certifired_img

Books and Documents

Pakistan Press (12 Aug 2017 NewAgeIslam.Com)



Seven Decades On By Irfan Husain: New Age Islam's Selection, 12 August 2017





New Age Islam Edit Bureau

12 August 2017

Seven Decades On

By Irfan Husain

Will India And Pakistan Ever Grow Up?

By Aijaz Zaka Syed

Pak-India Nuclear War — Avoided

By Pervez Hoodbhoy

Significance of August for Pakistan

By Mohammad Jamil

Gaza: A Forgotten Reality

By Saman Zulfqar

Change and No Change

By Muhammad Usman

Indo-Pak And The Moment Of Truth?

By Moonis Ahmar

It’s All Good News For Nawaz

By Talimand Khan

Compiled By New Age Islam Edit Bureau

---

Seven Decades On

By Irfan Husain

August 12, 2017

I WAS three years old when our family came to Karachi from Delhi at Partition, 70 years ago.

While I have no memory of the journey, I learned later that our train had been attacked on the way, and we had been saved only by the presence and courage of the handful of soldiers who escorted us. Hundreds of thousands who fled the madness on both sides of the new border had been less fortunate.

Years later, I asked my late father — a well-known writer and Sanskrit scholar in undivided India — why he had taken the decision to migrate to the new state. “Well,” he replied. “My Hindu and Sikh friends said they were not sure they could protect us at the height of the rioting. Also, I thought there would be more opportunities for you children in Pakistan.”

So What Have We Gained From Partition?

Since then, I have often wondered how life would have turned out had he decided to stay. Until a couple of decades or so ago, it was less clear he had made the right choice. This was when India still seemed to be following the secular path charted by its founding fathers, a path abandoned long ago by Pakistan.

However, as the extreme Hindu nationalist philosophy of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh has taken root, India is becoming a depressing mirror image of Pakistan, something columnist Mahir Ali noted recently in these pages. Over the years, I must have received scores of emails from Indian readers saying how glad they were that Pakistan had gone its own way, otherwise India would have had to cope with millions of more Muslims.

Similarly, Pakistanis have justified Partition by pointing to the plight of millions of marginalised Indian Muslims. But as I wrote at the 50th anniversary of Pakistan, an undivided subcontinent would have had around 600m Muslims. This is not a small minority that could have been easily kicked around by the majority.

So what have we gained from Partition? And what have we lost? In 1947, the land that now constitutes Pakistan was among the most undeveloped areas in India. There is little doubt that much physical progress has been made since Partition. Universities, colleges and schools have proliferated; hospitals built; an elaborate network of roads links villages to towns; and telephone lines and electricity connections are available to millions.

But at the same time, the perpetual state of hostility with India over Kashmir has ensured a huge and continuous drain on our resources. And there has been the immeasurable cost caused by our powerful army’s constant meddling in politics. This has skewed and stunted democratic institutions, and given birth to the Islamist militancy used by our establishment to further its regional agenda. And this, in turn, has led to a shredded national reputation abroad, and the loss of thousands of lives to home-based terrorism.

In search of a national identity, Pakistan has looked west to the parched deserts of Saudi Arabia for cultural inspiration. Disregarding our rich South Asian heritage, there have been plans to impose Arabic on schoolchildren; the establishment of madrasas has been encouraged, often with Saudi funding.

These multiple threads of enforced religiosity have produced an overarching environment where reason and rational thought are rejected as western inventions. To illustrate our backward trajectory, Hafiz Saeed — leader of the Jamaatud Dawa, and a man with a $10m bounty on his head posted by the US government for his alleged history of armed militancy — is setting up a political party to contest the next elections. Unsurprisingly, he is using a new version of Mr Jinnah’s party, the Muslim League, as a vehicle for his political ambitions.

The growing fundamentalism in Pakistan is the result of the inescapable logic of demanding a state in the name of religion: sooner or later, it will come to dominate the social and political landscape.

A dearth of vision, imagination and political courage has defined the leadership we have been cursed with for most of the post-Partition years. Mr Jinnah and his colleagues and contemporaries must be turning in their graves at the thought of the pygmies who succeeded them. Nawaz Sharif, Imran Khan, Asif Zardari and Tahir ul Qadri are only some of the political stars on our horizon, though the latter is more like an asteroid who makes an annual appearance to sow further discord.

At Partition, we were a country of around 32m; since then, we have multiplied like rabbits, and now number 200m. Had so many Pakistanis been educated, we could have been a powerhouse of creativity and productivity. As it is, millions live in abject poverty with no access to schools, hospitals or clean drinking water.

So while many middle-class urban Pakistanis will celebrate our country’s 70th birthday with much fanfare, millions of women and members of our minorities will have little to cheer about.

Source: dawn.com/news/1351088/seven-decades-on

----

Will India And Pakistan Ever Grow Up?

By Aijaz Zaka Syed

August 12, 2017

India and Pakistan have been celebrating their independence from the British and separation from each other for 70 years. Farewells are never easy. The stronger and older the bonds, the more violent and painful is the separation.

Not surprisingly, the partition of the Subcontinent 70 years ago had been so overwhelming in its nature and impact that it took generations on both sides to recover from it. In many ways, the two nations are still recovering from it. Toxic bitterness and acrimony still lingers on in their engagement and the daily skirmishes along the border and perpetual war of words.

A great deal has been written to make sense of the chaos, trauma and suffering on both sides. From Khushwant Singh’s classic Train to Pakistan and Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children to Qurratulain Haider’s Aag Ka Darya and Manto’s Toba Tek Singh, a whole new genre came into existence to capture the searing experience of history’s greatest migration. The unprecedented carnage and stories of betrayal and human depravity as well as heroism also gave birth to some of the finest and most powerful poetry in Urdu, Hindi and Punjabi.

The inimitable Faiz wrote in Subh-e-Azadi (Dawn of Freedom):

Yeh Daagh Daagh Ujaala, Yeh Shab Gazeeda Seher/Woh Intezaar Tha Jiska, Yeh Woh Seher To Nahin

(This stained, pitted first-light, this day-break, battered by night/This dawn that we all ached for, this is not that one)

But all said and done, no words can perhaps ever capture the true pain and loss of those who not only had to flee their homes and the land of their ancestors overnight but also had to lose their loved ones along the way.

According to most conservative estimates, the communal violence on both sides claimed at least two million lives, not to mention the multitudes who lost their homes and everything they had before moving to the other side.

Millions of families were torn apart, mirroring the great divide between the two nations and communities. Doubtless, the greatest casualty of Partition had been the historical relations between the Hindus and Muslims. Close friends became strangers and bloodthirsty enemies overnight.

The schism survives and festers to this day. The perpetual bickering between India and Pakistan over Kashmir and other assorted issues and the recent rise of the extremists on both sides have been only adding fuel to the fire.

All this could have perhaps been avoided if the British had not been so incredibly inept and clumsy in their final transfer of power and the division of the Subcontinent into two dominions. The whole thing had been handled so haphazardly and crudely that it prompted many to wonder if there had been a deliberate method in the madness.

British barrister Sir Cyril Radcliffe, who had been assigned the unenviable task of redrawing the map, had never been to the Subcontinent, let alone understand its historical and geopolitical complexities. He had exactly five weeks to do his job. No wonder he just drew a line across the map – literally – imperiously condemned millions to a fate they had little say in choosing.

British American poet W H Auden captured Radcliffe’s predicament well in his 1966 poem, Partition:

Unbiased at least he was when he arrived on his mission,/Having never set eyes on this land he was called to partition

Between two peoples fanatically at odds,/With their different diets and incompatible gods.

He got down to work, to the task of settling the fate/Of millions. The maps at his disposal were out of date

And the Census Returns almost certainly incorrect,/But there was no time to check them, no time to inspect

Contested areas. The weather was frightfully hot,/And a bout of dysentery kept him constantly on the trot,

But in seven weeks it was done, the frontiers decided,/A continent for better or worse divided.

For better or worse, indeed. Interestingly, both Indians and Pakistanis to this day accuse the departing empire of being biased in favour of the other side. While in India, the Raj is seen as the sole architect of Partition and thus the creator of Pakistan – especially by the Hindu right– most Pakistanis view the British as having been soft on India, especially in view of Pandit Nehru’s proximity to Lord Mountbatten and his wife Edwina Mountbatten.

In their unseemly haste to cut and run, the British messed up the whole rites of passage big time, plunging the Subcontinent into chaos that was never witnessed before, forcing many to question the whole logic and wisdom behind the division.

Ruing the staggering loss of life on both sides, Pakistani columnist Mahir Ali wonders if the leaders who sat down with the last viceroy on June 3, 1947 to agree on the accelerated split would have proceeded with their compromise had they any inkling of the holocaust that would ensue:

“Nehru and Jinnah were very different personalities, yet they also had much in common – and neither of them was an enthusiast for genocide. Foreknowledge of the bloodbath that lay ahead would have concentrated their minds, possibly persuading them to revisit the options that had been available just a year earlier”.

Indeed, the catastrophe might have been averted if the two sides had demonstrated greater foresight and forbearance with each other. But then history is full of such ‘ifs’ and ‘might-have-beens’. On the other hand, given the decisive right turn India has taken and the shenanigans of Hindutva extremists over the past few years, many in Pakistan have been thanking their founder for earning them a separate homeland – albeit at a huge cost.

Whatever the historical causes and whoever may have been responsible for it, Partition is a reality today and the sooner India and Pakistan accepted and came to terms with it, the better for everyone.

What is perhaps even more tragic than the tragedy itself is the path of perpetual confrontation and conflict that the two countries have followed since their split.

Imagine the difference India and Pakistan could make in their people’s lives by bringing down political temperatures and living less dangerously. The billions of precious dollars that are being currently spent on expensive, outlandish arms and plotting against each other could transform hundreds of millions of lives in a region that is compared to Sub-Saharan Africa in terms of poverty and backwardness.

The only people to benefit from their constant hostilities – apart from the manufacturers of arms in the West – are the militaries and militants on both sides.

Even as they remain handcuffed to history, in Rushdie’s memorable words, the neighbours have refused to draw any lessons from the past. Defying the strong bonds of culture, food, sports, language and much else that bind them, they remain the prisoners of their past.

Across the world, countries that share far less and have fought the bloodiest of wars have benefited by reconciling with their past and looking to the future. Look at Europe, the battlefield of history’s most catastrophic wars, which has emerged as a great economic power in no time by doing away with borders and walls.

Look at Southeast Asia or the miracle of Asean, which is celebrating its 50th anniversary. Countries like South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand have emerged as powerful economies by accepting each other and working together. India and Pakistan – and other countries in the region for that matter – can achieve even more, given their rich pool of human resources. The question is: are they willing to? Will India and Pakistan ever let go of the past? Will they ever grow up?

Source: thenews.com.pk/print/223070-Will-India-and-Pakistan-ever-grow-up

----

Pak-India Nuclear War — Avoided

By Pervez Hoodbhoy

August 12, 2017

PAKISTAN and India celebrate their 70th anniversaries next week. Shall they be around for their 100th one too? It depends on how long their luck holds out, and if they can stop their mad rush to increase the chances of disaster.

What’s new? Two weeks ago, a terrifying report published in the Indian Express should have scared sensible people into asking hard questions. But no one paid much attention to it — jaded publics on both sides would rather tune in to the hottest political intrigue or celebrity gossip than waste time on something that didn’t actually happen.

Here’s what was reported: on June 24, 1999, at the height of the Kargil war, an Indian Air Force Jaguar flying close to the Line of Control locked its targeting laser onto a possible base set up by Pakistani infiltrators. The second Jaguar flying close behind was supposed to bomb this chosen target. In fact, the Indian pilot had unknowingly crossed a few miles into Pakistani territory and in his cross hairs was a forward base of the Pakistan Army at Gulteri.

The Indian pilot’s mistake could have activated Pakistan’s war plans and triggered its nuclear assets.

An Indian air commodore, who was airborne at the same time, recognised that the first pilot had erred. It being a violation of combat rules to fly over the Pakistani side, he denied permission to fire. The bomb was subsequently retargeted to a point on the Indian side of the LoC.

The reported incident does not appear fabricated. First, it was revealed 18 years after the event and so there is no immediate gain. Second, the source was knowledgeable — he is retired Air Marshal Vinod Patney, who was then the head of India’s Western Command and directly responsible for air operations in the Kargil war. Third, it does not favour either country, and, in fact, points to a mistake on the Indian side.

Imagine for a moment that permission had been granted. The course of history would have totally changed because, unknown to the Indian pilots, at that very moment prime minister Nawaz Sharif and COAS Gen Pervez Musharraf were addressing troops amassed at Gulteri base. The laser-guided bomb, if released, would have eliminated Pakistan’s top leadership.

And then what? Would GHQ have waited for an explanation or accepted an apology for this horrible mistake? Or would Pakistan’s war plans have been triggered and nukes operationalised? This would take only a matter of minutes or hours.

Seeing Pakistani nuclear weapons being prepared, what would the Indians have done? Would the IAF have targeted Pakistan’s airbases and missile sites? Action and reaction. Fear fuelling misjudgement until nuclear blasts and fireballs destroy cities in both countries. Millions killed and more injured.

South Asia got hugely lucky that day. But as India rushes to put nuclear weapons on submarines — and Pakistan tries to follow suit — a whole new set of dangers has arisen. The chance of a missile being wrongly launched is greater for submarines than for aircraft or other land-based systems.

Here’s why. Submarines try to hide and adversaries try to find them. All submarines forces face this problem of antisubmarine warfare but, in the India-Pakistan case, an undersea competition is highly destabilising because Pakistan’s fleet is fairly vulnerable. Its three Agosta-90B type diesel electric submarines (eight Chinese ones are on order) are fairly noisy and trackable. Of the three, only one is actually likely to be on patrol at a given moment because the others would be refuelling or under repair. The submarine on patrol may in time be armed with nuclear-tipped cruise missiles.

While Indian capability to locate and destroy a diesel-powered submarine is unknown, this will improve with time. India already claims to have tracked the ocean trajectory of a Chinese nuclear submarine that recently docked in Karachi. Pakistan’s nervousness will drive it to build more nuclear-armed submarines, maybe even nuclear-propelled ones. Safety margins will shrink further.

To give an example: up to this point, Pakistan and India both claim that for safety reasons their nuclear warheads are kept in disassembled form with key parts kept at different physical locations. This builds in a time delay, making unauthorised use or an accident less likely. In a crisis the National Command Authority (or its Indian equivalent) would give the order to assemble a weapon. But with a submarine, all missiles must be fully ready for use before the ship leaves port.

There’s an added danger — communicating with a submarine prowling the ocean’s depth is hard since radio waves cannot travel long distances through saltwater. Typically, a deeply submerged vessel can only receive simple coded messages, not audio or video. Still worse: there can be only one-way communication — from vessel to base is impossible unless it surfaces and risks detection. Since a technical fault or enemy action can disrupt communications, the submarine commander has to be given the codes and authority to arm and launch nuclear missiles without seeking permission.

So here is a hypothetical question: suppose a Pakistani submarine is, or believes it is, under attack from some surface ship, another submarine, or aircraft. Given the impossibility of communicating with ground-based authorities, would the commander launch — or not launch — the submarine’s nuclear missiles? Of course, the attacker cannot know whether a normal sub is in its cross hairs or, instead, a nuclear-armed one.

This is not completely fictitious. During the Cuban Missile Crisis, a Soviet submarine found itself surrounded by American ships that began using underwater explosive depth charges to force it to surface. The Soviet submarine could not call Moscow for instructions without rising to the surface. The American ships did not know the Soviet submarine was armed with nuclear torpedoes.

Finding itself under attack, and believing that war had broken out, the submarine captain wanted to launch a nuclear torpedo to drive away the American ships by targeting a nearby American aircraft carrier. Other members of his crew did not agree. Eventually, the submarine decided to surface. Had the submarine captain had his way, a nuclear war could have started.

Source: dawn.com/news/1351091/pak-india-nuclear-war-avoided

-----

Significance of August for Pakistan

By Mohammad Jamil

August 12, 2017

MONTH of August has great significance for Pakistan in two respects. For one Pakistan emerged on the map of the world on August 14, 1947as an independent and a sovereign state. Secondly, Quaid-i-Azam declared that all citizens of the state including minorities would have equal rights and opportunities. Quaid-i-Azam’s speech of August 11, 1947 before the Constituent Assembly had clearly laid down the outlines of the type of state he visualized Pakistan to become. He said “You are free; you are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or any other places of worship in this state of Pakistan. You may belong to any religion or caste or creed that has nothing to do with the business of the state.” Almost all governments in the past took steps to implement Quaid’s commitment and vision.

In 2011, the government of Pakistan declared August 11, as “National Minorities Day” after former minister of Pakistan minorities’ affairs Shehbaz Clement Bhatti was killed on March 02, 2011 by militants of banned Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan. Terrorists have killed thousands of Muslims as they did not differentiate between Muslims and non-Muslims; however state of Pakistan held minorities in high esteem, as people from the minority communities held high positions in armed forces as well as in civil administration. Justice A R Cornelious, a Christian, was the fourth Chief Justice of Pakistan. Then we had Acting Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Justice Bhagwan Das — a Hindu. He had been a Supreme Court Judge since February 2000 for over a decade. He also worked as the chairman of Federal Public Service Commission of Pakistan. Many Christians have rendered meritorious services in Pakistan Air Force.

Group Captain Cecil Chaudhry (Sitara-i-Jurat) was a Pakistani academic, human rights activist, and veteran air force fighter pilot. He fought in the Indo-Pakistani war of 1965, and later as a Squadron Leader in the Indo-Pakistan War of 1971. A part of Lawrence Road Lahore has been renamed as Cecil Chaudhry Road to honour him. He was amongst the distinguished breed of air warriors to whom we are all indebted. He was a legendry pilot and a true patriot, who displayed unflinching courage, exemplary devotion and professionalism throughout his service in the PAF. His services significantly contributed to achieving air superiority by PAF during the Indo-Pak war of 1965. Another Christian, Wing Commander Mervyn Leslie Middlecoat (Sitara-i-Jurat) was a Pakistan Air Force fighter pilot who proved his mettle in a number of aerial battles during the 1965 and 1971 Indo-Pakistani wars, before being shot down on December 12, 1971.

As envisioned by the Quaid, Pakistan was to be a modern Islamic welfare state where a free and independent people would enjoy equal rights without discrimination on the basis of religion, sect, ethnicity or gender. The day August 14 is indeed the day to rejoice, as we got freedom from the British Raj. It is also the day for introspection, self-accountability and evaluation as to how far we have been able to live up to the ideals set by the founding fathers. Quaid-i-Azam had envisaged a free, progressive, humane, and modern Pakistan, ruled by just laws, rooted in the eternal values of Islam, and at the same time responsive to the imperatives of constant change. Unfortunately, inept leaders have brought the country to the present pass, and it is facing economic challenges and spectre of extremism and terrorism. However, Pakistan’s armed forces would completely destroy their infrastructure and network.

Pakistan is now an atomic power, and its people and armed forces have the ability to meet any challenge posed by internal and external enemies of Pakistan. And they have the capability and the will to defend the integrity of Pakistan. Allama Iqbal had given the clue as to how to move forward, and find a respectable place in the comity of nations. He had underscored the need to reinterpret Islamic thought and assimilate its eternal principles to overcome centuries-old stagnation with a view to launching the nation on the path to revival and build a future worthy of its glorious past. Pakistan, indeed, has industrious people, vast areas of land, variegated seasons suitable for various crops and fruits, rivers, large coastline and abundant natural resources. Its mountains and valleys are the most scenic in the world. Its strategic position, which is confluence and meeting point between Sinkiang of China, Iran and Central Asian republics, cannot be over-emphasized.

Its principle city-port Karachi is a convenient route for Central Asian States for trade with the western and other countries. With the completion of Gwadar deep-sea port, it has the potential to become a hub of international trade. Last but not the least; the people of Pakistan are proud inheritors of traditions of great sufis, saints and poets who fostered the message of peace and brotherhood over the centuries. Inspired by their exhortations, the people of Pakistan are determined to establish socio-economic justice in the society with a view to uniting the nation. And Pakistan would one day find a respectable place in the comity of nations. It is hoped that one day our nation-state of Pakistan will assume the actual meanings of its configuration as envisioned by the founding fathers and will not be identified with one of the most corrupt, but with civilized nations of the world.

Source: /pakobserver.net/significance-august-pakistan/

----

Gaza: A Forgotten Reality

By Saman Zulfqar

August 12, 2017

IN recent days Middle East has been in the limelight but not due to Palestinian issue that was once the main conflict in the Middle East but has become a forgotten reality. The Arab-Islamic Military Alliance and Qatar crises have overshadowed the plight of Gazans who have been suffering for more than a decade now.

A recently published United Nations report claims that living conditions in Gaza are deteriorating faster than was anticipated in an earlier report in 2015. ‘Gaza has continued on its trajectory of de-development’ said Robert Piper, the UN Coordinator for Humanitarian Aid and Development Activities, talking about new report, ‘Gaza – 10 years later’. He further added that from healthcare to unemployment, to energy, to access to water, Gaza’s 2 million people are seeing faster decline. Moreover, a sharp increase is noted in population growth of Gaza, while infrastructure and services have not been able to keep the pace.

The problems of Gaza – a 130 square mile strip of land on the Mediterranean, started accelerating since Hamas took over Gaza 10 years ago. Israel has maintained tight control over the movement of people and goods from all sides of Gaza, except 7 mile long border Gaza shares with Egypt and that is rarely open. Adding to these difficulties, Palestinian Authority recently decided to reduce the supply of electricity to put pressure on Hamas. It is worth noting that people of Gaza already get access to electricity only for two hours. Another issue of concern raised by UN report should draw attention of the international community. The report identifies that by the end of 2017, Gaza’s only water aquifer would be depleted and damage could be irreversible due to salt water entering the aquifer – exposing the people of Gaza to water borne illnesses.

The question arises that who is responsible for all this? And how for Gazans’ plights will remain unaddressed? Palestinian issue has been ignored by Arab states and the resolution of Palestine issue does not seem on the priority agenda of any regional Arab state. Middle East is simmering in conflicts and crises – the most recent has been intra-Arab crisis known as Qatar crisis. A month has passed but no end to the crisis can be anticipated. All efforts made to mediate between Qatar and the Gulf States have not succeeded so for, leaving things in a stalemate. What to talk of regional and extra-regional states’ interest in resolution of Palestine issue, the first thing that is needed is reconciliation between Hamas and Palestinian Authority. The internal unity would enable Palestinian to struggle for their just right to self-determination. In this regard, Russian role as an outside power cannot be ignored. Russia despite having close relations with Hamas’ political rival Palestinian Authority, advocates the inclusion of Hamas in the Israeli Palestinian negotiations.

In this regard, in the past, Russian foreign minister held talks with Khalid Mashaal, the exiled Hamas leader at Doha in 2015 and discussed the possibility of reconciliation between Hamas and Palestinian Authority. Russia welcomed the election of Ismail Haniyah, who replaced Khalid Mashaal as the head of movement’s political bureau, and praised Hamas’ new policy document issued after the election of new leader. Russia is the only major power that has cordial relations with Hamas that expects Russia, a member of International Quartet on Middle East, to play its part in breaking siege of Gaza imposed in 2006. Russia also supports the formation of Palestinian state on the basis of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions. Russia considers the resumption of Palestinian-Israeli dialogue as a precondition for establishing two equal states to bring a lasting peace in the region.

As regards China, it supports the establishment of the state of Palestine with full sovereignty on the basis of 1967 borders and with East Jerusalem as its capital. China reiterated its traditional stance during a recent state visit of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to Beijing. China expressed its desire to hold a Palestinian-Israeli peace symposium to share ideas about resolution of Palestine issue. Contrary to Chinese and Russian stance, United States has become increasingly hostile towards Hamas and has recently added many Hamas leaders on the list of terrorists. President Donald Trump during his visit to Saudi Arabia placed Hamas and Hizbullah in the category of terrorists. If US want to play role in Middle East peace process, it has to accept all parties and groups, representative of people so that sufferings of people could be reduced.

Source: pakobserver.net/gaza-forgotten-reality/

----

Change and No Change

By Muhammad Usman

August 12, 2017

DISQUALIFICATION of Nawaz Sharif by Supreme Court is a truly landmark adjudication in history of Pakistan. It is a water shed in midst of environments, making a break from our history of twists and turns to path of rule of law and supremacy of constitution albeit our ruling elite remains obdurate and stubborn. Following the verdict of Supreme Court, two things are very distinct. One, scrupulous adherence to constitution by institutions. Two, abuse of authority and gullibility of people by our ruling elite.

The verdict meant curtain for Nawaz Sharif only. It held nothing against right of PML(N) to rule the country. None even tried to infringe upon their right rather helped them indirectly to select their new PM without let and hindrance. Resultantly, it was a smooth and orderly transition, never seen in Pakistan. The cases of Jamali and Gillani were different in kind. Main political opposition, PTI also did not show propensity of any kind for unconstitutional set up. It is a refreshing change from our sordid and unsavory political past. It was heartening to see constitution, taking its course at its own. It would certainly helped fledgling democracy in making significant strides to its ultimate stage of maturity. All concerned deserve appreciation and gratitude especially from the party which is its main beneficiary; PML(N).

To the contrary. It was leadership of PML(N) who stooped low to the detriment of belief and resolve of people on democracy particularly, when they have only seen its flipside so far. People deserve a better PM than Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, initially temporally, now permanently. He is considered widely main suspect in mega LNG corruption scandal. He has no compatible political background except excellence in art of kowtowing and acquiesces. This makes him a perfect courtier. Sharif family direly need such person at helm to help their self-seeking political pursuits and legal entanglements. It is no bizarre thought. Nation has already started seeing him playing his role dutifully with hardly any interval. Though Nawaz Sharif lost the job yet he holds the strings informally. He handpicked the PM while sitting in PM’s house with tag of disqualification on his forehead. He finalized tailor made cabinet for forthcoming general elections. He continues to get protocol as of a sitting PM.

Being inevitable, Nawaz Sharif has to act upon decision of Supreme Court with heavy heart. His activities and utterances present different picture; desperation and defiance. It seems that he could embark upon any course which could give him either of two regardless of its cost to nation; a wild card for his return/survival in one form or the other or roll back of entire system. To saner minds, both are improbable. Initially his attack on Supreme Court was oblique for disqualifying him unduly on a frivolous charge of Iqama. He blames that he has been framed. Now his assault is almost open and direct which could implicate him in contempt of court. Besides, he could be booked for instigating the people to help him restore respect of public mandate.

By his understanding, his disqualification is an insult to mandate of people. Millions of People sent him to Islamabad. In contrast. Only five men have dislodged him back home. By its implications, it is a revolt against judiciary. He has chosen his long march on GT road for public endorsement of his pronouncements which otherwise is an utter failure. Notwithstanding this, his media crooks in league with bought media would try to make this a case of public approval. Underlying purpose is to pressurize judiciary in event of his review petition and opening of references against Sharif family by NAB. In his assertions, he also never spares establishment for their unspecified ghost role in his ouster.

The march has been taken out under government’s full arrangements. It clearly show their subservience to disqualified Nawaz Sharif. PML (N), s government, hand in gloves with other political parties sans PTI, seems to gear up parliament to amend article 62 and 63 on name of removing ambiguities to prevent their exploitation by vested interests. Gravest aspect would be their application with retrogressive effect to provide relief to Nawaz Sharif. These all parties are part of a cabal whose sole aim is power and lot and plunder. In common parlance, they are known ruling elite. PM Abbasi has already dilated upon on the issue. The fact has also dawned on architect of controversial 18th Amendment, Chairman Senate, Raza Rubbani about meek role of Parliament in Panama case. He wants to revitalise it.

Opposition leader is calling Nawaz Sharif come to Parliament on the name of strengthening the democracy. Nawaz Sharif is also contemplating to dust off long forgotten Charter of Democracy, signed under auspices of USA. In their case, it was a document to weaken Pakistan. In our case, it was a permit to rule turn by turn and plunder the country according to own appetite. At the moment, Nawaz Sharif is main pillar of our ruling elite. His demolition has shaken them to core. It is a matter of time when all would collapse en masse if they fail to take some drastic counter measures. These are likely to include disqualification of Imran Khan to mitigate their worries greatly. In brief, lines are clearly drawn. On one side, people want to take the country to rule of law and accountability. On other side, people want to keep status quo. It is test of our collective wisdom and action.

Source; pakobserver.net/change-no-change/

----

Indo-Pak And The Moment Of Truth?

By Moonis Ahmar

12-Aug-17

After seven decades of independence from the colonial tutelage, it is time for India and Pakistan to examine why the two are unable to mend fences and how they can live as ‘normal’ and peaceful neighbours? Hostility, antagonism, paranoia and mistrust which continue to influence and shape the mindset of leadership of India and Pakistan is not a new phenomenon but it is as old as their existence as sovereign states.

Why India-Pakistan moment of truth has arrived and how it is termed as an opportunity for New Delhi and Islamabad to take fresh initiatives for mitigating seven decades of unabated tension and confrontation? Because of three main reasons one can argue that a paradigm shift in Indo-Pak relations is possible in the years to come. First, after going through three wars and numerous armed conflicts, India and Pakistan tend to reach a stalemate or cul-se-dec thus exhausting their energies to sustain the level of conflict. Armed with hundreds of nuclear weapons capable of inflicting colossal material and physical damage in the event of an all out war, the challenge for India and Pakistan is how to deal with the costs of conflict while at the same time also manage the task of social and human development. As unresolved contentious issues namely Jammu & Kashmir, Siachen and Sir Creek ought to be a zero-sum game for India and Pakistan, there is no option left for the two countries except to resume composite dialogue and follow the path of purposeful negotiations. The age-old rhetoric based on ‘blame game’ has been counter productive and cannot go on for ever.

One harsh reality that has never gone away over the last 70 years is the deliberate omission by both sides of their shared rich cultural heritage and strong traditions of tolerance and harmony regardless of cultural and religious variations

Second, lethal threats like global warming, climate change, energy, water and over population will cause havoc in South Asia if the regional countries particularly India and Pakistan continue to neglect issues which will deepen human security predicament of their more than one billion population. While not being mindful of such threats which will endanger the lives of millions of people of the two countries, the outcome will be further marginalization of South Asia in terms of global human development index. Without united and coordinated efforts to deal with such threats, India and Pakistan cannot escape from the implications of issues which will further degenerate their quality of life.

Furthermore, extremism, intolerance, militancy, violence and terrorism particularly among the youths are the issues which India and Pakistan cannot deal in an isolation; without coordinated and united efforts. Unfortunately, the option of composite dialogue which could have been of enormous use for the two countries to deal with contentious issues and move ahead remains dormant primarily because of New Delhi’s adamant stance not to proceed with dialogue unless its precondition to first deal with the issue of terrorism is met. Yet, sooner or later, India will have to reconsider its behaviour and stance and revert to composite dialogue with Pakistan because confrontation cannot be a permanent option. India’s ambition to emerge as an Asian and then a global power would remain elusive unless it normalizes its relations with Pakistan. Third, scores of missed opportunities in the last seven decades by India and Pakistan to mend fences plunged the two countries deeper in the web of underdevelopment, backwardness and marginalization in world affairs. It is the realization of being left out in global competition like world Olympics that is sufficient to reinforce the impending ‘moment of truth’ emerging in India and Pakistan about the price of conflict which they have paid in the last five decades at the expense of human and social development.

After seven decades of independence, India and Pakistan must look into some of the hard realities and unleash a thought process for transforming their failures into successes. One major hard reality which is quite obvious in 70 years of relationship of India and Pakistan is deliberate omission of their rich cultural heritage and strong traditions of tolerance and harmony regardless of cultural and religious variations.

When partition of the Indian sub-continent took place amidst large scale violence and migration, neither Jinnah nor Nehru or Gandhi had visualized that the two countries would turn out to be permanent enemies and their borders would be inaccessible for normal travel and trade. But their successors made sure that ‘enemy images’ which shaped post-1947 Indo-Pak relations must remain intact. That the baggage of history must be carried out by the post-partition generation so that efforts for peace and reconciliation remain futile or fragile. Hostility, mistrust and suspicion permeated in the post-partition generation because of history text books which instead of advocating peace, tolerance and reconciliation promoted antagonism and ill-will. That is the reason why India and Pakistan failed to produce leaders like Nelson Mandela, Charles de Gaulle and Willy Brandt who in their respective countries followed the path of peace and economic progress through prudence and vision.

The way out for India and Pakistan from present impasse is an uphill task but not impossible. In the last 70 years scores of proposals and plans in the realm of conflict management, resolution and confidence building measures were presented through Track-I, Track-2 and Track-3 initiatives but without plausible results. However, it doesn’t mean that one should abandon hope and optimism for a better future for more than one billion population of India and Pakistan. If their present is painful then their past and future will also be unpleasant.

Source: dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/12-Aug-17/indo-pak-and-the-moment-of-truth

----

Nazir Abbasi in Kuli Camp

By Hasan Mujtaba

12-Aug-17

He lived the life and died the death about which novels could be written. A handsome looking, tall, youthful, walrus like mustached, with razor edged sense of humor (was not really a cliché) which, what his old comrade Mir Theo says could not conceal a melancholy in his wide twinkling mischievous eyes. Yet, his was melodic voice. So melodic, the sentry soldiers of his cell at Kuli Camp Quetta, a historically notorious interrogation centre where he had been detained, would request him to sing "Roze di jail chum laiye"for them.

The captors at his Kuli Camp interrogation centre had warned him while he was being freed "we are letting you go alive this time, but next time, you wont have the chance." True to their warning, he was not let go alive while captured second time. He was tortured to death in custody of military intelligence agencies under military dictatorship of Zia regime on August 9, 1980. He was Nazir Abbasi, the student leader and leftist revolutionary who founded Democratic Student federation (DSF) nationwide in Pakistan. Nazir Abbasi was said to be an active member of the then underground Communist Party (CPP) that had remained disbanded from 1953 to 1989. The names of the members of the ‘party’ were kept secret except the few on active scene.

At the outset of martial law by dictator general Zia ul Haq, Nazeer Abbasi had been arrested with his other colleagues including Moolchand, Syed Shakir Sarah, Faiz Soomro, Ghanshyasm Deepak and Sindh’s peasants’ rights leader Mandela Shar from various places in Sindh, detained and remained incommunicado at Kuli Camp Quetta, historically notorious for housing torture cells in named of interrogation center. They were probably first of the missing persons who were made enforcedly disappeared within months of the Zia’s martial law in the country. Except Nazeer and Mandhal Shar, all were in their late teens then.

Nazir Abbasi and his leader Jam Saqi were fond of quoting from a book they had memorised. ‘The Method’ was authored  by Greek writer P Korovesis and was published in 1969. It was based on a first hand account of the horrifying tale of torture experienced by a theatre actor after his arrest

Nazir Abbasi and his leader Jam Saqi were fond of quoting from a book they had memorised titled "The method" authored by a Greek writer P. Korovesis published in 1969. The book was based on the firsthand account of horrifying tale of torture experienced by a theatre actor after his arrest and detention on charges of being a suspect communist conspirator in 1960s. I had also a chance reading the book in 1980s and that gave me few sleepless nights. The Greek theatre artist had also undergone ‘bastinado, an ancient method of torture by beating soles of his feet with sticks and got badly swollen. In the Greek interrogation centre had different section where different method of torture was practiced and had different names. Hanging the prisoner upside down, hanging female prisoner from her genitalia from the prison roof naked all the night, burying the prisoner in ground up to his neck and give him electric shocks under the supervision of doctor, beating their feet soles with rifle some of the ‘Method’ witnessed by the Greek theatre actor. Nazir Abbasi and Jam Saqi were sounded like Don Quixotic revolutionary. Later Jam Saqi advised his interrogators during his incarceration at the interrogation center at Lahore Fort to read the ‘Method’. Probably, they seem to have read it by now.

Nazir Abbasi’s stay in detention center happened to be a company for his fellow inmates, even guards, soldiers and sometimes interrogators and captors. Once his interrogator, who was a senior colonel, brought a book on Marxism and began discussing with him. He asked him to reveal names of the communists in Pakistan. "Khurshid Hasan Mir, CR Aslam, Mairaj Mohammed Khan and Dr Musbashar Hasan" Nazir told the colonel. It made the colonel mad."They are fake tell me the names of real ones", hitting his table with his fist was colonel’s reaction.

Even after his release, one of his guards’ forms his Kuli Camp days came to visit him in Hyderabad to thank him because he had his leave sanctioned because of Nazir’s pressing his officers on the issue.

Source: dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/12-Aug-17/nazir-abbasi-in-kuli-camp

-----

It’s All Good News for Nawaz

By Talimand Khan

12-Aug-17

Nawaz Sharif, though ousted from the prime minister's house by the verdict of five-member bench of the Supreme Court, could not be outclassed politically or even morally given the grounds of the decision that disqualified him.

The refusal to cave in to the pressure to scrap his proposed program of travelling to Lahore via the politically proverbial GT Road indicates his defiance and putting up political resistance.

Two decades ago, who could predict that circumstances would change Nawaz Sharif politically and ideologically in such a diametrical way? Nawaz had however resentment even at the time of the toppling of his first government that streamed out of his ego rather than difference in political points of view, informing to shape internal and external policy priorities.

Today Nawaz Sharif is bruised, hurt emotionally because of the way he has been tried and ousted from power but the move has placed him at a political vantage with nothing to lose further. But such an individual can turn the tides.

However, he has not placed his entire cards on the table. Perhaps, Nawaz is the luckiest politician who not only won his third come back into power but this time got a unique opportunity to struggle for what he could not accomplish while in power. To deprive him of high moral ground he was disqualified by the superior judiciary but on grounds which forced even impartial legal experts to look askance.

Instead of throwing him into political and moral oblivion, the decision equipped him with a formidable sense of victimhood that is more effective than any other political plank and narrative, particularly in our society. The adverse outcome of references against him and his family by NAB under the supervision of the Supreme Court judge will now further ingrain that sense among people. The initial reaction and response of people, particularly the PML N's voters on the first day of his GT Road rally shows his vote bank is not only intact but can swell further if the PML-N maintains the tempo. This also shows maturity of the electorate that can now read between the lines as well as understand the power game.

Moreover, the international press and opinions unequivocally interpreted his disqualification by the judiciary through the lens of Pakistan's treacherous political history and institutional imbalances. Unlike 1990s, international opinion and community find in Nawaz a regional pacifist that could turn the region from geo-strategic to geo-economic to accommodate and adjust the interests of regional and trans regional powers with positive economic and political effect.

Besides, for the first time Nawaz Sharif finds himself and his party in unique circumstances. He is ousted but his party is in power in the centre as well as in the most populous and resourceful province of Punjab. At least, his workers will not face hostile police and civil administration during political mobilisation. However, the abstract threat posed by the militancy and terrorism might be used to deter him but so far defied by him. Perhaps, this account has also been running an overdraft which hamstrung political mobilisation and process since the last decade.

This time the political situation is not as bleak for Nawaz as it was back in October 1999. That is, if he plays his cards carefully for the larger cause and not narrows parochial interests

So far, miraculously, the PML-N remains intact. That is a silver lining on the dark horizon unless deliberate cleavages are created within the party due to increasing pressure from invisible quarters. His political allies are still supporting him inside and outside of the parliament. Nawaz's current political stance found sympathies and allies in the erstwhile left and progressive due to his pacifist foreign policy approach and civilian supremacy stance domestically.

Even in the face of realpolitik, PPP cannot toe the line of establishment totally. If PPP remains sitting on the fence or opts to play on both sides of the fence it can result in eroding of its own support base, particularly among its die hard anti-establishment cadres who offered sacrifices for democracy and civilian supremacy since Zia's era. Moreover, Nawaz seems to have become anti-establishment to uphold pro civilian supremacy. He is likely to draw the support of the active as well as dormant, struggle hardened cadres of the left and the progressive. But Nawaz Sharif needs to be mindful of his son-in-law, Capt Safdar's inane utterances.

This trend can be calibrated by going through the current writings and op-ed of the left and progressive intelligentsia, journalists and writers in support of Nawaz Sharif's current stance who were not favourably drawn towards him two decades ago. Nawaz still enjoys the support of the far right conservative intelligentsia and journalists that make a healthy confluence of minimum consensus between the conservative and progressive for the supremacy of civilian.

This time the political situation is not as bleak for Nawaz as it was in post October 1999, if he plays his cards carefully for the larger cause and not narrow parochial interests. He should move now from limited objectives to broader goals that can make him an icon in the history of politics even if he meets, God forbid, Benazir's fate. His statesmanship role and struggle for a constitutional polity with sovereign parliamentary system can galvanise across the board support and consensus that can change the tides of our political history.

Source: dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/12-Aug-17/its-all-good-news-for-nawaz

-----

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/pakistan-press/new-age-islam-edit-bureau/seven-decades-on-by-irfan-husain--new-age-islam-s-selection,-12-august-2017/d/112180




TOTAL COMMENTS:-    


Compose Your Comments here:
Name
Email (Not to be published)
Comments
Fill the text
 
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.

Content