordan?

Jordan being the target of terror attacks is not a big surprise. It has been so for a number of reasons. The kingdom is an active member of the US-led anti-ISIS coalition and was among the first countries to declare war against terror. Countries such as France, Germany and Bangladesh, far away from terror-hit Iraq and Syria, had been the target of terrorist attacks, which gives an indication of Jordan’s predicament.

Although a security penetration of some kind has always been Jordan’s major concern, the kingdom still sees ISIS, al-Qaeda and other radical organizations as posing no strategic threat to its national security. Despite the growing concern of sleeper cells inside the refugee-plagued kingdom and its long border line with Syria and Iraq, extending to nearly 400 kilometres, Jordan has been showing resilience and firmness in the face of countless terrorist attempts to undermine its valuable asset in this turbulent region.

However, 2016 has been really a tough year for Jordan. The country witnessed four unprecedented attacks with the Karak one being the latest. Besides the ISIS-claimed attack on a forward military post at the borders with Syria in June, the Irbid attack in March, the “lone wolf” attack on the intelligence personnel in Amman’s Baqaa office in June and, seemingly, the Karak attack have all been the result of home-grown radical extremism.

It is not easy to address this phenomenon in Jordan, and elsewhere, considering the widespread use of social media, and prevalence of poverty and unemployment.

Angry Voices

Although Jordanians have always been proud of the professionalism of their country’s security bodies, some angry voices have emerged from the streets. Even the parliament expressed dismay at the increasing attacks on army and police posts.

Let’s not forget here that the Lower House was the first Jordanian entity to call on the government to reconsider its long-held open-border policy with Syria.

But with counterterrorism efforts becoming really complicated in Jordan and in other countries surpassing the conventional military methods to a more sophisticated ideological, educational, cultural and technological endeavour, another attack is just round the corner, especially with ISIS and al-Qaeda becoming more of a “mind set” than terror organizations.

Raed Omari is a Jordanian journalist, political analyst, parliamentary affairs expert, and commentator on local and regional political affairs. His writing focuses on the Arab Spring, press freedoms, Islamist groups, emerging economies, climate change, natural disasters, agriculture, the environment and social media. He is a writer for The Jordan Times, and contributes to Al Arabiya English.

Source: english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/middle-east/2016/12/21/Karak-attack-yet-another-test-of-Jordan-s-resilience.html


Something Can Be Done To Help the People of Aleppo

By Dr. Méguerditch Tarazian

21 December 2016

The last time Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) managed to get a medical aid convoy through to hospitals it supports in eastern Aleppo was back in August. Since then, the town has endured a never-ending siege and the only information MSF teams have had regarding the reality of the lives of Syrian medical personnel has been by Skype or telephone.

Doctors have been telling us for months about shortages and the challenges of treating casualties against a backdrop of intensive bombings. The past few days, they have been describing how terrified they are about the fate that awaits them, their fear of reprisals for providing medical care in the rebel-held zone and how they want to be evacuated.

In the final throes of the battle to retake Aleppo — no matter what the cost — we must continue to demand that the different parties to the conflict allow civilians to flee without risking their lives, something they have consistently refused to agree to.

Since September, the rebels have rejected this option several times, with some armed groups going so far as to prohibit civilians from using corridors opened by the government of Syria and its allies.

They finally consented on Tuesday, and so did the Syrian government after some hesitation. As the evacuation of civilians finally got underway, MSF teams are positioned in Atimah, in Idlib governorate, 35 kilometers away from Al Atareb in Aleppo governorate and are ready to help the displaced with 45 tons of medical supplies — mainly drugs, consumables and medical equipment — and non-food items.

We must continue to demand that the people of eastern Aleppo be allowed to evacuate while hoping that the emotion stirred up by the media in reaction to the deluge of bombs prevails on the Syrian and its allies to be less intransigent regarding the plight of civilians.

But we must not forget that the extreme violence of the retaking of the town is a sad reflection of what is happening in neighbouring Idlib province where hundreds of thousands of displaced people are now trapped.

Idlib Bombings

The inhabitants of Idlib are also subjected to a sustained aerial bombing campaign and doctors in the hospital network that MSF supports in the region have reported 54 attacks on health workers and medical facilities since June 2016. Health services in the opposition-held zone have been the target of loyalist troops since the conflict began in 2011 and, under Syrian counterterrorist laws passed in 2012, providing medical care to a casualty in opposition-held zones such as Idlib can be penalized as material support to terrorism.

Given the enormous challenges clandestine health services have faced in attempting to respond to the needs of countless war-wounded and people suffering from chronic illness (the main cause of death before the war), MSF was itself forced to go underground in order to provide assistance to the people of Syria. The Damascus government has never authorized our organization to operate in Syria.

Added to these limits is the conflict situation in fragmented Idlib province that is controlled by various armed groups, some of whom target relief organisations with abductions, arbitrary arrests and restrictions. It is therefore very hard for MSF or any humanitarian actors to provide the inhabitants of Idlib with the level of assistance they require.

It is to Idlib province that the last remaining civilians Aleppo are supposed to be evacuated, but it is not a safe haven for the displaced, many of whom who would like to be able to flee via Turkey.

But with the border sealed to Syrians seeking to flee, they are condemned to all-out war. The rights of an individual to flee a war zone — in Aleppo, Idlib, or anywhere else — must be recognized and safe passage provided to those who want to leave.

Before the carnage in Idlib reaches the level of Aleppo, Turkey must open its borders. And to encourage the country do so, western nations must send out a strong signal by declaring they are ready to show more generosity than in the past in giving refuge to Syrians whose fate in Aleppo they are now lamenting.

This is quite simply the same story, and the same people, all over again.

Dr. Méguerditch Tarazian is the President of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) in France. While still in medical school, he worked as a translator for MSF in Nagorno-Karabakh, and from 1999-2002, he worked as an MSF field doctor in Sierra Leone, Afghanistan, Iran, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. In 2003, he became an emergency coordinator for MSF projects in Liberia, Côte d’Ivoire, Niger, Pakistan, Central African Republic, Jordan, as well as other countries. From 2007 until being elected President, he served first as Deputy and then as Director of MSF’s Emergency Programming at MSF in France.

Source: english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/middle-east/2016/12/21/Something-can-be-done-to-help-the-people-of-Aleppo.html


Donald Trump's Cabinet Bodes Ill For The Planet

By Lauren Carasik


President-elect Donald Trump's cabinet is shaping up as a nightmare for environmentalists and others committed to bold action on climate change. Trump tapped Rex Tillerson, CEO of ExxonMobil, the biggest publicly trading oil company in the world, as secretary of state, where he would head the agency in charge of negotiating international climate agreements.

His selection rounds out a cabinet filled with climate sceptics, and signals a resurgence of oil and gas power inside the Beltway that is poised to dictate foreign policy while ignoring the staggering social costs of carbon.

Trump recently reaffirmed his hostility to climate protections, vowing again to "cancel the restrictions on the production of American energy including shale, oil, natural gas and clean, beautiful coal".

Kathy Mulvey, the climate accountability campaign manager at the Union of Concerned Scientists, denounced the choice. "[T]here's a real concern that President-elect Trump is creating a government of, by, and for the oil and gas industry," Mulvey said. "The analogy of the nomination of Rex Tillerson for secretary of state would be akin to nominating a tobacco CEO as surgeon general," she added.

Scott Pruitt and Rick Perry, selected to head the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Energy (DOE) respectively, are avowed climate sceptics.

Pruitt, the Oklahoma attorney general and loyal friend to the oil and gas industries, is set to take the helm of an agency whose legacy he appears determined to dismantle. Touting himself as a leading opponent of the EPA's "activist agenda", Pruitt helped spearhead state-led opposition to the Obama administration's Clean Power Plan, which is key to meeting the country's commitments under the Paris climate agreement.

Pruitt wrote in the National Review that "scientists continue to disagree about the degree and extent of global warming and its connection to the actions of mankind".

Moreover, former Texas governor Rick Perry will head the DOE, an agency he once vowed to abolish, after committing the memorable faux pas of forgetting its name in a presidential debate.

Perry, who hails from a state with a powerful energy sector, sits on the board of Energy Transfer Partners, developer of the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline. Both are expected to advance Trump's anti-regulatory, pro-extraction agenda.

Fox Guarding The Henhouse?

Tillerson is cast as a pragmatic, experienced businessman who possesses a skillset seamlessly transferrable to statecraft. Yet, the oil magnate's globetrotting has been in service of corporate profit, not advancing the public good.

The elevation of an oil baron as the nation's top diplomat lays bare Trump's priorities. As Steve Coll observes in The New Yorker, "American power is best understood as a raw, neo-colonial exercise in securing resources." Tillerson's ties with Vladimir Putin, and by extension with Russia's energy industry, have caused consternation, and he has promoted the company's interests abroad despite the significant human costs of doing so. Activists are alarmed by Tillerson's presumed loyalties and his company's conduct on climate change.

ExxonMobil has come under fire for covering up what its scientists have long known about the dangers posed by carbon emissions. Separate reports by the Los Angeles Times and InsideClimate News last year prompted the attorneys general of Massachusetts and New York to investigate whether ExxonMobil committed consumer or securities fraud by failing to disclose to its shareholders what it knew about climate change.

The company claims it has not suppressed evidence of climate change, and Tillerson conceded it was real shortly after he ascended to the company's top position in 2006.

But the oil giant is aggressively fighting the investigation into its conduct, calling the effort politically motivated and even suing the attorney generals for violating the company's free speech and other constitutional rights.

Others have joined the effort to hold the oil giant to account. On December 14, the Pace Environmental Law Clinic filed a petition on behalf of the Waterkeeper Alliance to suspend ExxonMobil from contracts with the government, citing its "pervasive pattern of deceptive and damaging conduct related to environmental issues generally and climate change issues in particular".

INFOGRAPHIC: Who's who in Donald Trump's administration?

Dispirited activists derive some small satisfaction from the fact that Tillerson may have to testify in confirmation hearings about what Exxon knew and when, potentially circumventing the company's obstructionism.

Tillerson espouses faith in technological advances and adaptation to remediate deleterious climate effects, and promotes the continued use of fossil fuels as a bridge to more sustainable resources. In so doing, he avoids the urgency of immediate action to curb emissions by deferring to the forces of the free market to fix the problem.

The company also justifies cheap energy as the key to alleviating poverty. Yet some anti-poverty institutions have a different view, including the World Bank, which concluded that "avoiding climate risks is the route to sustainable development".

ExxonMobil endorses the Paris climate agreement, along with a carbon tax, yet it continues to support institutions and politicians that oppose both.

It Already Begun

The chasm between words and deeds highlights the fact that it derives much of its income from the continued extraction of fossil fuels despite the imperative of keeping most of those resources in the ground.

Trump's transition team raised yet more alarm bells when it sent a questionnaire to the DOE asking for the names of people who had worked on initiatives to curb greenhouse emissions. An unbowed DOE refused to comply. After ensuing outrage, the Trump team claimed the questionnaire was unauthorised, but the chilling effect is clear.

The Washington Post reported that concerned scientists "have begun a feverish attempt to copy reams of government data onto independent servers in hopes of safeguarding it from any political interference".

Tillerson's relative moderation cannot mask the irony that one of the cabinet nominees with the least extreme position on climate made his fortune by extracting carbon fuels.

Trump's appointments make it clear that we cannot rely on the government to protect the planet: that stewardship will be up to civil society.

Lauren Carasik is a clinical professor of law and the Director of the International Human Rights Clinic at Western New England University School of Law. She has provided legal support for the water protectors.

Source aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2016/12/donald-trump-cabinet-bodes-ill-planet-161219100238604.html


America’s Empty ‘Happy Talk’ On Palestine Coming To An End

By Ray Hanania

22 December 2016

US President-elect Donald Trump is doing exactly what Palestinians and the Arab world need. He is throwing out all the useless, do-nothing “happy talk” about saving Palestine and Jerusalem that has put the Arab and Muslim worlds in a coma. Arabs and Muslims do not see it because their minds are numbed by nearly 24 years of American “happy talk” about Middle East peace, which has failed to deliver on any of its promises.

The days of relying on American largesse to make peace happen is over. Trump’s recent Middle East pronouncements have yanked away the blanket of hypocrisy that has covered and enabled Israel’s steady destruction of Palestine. Instead of reacting with justified indignation to Trump, as we have seen from Arabs and Muslims in all quarters, we should recognize that the Arab world has been romanced into an atrophy of false promises and hope.

We have been duped. It is hard to see through this fog, but Arabs and Muslims need to open their eyes to what has taken place since Palestinians accepted Israel’s right to exist in a handshake on the White House lawn on Sept. 13, 1993, in exchange for a promise of statehood that has never come. Two years later, Israeli extremists destroyed peace by murdering the one Israeli leader who was willing to make it, Yitzhak Rabin.

Israel has since continued its deliberate and systematic destruction of Palestine under a blanket of “happy talk” about peace, compromise and unfulfilled promises. Many Arabs and Muslims are angrily blaming Trump for destroying this system, as if the US ever really embraced the “two-state solution” or a peace that gives Palestinians statehood.

Look at the reality. Trump has named David Friedman as US ambassador to Israel. Friedman is a well-known Israeli-American settler who has openly denounced the two-state solution, called the Palestinian Authority corrupt, vowed to crack down on “Palestinian extremism,” and urged that economic support be provided to the Palestinian “middle class” to address its needs.

We have always believed their needs would be solved by the two-state solution, which has been propped up as a corpse for the past 24 years. Ironically, the loudest screamers against Trump are Arab activists who have for years rejected the two-state solution, denouncing both Rabin and co-signer Shimon Peres, just the way Friedman has done.

Arab and Muslim extremists have worked hard to destroy the two-state solution, so why are they complaining about Trump? The emotions of these predictable activist extremists have mis-focused the Arab and Muslim world’s dysfunction into a false anger against Trump. He is the wrong target.

As for “moderates” like myself, we have clung futilely to an illusory hope. Two states is the best solution, but the truth is Israel does not accept it. It continues to expand settlements, steal more land and make the occupation of Jerusalem and the West Bank more brutal. Worse is that the most powerful nation on Earth, the US, has been incapable of stopping Israel.

President Barack Obama, who more than any past president strongly advocated the two-state solution as the face of his Middle East policies, has been thwarted not just by the American right and Trump’s conservative circles, but by the hypocritical, double-talking American and Israeli left too.

Palestinians have lost more land, seen illegal Israeli settler numbers increase at a record pace, and witnessed the second-largest civilian death toll during Obama’s presidency than under any of his predecessors. Why did we sit back and accept that reality? Because we preferred smiles, handshakes, false promises and “happy talk” over the truth.

Without getting one significant concession from Israel, Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims have blindly opened their arms and embraced Israel on nearly every level while all this oppression continues unabated. Though Palestinians are far worse off today than they have ever been, Israel is enjoying new partnerships in the Arab world. Israel has received the largest grant of US taxpayer funding in history, more than $38 billion.

It is taking pictures with Arab leaders and sharing in multimillion-dollar business investments. Meanwhile, Arabs sit in cafes smoking hookahs and sipping coffee, pretending that Trump is the problem.

Had Hillary Clinton won the presidency, Arabs and Palestinians would be catatonic on a political gurney being fed lies intravenously to keep us in our coma. Trump has thrown cold water in our faces. If we look, we can see the ugly truth and ignore the worthless “happy talk.” He is waking the Arab and Muslim sleeping giant, but will we be awakened?

Israel’s refusal to accept the right of Palestinians to exist is the main obstacle to peace. Its refusal to implement the basics of the peace accords has fueled growing extremism in the region. Israel is the obstacle to peace.

However, this is not just about the future of the Palestinians. It is also about the integrity of the Arab and Muslim worlds. Israel’s rejection of Palestinian rights is a slap in the face of every Arab and Muslim. Do we just stand there and take it? It is shameful that Arabs and Muslims have done nothing, propped up in our hopes by empty “happy talk” and the false promises of a brighter future that Obama fed us in Cairo in 2009.

Peace does not come from preteens, but from clearly defined and well thought out strategies that Arabs and Muslims must develop to force Israel to recognize Palestinian, Arab and Muslim rights.

Either the Arab and Muslim worlds develop new strategies to restore their honour and force Israel to recognize Palestinian statehood, or we just accept the reality that Jerusalem is irrelevant and “saving Palestine” is a pipe-dream. If that is the case, who cares where Trump puts the US Embassy?

Ray Hanania is an award-winning Palestinian-American columnist. He can be reached at rghanania@gmail.com.

Source: arabnews.com/node/1027926/columns


Lebanon — The ‘Post-Aleppo’ Government

By Diana Moukalled

22 December 2016

Preventing civil war was the pretext to justify a political settlement that brought Gen. Michel Aoun to the presidency. Now the same excuse is used to justify the contradictory formation of the government, which was announced by Prime Minister Saad Hariri.

We can debate endlessly how accurate this pretext was, especially in terms of the many concessions made, and the deep differences and contradictory visions of the new Cabinet’s members. There is no guarantee that they will not fall out even before the new government begins work.

How will it draft its ministerial statement? What policy will it adopt toward the international tribunal investigating the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, and toward Hezbollah’s weapons and its fighting in Syria? These issues represent the first month’s challenges for the government.

Regional circumstances have not given Hariri enough time to form a better government, as he realizes that he is entering a new phase that is critical for him and his movement. In addition, consensus will likely remain a requirement for the formation of any government in Lebanon. Opposition will be only allowed under the confines of loyalty to the ruling party. Therefore, the country’s weakness and impasse will continue.

Since the end of Lebanon’s civil war, the country has failed to establish an authority and institutions that are independent of power-sharing among different sects and beliefs, in a way that paralyzed the state. This has been driven by a regional Syrian-Iranian push.

The mission of this interim government, which will only stay for a few months, is to prepare for a new election law and hold parliamentary elections in spring. However, several names in the Cabinet do not suggest that elections will be its mission. This raises the possibility of a new political vacuum.

It is very hard to overlook all these clear-cut facts surrounding the new government. Hariri, the most prominent opposition leader against Hezbollah and its Syrian ally, and head of the largest bloc in Parliament, has made major concessions. This includes his acceptance that Hezbollah has veto power and a set of names in government that are a major provocation to him and the legacy of his father.

Hariri’s government comprises many of his opponents: Hezbollah, Amal and Aoun’s party. It also includes a bloc loyal to former President Emile Lahoud, a very close ally of Hezbollah and of Syrian President Bashar Assad.

The March 8 alliance, consisting mainly of Hezbollah and Aoun’s party, welcomed the new government, considering it a “post-Aleppo” government. This comes in light of the major concessions made by Hariri to appoint some figures in the government.

The status quo will not improve in Lebanon without regional change, which seems unlikely. The regional situation is getting more complicated, especially after the fall of Aleppo and the military progress achieved by the Syrian-Russian-Iranian alliance.

This means the government is making dysfunctional political balances, especially when tested by the most crucial task. This government was invited by Assad to contribute to the “post-Aleppo liberation” phase, in a blatant challenge to Hariri, and to pressure him to submit to Syrian-Iranian influence in Lebanon. The ministerial statement is the first test of the government’s — specifically Hariri’s — ability to counter the Syrian-Iranian alliance. It will not be the last test.

Diana Moukalled is a veteran journalist with extensive experience in both traditional and new media. She is also a columnist and freelance documentary producer.

Source: arabnews.com/node/1027921/columns

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/middle-east-press/new-age-islam-edit-bureau/a-pinch-of-fear-in-every-turkish-citizen--new-age-islam-s-selection,-22-december-2016/d/109449


Compose Your Comments here:
Email (Not to be published)
Fill the text
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.