FOLLOW US:

Islamic Ideology (31 Oct 2011 NewAgeIslam.Com)
Muslims Have NO Qur’anic Basis for Religious Supremacism, writes Islamic scholar Muhammad Yunus for New Age Islam

 

By Muhammad Yunus, NewAgeIslam.com

(Joint Author), Essential Message of Islam, Amana Publications, USA, 2009.

The caption may shock many Muslims who believe that as the followers of the last Prophet, and believers in the final revelation, they are spiritually superior to other faith communities. Muslim scholars sacralize this notion by interpreting the verse 3:85 in isolation. The verse declares: “If anyone seeks other than Islam as a din (religion), it will not be accepted of him, and in the hereafter he will be among the losers.”

However, the preceding two verses (3:83/84) that qualify the statement of 3:85 read:

“Do they seek any (religion) other than the din (religion) of God, to whom all in the heavens and on earth have submitted (asslama), willingly or unwillingly, and to whom they will all be returned (3:83)? Say: ‘We believe in God, and in what has been revealed to us, and in what has been revealed to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, and the tribes, and to Jesus and Moses and (other) Prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them; and surely to Him do we all submit (muslimun)’ (3:84).

Thus, read together, the passage 3:83-85 refers to the universal faith of Islam to which all ‘in the heaven and earth’ and ‘all faith communities’ have submitted.”

This raises a question; what is the universal faith of Islam that encompasses all faith communities?

The Qur’an answers this in the following clear verses that employ the common noun ‘Islam’ (root SLM) in verb and other derivative forms with the connotation of orienting, submitting, surrendering, or committing oneself to God or to be at peace with God:

“Indeed! Whoever commits (asslama) his whole being to God, and does good deeds - will get his reward from his Lord. There will be no fear upon them nor shall they grieve” (2:112).

“And who can be better in faith (din) than the one who orients (asslama) his whole being to God, and does good deeds, and follows the way of Abraham, the upright one, and God took Abraham as a friend” (4:125).

“And who is finer in speech than the one who invites to God, does good deeds and says: ‘I am of those who submit to God (muslimun)’” (41:33).

Thus, in the Qur'anic diction, all people regardless of religion who orient or submit themselves to God and do good deeds are ‘Muslims.’ The Qur’an further illustrates its pluralistic concept of Islam in the following verses:

“When his Lord said to him (Abraham), ‘Submit (aslim)’, he said, ‘I submit (aslamtu) to the Lord of the worlds’ (2:131). Abraham enjoined his sons to do so, as did Jacob: ‘O my sons, God has chosen the religion (din) for you; so you should not die unless you have submitted to God (muslimun)’ (2:132). Were you (among) witnesses when death came to Jacob? He said to his sons, ‘What will you serve after I am gone?’ They said, ‘We will serve your God; the God of your fathers, Abraham, Ishmael, and Isaac - the One God; and to Him we have truly submitted (muslimun)’” (2:133).

“Those who believe, and those who are Jews, Christians and Sabians - and (in fact) anyone who believes in God and the Last Day, and does good deeds - shall have their reward with their Lord. They have nothing to fear, nor will they regret” (2:62).

 “Indeed! Anyone who submits his whole self to God and is a doer of good - will get his reward from his Lord. They have nothing to fear nor will they regret” (2:112).

  “Those who believe, and those who are Jews, Sabians and Christians - (in fact) anyone who believes in God and the Last Day, and does good deeds - they have nothing to fear, nor will they regret” (5:69). [See also verses 64:9, 65:11)]

Given the pluralistic dimension of God’s din (Islam), the Qur’an also chooses this universal religion for the Muslims - the followers of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).

“…This day, those who reject (this Qur'an) despair of (ever harming) your religion. Therefore, do not fear them; fear Me. This day I have perfected your religion for you, completed My favor on you, and have chosen Islam for your religion…” (5:3).

Conclusion: From the Qur’anic perspective all faith communities – Christians, Jews, and others – regardless of their mention in the Qur’an (4:164, 40:78) - belong to the universal religion of Islam (Submission to God and doing of good deeds), and so do the followers of the Prophet – the Muslim community. Each member of the universal faith of Islam, whether he or she is a Muslim, a Christian, a Jew or has any other faith not explicitly mentioned in the Qur’an because of its historic context, will be judged solely on the basis of his/her deeds and none can claim any spiritual supremacy over the others:

“Neither your desires, nor the desires of the People of the Book (can prevail): whoever does evil will be requited accordingly, and he will not find any protector or helper besides God. Anyone - be it a man or a woman, who does good deeds, and is a believer in God – it is these that shall enter the Garden and will not be wronged at all” (4:123/124).

Oct. 23, 2011

A regular columnist for NewAgeIslam.com, Muhammad Yunus, a Chemical Engineering graduate from Indian Institute of Technology, and a retired corporate executive has been engaged in an in-depth study of the Qur’an since early 90’s, focusing on its core message. He has co-authored the referred exegetic work, which received the approval of al-Azhar al-Sharif, Cairo in 2002, and following restructuring and refinement was endorsed and authenticated by Dr. Khaled Abou El Fadl of UCLA, and published by Amana Publications, Maryland, USA, 2009.

URL:  http://newageislam.com/islamic-ideology/muslims-have-no-qur’anic-basis-for-religious-supremacism,-writes-islamic-scholar-muhammad-yunus-for-new-age-islam/d/5802

 


COMMENTS
  • Dear Aiman Reyaz,

    I have taken no offence of your comment but it was a bit of disappointment for me that others failed to see the unfavorable and one sided communal innuendoes of the article that had prompted my very loud protest. If you critically read the pieces by Vidya Bhushan Rawat, Dilip Padgaonkar and Rajdip Sardesai on the theme, you can see how all these three (conceivably) Hindu writers have placed Owaisi in the mosaic of India’s hatred-stained political milieu, have completely exempted Indian Muslim masses from any communal/ disruptive behavior and have not uttered one word about any potential backlash. I was shocked to observe such innuendoes in an article written by a Muslim Research Scholar and summarily expressed my deep frustration by a loud and shocking remark.

    Coming to the point, I want you to read the following clauses of Indian constitution related to limitations on freedom of expression and remind the commentators as boldly as you reacted to me if you think they are transgressing its noble provisions on the theme. 

    Section 153A of the penal code says, inter alia:

    Whoever (a) by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise, promotes or attempts to promote, on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, or (b) commits any act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, and which disturbs or is likely to disturb the public tranquility, . . . shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.[3]

    Enacted in 1927, section 295A says:

    Whoever, with deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of any class of [citizens of India], [by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise], insults or attempts to insult the religion or the religious beliefs of that class, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to [three years], or with fine, or with both.[4]

    [Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_laws_in_India]

    Drive this episode out of your mind please and rest assured I have taken no offence whatsoever of what you wrote. So there is no question of your seeking an apology - a kind gesture of yours that reflects an intellectual integrity and generosity that is truly admirable.
    By muhammad yunus - 1/12/2013 11:48:46 AM
  • @Mr Yunus, I have to apologise to you for writing a comment on Mr Saif Shahin's latest article. You being a fatherly figure (no sarcasm intended) to me, I ask f you to forgive and forget my comment. Thank you for helping me know the straight path- the path that is liberal, humble, all-embracing and most of all, loving and forgiving.
    By Aiman Reyaz - 1/10/2013 8:35:29 AM
  • "the only religion acceptable in the sight of Allah is Islam" ie., aquiring peaceby submitting your will to God and believing that there is only one God and Muhammad is His Messenger. This is islam. the verse related to other prophets is correct but does it include hindus, buddshists, jains, sikhs, atheists- theanswer to all of that is NO A BIG NO.
    you quote that jews,christinas and sbains can go heaven. yes they can but those jews, christians and sabians who believe in God, who is imageless and not Jesus as God (as christians say). andthat verse is meanst for that time only not for this time because allah says later the only religion acceptable in the sight of ALlah is islam.
    By Truth - 11/22/2012 8:12:22 PM
  • Dear Raihan Nezami saheb. It is your choice. Rationality doesn't suit to you. Isiliye duniya tarast hai aap logon se. Jahaan dekho museebat ka saaman bane huen hain. Jo koi pooch bhi raha hai to vote ki khatir. Jahaan bhi jaate hain wahi jagah kharab kar dete hain.
    By rational - 10/4/2012 10:28:02 AM
  • Dear muhammad yunus (1) saheb. I have admitted I behave like irrational sometime and I gave a reason for it too.
    Dear Yiunus saheb in your love of Allah and his scheme you are blaming wrong person. Ask Muslims not me. They believe rightly (as per Quran and Ahadith) believers in Mohammed the prophet will only be blessed. I am seeing you are leaving rationality not me. Are 1.2 billion Muslims wrong, and you are right?
    If I agree with you I fail to see what is the need of  the Quran and Mohammed(PBUH)? Why Muslims are interested in Dawah work?
    "Would thi s not be a grand failure of God's scheme." It is already failed.
    Who cares? Let it fail. You are much worried than Allah. Does it effect Allah in any way? You believe in his scheme, I don't.
    If you agree we can discuss this scheme also.
    You force me to repeat though you accuse me for this.
    Allah sent 124000 more or less prophets to guide the mankind. If you see objectively (not biased) what is the score of success? in the past and present. Don't start to say majority in the world is Muslim. Will you count sun, moon, earth , stars, sky, animals of every kind as Muslims, then certainly Allah has not failed in his scheme. Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists any other than Muslims don't consider themselves Muslims. Do they? Why are you adamant to declare that they will be blessed despite their beliefs contrary to Islam?   They don't want to be counted as Muslims. Are you following me? Ask them, Are they Muslims as per the definition of Muslims? One who believes in oneness of Allah and Prophecy of Mohammed(PBUH) is a Muslim. Do they believe in second part of the kalima?
    I don't know what do you want to prove against the established definition of the Muslim?
    BTW what is Allah doing now? A rude but simple question. Please don't run after my rationality?

    By rational - 10/4/2012 10:19:42 AM

Compose Your Comments here:

Name
Email (Not to be published)
Comments
Fill the below text
 
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.