War on Terror
should not be surprised if the next episode of the interminable ‘war on terror’
is not a scaling back but a renewed and ruthless turn to occupation, one that
would dominate and, in the minds of those orchestrating it, annihilate
terrorism. If we know anything about the new American president, it is his
penchant for projecting strength and authority, and as he grows into his power
as president, it is unlikely that America will be enough to exercise it....
The terrorism threat from Syrian refugees is low for three reasons,
according to Dan Byman, a staff member of the 9/11 Commission, which in 2011
conducted the official inquiry into the Al Qaeda attacks. “First, very few
among the refugees support the terrorists,” Byman, now a senior fellow at the
Brookings Institution, told me. “Second, the vetting for the refugees is
extensive. Third, the American Muslim community has consistently shown itself
to be hostile to terrorism and reports most of the few suspects in their
terrorists are not to blame for Australia’s racism. If someone cannot tell the
difference between Susan Carland and Osama bin Laden then they are not
ignorant. They are willingly ignorant. But that’s the logic of racism, to
dispossess the racist even of their own humanity and their sense of it, and
above all to dispossess Muslim from their own lived Islam, from its own
contested cultural debates, from its own expansive and endlessly deep heritage,
from its own linguistic lineage...
And if this be “isolationism,” then let the War Party make the most of
it. Because the American people are done with global crusading. Enough is
enough: let them kill each other if that’s what they’re intent on doing. Let’s
just make sure that they aren’t killing us....
If we‘re serious about ending terror attacks, there are a host of
non-military approaches that hold far more promise than bomb-drone-kill.
Diplomacy, humanitarian support, arms embargos, economic assistance, more
diplomacy — we need to use them all instead of military action, not alongside
it. Step one means acknowledging that the current strategy is failing....
One of the Prophet Muhammad’s most important goals in revealing the
Quran was to end the kind of bloodshed that Islamic terrorists commit today, as
that bloodshed was rampant all throughout pre-Islamic Arabia. Essentially,
Muhammad brought peace to the previously war-torn Arabian Peninsula
single-handedly, and he did so through a campaign of nonviolence and the
creation of a peaceful coalition of tribes. While many verses of the Quran deal
with war, the onlywars permitted by
the Quran are ones of self-defence. The Quran considers war to be evil, but
sometimes necessary to prevent persecution or maintain decent values.....
Involvement by the PKK or any of its offshoots in the Ankara bombing
would mark a critical turn in a war that has already gripped the country for
more than three decades. It would also signal a dangerous shift in the PKK’s
strategy. In recent years, the group has shied away from attacks on civilian
targets. Its decision to abandon that policy would do major damage to both the
legitimate Kurdish struggle for new rights and autonomy....
Joseph S. Nye
Terrorism is a
serious issue, and it deserves to be a top priority of our intelligence,
police, military and diplomatic agencies. It is an important component of
foreign policy. And it is crucial to keep weapons of mass destruction out of
terrorists’ hands. But we should not fall into the terrorists’ trap. Let the
actions of thugs play out in an empty theatre....
Mahboob A Khawaja
….. Obama’s global ‘war of terror’ has expanded to roughly 100 countries around the world, winding down the large-scale military invasions and occupations such as those in Afghanistan and Iraq, and increasing the “small-scale” warfare operations of Special Forces, beyond the rule of law, outside Congressional and public oversight, conducting “snatch and grab” operations, training domestic repressive military forces in nations largely run by dictatorships to undertake their own operations on behalf of the ‘Global Godfather.’…
Serving justice is the core of the faith of a devout Muslim. “O who you believe, be persistently standing firm in justice, witnesses for God, even if it be against yourselves or parents and relatives. Whether one is rich or poor, Allah is more worthy of both. So follow not personal inclination, lest you not be just. And if you distort [your testimony] or refuse [to give it], then indeed Allah is ever, with what you do, Acquainted.” (The Qur’an Chapter 4, verse 135.)
How do Muslims respond to terrorist attacks?
By Syed Kamran Hashmi
War on terror: more of the same — II
By Dr Saulat Nagi
Syrian crisis takes a turn for the worse
By Abdur Rahman Chowdhury
Compiled by New Age Islam Edit Bureau
Unlike what many Muslims and the liberal western elite emphasize, contemporary terrorism undoubtedly has a religious element to it. It is frankly disingenuous to deny this reality. It is also futile, however, to judge Islam. Islam is not an entity, a specific institution, or a state.
All 25 websites, barring a few exceptions, are affiliated to the IS and being used to propagate the terror group’s ideology. “While some of the sites contain videos of preachers appealing to the youth to join the terror group’s fold, others contain plain literature aimed at enticing young men towards the Jihadi ideology,” a source said, adding that most of the sites were interactive to keep the recruitment channel open.
A “war” on terror that characterizes, for example, all Syrian refugees as potential combatants thus plays right into the hands of recruiters like Abaaoud, who aim to “sharpen the contradictions” between Muslims and those of Christian heritage. We should rather be observing that some Syrians have joined a criminal cartel that has taken over some desert towns at gunpoint, but that most Syrians have not done so.
How Paris has changed the war on terror forever
After Paris: United with Putin against war on terror?
Nina L Khrushcheva
Defining terror, evolving responses
Compiled By New Age Islam Edit Bureau
What then is
the way forward for India? One, engage more rigorously with the Gulf countries.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent visit to UAE, the first such visit since
1981, was long overdue. ... Intelligence cooperation, including in tracking
cyberspace, is necessary to disrupt recruiting networks, fund flows and other
lifelines that sustain extreme jihadism.
Two, try and
change the emerging Wahhabi/Salafi narrative in Muslim communities by
strengthening traditional behaviour patterns and practices. As noted scholar
and reformist Sultan Shahin complains, the Indian establishment only engages with
bearded mullahs even if they are obscurantists. Recognition of diversity from
Muslims and the engagement with forward looking individuals and institutions
would be a good start. The youth are keen to grasp the opportunities provided
by an emerging India, and they are best placed to replace the narrative of
victimhood and discrimination with one of participation and hope.
should be matched by keeping an open eye on potential ‘emigrants’, and families
given the confidence that the state would work with them to de-radicalise these
misguided youth with no stigma attached. Four, many occupations like weavers
and other artisans, where Muslims predominate, are faced with obsolescence. ...
with an avalanche of terrorist violence resulting in many civilian causalities,
police under pressure have occasionally charge-sheeted innocents who have been
locked up for years before being released by courts for lack of evidence. Our
legal and police system discriminates against the poor who lack resources and
connections. Where police have acted with bona fides, mistakes must be accepted
but where there is clear mala fide and injustice, restorative justice demands
should not be ignored. The characteristic of a strong state is not random
violence or arbitrary action but its ability to separate genuine mistakes from
mischief. And for ensuring the rule of law where the powerful do not get away
because of the culture of impunity......
Thoughts on Countering Terrorism
By Maulana Wahiduddin Khan for New Age Islam
It is true that present Muslim extremism is the result of the glamourization of the self-styled concept of global Khilafat or caliphate. Its real solution lies in de-glamourizing this false ideology developed by extremists through a misinterpretation of Islamic sources. Moreover, de-glamourization of the Khilafat can be achieved by de-Islamizing this concept of the Khilafat based on false interpretation.
under New Taliban Leadership
Gulf States and
Iran’s Diplomacy of ‘Openness’
The Risk of ISIL
The Matter With Egypt?
Compiled by New Age Islam Edit Bureau
battle of Kobani and Tel Abyad are vivid examples -- meta-histories -- embedded
in the contradictions and dilemmas of a global war on terror and the
nationalist demands of regional and local forces who also stress that they too
are fighting terrorism.....
Kenya is at war. This mantra is repeated over and over ad infinitum by government officials and pro-establishment types. At a time of military conflict, we are told, peacetime rules and conventions do not apply and we should be prepared to give up some of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the constitution....
Kunwar Khuldune Shahid
The ideological superstructure of Jihadism is based on one simple idea that is inherent to orthodox religion, one which many of us and our state institutions proudly manifest: religious superiority. Any Islamic state that differentiates between a Muslim and a non-Muslim – which most of them do – becomes a breeding ground for Jihadism....
Although Islamic State regularly captures global headlines, the so-called fight against ''terrorism'' is not just confined to the Middle East. The United States quietly maintains other fronts in the War on Terror - including the Philippines....
To suggest that the US policies in Yemen were a “failure” is an understatement. It implies that the US had at least attempted to succeed. But “succeed” at what? The US drone war had no other objective aside from celebration the elimination of whomever the US hit list designates as terrorist....
The idea is to repeat the US success in 2006-07 in
supporting the Sunni “Awakening Movement” which weakened, though it never
destroyed, al-Qaeda in Iraq, the predecessor of Isis. Now as then, many Sunnis
hate the extremists for their merciless violence and enforcement of outlandish
and arbitrary rules on personal behaviour that have no connection to even the
strictest interpretation of Sharia....
This is the real problem. When you knowingly identify terrorism with a particular religion, you polarise the society. Unfortunately a campaign has been launched against Islam all around the world, by the powers who feel "threatened" by its ideology, particularly by its political set up. For almost five decades, they were in tussle with an "enemy" in the form of communism and fought tooth and nail against it (at that time, Islamists were no less than comrades and no less than Mujahedeen). But once Soviet Union disintegrated in early 1990's, West found itself enemy less. They did need enemy so that aggressions which they launch from time to time, could be justified. And the new enemy were one time friends.....Islamists. And now every attempt is being made to demonize political ideology propagated by Islamists. And every violent act done is put in their bag (even though mainstream Islamists have never been in favour of violence and condemned it every time)....