certifired_img

Books and Documents

Pakistan Press (23 Aug 2017 NewAgeIslam.Com)



Going To Extremes By Mahir Ali: New Age Islam's Selection, 23 August 2017





New Age Islam Edit Bureau

23 August 2017

Going To Extremes

By Mahir Ali

Access to Justice and Women Rights

By Jamil Junejo

No Country for Women

By Ailia Zehra

Afghan Reality Check

By Zamir Akram

Cutting the Lifeline, Literally

By Muhammad Hamid Zaman

Perils of Cultural Alienation

By Aziz Ali Dad

Charlottesville And Beyond

By Lydia Howell

Trumped In Afghanistan

By Faryal Leghari

Trade: A Low Hanging Fruit in Ties with Bangladesh

By Syed Shujaat Ahmed

Compiled By New Age Islam Edit Bureau

------

Going To Extremes

By Mahir Ali

August 23, 2017

GIVEN that Barcelona is among the most popular tourist destinations in Europe, it is hardly surprising that almost all the victims of last Thursday’s terrorist rampage came from various parts of the world. The murderous intent, as is usual in such cases, was indiscriminate. Precisely what motivated the young Muslims, several of them still in their teens, to participate in the gory plot is open to conjecture, although it is probably safe to assume that a profoundly misguided view of religious obligations was a part of the mix. News reports suggest they were radicalised by a Salafist imam — who, like the terrorists, was of Moroccan origin, and died in the massive explosion in Alcanar when gas canisters stored for the purpose of staging a more explosive attack thankfully blew up prematurely.

Apparently, the intended target was the Sagrada Familia church, the most prominent example of Antonio Gaudi’s quirky architecture in a city delightfully peppered with examples of his unorthodox designs. The resort to a vehicle as an instrument of terrorism — along the lines of attacks in France, Germany and Britain — seems to have been Plan B. And although even a single life lost in such horrifying instances is one too many, the toll, dreadful as it was, could have been much worse.

Much the same could be said about the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia the previous weekend, where a radicalised young man targeted anti-fascist protesters by driving a car into them and killing Heather Heyer, a legal assistant. She was among those who rallied to oppose the Unite the Right demonstration organised by a panoply of racist groups, ostensibly to oppose the local government’s decision to remove a statue of Confederate general Robert E. Lee that had been put up in 1924, almost 60 years after the South had lost its right to perpetuate slavery.

The American Civil War ended in 1865, but the struggle to clarify its legacy goes on. The period known as Reconstruction was relatively short-lived. It wasn’t until a century after Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation that voting rights and other constitutional guarantees of equality for African Americans were ensconced in law. Even so, the white supremacists have sporadically resurfaced. They were suitably impressed by Donald Trump’s efforts, long before he became a presidential candidate, to insinuate that anyone called Barack Hussein Obama could hardly be American.

Enemies range from people of colour to ‘communists’.

They were even more enthused when candidate Trump articulated slurs against Mexicans and declared he would institute a ban on Muslims entering the US. After Charlottesville, he was quiet for a while, then announced he saw little difference between the neo-Nazis and their opponents. He was subsequently persuaded to be more clear-cut in his denunciation of racists, but thereafter returned to his original formulation, declaring that there were “many fine people” on both sides.

The president may have felt flattered because some of the far-right demonstrators wore ‘Make America Great Again’ caps, never mind that many of them were echoing the ‘blood and soil’ slogans of the German Nazis amid considerable evidence of distinctly anti-Semitic vibes. His ambiguity spurred a backlash from leading lights of the Republican Party as well as the captains of industry, which flowed into the West Wing disarray that has crippled the White House.

The announcement of a ‘new’ strategy for Afghanistan (and Pakistan) was at least partially an attempt to restore presidential authority, presaging increased participation in an essentially unwinnable war. But the darkness that simultaneously crept across the continental US, courtesy of a complete solar eclipse, was perhaps a better metaphor for its current woes at home and abroad. Writing recently in The Guardian, Jason Burke drew appropriate parallels between the Islamist and Ame­rican nationalist varieties of the far right, without claiming equivalence. It is perfectly true that those determined to spread hatred prey on vulnerable young minds and channel their grievances towards antagonism against ‘the other’, invariably those of a different religion, race or ethnicity. Wherever this attempt succeeds, the consequences tend to be horrendous.

At the most basic level, such tendencies derive from a refusal to recognise the common humanity we all share. In the narrative of the Islamists, anyone not fundamentally wedded to a heinous interpretation of the faith is fair game. Among American nationalists, the enemies range from people of colour to Jews and ‘communists’, a list that has not changed a great deal since the resurgence in far-right tendencies after the Second World War, amid open references to “finishing Hitler’s work”.

Back then, Harry Truman, who ushered in the American security state, baulked from taking action against African American lynchings. But neither he nor his successors in the White House, regardless of how far to the right they leaned or how shamelessly they dog-whistled, publicly declared neo-Nazis to be “very fine people”. The shift is both telling and ominous.

Source: dawn.com/news/1353341/going-to-extremes

-----

Access to Justice and Women Rights

By Jamil Junejo

23-Aug-17

The recent introduction of laws supporting the rights of women in Sindh like elsewhere in Pakistan, is a welcome development. However, laws operating against the backdrop of a crumbling judicial system coupled with poor access to justice is unlikely to bring about significant change.

The women of Sindh, especially those in the rural areas are perpetually hung at the altar of woes, worries, torture and trauma. No sun rises without bearing news of either forced marriages, domestic violence, or murder in name of so-called “honour”.

In this regard, some of these alarming news items appeared last week in a local daily. A dead body of a 20 years old girl kidnapped earlier was found in Jhudo town,... doctors pronounced that the possibility of rape could not be ruled out, “A woman staged a protest against some influential people in Baqrano area, Larkana,...” she said they regularly tortured her before her handicapped husband, “An attempt was made to kidnap a woman...”. “A female resident of Naro area staged a protest against her husband whom she accused of domestic violence”. “A woman approached a police station in Sukkur and demanded protection from her husband whom she accused of domestic violence...”

No doubt, deep seated patriarchy in social, administrative and political organisations is the main cause behind the persecution of women in Sindh, much like elsewhere in the world. Unfortunately patriarchy cannot be demolished in one stroke; its development began as a process and a process is necessary to reverse it.

It is no new fact that victims of patriarchal highhandedness can only utter resentment and occasionally resist before risking themselves to social exclusion and further violence. Being a villager myself, I have personally observed how women routinely experience misogynistic behaviour throughout the day. Most women remain silent and continue to suffer violent treatment. Others, bent on getting justice, are courageous enough to report to nearby police stations but rarely are their cases given priority or their persecutors punished.

Rule of law and access to justice may not guarantee complete justice to women given the deeply rooted patriarchy in Sindh, but it can potentially prevent the occurrence of offenses against women and can instil hope and courage among the victims

This is due to two main reasons, weak rule of law and poor access to justice in much of Sindh.

In the pre-trial stage, police officers are bribed and succumb to political and social pressures to tamper with the cases. When approached by a female victim, police officers are reluctant to lodge the case as they claim that women’s issues should be addressed privately. On agreeing to file the case, police officers apply soft provisions of law on the report, thereby allowing the accused to escape charges.

The trial stage also fails to bring complete justice to victims. According to an unpublished trend analysis report of district Jacobabad, over the last nine years from 2008 to 2016, 188 cases of honour killing were registered at the police stations in the district. However, not a single person has been sentenced or punished and most of them are set free. According to the same report, 22 cases of rapes were registered in the district from 2008 and 2014, and all the accused persons were released. According to same report, after the insertion of section 310A in the PPC through the Criminal Law (Third Amendment) Act 2011, in Jacobabad a total of 17 cases were reported under section 310A (punishment for giving women or girl in marriage or otherwise in Badla-E-Sulh, Wani, Swara). Most of the accused have been acquitted by the court.

The above report focusing on the access to justice situation in Jacobabad district may not necessarily reflect the situation in all of rural Sindh. The report also may not necessarily reflects that judges are not gender sensitised, but it does reflects the status of weak prosecution caused by corruption, flawed investigation, misreporting and use of delay tactics by investigation officers and public prosecutors.

In order to ensure access of justice to women, we need to eradicate corruption in all police and prosecution departments. More importantly, we need to strengthen the role of police and prosecution departments in the light of internationally recognised principles such as United Nations guidelines on role of prosecutors, and international human rights standards for law enforcement (agencies).

Rule of law and access to justice may not guarantee complete justice to women given the deeply rooted patriarchy in Sindh, but it can potentially prevent the occurrences of offenses against women and can in still hope and courage among the victims.

Source: dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/23-Aug-17/access-to-justice-and-women-rights

-----

No Country for Women

By Ailia Zehra

23-Aug-17

The mudslinging and personal attacks that followed Ayesha Gulalai’s harassment allegations against PTI chief Imran Khan sent a clear message to all the women of Pakistan — don’t speak out if you are a victim of sexual harassment. The reaction to her outburst and what was witnessed on the political scene following the development is enough to further shatter the confidence of victims who are not courageous enough to speak out.

Ayesha Gulalai’s case shows that, once again, Pakistan's patriarchal society is unable to shed its misogynistic fixation with the ‘honor’ (ie physical control) of womenfolk

Ayesha Gulalai’s case will be settled after an investigation begins, because of its high profile status — and the truth will eventually be out. But this entire episode is a reminder of the hell that sexual harassment victims in Pakistan experience once they make their grievances public.

Apart from the culture of misogyny, the episode revealed another disturbing aspect of Pakistan’s politics. PTI leaders criticised Gulalai for refusing to resign from her National Assembly seat saying she was nominated by the party on a reserved seat and has therefore lost the moral authority to retain it after her decision to quit the PTI. This particular argument exposes the disdain for women elected to the parliament on reserved seats.

There is a need for reserved seats for women politicians because they don’t get equal opportunities while running for public offices because of the patriarchal structure of politics, and of our society itself. Women often have had to deal with personal attacks and propaganda campaigns while running their election campaign.

From Fatima Jinnah to Benazir Bhutto, every female politician had to face misogynist elements, and rivals used character assassination as a political tool against them. This is one of the reasons why middle class families discourage their daughters from entering politics, and the field is widely seen as male dominated. Therefore, those who see women elected on reserved seats as ‘lesser’ members should realise these seats exist because patriarchy is still alive and kicking — even in 2017. There won’t be a need for special arrangements to bring women to the assemblies if men helped create a safe environment for them — based on equality and free of hostility.

Ayesha Gulalai belongs to Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) where previously women were not even afforded the right to vote. Her sister had to live as a boy for years in order to be able to follow her dreams of being a squash player. None of us are aware of the struggle Gulalai went through before joining politics, given that she belongs to one of the most backward and conservative regions of the country.

Every political party ought to ensure that its female workers do not duffer because of a lack of opportunities. By giving her the NA seat, PTI only fulfilled this political responsibility and it should not be presented as a personal favour to her. PTI has every right to take disciplinary action against Gulalai, but the party MNAs’ act of interrupting her NA speech was entirely uncalled for.

From PTI followers maligning Gulalai’s squash-playing sister for wearing shorts, to party representatives making sexist remarks, the reaction to her allegations of sexual harassment had been disgusting — but hardly surprising. However, it would be wrong to single out PTI for criticism because a number of PML-N leaders resorted to the same tactics when Ayesha Ahad reappeared in the limelight and accused Hamza Shehbaz of mistreatment.

Most PML-N representatives who are so eager to have the Gulalai case investigated are guilty of practicing misogyny and sexism. Not too long ago, former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif insulted the female participants of the PTI rallies for dancing and singing. Rest assured the PML-N leaders who claimed to be the champion of women rights in the wake of Ayesha Gulalai’s allegations will never support a woman of their own party if she accuses one of their leaders of harassment. PTI reps who are questioning Gulalai’s allegations today will then be speaking for women’s right. No political party has a harassment cell or committee despite presence of woman members. No party considers this serious issue worthy of being addressed in party manifestos. It appears that they only use such incidents and the victims’ grievances to pull each other down.

To reverse this all, we will need a counter narrative to the flawed concept of ‘honour’ that exists in the country. A woman’s ‘honour’ is associated only with her body, and this is why she is merely seen as an entity that needs to be controlled in order to protect this so-called ‘honour’. As soon as this flawed belief ends and women are respected as complete humans instead of their identity being determined by their gender or relationship to men, real progress with regard to women rights will be seen. Ordinary women and girls need to reclaim the public space occupied by men and take it from there. Furthermore, awareness campaigns about pro-women legislation like Protection from Sexual Harassment at Workplace and Protection of Women against Violence should be initiated by the government.

Source: dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/23-Aug-17/no-country-for-women

----

Afghan Reality Check

By Zamir Akram

August 23, 2017

After months of procrastination, US President Donald Trump finally announced on 21st August a “strategy” for Afghanistan and South Asia. But while his speech is long on rhetoric, it is short on substance. He declared the intention to “win” but not how this will be achieved after trying for 17 years and spending a trillion dollars, even with increases in troop deployment. None of the contradictions in US Afghan policy seem to have been resolved. There are only two issues on which there is agreement: that America is losing the war and Pakistan is to blame for it. But blaming Pakistan and punishing it, as Trump has suggested, cannot be the basis of a viable strategy. What the Americans need is an honest reality check in Afghanistan.

The reality is that Washington’s Afghan quagmire is the result of several American acts of omission and commission dating back to their 2001 intervention in Afghanistan.

From the outset, America has ignored the lessons of history. The tribes in the Pakistan-Afghanistan border region have fought invaders since Alexander, followed by the Mughals, the British and more recently the Soviets. All had to eventually withdraw from there. This is the stark reality confronting America today. Welcome to the graveyard of empires.

This has been compounded by the lack of a clear strategic objective. At first, President Bush only wanted to eliminate al Qaeda but then got into nation-building. Obama ordered a surge to create conditions for troop withdrawal by 2014, leaving behind forces only for logistic support and training. Now Trump is back to eliminating terrorists but not nation-building.

After dislodging the Taliban, the US failed to capitalise on its quick victory by failing to provide the hammer and anvil with Pakistan to prevent the Taliban and al Qaeda forces from relocating and regrouping. It also ignored Pakistan’s advice not to alienate the majority Pashtun by aligning with the Tajik-led Northern Alliance, and refusing to coopt moderate Taliban leaders opposed to al Qaeda. Worse, the unitary constitution imposed on Afghans violated traditional tribal autonomy, creating a Pashtun backlash in the Taliban’s favour. American failure to win Afghan hearts and minds through effective economic and social development programmes also contributed to the appeal of the Taliban, especially among Pashtuns. Worst of all, the indiscriminate use of air power, cruise missiles and drones, led to thousands of casualties. This “collateral damage” brought recruits to the Taliban in droves, and underscores their appeal today.

The American shift of focus from Afghanistan to the Iraq war further helped the Taliban to re-group and target American/Nato and Afghan forces with increasing effectiveness. Local disenchantment with the corrupt and ineffective Kabul government, fuelled by failed promises and continuing insecurity, also provided the necessary public support for the Taliban. Consequently, the Taliban now effectively control half of Afghanistan, including even non-Pashtun areas in the north and east of the country.

The US has also failed to eliminate the drug trade, a vital source of funding for the insurgents. Even Afghan government ministers and officials are reportedly involved in this narco-terrorist network, an example of the complete breakdown of governance in the country.

This situation has now become even worse with the emergence of Islamic State or Da’ish, a threat recognised by Russia, China and Iran, owing to which they are now opening links with the Taliban, the only force currently opposing the IS in Afghanistan. The US also needs to recognise that the greater long-term threat to its security is posed by the IS rather than the Taliban.

Unless Trump learns from past American mistakes and recognises existing ground realities in Afghanistan, his “strategy” will fail. Washington needs to distinguish between the Taliban and al Qaeda/IS terrorists — the latter can be eliminated, the former cannot, unless half the Afghan population is wiped out. There is also no military solution to the Taliban, as the last 17 years of warfare demonstrate. The only option is a political solution based on power sharing among Afghans arrived at through dialogue.

Instead of threats and punitive action, America needs to work with Pakistan, which is crucial for an Afghan solution. It must recognise Pakistan’s security interests in Afghanistan and South Asia as a whole, which are being undermined by their support to Indian involvement in Afghanistan. Washington must also help to close down Indian-sponsored TTP sanctuaries in Afghanistan while cooperating with Pakistan to effectively seal the Pakistan-Afghan border. Over the longer term, the US should address the real terrorist threat posed by the IS and al Qaeda remnants in collaboration with Pakistan and other regional powers like Russia and China.

But, unfortunately, Trump has not given any indication of recognising South Asian realities. He has almost entirely blamed Pakistan for America’s Afghan quagmire and threatened terrible retribution, including giving India and even greater role in Afghanistan. This will neither encourage Islamabad’s cooperation nor intimidate Pakistan to abandon its crucial priority which is to ensure its regional security against Indian machinations. Moreover, any sanctions or violations of Pakistani territory will create a popular backlash that will deny America the vital means to deal with Afghanistan. Therefore, to use Pakistan as a scapegoat is not a strategy, it is an excuse for failure.

Source: tribune.com.pk/story/1488463/afghan-reality-check/

-----

Cutting the Lifeline, Literally

By Muhammad Hamid Zaman

August 22, 2017

The week where every headline was about celebrating the 70th anniversary of the birth of a new nation, an unimaginable tragedy unfolded at a government hospital in Gorakhpur, India. The hospital ran out of liquid oxygen, a lifeline for sick babies and children who needed it to survive. At least 60 died. Whether the hospital ran out of oxygen, or whether the suppliers decided to cut it due to unpaid bills is still being debated. That debate, mired in politics and deflection of blame, is irrelevant for those who lost their most precious treasures.

The situation for little ones in Pakistan is not much better either. During my meetings in Lahore last month, I got to see a number of physicians, including those who work at Children Hospital Lahore, the largest hospital for children in the province. The situation there did not seem much better — and I was told that the children who have to get their biopsies done for cancer testing have to bear unbearable pain. There is not enough anesthesia for them, and a weak local anesthesia is all that is available. The screams, agony and pain of innocent children has become commonplace at the leading hospital in the country.

Life is cheap on both sides of the border. There seems to be a threshold, a bare minimum number of casualties, for it to make news. The initial reaction, by the local government in Uttar Pradesh, was to suggest that on average ten children die in this season at the said hospital. In other words, the loss of life is both routine and not a big deal whatsoever. The fact that it was sixty and not ten, therefore, is a minor blip on the radar of statistics. Across the border in Lahore, when I asked doctors and bureaucrats about the lack of the very basic medical supplies at hospitals, they shrugged their shoulders and said unfortunately this is how it is. In other words, not much can be done to change the system and we need to change the topic of the conversation.

Given the attitude of those in charge and those in power, it is not unreasonable to assume that similar smaller scale tragedies occur routinely. They just do not matter much because the poor die routinely and who is keeping the score anyway. While the reasons for the tragedies in our hospitals are complex, and range from a heavy population burden to lack of resources, corruption and mismanagement, there is only one reason for our indifference. It is our moral failure to recognise the value of the lives of the poor. The system does get any better because we do not care, and those who are the victims of our collective negligence and indifference are weak. Those burdened with the challenges of poverty have little room or ability to have their voices heard. For as long as our indifference, at the individual and collective level remains intact, there is little reason to assume that other aspects of the problem, from resources to management, are going to change.

The horror in Gorakhpur, the situation in Lahore and many such unreported or underreported tragedies across the region that do not meet the casualty threshold, should make us wonder what kind of people have we become? Seventy years on, is the life of a poor baby any more precious than it was in 1947? Perhaps we are better off in having newer technologies, but are we better off in our empathy, recognition of the value of life, and a fundamental desire to protect the children of the poor?

Source: tribune.com.pk/story/1487415/cutting-lifeline-literally/

-----

Perils of Cultural Alienation

By Aziz Ali Dad

 August 23, 2017

The culture of Gilgit-Baltistan has evolved over the centuries within a mental framework or worldview that is unique to the region. Likewise, the economy, literature, society, music and architecture of the region have a close relationship with the indigenous worldview.

Within the traditional social setup, cultural knowledge is transmitted through institutions, personalities, rituals and activities that are linked to orality. Since all the languages of Gilgit-Baltistan are oral, cultural knowledge is imparted through oral mediums.

Such mediums have enabled individuals to become a part of the worldview that connects the individual self with society, the semiological universe and the world. This indigenous worldview has informed the people’s understanding of different spheres of life and nature.

With the advent of modernity, Gilgit-Baltistan’s society has experienced the disintegration of the traditional worldview and the natural world and society has been disenchanted. As a result, society has lost the mental structure that offers different ways of seeing the world. A society without a mental framework to understand the subjective and objective world cannot make sense of the order of things.

The disintegration of the indigenous worldview has affected every aspect of life, including the processes that have facilitated the internalisation of cultural knowledge. The disintegration of the traditional worldview has created a rupture in the value-chain of knowledge transmission.

In the absence of a worldview, society and its members continue to operate in an ideological vacuum. In other words, the society of Gilgit-Baltistan has become a clean slate. In this state, it has gained exposure to exogenous ideas, the modern cultural industry and the media. When a society without cultural and intellectual capital gains exposure to a stronger culture, it loses the genuine parts of its culture and becomes a passive receptor of various impressions. This results in a change in the structure of thought and brings about a change in social behaviour and the cultural ethos. Such changes have far-reaching effects on society and the self.

With the rupture in cultural transmission, the individual feels alienated from his/her society and nature. The disintegration of the worldview in Gilgit-Baltistan is an outcome of the roaring current of change that, in the words of Alvin Toffler, “overturns institutions, shifts our values and shrivel our roots”.

Now, the indigenous sources of self in Gilgit-Baltistan have dried up and the individual is invested with ideas and a cultural vocabulary that does not help him/her make sense of self-existing in society and nature. Such is the situation that the new generation of Gilgit-Baltistan can easily explain the psychology of African hyenas, but are oblivious to the social dynamics in their own hamlets or neighbourhoods.

There is no denying the fact that modern means of communication have facilitated cross-regional cultural interaction. However, at the same time, it has widened the communication gap within local communities in Gilgit-Baltistan.

Take the example of organic relationships and communications that have evolved during the age of compulsory foot-walks. In olden times, there were no roads and hotels and people established relationships with far-flung villages and areas in Gilgit-Baltistan through marriages and other kinship-based solidarities. With the opening of the Karakoram Highway (KKH), the people began using modern means of communication.

Now, a person does not know about his blood relatives who live in a different ethnic, linguistic and religious milieu because modern transportation has enabled him or her to whiz past the villages in a vehicle without fulfilling traditional compliments.

Ideally, the modern schooling system should have taken the role of imparting cultural knowledge in the wake of the disintegration of traditional mediums of transmission. But this has not happened in Gilgit-Baltistan as none of the local languages and indigenous literature is part of the education system.

In his book titled ‘Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know’, E D Hirsch states that “the basic goal of education in a human community is acculturation, the transmission to children of the specific information shared by the adults of the group or polis”. He claims that “only by piling up specific, communally shared information can children learn to participate in complex cooperative activities with other members of their community”.

In the case of Gilgit-Baltistan, the education system has failed to acculturate children. As a result, there has been a failure among individuals to cooperate and participate in collective activities. There has also been a breakdown of communication among linguistic, cultural and religious groups in the region. Although the region has witnessed a phenomenal increase in literacy as compared to other parts of Pakistan, it has failed to equip the new generation with cultural literacy.

Today, children and the youth of Gilgit-Baltistan can quote Mir, Ghalib, Faiz, Shakespeare and John Keats but cannot express their sense and sensibilities in local cultural metaphors. Hence, local literature is replete with alien metaphors, similes and images that do not have a resonance with the lived experience of the people who inhabit the cultural space of Gilgit-Baltistan.

Another major change in culture and society has been brought by information and communication technology. Gilgit-Baltistan has entered the information age with the dawn of the new millennium. The advent of modern information and communication technology has coincided with another development: the uprooting of the youth from the region. Owing to the lack of opportunities, the youth in Gilgit-Baltistan have left their homes to find jobs in major cities of Pakistan and abroad. This has culminated in the hollowing-out of adults and the youth in various villages. As a result, important social and cultural roles are fast disappearing.

What we are witnessing in the abovementioned developments is the uprooting of the self from society and the individual from solid space. With their absence in solid spaces, the residents of the region who are living elsewhere try to reconnect with their culture and society through virtual spaces. In this regard, social media has become an effective tool to establish new connections and solidarities. Now, virtual identity has superseded the solid identity among the new generation in Gilgit-Baltistan. Unlike previous ages, the sources of the contemporary self stems from virtual spaces and alienated conditions.

The combination of the virtual with the alienated self can have dire repercussions on culture and society as such a society is more prone to nihilism. To avoid the complete alienation of the self from culture, it is imperative to invest in creating solid spaces where the self can express its creative and aesthetic dimensions through cultural metaphors and gain cultural knowledge.

Amid the disintegration of atoms in the cultural sphere, it is heartening to see that novel initiatives have been undertaken by the civil society and the government. For example, the Aga Khan Cultural Service Pakistan has opened a music school and a carpentry centre for women in Altit Village in Hunza. It imparts training to young men and women in the cultural music, arts and crafts of Gilgit-Baltistan. Similar, activities are carried out by the Bulbulik Music School in Gojal, the Karakoram Area Development Organisation (KADO) and the Baltistan Cultural and Development Foundation.

Traditionally, music and poetry has remained male-dominated and caste-specific. Now, young students from diverse backgrounds are learning music and other crafts. In addition, the government of Gilgit-Baltistan plans to introduce local languages at school till class five. In this regard, a special committee has agreed on a common syllabus.

However, the outreach of the abovementioned initiative is still limited. At the broader level, the society is under the spell of a new version of faith that manifests itself in social and mental spaces in the shape of religiosity. This has contributed towards creating an exclusivist narrative that is based on faith. This new form of religiosity is gobbling up the remaining cultural spaces and expressions.

Such an exclusivist mindset can be countered by investing in culture and creating cultural spaces that are not only inclusive but also provide spaces for the self to reengage creatively with society and achieve self-actualisation. If we ignore culture, we are doomed to be swallowed by multiple forms of nihilism.

Source: thenews.com.pk/print/225262-Perils-of-cultural-alienation

-----

Charlottesville And Beyond

By Lydia Howell

August 23, 2017

Unequivocally opposing white supremacists in all their manifestations: Ku Klux Klan, Nazis and militias should be a moral reflex. Terms like ‘white nationalism’ and ‘Alt-Right’ are fuzzy euphemisms. Blunt clarity is required. What we saw in Charlottesville, Virginia are white supremacist domestic terrorists.

In May, te FBI warned of the rising tide of far-right extremists.

Since September 11, 2001 through the end of December 2016, white supremacist domestic terrorism have been far higher than domestic terrorism by Muslims: 74 percent white supremacists vs. 26 percent by Muslims.

Racist violence has always been essential to maintaining a system privileging white, rich men and put everyone else in a descending order, with people of color at the bottom. Men in 3-piece suites, legislators, businessmen, and media benefit from violent white supremacist ‘shock troops’, enforcers of the racist order structuring a class system.

After Charlottesville, the easiest call is condemning Nazis. Many of our grandfathers and fathers fought in WWII. What’s often not recognized is that that includes African-Americans, Latino and Native Americans. The most decorated battalion was native-born Japanese-Americans who signed up to fight from inside US concentration camps that held 120,000 Japanese-Americans (mostly citizens) from spring 1942 to April 1946.

How many Americans know that Adolph Hitler modeled his concentration camps on US forced relocation of Native Americans to reservations? How known are pre-WWII American Nazi-sympathizers – including Minnesota’s own favorite son, aviator Charles Lindberg, visiting Germany in the 1930s, praising their airplanes? Minneapolis was the most anti-Semitic city in the 1930s and ’40s. Today, by every measure, Minneapolis has one of the worst racial disparities.

It shouldn’t be hard to condemn the American-made KKK – the world’s oldest, ongoing terrorist organization. Starting in 1866. KKK’s violent waves reversed free Black people’s gains during Reconstruction, established and maintained Jim Crow in the 1890s through 1960s. This wasn’t just in the South: Klan membership peaked in the 1920s at one-million with 80,000 in Detroit alone. The 1950s and ’60s Black civil rights movement faced Klan terrorism. Election of the first African-American president, white supremacist terrorist groups surged again.

Facts of history and events in Charlottesville disprove Trump’s brazen false equivalence between the white supremacists and counter-protesters. Violence has always been  central to the Klan, Nazis and militias – while anti-racism has        primarily        been a non-violent     movement. American-made white supremacist groups’ tactics have always been arson, brutal assaults, rape and murder. They’ve targeted Black people, immigrants, any religion      except fundamentalist Protestants: Jews, Catholics and today Muslims face assaults, murder and attacks on their mosques;less well-known is the targeting of white anti-racist allies – termed race traitors – like Heather Heyer in Charlottesville.

The Klan, Nazis and militia came to Charlottesville armed with weapons: shields had razor-sharpen points, pop cans filled with cement, baseball bats and guns, concealed and displayed.

Antifa and anarchist youth (a minority of the counter-protesters) came with thin sticks, pepper-spray and their fists.

Friday, August 11th, the racist mob’s torch-lit march echoed Hitler’s Nuremberg rallies and Klan cross-burnings. They yelled 1920s Hitler brown-shirts’ slogan “Blood & Soil” along with anti-Jewish and anti-Black chants. This mob surrounded a Black church, filled with counter-protesters at a prayer service, trapping them inside for 30 minutes.

Saturday, August 12th, fifty peaceful clergy-members linked arms at the park’s entrance when the white supremacists attacked them. Anti-fa stepped in and as Black theologian Professor Cornel West said, “They saved our lives.”

It bears repeating that since September 11th – and increasing, since 2008 – the majority of domestic terrorists are white supremacists.

Yet, Trump has eliminated federal focus on all terrorism except by Muslims – part of a long history of ignoring far-right and white supremacist extremists.. This is yet another green light to racist violence – which continues to target Black people, immigrants (and Latinos mistaken for immigrants), and Muslims (along with Sikhs who are mistaken for Muslims). This violence that has a long history of infecting law enforcement, past and present. One of the most infamous examples was the murders of three civil rights workers Goodman, Schwerner (both white) and Cheny (Black) registering Black people to vote, during Freedom Summer 1964 in Mississippi: local sheriffs who were KKK-members participated in kidnapping and murder. Like so much impunity for police, it’s rare to investigate white supremacist group membership in police departments. But, the DHS released a report on it.

Behind white supremacist violence are policies carried out by elected officials, government employees and businesses – and      these policies are not in some distant past. Since the 2000 presidential election, a growing attack on voting rights, that’s already purged hundreds of thousands of legal voters from the rolls; Trump’s so-called Voter Integrity Commission continues Republican attacks on voting rights, to eliminate Democratic-leaning voters (which the Democratic Party has only weakly resisted). The       2007-8 economic meltdown had a disproportionate impact on Black and Latino home-owners who Big Banks targeted for mortgage fraud and sub-prime loans – most blatantly by Wells Fargo with what they called “ghetto loans”. As Dodd-Frank is undermined (with the aim to repeal it), Wells Fargo and others are reviving fraud that stole billions in wealth from communities of color. Like Republicans, the Democratic Party is awash in campaign contributions from Big Banks and Wall Street promoting legal robbery. Trump’s Education Secretary Betsy DeVos is reversing decades-old civil rights protections, with passive aiding and abetting by Democrats that’s colluded with policies like No Child Left Behind and for-profit charter schools. These are just three examples of policies benefiting from white supremacy violence.

Right-wing media, on the air and online, fuels white supremacist mob violence – and its silent white supporters, who call themselves ‘Tea Party’ or ‘Libertarians’ (in Congress’ ‘Freedom Caucus’ mould) or simply ‘conservatives’. Right-wing radio hosts like Rush Limbaugh ( given air-wave access that liberals (much less the Left) can only dream of and propagandists like Ann Coulter, Dennis Prager, and many others, along with Fox TV, are the creators of actual ‘fake news’. Often they take their talking points from more obscure white supremacist websites, giving a megaphone to false stories, made-up statics and outright lies – that work to dehumanize and make ‘enemies’ of people of color, immigrants, LGBT people and Muslims.

Once you term any group of people to be less than human, to be a danger, it becomes acceptable to do anything to them. History shows us the reality of this and that reality is playing out today with Donald Trump getting all his ‘information’ from these same racist brainwashing media.

Days before Charlottesville, a mosque in a Minneapolis suburb was bombed. Luckily, no one was injured or killed. Unlike Trump, Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton immediately called the attack “a dastardly act of domestic terrorism”. Trump didn’t even have the decency to call Heather Heyer’s mother until the day of her daughter’s funeral.

People defending Confederate monuments should consider this: there are no statues honoring Hitler, his generals or other Nazi officials in Germany; no parks are named for SS or Gestapo leaders. Yet, in the US, Nathan Bedford Forrest, slave trader, Confederate general and Grand Wizard of the original KKK is honoured by over 32 statues, with parks and high schools named after him. General Robert E. Lee owned slaves and committed treason leading the Confederate Army. John C. Calhoun was a political architect of Southern secession and philosophical justifications for slavery. This isn’t ‘heritage’ but, a history that should be damned as the Germans have the Third Reich.

Source: thenews.com.pk/print/225263-Charlottesville-and-beyond

------

Trumped In Afghanistan

By Faryal Leghari

August 23, 2017

US President Donald Trump’s unveiling of his government’s Afghanistan policy should not surprise us. It is as expected. The increased US troops that have been welcomed by Kabul are only going to exacerbate the conflict and give the insurgents an impetus to continue on a war footing.

As anticipated, India was asked to contribute more to the country. After all, Modi and Trump’s ideological and world viewpoints converge dangerously close to each other. Giving a carte blanche to India to extend its role in Afghanistan is – as pronounced by Pakistan’s retiring High Commissioner to India, Abdul Basit – nothing but “a recipe for disaster”.

Washington, instead of using this opportunity to reprimand India for its insidious role in Afghanistan vis-à-vis Pakistan, has overlooked the evidence painstakingly conveyed to the Pentagon and the US State Department over the years by Islamabad. It has instead chosen to make its bed with a state whose continued use of military force and deplorable human rights record in Kashmir can only earn it the accolade of state terrorism.

But ‘state terrorism’ is the sword of Damocles hung over Pakistan as a last measure. We, the sponsors of terrorism, shall be labelled as such if we do not do what is being demanded: pull back all support from the Haqqani Network and destroy their safe havens.

Let us view this hypothetically: what if trouble persists in Afghanistan even after our military flushes out every Haqqani man, woman and child from the crevices of the hinterlands, which is most likely? Will Kabul and Washington still point their fingers at some other faction and demand Pakistan stop supporting it?

America’s expedient use of friends and foes is nothing new. We, in Pakistan, have been privy to it for decades and lament it periodically and unabatedly. Yet, we continue to plough on, nurturing our relationship with Washington through the lows and the highs. But this is realpolitik. Though we may have compromised our integrity and national pride at some low points in the past decades, we are a sovereign nation. Do we need these reminders? Yes – and often.

As for the US, it is ready to overlook the human cost we paid in the loss of thousands of our soldiers fighting the war on terror for those ‘billions and billions of dollars’ given to Pakistan. The US wants Pakistan to get serious about clearing the safe havens for all those resisting the government in Kabul and the presence of the foreign forces. But not a word is mentioned about the safe havens operating on the other side of the Durand Line that house the TTP terrorists who use these as bases to launch attacks on Pakistan.

Asking India to extend its ‘political’ and economic role in India is nothing short of asking New Delhi to damage Kabul’s already frayed relations with Islamabad. Not to mention its use of the so-called consulates for destabilisation purposes in Balochistan. Kabul’s ire with Pakistan, stemming in large part from its own inability to bring dissident factions to an agreement, has further deteriorated relations between the two neighbours.

This is extremely unfortunate, given Pakistan’s open-door policy for millions of Afghan refugees during the previous troubled decades. Instead of being discussed and redressed behind closed doors, any grievances are always publicised and exaggerated. Despite all parties agreeing to end the blame game and working closely to alleviate suspicions regarding alleged intelligence operations, the situation remains tenuous.

But first, we need to question our policy towards the US at this very critical juncture. Our relations with our western neighbours, including Iran, are at a low point. Our military and foreign policy – instead of evolving with changing geopolitical dynamics – remains stymied. The turning point in our approach to militancy and ending any alleged support to militant groups had come a while back. Let’s not forget the horror of the massacre of the Army Public School in Peshawar in December 2014 and the reaction that bound the nation together.

However, the lack of unity on the political front and the formulation of a clear and concise policy that has an inherent flexibility to accommodate any developments that threaten our national interests – and not just in the short term – has been our bane. If Pakistan could survive the damage of the past decades and prove its resilience, can it not coalesce together at this point and bridge the fault lines that threaten its own survival? If our policy is to change, it must be for the sake of our own people and not because of external threats.

Pakistan’s help in bringing long-lasting stability to Afghanistan cannot be overlooked. Instead of working together towards an inclusive approach that brings Afghan insurgents to the negotiating table, Kabul and Washington – no doubt out of frustration – have chosen to go back full circle and opt for more boots on the ground. The onus will be on NATO to share the financial and human costs, as Trump has already laid out in his recent speech. And with India thrown in, it is bound to be an even greater morass. It is hoped that our civilian and military leadership put aside their ‘other’ preoccupations at present and formulate a cohesive strategy in response.

Source: thenews.com.pk/print/225264-Trumped-in-Afghanistan

-----

Trade: A Low Hanging Fruit in Ties With Bangladesh

By Syed Shujaat Ahmed

August 23, 2017

Bangladesh has been one of the key exporting destinations for Pakistani goods over the decades. Pakistan’s exports to Bangladesh have come through various fluctuations but still managed to end on a rise. It rose from $14.27 million in January 2005 to $48.8 million in January 2017. This fluctuation in export is primarily due to rising domestic demand and a stiff competition in the export market. Other reasons for the fluctuation include improved manufacturing facilities in Bangladesh, rise in regional agreements with India, Nepal, Bhutan and the Maldives and also major developed economies along with increase in informal trade.

In January 2017, the most popular commodities that found their way to Bangladesh from Pakistan included cotton yarn not for sewing cotton type products and woven cotton fabric products. Among export of services, Pakistan provided transportation, government-related services, telecommunication, financial and travel services. During the same month Pakistan’s major imports from Bangladesh was tea (flavoured and not flavoured), hydrogen peroxide, woven cotton fabrics, jute and other textile fibres and yarn of jute or other textile fibres.

Pakistan over the decade has also been a key supplier of cotton and woven goods along with the services sector where contribution was of minimal level to the economy. Like trade in locally-produced goods and services, its flow has also reduced over the period when it comes to discussion of trade ties between the two South Asian countries. There are several explanations for this reduction. The most important are: political shifts occurring in this region, eg, different regional agreements where Pakistan is not a part of. These key regional agreements include South Asian sub-regional Sub-Economic Commission, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal motor vehicle agreement and Bangladesh, Bhutan, India and other agreements of regional connectivity (Sasec and BBIN). Beside these political shifts and regional pacts there had been increasing demand in the domestic market both in Bangladesh and Pakistan also resulted in low trade over the period.

In different forms of literature, we had established that the relationship between Pakistan and Bangladesh was not on the positive side thus resulting in low and fluctuating trade numbers over the period. Data has also revealed that there is huge trade potential in the services sector, ie, during 2010-15; Pakistan has been more inclined in government and other business services leading to increasing employment trend and mostly in the lower and upper middle class income groups.

We also have evidence from recent literature of different forms and data that the slowdown and fluctuation was mainly due to political differences which has hindered the growth in various sectors and thus resulting in trust deficit followed by communication problems between people of different countries. This less than desired pace of reform in formal trade also explains the reason for stagnant growth in economic and political ties.

While security and political cooperation between the two countries may continue to remain a great challenge, we believe that cooperation in trade is a low hanging fruit, considering the business communities of both sides. We have clear identification of challenges which the business community is facing. And given this identification, there should be an easy solution to work on. For example, in 2013 there were different MoUs signed between traders from both sides, the business community was worried about getting business visas, non-signing of a free trade agreement, lack of implementation of regional agreements like the South Asian Free Trade Agreement (Safta).

A critical evaluation of data and trends reveal that several mutually-agreed decisions have yet to be implemented. For instance, both sides agreed to sign a bilateral FTA to open more trade alongside Safta. This needs to be implemented in letter and in spirit. There were many reservations beside these hindrances which were raised by Bangladesh. Key reservations included special and differential treatment of Bangladeshi goods on grounds of being a least-developed nation, as well as differences over opening of markets post-FTA.

The other major points of negotiations at that time included relaxed rules of origin, reduction in the rate of direct tariffs, elimination of non-tariff barriers, longer phase-out period of tariff withdrawal and anti-dumping and countervailing measures. During the course of discussion Bangladesh continued with its “negative list approach” in the negotiations for protection of local industry. By this approach both countries at the time of negotiations were on positive note to allow products between the two countries and save the items that are incorporated in the list.

During the dialogue period both countries were able to forge consensus on number of issues. Pakistan did agree to give Bangladesh special and differential treatment under the bilateral trade deal and both countries will continue with their negative lists. Bangladesh will be enjoying longer phase-out period and have a longer negative list of products along with two different type of lists been agreed upon. The first list will have products with immediate tariff concession and another with reduction in tariff in different phases.

Thus Pakistan had already granted duty-free access to Bangladesh tea and jute goods which came into effect during 2002-03. But Dhaka had no success in achieving the target over the period. Apart from the need to have a more expanded network of Pakistani banks in Bangladesh, there are challenges for other banks to pursue because of the different banks operating there from different parts of the world.

Despite these challenges, the business community is more upbeat and sees markets on both sides as linking trade to trust and bringing people closer to each other. During the last four to five years the business community is coming closer to each other for expansion of trade as an initial barrier to breaking the ice. Thus the business community is stressing both the governments to finalise a bilateral FTA for better ties. This agreement can strengthen cross border-value chains, comparative advantage for enterprises working on both sides. Given the conditions and trade terms, an urgent meeting should be called between ministries concerned at initial level followed by the head of the states which may be termed a near-term goal. Given the hesitation felt by the two governments based on political differences, we propose some recommendations which can hold the political representatives and bureaucracy on both sides more answerable to the long due promises.

Firstly, the finance and commerce ministries of the two countries should be pressed into meeting by the Bangladesh and Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry. Secondly, representatives from both the chambers should also meet with the president of Saarc Chambers of Commerce and Industry with the request to send formal communication to the heads of the two states. The key focus of this request should demonstrate the loss to all stakeholders given the reduced level of cooperation and high political tensions.

Thirdly, the apex chambers on both sides need to invest their resources to showcase their argument in print, electronic and social media, and highlight the loss to producers, traders and consumers as a result of a lack of bilateral cooperation. Fourthly, a detailed orientation may be organised for economic journalists, think tanks and academia in Dhaka and Islamabad, so that repeated messaging is ensured through various forums.

Fifthly, think tanks in both Bangladesh and Pakistan should join hands in producing joint research and advocacy material. This will also bring in independent voices for pro-trade and transit reforms. Think tanks should focus on their views specific to the business community and to respective and concerned bodies in parliament. Sixthly, there is also a need for proactive approach of these standing committees which in the past also resulted in reforms and measures. Seventhly, advocacy efforts should be backed by rigorous research which demonstrates loss to the business community and the country’s economy.

Source: tribune.com.pk/story/1488459/trade-low-hanging-fruit-ties-bangladesh/

----

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/pakistan-press/new-age-islam-edit-bureau/going-to-extremes-by-mahir-ali--new-age-islam-s-selection,-23-august-2017/d/112294




TOTAL COMMENTS:-    


Compose Your Comments here:
Name
Email (Not to be published)
Comments
Fill the text
 
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.

Content