Books and Documents

Pakistan Press (26 Sep 2017 NewAgeIslam.Com)

Countering Islamic State By N Elahi: New Age Islam's Selection, 26 September 2017

New Age Islam Edit Bureau

26 September 2017

Countering Islamic State

By N Elahi

Our Approach to the Balochistan Problem

By Masood Hameed Baloch

Treatment of Women in Pakistan

By Shahid Javed Burki

Return to South Waziristan

By Rehmat Mehsud

The Rohingya Massacre

By Dr A Q Khan

Pakistani Media’s Misplaced Priorities

By Kamran Yousaf

Thank You, Syedna

By Kamal Siddiqi

The Tragic Ordeal Of Rohingyas

By Aymen Ijaz

Implications of NA-120 By-Poll

By Waqas Habib Rana

Compiled By New Age Islam Edit Bureau


Countering Islamic State

By N Elahi


Islamist militant groups like al Qaeda and Islamic State (Daesh) have a desire to find a firm foothold in Khorasan, the areas comprising Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, and Tajikistan. They don the cloak of jihadists of Khorasan to acquire the look of the legitimate group striving for the renaissance of Islamic power in the world, whose mention can be found in some Hadiths (Sayings of the Prophet). A Hadith in Sunan at-Tirmidhi 2269 is often quoted that black banners will rise from Khorasan and nothing shall turn them back until they are planted in Jerusalem. But some Islamic scholars argue that it has been misconstrued.

However, this narrative suits the militants well as it enables them to recruit conveniently from amongst the disillusioned youth and to strike against the government targets with impunity.

The local militant groups like Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), that had taken birth as the foot-soldiers of al Qaeda, desperate to avoid quickly drying up supply of recruits, have pounced to play in the hands of IS Khorasan. The first Amir of IS Khorasan, Hafiz Saeed, belonged to Orakzai Agency, FATA, and was leader of TTP. As a result of military operation in FATA, he sneaked into Afghanistan and soon joined IS and rose to the rank of its Amir. He was killed in 2015.

Though Afghan Taliban also wear black turbans, probably to give themselves Khorasani look, they never showed aspirations to operate beyond their borders. They however made a blunder to provide extended shelter to Osama Bin Laden, which earned the wrath of an infuriated US that bombed them out of power. Nevertheless the Afghan Taliban do not seem to have any alliance or love lost for IS.

A multi-pronged plan must be devised to tackle IS strategies ranging from recruitment to radicalisation of the youth, development of sleeper cells and training of terrorists

In fact a couple of years ago, the Afghan Taliban attacked and annihilated the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) because it had switched allegiance to IS. Afghan Taliban launched ferocious attacks on IMU fighters in Zabul and killed thousands of them. Though it debilitated them considerably, 5/6000 IMU fighters and their families are still operating in Afghanistan.

The support of TTP militants, IMU fighters and dissident Afghan Taliban has given considerable strength to IS in Afghanistan. It has gradually entrenched itself in Nangarhar, Uruzgan, Logar, and Kunar provinces of Afghanistan. But it keeps launching terrorist attacks up till Kabul and beyond. Two weeks ago, it claimed responsibility of a suicide attack outside a cricket stadium in Kabul in which three persons including a policeman were killed.

Pakistan should be equally worried about spill-over of IS from Afghanistan. The last forty years history is evident that weak and lackadaisical management of Eastern and Western borders has given birth to security problems for Pakistan.

IS has already made its presence felt in different forms in different areas of Pakistan. Though Foreign Office spokesman denied organised presence of IS in Pakistan, in 2015 the Foreign Secretary of Pakistan had admitted that IS posed serious threats to Pakistan. The former Minister Interior had also denied the presence of IS in the country but later clarified that his statement was misconstrued.

The security and intelligence agencies of Pakistan have been taking active action against the pro-IS elements for last two years. In Lahore, Counter Terrorism Department (CTD) arrested three members of Sautul Ummah that had pledged allegiance to IS, who were in possession of explosive materials. In first two months of year 2016 Pakistan’s Intelligence Bureau apprehended IS activists from Punjab who confessed their involvement in various terrorist activities and disclosed that the IS had presence in all districts of Punjab and in many cities of other provinces, in form of sympathisers and facilitators.

Two important states of so-called Khorasan, Pakistan and Iran, had agreed in July 2016 that IS was a common threat to both neighbouring states. It was a consensus that IS not only posed threat to strategic stability of Muslim States, it also brings embarrassment to Islam. This statement was made after Pakistan’s National Security Adviser Nasser Khan Janjua, who was in Tehran on a three day visit, met his counterpart. Both sides agreed about improving border management and incorporating better institutional mechanisms.

This cooperation mechanism, with greater emphasis on sustained intelligence sharing, must be extended to other states like Afghanistan, Tajikistan, China, the US and others to check the surreptitious spread of IS sleeper cells and sympathisers in the region. A multi-pronged plan must be devised to tackle the IS strategy ranging from recruitment to radicalising the youth, developing the sleeper cells to training the terrorists etc.

The first and foremost counter measure should aim at strangulating IS recruitment spree from amongst the disenchanted youth who easily succumb to the bait of radicalisation. It would require better opportunities of education and jobs for the youth of this region. Educated, enlightened and financially secure youth will be better equipped to deflect the extremist worldview and to propel a strong counter narrative against the harbingers of Armageddon from Khorasan and elsewhere.

Source: dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/26-Sep-17/countering-islamic-state


Our Approach to The Balochistan Problem

By Masood Hameed Baloch


Tempers in Pakistan have been running high since we found out about the ‘Free Balochistan’ posters in Geneva. Pakistani legislators have pointed fingers at the Swiss government, accusing them of backing Baloch separatists and propagating the free Balochistan agenda.

In Pakistan the government often does what it can to limit the degree of free speech which can be exercised by the country’s citizens. Apparently, they want the Swiss government to follow suit. But unlike our government, the Swiss government is bound by it’s country’s law. Therefore it can’t do anything to stop Baloch separatists in Switzerland from expressing their political beliefs. Until the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and it’s ilk are designated as a terrorist organisations by the UN, the Swiss government can do nothing.

Fortunately, the orgy of violence which has been conducted by these groups for the past decade has resulted in lessened support for them from Baloch society. The Baloch still feel that they have been treated unfairly since the creation of this country. But they have realised that they can only obtain their rights through political means and within the framework of Pakistan.

But this does not mean that our predicament in Balochistan is over. A sense of deprivation definitely still exists and looms large in the province. Ex Chief Minister (CM) Mali Bloch and current CM Bahaullah Zahra can brag all they want about how they brought peace to Balochistan? But the absence of resistance does not mean peace and rhetoric can’t resolve the Balochistan problem. If the province’s core socio-political and economic problems are ignored, any progress made in recent years will be reversed.

According to official statistics, 80 percent of the population in Balochistan lives below the poverty line and 70 percent of the population is illiterate. Despite being rich in natural resources, it is the most underdeveloped province in the country. To solve these problems, the government has to build some measure of political trust with Baloch people.

Tragically, the political system in Balochistan is in utter disarray. It is mostly drug lords, businessmen and other corrupt individuals who enter the political field in Balochistan. They spend massive amounts of money on their election campaigns. Once they have won the seat they were after, they don’t do much else. Practices such as these cause great damage to the political system and must be discouraged. Poll rigging is also widespread, and contributes to sentiments against Pakistan.

Former Senator Sana Baloch is reported to have said, “In the 2013 election, the Balochistan National Party BNP-M led by Akhtar Mengal, was badly pushed to the wall and the BNP’s mandate was altered overnight into the favour of nationalists such as National Party and PkMAP to ensure the continuation of the status quo.”

There is also a great degree of scepticism regarding CPEC among the Baloch. Many of them think that if gas, gold and coal couldn’t solve their problems, then neither can CPEC. This perspective of CPEC among the Baloch should galvanize Pakistan towards addressing Baloch problems. It needs to engage in political dialogue and seek a political solution instead of a military one. Balochistan’s political institutions also need to be strengthened. The 2018 elections in Balochistan are crucial in this regard. The authorities need to ensure fair and transparent elections and give them room to compete with other provinces.

Source: dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/26-Sep-17/our-approach-to-the-balochistan-problem


Treatment of Women in Pakistan

By Shahid Javed Burki

September 25, 2017

Pakistan does not treat its women well. This can be attributed to two traditions the country has inherited. One, women’s poor status is common in the Muslim world. They are segregated and don’t have access to the government supplied social services that equal those available to the male population. There is no better example of this than the attack on Malala Yousafzai that almost killed her. Her crime: to speak in public about the importance of educating girls. The second example is from Saudi Arabia that does not allow women to drive automobiles. This restriction severely limits women’s ability to move around and hence, for them to enter the workforce in the Kingdom. The second tradition comes from the country’s location. Pakistan is a South Asian country and women’s status in the subcontinent is low. It took the rule by the British to make the burning of Hindu widows a crime, a practice called ‘sati’. Even now, India by tradition assigns a very low status to women in its society. It is interesting that the practice of ‘triple Talaq’ — a husband could divorce his wife by simply saying ‘I divorce you’ three times — among Muslims in India was declared to be illegal by the Indian Supreme Court. In Pakistan, the practice was banned by the 1961 Muslim Family Laws Ordinance promulgated by the military government headed by Field Marshal Ayub Khan. Upon achieving independence, Bangladesh did not abandon this marital law provision.

Women’s low status in Pakistan has serious demographic consequences. The government’s optimism that the country had entered the phase of demographic transition has not been borne out by the census of 2017. It is estimated that the rate of growth in population was one-third higher than what the government had believed. It was 2.4 per cent rather than 1.8 per cent assumed in the Pakistan Economic Survey of 2016-17. The second surprise from the census’s finding is that the sex ratio in Pakistan has not adjusted to what is regarded as the demographic norm. In normal populations, the ratio of women in the total population is slightly higher than that of men. This is largely on account of women’s longer life expectancy. This has not happened in Pakistan and the reason is the relatively low status of women in the Pakistani society. As the impressive demographic transition in Bangladesh has shown, improving women’s standing in society has significant consequences for the birth-rate. Bangladesh, once a part of Pakistan, has shown what can be achieved by improving women’s social and economic status in society.

The main factor accounting for women’s higher social status in Bangladeshi society is the rate of female participation in the labour force which, at 43.1 per cent, is almost double of Pakistan’s 24.3 per cent. This is largely due to the employment of women in Bangladesh’s large garment-making industry. Another factor is the level of female educational attainment. Once women enter the workforce, their need for education increases. In Bangladesh, 42 per cent of women aged 25 years and above have some secondary education compared to Pakistan’s 26.5 per cent. The sociological consequences arising from these two factors probably explain most of the significant differences in the status of the women in these two countries.

In Pakistan, parents appear to invest less on their daughter’s education because they expect higher labour market rewards from their sons — this is due to the expected parental dependence on their sons during old age. This creates discriminatory practices and accounts for lower school enrolment rates for girls. The empirical evidence from Pakistan, however, shows that the return on education is much higher for females than males, but the portion of the returns on daughters’ education that goes to parents is much lower than in the case of sons. Upon getting married, most women move from their parent’s household to that of their husband’s. This is the case in particular in rural areas.

Another factor that applies to women in general in Pakistan and elsewhere is time-poverty or time-paucity. Girls’ day is filled with activities that are not required of boys. In the households with many children, older girls are required to care for their younger siblings. With their time thus crowded, girls are unable to attend schools. The problem becomes more acute for women in the workforce as they are still expected to continue with their gender-related and culturally-defined domestic roles. Lower rates of fertility reduce the size of households and cuts down on the demand on girls for attending to young children. This is one of the many virtuous cycles that appear all over the demographic field.

The foregoing raises a number of questions, many of them relating to the making of public policy. How should girls’ access to education be improved is a question policymakers should ask. This can be done with a combination of government action and private initiative. Governments at various levels — in particular at the local level — should build schools for girls, bringing educational institutions nearer to home. This way, girls will not need to walk long distances to go to school. The private sector should be encouraged to provide small amounts of credit to women entrepreneurs, especially to those that employ women to increase their operations. Once these steps have been taken, local governments may levy fines on the households that still keep girls from attending school. These and other actions could be incorporated in “women’s social uplift programmes”, provinces should be required to formulate and implement.

The employment of women in Bangladesh’s large garment industry has made them relatively independent of men’s control. They have a greater say in deciding on the appropriate size of their families. Bangladesh performs better in terms of the social development of women compared to Pakistan.

Source: tribune.com.pk/story/1515421/treatment-women-pakistan/


Return to South Waziristan

By Rehmat Mehsud


In 2017 I returned to my homeland, South Waziristan exactly 10 years after I left it as it had become a stronghold for militants. The process of returning the Internally Displaced Persons (IDP’s) of the tribal belt to their homes was completed last December. The whole region is regarded as one of the most dangerous places on earth.

I saw major changes on my return to South Waziristan. Both in the region and it’s people.

South Waziristan’s infrastructure has been ravaged by war. People’s houses are hardly fit to live in after years of incessant shelling. People whose houses have been completely destroyed received $4000 compensation money and people whose houses have been partially destroyed receive $2000. It’s a meagre amount to build or repair a house. The army has built roads, cadet colleges and Army Public Schools. But the repatriated families have no access to healthcare, communication facilities, gas or potable water. These are basic amenities which are the state’s responsibility to provide.

The problems don’t end here. It is mandatory for the tribal people to have a Watan card or Rahdari to come back home, along with a Computerised National Identity Card (CNIC). The area is still scattered with hidden or disguised Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) which have killed or maimed scores of children.

The area is still governed by the discriminatory Frontier Crimes Regulations, a set of laws left over from the British Raj intended to control the tribal people

However, the tribal elders don’t want to pay much attention to these issues. After over a decade of war, they only vie for peace. Which is understandable. After undergoing the problems and miseries of being IDP’s, the repatriated people are happy to live in tents set up inside their demolished houses. The area is also still governed by the discriminatory set of laws known as the Frontier Crimes Regulations, a set of laws left over from the British Raj intended to control the tribal people. The FCR also contain the ‘collective punishment clause’, which dictates that if one member of a tribe commits a crime, then their whole tribe can be held accountable for it. Any member of the tribe can be detained and their property seized. There is widespread corruption in the local administration which drives any attempts at development into reverse gear.

The FCR is still there, but a lot has still changed. On my return, I couldn’t recognise most of the tribal teenagers. They were still kids of five or six when I left South Waziristan. The Taliban’s set of draconian laws are also gone. Card games, music and girl’s education were all banned under their version of Sharia law. But on my return, I saw both boys and girls dressed in school uniform and attending the APS in Shakai, the valley where the government and Taliban struck their first peace deal.

Last Eid, youngsters arranged late night music parties, which were executed without any security problems. People venture outside their homes at night feeling secure and without carrying any arms. This was unfathomable ten years ago. For some of the former IDP’s, displacement turned out to be a blessing in disguise since they were able to start successful small businesses on the roadsides of DI Khan and Karachi.

Source: dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/26-Sep-17/return-to-south-waziristan


The Rohingya Massacre

By Dr A Q Khan

September 25, 2017

For the past few weeks, we have been seeing and hearing about the horrific persecution of Muslims in the Arakan district of Myanmar (formerly Burma). Fanatic Buddhist monks and regular troops have burnt huts, killed thousands of people and raped hundreds of women.

Western powers and the UN are just paying lip service to the matter – in the same way that they reacted to the crises in Bosnia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria. According to the UN, the atrocities perpetrated by the monks and the troops fall under various crimes against humanity.

Nobel Laureate Aung Sang Suu Kyi has not said anything against these horrendous atrocities. As a matter of fact, she has become a spokesperson for the perpetrators. She insists that the events that are being reported have not occurred and that the media is simply exaggerating the matter.

Despite these claims, many Western journalists have shown terrifying pictures of atrocities and the bodies of murdered men, women and children. Some of the bodies shown in these photographs had their arms, legs and heads chopped off. These atrocities are in no way any less than those committed by fanatical, orthodox Serbs in Bosnia. At least some of those evildoers paid the penalty that befits their crimes.

History is, once again, repeated itself. Similar inhuman treatment and atrocities were committed by the colonial powers in Africa, Asia, North and South America against the original inhabitants. History is filled with accounts of such barbaric actions. In our generation, we have seen this happening in Bosnia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria. The Americans and their allies have attacked and killed hundreds of thousands of innocent, unarmed people, all under an imaginary perception of a security risk to their countries.

If we examine the history of the Rohingya Muslims, we will realise that during the reign of Mughal Empire and the British Raj, Burma was a part of the Subcontinent and there were no barriers involved in travelling from India to Burma. From the 15th century onwards, Muslim and Arab traders and preachers from various countries started visiting the Arakan district of Burma and a large number of them settled in the region. A majority of those who settled there were from undivided Bengal and were considered to be peace-loving people.

Even though they considered themselves to be Burmese, their physical appearance and attire made them looked like Bengalese. The trouble started in 1982 when the Myanmar government adopted a law whereby the Rohingya were deprived of their Burmese nationality.

According to the UN, the Rohingya people are the most persecuted minorities in the world. The total population of the Rohingya in the Arakan district was between 1.3 million and 1.4 million. They mostly lived in the northern Rakhine State, which consisted of around 90 percent of the Rohingya populace. The current atrocities have caused about 900,000 people to flee to south-eastern Bangladesh and neighbouring Muslim countries. More than 200,000 others have been forcibly confined to camps and are living under deplorable conditions.

Government officials claim that the Rohingya are Bangladeshi refugees. However, the Rohingya say that they have belonged to the area for hundreds of years as they came during the Mughal and British colonial periods.

Historical evidence shows that migration from the Subcontinent to Burma took place for centuries – mainly as a part of the spread of Buddhism and Islam. Bengal had historical and cultural ties with the Rakhine State (formerly Arakan). The presence of Bengali-speaking settlers has been recorded in the history of Arakan history since the 15th century. In 1936 and 1939, many Muslims were elected to the Legislative Council of Burma under the Burmese Native Category in British Burma.

After independence in 1948, Rohingya leaders held high positions in the government and parliament. They requested the government to declare Arakan as a separate province under the central government. After the 1962 military takeover, Gen Ne Win’s government started enacting laws against the Rohingya. After the return of martial law in 1988, the army launched a violent crackdown against Muslims. After life became unbearable for them, more than 200,000 moved to Bangladesh, Thailand, Pakistan and the Middle East in 1991-1992. During British rule, Muslims from the Subcontinent formed the second-largest community in Rakhine – the largest being the Buddhists.

Human beings are an aggressive species. Whenever there is a chance to obtain power and wealth, they immediately become aggressive towards those who are weaker and terrorism, killings, expulsion and torture take place. This has happened all over the world and continues to happen today. Perhaps nothing has caused as much violence as religion and ethnicity.

What is happening against the Rohingya Muslims is a crime against humanity – a war crime. At least for once, Muslim rulers should show solidarity to protect their Rohingya brethren. Bangladesh, Indonesia, Turkey and Pakistan could teach Myanmar a lesson that it would remember forever. They should occupy Arakan (Rohingya land), declare it a non-entry province for the Burmese Army and the police and ensure that the refugees are resettled. A token multi-national force could be put in place to protect the people and no nonsense should be tolerated from the Myanmar government. If the West could create Lebanon, South Sudan and East Timor, Muslim countries should use the same logic and help the Rohingya.

Since it is a matter of Muslim repression, the UN and the West will never take concrete action to address the plight of the Rohingya. We hope Muslim rulers will realise that it was their silence in Bosnia, South Sudan and East Timor that allowed new countries to be created from Muslim countries. Let’s not forget how Hajjaj bin Yousuf sent Muhammad bin Qasim to sort out Raja Dahir of Sindh after hearing about a Muslim woman who had been looted and imprisoned by the locals and was in Raja Dahir’s custody. Remember, the Almighty will hold us all responsible for the indifference shown towards our Muslim brethren who are in need. He has ordained that we help the aggrieved and fight against tyranny and oppression. May Allah Almighty show mercy on the Rohingya.

Source: thenews.com.pk/print/232379-Random-thoughts-The-Rohingya-massacre


Pakistani Media’s Misplaced Priorities

By Kamran Yousaf

September 25, 2017

The Pakistani media follows a certain template. Pick any newspaper in the morning or tune in to any news channel in the evening, stories related to politics always make it to the front pages and primetime news bulletins. Read articles in any newspaper or watch any talk show on TV, only one issue dominates — politics.

It is true that there is never a dull moment in Pakistani politics. The fragile democratic system often disrupted by military coups has always kept us on our toes. In the last three decades, so much has happened on the political front that it is difficult to keep track of every event. Although people have short memories, few would have forgotten the major political developments of the recent past. In the last five years, we saw two sitting prime ministers being ousted from power by the Supreme Court.

The other issue that keeps us on the tenterhooks is security. After the 9/11 attacks, Pakistan has been in the eye of a storm. Frequent terrorist attacks, military’s counter-terrorism campaign and the ever-evolving, delicate geo-political scenario, are naturally issues that can’t be ignored. It is understandable that in this environment, the media in Pakistan has to give prominent coverage to issues related to politics and security. However, in a country with a population of around 208 million, it has much more to offer than just issues of politics and security.

It is not that our media never gives coverage to health, education and social issues, etc. The real problem is that such issues have never been given due importance that they should have otherwise. Two recent examples can illustrate what are the priorities of our media outlets, both print and electronic. A recent international study revealed that up to 60 million people living in Pakistan’s Indus Plain are at risk of being affected by high levels of arsenic in the region’s groundwater supply. The revelation was so startling that international media outlets, including the CNN and BBC, gave prominent space to the story. The Pakistani media picked the story but sadly, the coverage did not do justice to the seriousness of the findings. Similarly, another recent report suggesting around 173 people died in Pakistan in monsoon-related incidents was dumped, and one can’t even recall if any news channel bothered to have a serious discussion on it.

Those stories were not discussed or debated in primetime talk shows or bulletins. The reason is that our media, especially the 24/7 news channels, now rely on ‘readymade’ stuff. For example, it is easier to do a show on a statement given by the army chief or the prime minister or an issue that may invoke more fiery debates than subjects such as water or deaths related to monsoon incidents, because far more research and homework is required to cover nonconventional topics. Our media has developed the bad habit of following issues that give them good ratings and clicks. This approach means that the media has clearly abdicated its prime responsibility that is to highlight issues of public importance.

The media in developed democracies has long moved on from the conventional approach. Even if they do cover political issues, their coverage is not merely confined to statements but gives you an in-depth perspective. The media in the developed countries also ensures balance between political issues and issues of public importance. Rarely would you find their front pages and primetime news bulletins full of political coverage. It can be argued that this is because the political system in the West is stable and less prone to tragedies. However, this can never be an excuse for overlooking the real issues that matter to the masses in Pakistan.

But all is not lost. Introspection always helps in course correction. In these fast changing times, our media industry needs to challenge the conventional wisdom. Instead of getting indulged in the madness of ratings, our media needs to look at the bigger picture and prepare themselves for the situation when they will not be able to get the ‘readymade’ stuff.

Source: tribune.com.pk/story/1515418/pakistani-medias-misplaced-priorities/


Thank You, Syedna

By Kamal Siddiqi

September 25, 2017

This week, I met a couple from South Africa outside one of Karachi’s favourite restaurants – BBQ Tonite. They were members of the Dawoodi Bohra community, as was evident from their appearance, and had come to attend the Ashara Mubaraka. It was a pleasure talking to them as they were quite keen to know more about the city that was hosting them, not just the religious gathering they were attending. They had come to the restaurant on a local rickshaw from the house of a member of the community who was hosting them. Both husband and wife wanted to see Karachi, eat at all the places they had been recommended and visit all the places they had read about. It is always good to see excited tourists in one’s city. We in Karachi seem to have forgotten this sight.

The Ashara Mubaraka refers to a period of 10 days at the beginning of the Islamic year dedicated to the remembrance of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and Ahle Bayt, specifically his grandson Imam Hussain (RA).  The head of the community, His Holiness Dr Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin will conduct a series of sermons over the nine days that explore themes of justice, sacrifice, brotherhood, forgiveness, kindness and piety. Although Dawoodi Bohra centres across the world will host this event locally for members in their cities, the gathering led by Dr Syedna Saifuddin, which varies from city to city each year, attracts thousands of community members. In the next ten days or so, Karachi will play host to more than 40,000 guests from all over the world.  It seems that the Bohra community has more faith in Pakistan than do most of the country’s own citizens.

I recall a few weeks back when all of Lahore was decked up at a cost of millions to welcome the international eleven cricket team. Roads were blocked, traffic clogged and thousands were inconvenienced. But most did not complain as it was for a good cause. The Bohra community event is a hundred times what the World Eleven matches were. There is little or no state money involved although the Sindh government has helped with traffic and security arrangements.

It is a pleasure to see the arrangements made by the community itself. Apart from the unarmed Burhani Scouts and their sister organisations, you will see hundreds of middle-aged and old men, standing at vantage points in Saddar – where much of the activity is centered, helping traffic or pedestrians, and making sure there is no chaos created.

Members of the community also park at designated spots (there are no VIPs), board the six-seater yellow and black rickshaws that are one of Saddar’s iconic symbols, and are happily transported to and from their destinations. Given the size of this operation, it is like having the World Eleven event in Karachi every day of the week for ten days or more.

Karachi itself has been given a shot in the arm thanks to the community selecting this city as its venue for 2017. Most hotels are fully booked for more than two weeks running (something that had not happened in the second-tier hotels for some time), businesses are seeing a surge in sales while taxis, rickshaws, and other commercial transportation vehicles are much in demand.  Schools in Saddar have been closed to accommodate the visitors and many playgrounds have been designated for parking. All communities seem to have chipped in – Muslims, Christians, Hindus and others.

It may be mentioned that Karachi is home to one of the biggest concentrations of Dawoodi Bohras outside India but this is the first time in more than 20 years that the community is hosting its spiritual leader in Karachi. This is because the Bohras have also seen their share of violence. In September 2012, two blasts in a predominantly Bohra market killed seven people. Three years later, a bomb detonated outside a Bohra mosque moments after an evening prayer service. Two worshipers were killed.

In many ways, the event hosted by the Dawoodi Bohra community in Karachi, is as important as was the visit of the World Eleven to Lahore. If this passes off without a hitch (and fingers crossed that it does), it will help raise the standing of Karachi as well as that of Pakistan. We are grateful to the community for taking this step. Thank you, Syedna, for what you and your community are doing for our country.

Source: tribune.com.pk/story/1515427/thank-you-syedna/


The Tragic Ordeal of Rohingyas

By Aymen Ijaz


Since August 25, the Myanmar Muslims or Rohingyas are brutally persecuted and displaced in the name of ‘clearance operations’ carried out by the Myanmar security forces to root out the insurgents from the Rakhine state of Myanmar (formerly known as Arakan). It has been reported that the present violence began after the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) attacked Myanmar police and paramilitary posts to protect their ethnic minority group from persecution by the security forces. In fact, the illegal and unjustified persecution of poor Rohingyas at the hands of security forces has provoked Rohingyas and led to an armed resistance by Rohingyas and subsequently paved a way for deadly clashes, riots and communal violence. This distressed situation has added Myanmar among countries which justify their discriminatory and violent attitude towards Muslims in the name of retaliation against Islamic radicals, extremists and terrorists.

However, the persecution of Rohingyas is not a new phenomenon. History tells that Rohingyas are the world’s most oppressed and persecuted minority.

eginning in the 1970s, Rohingyas had been tortured by the Myanmar government but after 9/11, the situation aggravated as Rohingyas are now killed in the name of Islamic extremism. Under such horrendous circumstances, nearly 1.1 million Rohingyas have fled Myanmar due to widespread persecution and have taken shelter in neighbouring countries such as India, Thailand, Malaysia, Bangladesh and South East Asian countries. According to BBC, more than 400,000 Muslim Rohingyas have fled to Bangladesh under the current turmoil.

According to Amnesty International, Rohingyas are being considered illegal immigrants, non-citizens and foreigners in Myanmar, and have suffered severe human rights violations at the hands of security forces since 1978

The migrating Rohingyas have been provided shelter in newly established Rohingyas refugee camps by the Bangladesh government but their free movements outside the camps have been restricted with the hope of returning them to Myanmar or even to a third country.

According to Amnesty International, since 1978, Rohingyas are being considered illegal immigrants, non-citizens and foreigners in Myanmar and have suffered severe human rights violations at the hands of security forces. The anti-Muslim sentiments in Myanmar have developed since the history unfolded to Buddhists about their forced conversion during Mughal rule, which even led to ‘Anti-Muslims’ and ‘Burma for Burmese Only’ campaigns under the British rule in 1930s.

The Buddhists have denied Muslims claims of their ancestral settlement in Myanmar since 9th century and practically barred their recognition as Myanmar nationals under the constitution. According to Human Rights Watch Report 2000, the migration of labourers that took place from India and Bangladesh to Myanmar during the British rule is named illegal by the Buddhists and the Rohingyas are considered as Bengalis. They consider the term ‘Rohingyas’ as a recent invention for political objectives.

After independence in 1948, the political rights of Rohingyas were also confiscated when Burma Muslim Congress was removed from the Anti-Fascist Peoples’ Freedom Party (AFPFP) and was later dissolved. Muslim soldiers were expelled from Army and strict restrictions were imposed on Rohingyas related to cow slaughter and pilgrimage.

This clearly indicates the Myanmar government’s intention of ethnic cleansing of the Rohingyas, which was highlighted earlier in 2013 by the Human Rights Watch and also by the United Nations (UN) in 2016. In February 2017, a UN report pointed towards Myanmar troops’ crimes against humanity in its renewed military crackdowns in 2016. However, the Myanmar government has denied such accusations and maintained deadly silence over the issue of atrocities against Rohingyas. In a recent interview conducted by the BBC, Aung San Suu Kyi said that the phrase ‘ethnic cleansing’ was too strong to describe the situation in Rakhine state. Her indifferent behaviour towards Rohingyas has certainly undermined her reputation.

In the present crisis, the Myanmar government has reached its peak of inhumanity by blocking access to journalists and to all UN aid agencies from delivering food, water and medicines to anguished Rohingyas in the Rakhine state which also symbolises Myanmar’s ruthless efforts for their ethnic cleansing.

At the international level, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Turkey, Pakistan, Chechnya and other Muslim countries have openly condemned Myanmar’s insensitivity towards Rohingyas and demanded peaceful solution to the crisis. According to The Washington Post, the Indonesian government has threatened to severe diplomatic ties with Myanmar and has proposed five-point Indonesian plan to stabilise the situation which had been taken positively by Suu Kyi but no action has been taken yet. Turkey has sent its troops for aid supplies to Myanmar for displaced Rohingyas in the camps. Pakistan has also expressed support for the oppressed Rohingya Muslims and endorsed the recommendations of the Rakhine Advisory Commission and Organisation of Islamic Cooperation’s (OIC) Independent Permanent Human Rights Commission’s call for immediate and effective action to end this communal and ethnic violence against innocent and unarmed Rohingya Muslims.

Therefore at this juncture, practical steps must be taken by UN, OIC and peace activists to raise their voice for Rohingyas and to address their decades-old grievances.

The international community in consultation with the Myanmar government should find a permanent solution to the Rohingyas’ identity crisis, settlement rights and their citizenship issues. The issue requires an immediate global response.

Source: dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/26-Sep-17/the-tragic-ordeal-of-rohingyas


Implications of NA-120 By-Poll

By Waqas Habib Rana


Perception and reality, it’s a sketchy phenomenon. Word on the street in Lahore is that the establishment was actively campaigning against Sharif’s wife and PML-N candidate Kulsoom Nawaz. Multiple videos of the voters circulated in social media and Whatsapp groups complaining against the Army’s role in halting their fundamental right to cast the vote in favor of PML-N. In one such video, supporters of PML-N were seen chanting slogans against Imran Khan in front of an Army vehicle; as if they see the Army as an ally of anti-Nawaz Sharif forces.

In her winning speech, Maryam Nawaz Sharif declared PMLN’s victory a win against the seen and “unseen forces”.

The perception is that it has never been about accountability and it isn’t now. It’s more about revenge against one family.

Nawaz Sharif was declared disqualified to be an MNA by the Supreme Court of Pakistan on the basis on misdeclaration of assets. After his ouster from the Prime Minister’s office, Nawaz Sharif took to the GT Road from Islamabad to Lahore and questioned the reason of his ouster. He made veiled references to the forces behind the decision. In a meeting with senior journalists, Nawaz Sharif said that the dcision of his ouster was made long before the actual decision was announced by the Supreme Court.

It seems that he has been able to convince his voters, supporters and followers that his ouster is not based on justice but on conspiracy.

The unelected state institutions need to take a few steps back, reconsider their options and support the democratic process

What used to be an academic discussion, is now a discussion in the open; civil-military imbalance.

NA-120 by-election has mainstreamed the discussion of Civilian supremacy over the ever so powerful establishment in Pakistan.

Electronic media is too scared to show the sentiment against the Pakistan Army, but it doesn’t mean that the element of hate is not present in those videos. People blamed the Army for slow polling process, the Army may not have anything to do with it, but that’s how the people of NA-120 felt. The introduction of a political face of a banned extremist organization helps substantiating the thought that Army interfered in the

NA-120 poll

Our establishment has a history of political interference; for, being the king maker. It’s a matter of record that Nawaz Sharif was their prodigy. He is a popular leader of central Punjab now. And the perception is that he was thrown out of the Prime Minister’s office because of his differences with the establishment on foreign policy and other issues. It is said that the establishment has decided to teach him a lesson.

Nawaz Sharif is posturing to fight it out, to earn back the respect for his supporters’ vote. Who will emerge victorious and at what cost?

I can assure you that no one will be the winner. The army will gain a lot of hate in Punjab, Nawaz Sharif is a popular leader, whether you like it or not. The Army as an institution enjoys great support in Punjab but that will change once this battle gets more intense.

Nawaz Sharif will turn this battle into “People versus Army”, and it will get ugly.

Nawaz Sharif will also be at a loss at the end of it, his party will weaken, and there will be a lot of dirt on him through the NAB references that he now faces in Accountability Court.

And most importantly, it will be the loss of the people of Pakistan. The democratic system will suffer. Democracy is the only way forward and it should be allowed to operate without any outside influence or interference. Pakistan can only prosper if there is true democracy in the country.

The establishment needs to take a few steps back, reconsider their options and support the democratic process. They may not be able to twist Nawaz Sharif’s arm the way they did with Altaf Hussain and Asif Ali Zardari. If Nawaz Sharif resists and fights back then the consequences won’t be good for all the stakeholders.

Source: dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/26-Sep-17/implications-of-na-120-by-poll


URL: http://www.newageislam.com/pakistan-press/new-age-islam-edit-bureau/countering-islamic-state-by-n-elahi--new-age-islam-s-selection,-26-september-2017/d/112658


Compose Your Comments here:
Email (Not to be published)
Fill the text
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.